The precise date or origin of the script is unknown.
Origins of the Turkic scripts are uncertain. According to some opinions, ancient Turkic runes descend from primaeval Turkic graphic logograms.[6]
Linguist AndrĂĄs RĂłna-Tas derives Old Hungarian from the Old Turkic script,[7] itself recorded in inscriptions dating from c. AD 720.
Speakers of Proto-Hungarian would have come into contact with Turkic peoples during the 7th or 8th century, in the context of the Turkic expansion, as is also evidenced by numerous Turkic loanwords in Proto-Hungarian.
All the letters but one for sounds which were shared by Turkic and Ancient Hungarian can be related to their Old Turkic counterparts. Most of the missing characters were derived by script internal extensions, rather than borrowings, but a small number of characters seem to derive from Greek, such as 'eF'.[8]
The modern Hungarian term for this script (coined in the 19th century), rovĂĄs, derives from the verb rĂłni ('to score') which is derived from old Uralic, general Hungarian terminology describing the technique of writing (Ărni 'to write', betƱ 'letter', bicska 'knife, also: for carving letters') derive from Turkic,[9] which further supports transmission via Turkic alphabets.
In 1000, with the coronation of Stephen I of Hungary, Hungary (previously an alliance of mostly nomadic tribes) became a kingdom. The Latin alphabet was adopted as official script; however, Old Hungarian continued to be used in the vernacular.
There were still three thousand Huns who fled the battle of Crimhild, who fearing from the western nations, they remained on the cliff field until the time of ĂrpĂĄd, and they did not call themselves Huns, but Szekelys. These Szekelys were the remains of the Huns, who when they learned that the Hungarians had returned to Pannonia for the second time, went to the returnees on the border of Ruthenia and conquered Pannonia together, but not on the Pannonian plane, they were granted estates in the mountainous borderlands together with the Blackis, where mingling with the Blackis it is said they used their letters.
The Old Hungarian script became part of folk art in several areas during this period.[citation needed] In Royal Hungary, Old Hungarian script was used less, although there are relics from this territory, too.
There is another copy â similar to the Nikolsburg Alphabet â of the Old Hungarian alphabet, dated 1609. The inscription from Ănlaka, dated 1668, is an example of the "folk art use".
Hungarian script[19] was first described in late Humanist/Baroque scholarship by JĂĄnos Telegdy in his primer Rudimenta Priscae Hunnorum Linguae. Published in 1598, Telegdi's primer presents his understanding of the script and contains Hungarian texts written with runes, such as the Lord's Prayer.
The use of the script often has a political undertone as it is often used along with irredentist or nationalist propaganda, and they can be found from time to time in graffiti with a variety of content.[20] Since most of the people cannot read the script it has led to various controversies, for example when the activists of the Hungarian Two-tailed Dog Party (opposition) exchanged the rovas sign of the city Ărd to szia 'Hi!', which stayed unnoticed for a month.[23]
Rod calendar, around 1300, copied by Luigi Ferdinando Marsigli in 1690.[24] It contains several feasts and names, thus it is one of the most extensive runic records.
The Old Hungarian runes also include some non-alphabetical runes which are not ligatures but separate signs. These are identified in some sources as "capita dictionum" (likely a misspelling of capita dicarum[28]). Further research is needed to define their origin and traditional usage. Some common examples are:
TPRUS:
ENT: đȧ đł§
TPRU:
NAP:
EMP: đČĄ đłĄ
UNK: đČ đł
US: đČČ đłČ
AMB: đČ đł
Features
Old Hungarian letters were usually written from right to left on sticks.[citation needed] Later, in Transylvania, they appeared on several media. Writings on walls also were right to left[citation needed] and not boustrophedon style (alternating direction right to left and then left to right).
The numbers are almost the same as the Roman, Etruscan, and Chuvash numerals. Numbers of livestock were carved on tally sticks and the sticks were then cut in two lengthwise to avoid later disputes.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
50
100
500
1000
đłș
đłșđłș
đłșđłșđłș
đłșđłșđłșđłș
đł»
đł»đłș
đł»đłșđłș
đł»đłșđłșđłș
đł»đłșđłșđłșđłș
đłŒ
đłœ
đłŸ
ÌČđłœ
đłż
Ligatures are common. (Note: the Hungarian runic script employed a number of ligatures. In some cases, an entire word was written with a single sign similar to a bind rune.) The Unicode standard supports ligatures explicitly by using the zero width joiner between the two characters.[29]
There are no lower or upper case letters, but the first letter of a proper name was often written a bit larger. Though the Unicode standard has upper and lowercase letters, which are the same in shape, the difference is only their size.
The writing system did not always mark vowels (similar to many Asian writing systems). The rules for vowel inclusion were as follows:
If there are two vowels side by side, both have to be written, unless the second could be readily determined.
Sometimes, especially when writing consonant clusters, a consonant was omitted. This is a phonologic process, with the script reflecting the exact surface realization.
Text example
Text from CsĂkszentmĂĄrton, 1501.Runes originally written as ligatures are underlined.
English translation: "(This) was written in the 1501st year of our Lord. The smiths Matthias, John (and) Stephen did (this). Master Matthias (and) Master Gregory did (uninterpretable)
A set of closely related 8-bit code pages exist, devised in the 1990s by Gabor HosszĂș. These were mapped to Latin-1 or Latin-2 character set fonts. After installing one of them and applying their formatting to the document â because of the lack of capital letters â runic characters could be entered in the following way: those letters which are unique letters in today's Hungarian orthography are virtually lowercase ones, and can be written by simply pressing the specific key; and since the modern digraphs equal to separate rovĂĄs letters, they were encoded as 'uppercase' letters, i.e. in the space originally restricted for capitals. Thus, typing a lowercase g will produce the rovĂĄs character for the sound marked with Latin script g, but entering an uppercase G will amount to a rovĂĄs sign equivalent to a digraph gy in Latin-based Hungarian orthography.
^IstvĂĄn Fodor â György DiĂłszegi â LĂĄszlĂł Legeza: Ćseink nyomĂĄban. (On the scent of our ancestors) â Magyar Könyvklub-Helikon KiadĂł, Budapest, 1996. ISBN963-208-400-4 (Page 82)
^Diringer, David. 1947. The Alphabet. A Key to the History of Mankind. London: Hutchinson's Scientific and technical Publications, pp. 314-315. Gelb, I. J. 1952. A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 142, 144. Gaur, Albertine. 1992. A History of Writing. London: British Library. ISBN0-7123-0270-0. pp. 143. Coulmas, Florian. 1996. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Writing Systems. ISBN0-631-19446-0. pp. 366-368