Lords of Destiny (game)
Lords of Destiny was a play-by-mail game created by Maelstrom Games in the early 1990s.[1] It was a "low to moderately complex" game of space conquest for twelve players involving characters, fleets and space battle.[2] The game also injected humor into its turn results, and involved "moderate diplomacy" and "minimal time demands" for players.[3] Normal games lasted between 25 and 29 turns, randomly determined by a computer.[4] DevelopmentAs of 1993, Lords of Destiny came in a basic version for beginners and a complete version for more advanced players.[5] Jonathan Walton noted in a 1993 review in Paper Mayhem, a magazine for play-by-mail games, that Lords of Destiny was Maelstrom Games' first game, and that, although customer service had been good and the owner was a long-time play-by-mail gamer, the turn sheets were cluttered and required some improvements which had recently been made.[6] GameplayLords of Destiny's central focus was on combat and alliances, although it was not focused on building an empire through gaining land or economic growth.[7] Characters were a key aspect of the game, although players did not start with any characters.[8] Characters included: admirals, diplomats, economists, heroes, generals, governors, psionics, scientists, and spies.[8] "Legendary Characters", or "Lords of Destiny", were named after the game and had special abilities. They were achieved after a character became level 10 in a field, although there was only one Lord of Destiny possible per field per game.[6] The game's Victory Conditions were primarily combat-related along with some being resource-related.[1] ReceptionLords of Destiny won the Origins Award for Best New Play-by-Mail Game of 1992.[9] The game placed sixth in the Best Play By Mail Games of 1994 list in Paper Mayhem, a magazine for play by mail gamers.[10] In 1993, reviewer Jonathan Walton opined that, although Lords of Destiny wasn't the most modern or innovative game, "Is it a good, solid, Play-By-Mail game that gives you an excellent value for your money? In my opinion, resoundingly YES."[8] Reviews
See alsoReferences
Bibliography
|