Thank you. It doesn't conform to every resolution and you have to scroll vertically at some lower ones, but at least it doesn't realign improperly. Nagelfar (talk) 02:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cool userpage!
I'm sorry, this was the only barnstar I could find.
Hello! Your editing history indicates that you might be interested in joining the Ancient Germanic studies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the history, language and culture of the Ancient Germanic peoples. We also maintain the Ancient Germanic culture WikiPortal. If you are interested in contributing, you are welcome to sign up at the project page. Thanks!
Actual Idealism page
Nagelfar,
You seem to know something about actual idealism. Any chance you might be able to hammer some of the article's more obfuscatory sentences into something meaningful?
I've looked it over several times, and I feel if I alter it at all with the way I understand his philosophy, it would now come out even more convoluted. Maybe you could give me particular parts which appear difficult to you. Nagelfar (talk) 09:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cocaine analogues
Hi Nagelfer. I have made quite a few pages for various cocaine analogues already as you may have noticed! However bear in mind that there are hundreds, perhaps up to several thousand compounds described in the literature that can be considered cocaine analogues (i.e. aryltropane / arylpiperidine derivatives acting as monoamine reuptake inhibitors), and I do not think that all of these compounds are sufficiently notable to deserve their own wikipedia page. Perhaps at some stage it might be nice to flesh out that Phenyltropanes page again into an SAR review of the series, similar to how Nuklear wrote it originally but in more appropriate "wiki-style", however I don't really have the time or patience for a big project like that at the moment. I prefer to just make lots of stubs for interesting compounds providing a brief summary of what is known about them, which can then be expanded at a later date. With regard to cocaine analogues, I tend to only make pages for compounds that have at least been given code numbers if not actual names, and that have at least a couple of references showing their use in scientific research. Only five or so cocaine analogues have actually been reported to be used recreationally as "research chemicals" so far (CPT, CFT, RTI-55, RTI-121 and pFBT) and my feeling is that if a compound is not being used recreationally, is not being used in scientific research, and was not considered important enough even by the people who invented it to be given a code number or name, then it is not notable enough to deserve a page of its own. Meodipt (talk) 00:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah also whats the code for the "This user perceives the wikipedia project as a kind of natural self-fulfilling Akashic records." userbox as I would like to put it onto my userpage! Meodipt (talk) 00:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I made pages for a couple of representativeexamples of the oxacyclic and carbacyclic DAT inhibitors developed by Organix. There are heaps of other compounds in the series of course, but those two at least have a couple of publications that mention them, and anyone who then goes off and reads the references provided in the articles will quickly realise that there is a wide range of other analogues that are known. Meodipt (talk) 04:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Right you are. I must still be sleepy. Hope I didn't edit too many pages with misinformation. That should have been an intuitive fact. Nagelfar (talk) 18:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You wrote, "In 1938, when Adolf Hitler included creations of Futurism in an exhibition deriding what Nazi propaganda called degenerate art, Marinetti persuaded Mussolini not to allow the exhibition entrance into Italy." But according to the list of works in the Degenerate Art article, the exhibition contained no creations of Futurism. Correction, please. Marshall46 (talk) 13:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. Well it seems you are correct - now I check some references (CNS Drug Reviews 1999;5(1)27-42, European Journal of Pharmacology 2004;492:159–167) it seems that 18-MC does retain some affinity for both μ and κ receptors, indeed it only has around 2x selectivity for α3β4 over μ which is far less selective than I had thought. I was aware that ibogaine is an opioid agonist at pharmacologically relevant doses seeing as opioid side effects are often seen in treatment, and have resulted in death when heroin was coadministered, but my impression was that 18-MC was much more selective for α3β4. Actually it seems that the main difference with 18-MC is to reduce sodium channel binding, σ agonist and NMDA antagonist effects, but the μ and κ affinity is not reduced nearly as much. So I guess it can go on the opioids template if you like :-) Meodipt (talk) 21:58, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I agree we should look at the other ibogamine derivatives, I've been meaning to make pages for more of them but the problem is that there is not much information available. Certainly noribogaine, voacangine and coronaridine, as well as those synthetic 18-MC congeners, have been shown to produce anti-addictive effects in animals which presumably means they all act as α3β4 antagonists. However whether they have opioid affinity is unclear, I simply haven't been able to find much evidence one way or the other. Noribogaine certainly does have opioid effects as its assayed in that CNS Drug Reviews paper and found to have higher affinity at both μ and κ than either ibogaine or 18-MC, but voacangine and coronaridine just haven't been assayed so far as I can find. The 18-MC congeners are more potent and seem to be more selective for α3β4 than 18-MC itself but that doesn't mean they're entirely devoid of opioid affinity as well. I'd say add noribogaine and 18-MC to the opioids template seeing as those have both been shown to be opioid agonists, but hold off on the others unless we can find some binding data for them. Meodipt (talk) 06:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm aware, it is on purpose. Use the tab function to switch between active hyperlinks if you must, but I use that to prevent such activity. Nagelfar (talk) 04:35, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies for overlooking your comment from earlier, I do not know the answer to your question, but I do not believe so: the PRC diverged from the USSR on quite a number of controversial topics. Nagelfar (talk) 17:26, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Macro-haplogroup NOP rs2033003
I got it from the 23andMe SNPsOnChips spreadsheet http://www.webalice.it/asquecco/Y_DNA-Forums.zip This is of course a major revision of the Y tree. I would suppose that NOP* would show up as one of the odd minor K branches out there, of which there are several. Any way to convince Thomas Krahn to test some of these for it?
My guess is that S and M cluster together, given the geography, but there are unusual Ks in other places in Eurasia. -ted —Preceding unsigned comment added by Archaeogenetics (talk • contribs) 01:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi -- I've provisionally reverted your edit. The information you added is so complex and specific that it absolutely needs sourcing -- I'm quite open to having the information in the article if it is supported by a proper source. (I have no idea why you gave a picture of the molecule as a ref.) Also, please remember not to mark edits as "minor" if they make significant changes to the article content. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 18:06, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image (File:Masonna Logo.jpg)
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Masonna Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 04:58, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Eraserheadposter.jpg
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Eraserheadposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
I noticed your contribution to ol Hesiod's arche. I wonder if you are interested in the Eastern interpretation of the arche? In specific how it as a pagan concept of consciousness or nous, demiurge, dyad, duality, is expressed by in logicism as the finiteness or incompleteness in contrast to the arche or uncreated. LoveMonkey (talk) 15:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
By 'eastern' do you mean Greek or Slavic 'eastern occidental', (as in eastern orthodox) or Asian interpretations of the term? I am interested but am not greatly erudite on the matter. Thanks for noticing; best regards. Nagelfar (talk) 23:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:Eduard von Hartmann.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Eduard von Hartmann.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kellyhi!17:27, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That current image is not the one I originally uploaded. Though the copyright rational was that the image was over one hundred years old. Nagelfar (talk) 02:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Monoacetylmorphine a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. BelovedFreak20:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Came to basically say the same thing. No worries, though, everything's fixednow. Thanks for keeping an eye out for mis-named articles, and don't be afraid to keep being bold in your changes. =) That said, feel free to let us know over at requested moves if you ever need assistance with any weird moves like this, so that we can easily maintain the page history during the moves. =) --slakr\ talk /21:06, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you can upload it at a higher resolution, and as a PNG rather than as a GIF? PNGs have less compression artifacts than GIFs. Also, you can upload them to commons.wikimedia.org, where they can be shared with all the other wikiprojects.
Honestly I don't have much to work with on my end in that capacity, but I certainly am not adversed to others taking up my slack in that area. I apologize for the not appropriately thorough nature of my contributions, but contributions they are nonetheless. Nagelfar (talk) 19:28, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Taking a non-free image and editing it is creating what's called a "derivative work", and is generally no "freer" (and sometimes even less-so) than the original. It's fine to redo from scratch and wind up with something that looks pretty close or even nearly identical, especially if it's just representing simple facts of structure (facts aren't protected), but I think any specific representation of facts that starts as someone else's is tainted by their licensing restrictions. DMacks (talk) 06:27, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Do take a look at the structure drawing guide, there are some suggestions for software. ChemSketch is free for personal use, and that's what I use. BKChem is open source as well. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 05:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploading free images/media to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view previous uploads by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'file' namespace from the drop down box (or see [1]). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading! :Jay8g Hi!- I am... -What I do...WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM00:31, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Morphine Numbered Position.jpg listed for deletion
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:00, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free rationale for File:Bauplan der Wewelsburg.gif
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Translation of 95 year old philosophy.
It sounds like an interesting project; I'm actually surprised it hasn't been translated already, although Gentile's involvement with fascism always hindered his popularity. I've been inactive for a long time due to my job taking up a lot of my time and denying me internet access, and I'm still not sure how much I'd be able to contribute, but I'd be glad to help in my spare time.
Let me know the additional details, i.e. which subsection you'd like me to start with or where to upload the work.
Cheers. --Εξαίρετος (msg) 19:06, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks for letting me know: the project sounds really interesting! But I'm not sure I'm the right person for this. I am an Italian mother tongue translator, so the rule-of-thumb would be for me to translate only into Italian (I could do the opposite, but to get a decent final translation it would then require some editing I suspect). Anyway, I could help with any questions you might have on the original text: being almost 100 years old, seems to me that the language is a bit tricky. --Kiabara (talk) 08:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting idea. I'm an ESL speaker (native Italian), so I'm pretty much in the same predicament as Kiabara. That being said, two questions:
Is there a transcribed copy available in Italian of this book? I think that would be the first step in adding value to Wikipedia (i.e., transcribing into Wikisource)
After this is taken care of, we would be able to break the job down into more manageable units, which could later be harmonized / proofed.
Not transcribed, but a proper program could probably get a very accurate Italian rip from the *.PDF file. This project still greatly interests me and if you have any way forward thought out or able to take advantage of please get back in contact with me and I will assist in any way possible to me. Nagelfar (talk) 02:03, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry... because of school i hadn't read your message. Are you still translating Sistema di logica come teoria del conoscere? if you want i could help you now ;) --Massa90 (talk) 08:38, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have yet to begin or know where to start. It would be a major project and I am only familiar with the philosophy as to how I could contribute, not the Italian language. If you could help me with assembling an affluent Italian speaking team who has interest, I'd be much appreciative. This is on the ground floor as to right now, though it is a top priority as to what I'd like to help as a contribution to both the world of anglophone philosophy and the Italian culture of philosophy and its much needed & neglected appreciation by the English speaking world. Nagelfar (talk) 03:13, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your interpretation of the ancient planetary symbols...
... Is faultless, convincing, knowledgeable, simple, elegant, and impressive. Thank you
Thanks for uploading File:Masonna.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kellyhi!08:05, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:Larbrovalknut.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Larbrovalknut.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kellyhi!12:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:REVERTBAN my reversion is permitted and indeed encouraged. You have every right to restore the content, but now you own it. But my revert was 100% OK. Nuklear has a long history of cluttering up articles with random syntheses and was quite abusive when he was still socking under usernames. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nuklear/Archive ; that is just a small part of the picture. He edits under IP addresses now and it is not worth creating new SPI cases for all of them. Like I said, you own any of my reversions that you restore. That's all - have a great day. (btw, it is hard to read black on grey!) Jytdog (talk) 18:26, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine by me. To be honest, I asked Nuklear to help me (I was unaware that he was banned, he started his 'sister page' to the one I started and am currently editing twenty two months after mine (I started mine Dec. 10th 2007, he created his as almost a carbon copy of my original in Sept. 2009) and his grew exponentially faster because of his diligence. All the edits by him on either of these two pages which I have ever noticed are fair use, no copyvio and accurate in terms of content. Feel free to revert anything he adds as per your rights within the lines of Wikipedia policy since he is banned. But if I think it's worth while I will continue to include it. But this is all done in good faith. My regards. Nagelfar (talk) 18:36, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for your reply! Nuklear is actually a sad case - there are private details i'm aware of, but what i'll say is that i don't think WP is a healthy thing for him. you can email me if you want to understand better. Jytdog (talk) 18:57, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
oh~ if you go to my userpage, and look in the way-left margin under "tools" you will see "email this user" - lots of people have that enabled. :) Jytdog (talk) 01:28, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't show up for me, using Firefox 34.0.5, I just see:
"Tools"
What links here
Related changes
User contributions
Logs
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
oh interesting! I just looked in preferences, where you can enable this feature or not. It says " You also need to provide an email address if you wish to enable the "Email this User" feature to either send or receive emails via Wikipedia. Your email address is not revealed when other users contact you." I am guessing you cannot see it, as you don't have that enabled on your account. in any case my email is my username at gmail. Jytdog (talk) 18:43, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To which references are you referring? On most of my entries as late, there is no secondary sourcing, but I note such are alternate 'postulations' from other sides. Nagelfar (talk) 17:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Nagelfar. You recently created the page C2-Acetoxycocaine as a redirect to itself. I assume that this was an error, so I'm letting you know so that you can edit the page to redirect it wherever it was supposed to go. Thank you! —Granger (talk·contribs) 14:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 3-(dimethylamino)-2,2-dimethyl-1-phenylpropan-1-one, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Effective dose. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hey, that's a good article you posted. I never knew about this compound previously only just found out today. Seems interesting thinking about getting a custom synth done at some point not sure yet which compound to order. The problem is as soon as they see it has some kind of cash impetus they would try to illegalize it.--89.240.141.59 (talk) 09:59, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes someone brought it to my attention from a forum I frequent which has a lot of people interested in "grey market" pharmaceuticals. [2]. Regards, Nagelfar (talk) 22:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently only tested for it's opioid activity, some pretty erudite individuals at my aforementioned forum postulated that it's oxygen and nitrogen could interact in a near-minimum energy state which also given it dopamine reuptake inhibition properties. Nagelfar (talk) 23:02, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of cocaine analogues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Efflux. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
(member since 2002, and user since year zero) I think I did there, doesn't seem to be noticed where-ever I place it, though. Nagelfar (talk) 18:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I only mean that partially tongue-in-cheek; you've done great work. I would love to pick your brain sometime regarding the substitutions we may see in possible future grey-market releases of MPH analogues. Would love to get your opinion, if you have one, on the possibility of detrimental health effects of the current grey-market F-substitution.
Great work!!!!
F-substitution as in F para(meta)-fluoro? I think of fluoxetine in regard to that with its para-tri-fluoro that increases serotonin reuptake inhibition relative to DA re-uptake modulation, where the additional-benzene length makes an SDRI rather than the amphetamine-esque skeleton of the SSRI that maintains VMAT releaser functionality. Nagelfar (talk) 07:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello, Nagelfar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Nagelfar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Ejaculation Generater.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Orphaned non-free image File:Inner Mind Mystique Vinyl.jpg
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Inner Mind Mystique Vinyl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Orphaned non-free image File:Inner Mind Mystique.jpg
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Inner Mind Mystique.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ravenswing 16:52, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 20:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Morgellons
You cite two sources for your opening sentence on the Morgellons entry. I don’t find them particularly credible or compelling evidence to support this entry’s themes. There are other, more recent sources published in peer reviewed medical journals that contradict this outdated perception. The most recent research published in 2018 as well as this year by Middleveen et al is actually credible and worthy of consideration. This entry is quite simply inaccurate. If you’d be so kind to unlock this for editing, I’d appreciate it. CrystalClearMM (talk) 23:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was unaware that it was locked. My account doesn't show as such, but I am currently using a mobile device. If this issue persists contact help, I'll try checking again. Nagelfar (talk) 01:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Orphaned non-free image File:Bauplan der Wewelsburg.gif
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Bauplan der Wewelsburg.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
){kind=link}
