Free content, libre content, libre information, or free information is any kind of creative work, such as a work of art, a book, a software program, or any other creative content unrestricted by copyright and other legal limitations on use. These are works or expressions which can be freely studied, applied, copied and modified by anyone for any purpose[1][better source needed] including, in some cases, commercial purposes. Free content encompasses all works in the public domain and also those copyrighted works whose licenses honor and uphold the definition of free cultural work.
In most countries, the Berne Convention grants copyright holders control over their creations by default. Therefore, copyrighted content must be explicitly declared free by the authors, which is usually accomplished by referencing or including licensing statements from within the work. The right to reuse such a work is granted by the authors in a license known as a free license, a free distribution license, or an open license, depending on the rights assigned. These freedoms given to users in the reuse of works (that is, the right to freely use, study, modify or distribute these works, possibly also for commercial purposes) are often associated with obligations (to cite the original author, to maintain the original license of the reused content) or restrictions (excluding commercial use, banning certain media) chosen by the author.[citation needed] There are a number of standardized licenses offering varied options that allow authors to choose the type of reuse of their work that they wish to authorize or forbid.
Definition
There are a number of different definitions of free content in regular use. Legally, however, free content is very similar to open content. An analogy is a use of the rival terms free software and open-source, which describe ideological differences rather than legal ones.[2][self-published source?] The term Open Source, by contrast, sought to encompass them all in one movement.[3][4] For instance, the Open Knowledge Foundation's Open Definition describes "open" as synonymous with the definition of free in the "Definition of Free Cultural Works" (as also in the Open Source Definition and Free Software Definition).[5] For such free/open content both movements recommend the same three Creative Commons licenses, the CC BY, CC BY-SA, and CC0.[6][7][8][9]
Copyright is a legal concept, which gives the author or creator of a work legal control over the duplication and public performance of their work. In many jurisdictions, this is limited by a time period after which the works then enter the public domain. Copyright laws are a balance between the rights of creators of intellectual and artistic works and the rights of others to build upon those works. During the time period of copyright the author's work may only be copied, modified, or publicly performed with the consent of the author, unless the use is a fair use. Traditional copyright control limits the use of the work of the author to those who either pay royalties to the author for usage of the author's content or limit their use to fair use. Secondly, it limits the use of content whose author cannot be found.[10] Finally, it creates a perceived barrier between authors by limiting derivative works, such as mashups and collaborative content.[11] Although open content has been described as a counterbalance to copyright, open content licenses rely on a copyright holder's power to license their work, as copyleft which also utilizes copyright for such a purpose.[12]
The public domain is a range of creative works whose copyright has expired or was never established, as well as ideas and facts[note 1] which are ineligible for copyright. A public domain work is a work whose author has either relinquished to the public or no longer can claim control over, the distribution and usage of the work. As such, any person may manipulate, distribute, or otherwise use the work, without legal ramifications. A work in the public domain or released under a permissive license may be referred to as "copycenter".[13]
Copyleft is a play on the word copyright and describes the practice of using copyright law to remove restrictions on distributing copies and modified versions of a work.[14] The aim of copyleft is to use the legal framework of copyright to enable non-author parties to be able to reuse and, in many licensing schemes, modify content that is created by an author. Unlike works in the public domain, the author still maintains copyright over the material, however, the author has granted a non-exclusive license to any person to distribute, and often modify, the work. Copyleft licenses require that any derivative works be distributed under the same terms and that the original copyright notices be maintained. A symbol commonly associated with copyleft is a reversal of the copyright symbol, facing the other way; the opening of the C points left rather than right. Unlike the copyright symbol, the copyleft symbol does not have a codified meaning.[15]
Usage
Projects that provide free content exist in several areas of interest, such as software, academic literature, general literature, music, images, video, and engineering. Technology has reduced the cost of publication and reduced the entry barrier sufficiently to allow for the production of widely disseminated materials by individuals or small groups. Projects to provide free literature and multimedia content have become increasingly prominent owing to the ease of dissemination of materials that are associated with the development of computer technology. Such dissemination may have been too costly prior to these technological developments.
Media
In media, which includes textual, audio, and visual content, free licensing schemes such as some of the licenses made by Creative Commons have allowed for the dissemination of works under a clear set of legal permissions. Not all Creative Commons licenses are entirely free; their permissions may range from very liberal general redistribution and modification of the work to a more restrictive redistribution-only licensing. Since February 2008, Creative Commons licenses which are entirely free carry a badge indicating that they are "approved for free cultural works".[16]Repositories exist which exclusively feature free material and provide content such as photographs, clip art, music,[17] and literature.[18] While extensive reuse of free content from one website in another website is legal, it is usually not sensible because of the duplicate content problem. Wikipedia is amongst the most well-known databases of user-uploaded free content on the web. While the vast majority of content on Wikipedia is free content, some copyrighted material is hosted under fair-use criteria.
Free and open-source software, which is often referred to as open source software and free software, is a maturing technology with companies using them to provide services and technology to both end-users and technical consumers. The ease of dissemination increases modularity, which allows for smaller groups to contribute to projects as well as simplifying collaboration. Some claim that open source development models offer similar peer-recognition and collaborative benefit incentive as in more classical fields such as scientific research, with the social structures that result leading to decreased production costs.[19]
Given sufficient interest in a software component, by using peer-to-peer distribution methods, distribution costs may be reduced, easing the burden of infrastructure maintenance on developers. As distribution is simultaneously provided by consumers, these software distribution models are scalable; that is, the method is feasible regardless of the number of consumers. In some cases, free software vendors may use peer-to-peer technology as a method of dissemination.[20] Project hosting and code distribution is not a problem for most free projects as a number of providers offer these services free of charge.
Free content principles have been translated into fields such as engineering, where designs and engineering knowledge can be readily shared and duplicated, in order to reduce overheads associated with project development. Open design principles can be applied in engineering and technological applications, with projects in mobile telephony, small-scale manufacture,[21] the automotive industry,[22][23] and even agricultural areas. Technologies such as distributed manufacturing can allow computer-aided manufacturing and computer-aided design techniques to be able to develop small-scale production of components for the development of new, or repair of existing, devices. Rapid fabrication technologies underpin these developments, which allow end-users of technology to be able to construct devices from pre-existing blueprints, using software and manufacturing hardware to convert information into physical objects.
In academic work, the majority of works are not free, although the percentage of works that are open access is growing. Open access refers to online research outputs that are free of all restrictions to access and free of many restrictions on use (e.g. certain copyright and license restrictions).[24] Authors may see open access publishing as a way of expanding the audience that is able to access their work to allow for greater impact, or support it for ideological reasons.[25][26] Open access publishers such as PLOS and BioMed Central provide capacity for review and publishing of free works; such publications are currently more common in science than humanities. Various funding institutions and governing research bodies have mandated that academics must produce their works to be open-access, in order to qualify for funding, such as the US National Institutes of Health, Research Councils UK (effective 2016) and the European Union (effective 2020).[27][28][29]
At an institutional level, some universities, such as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, have adopted open access publishing by default by introducing their own mandates.[30] Some mandates may permit delayed publication and may charge researchers for open access publishing.[31][32] For teaching purposes, some universities, including MIT, provide freely available course content, such as lecture notes, video resources and tutorials. This content is distributed via Internet to the general public. Publication of such resources may be either by a formal institution-wide program,[33] or informally, by individual academics or departments.
Open content publication has been seen as a method of reducing costs associated with information retrieval in research, as universities typically pay to subscribe for access to content that is published through traditional means.[9][34] Subscriptions for non-free content journals may be expensive for universities to purchase, though the articles are written and peer-reviewed by academics themselves at no cost to the publisher. This has led to disputes between publishers and some universities over subscription costs, such as the one that occurred between the University of California and the Nature Publishing Group.[35][36]
Free and open content has been used to develop alternative routes towards higher education. Open content is a free way of obtaining higher education that is "focused on collective knowledge and the sharing and reuse of learning and scholarly content."[37] There are multiple projects and organizations that promote learning through open content, including OpenCourseWare and Khan Academy. Some universities, like MIT, Yale, and Tufts are making their courses freely available on the internet.[38]
Any country has its own law and legal system, sustained by its legislation, which consists of documents. In a democratic country, laws are published as open content, in principle free content; but in general, there are no explicit licenses attributed for the text of each law, so the license must be assumed as an implied license. Only a few countries have explicit licenses in their law-documents, as the UK's Open Government Licence (a CC BY compatible license). In the other countries, the implied license comes from its proper rules (general laws and rules about copyright in government works). The automatic protection provided by the Berne Convention does not apply to the texts of laws: Article 2.4 excludes the official texts from the automatic protection. It is also possible to "inherit" the license from context. The set of country's law-documents is made available through national repositories. Examples of law-document open repositories: LexML Brazil, Legislation.gov.uk, and N-Lex. In general, a law-document is offered in more than one (open) official version, but the main one is that published by a government gazette. So, law-documents can eventually inherit license expressed by the repository or by the gazette that contains it.
History
This section needs to be updated. The reason given is: The Open Content Project was replaced by Creative Commons over 10 years ago. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(July 2024)
Origins and Open Content Project
The concept of applying free software licenses to content was introduced by Michael Stutz, who in 1997 wrote the paper "Applying Copyleft to Non-Software Information" for the GNU Project.[39] The term "open content" was coined by David A. Wiley in 1998 and evangelized via the Open Content Project, describing works licensed under the Open Content License (a non-free share-alike license, see 'Free content' below) and other works licensed under similar terms.[40]
The website of the Open Content Project once defined open content as 'freely available for modification, use and redistribution under a license similar to those used by the open-source / free software community'.[40] However, such a definition would exclude the Open Content License because that license forbids charging for content; a right required by free and open-source software licenses.[citation needed]
5Rs definition
It has since come to describe a broader class of content without conventional copyright restrictions. The openness of content can be assessed under the '5Rs Framework' based on the extent to which it can be retained, reused, revised, remixed and redistributed by members of the public without violating copyright law.[41] Unlike free content and content under open-source licenses, there is no clear threshold that a work must reach to qualify as 'open content'.
The 5Rs are put forward on the Open Content Project website as a framework for assessing the extent to which content is open:
Retain – the right to make, own, and control copies of the content (e.g., download, duplicate, store, and manage)
Reuse – the right to use the content in a wide range of ways (e.g., in a class, in a study group, on a website, in a video)
Revise – the right to adapt, adjust, modify, or alter the content itself (e.g., translate the content into another language)
Remix – the right to combine the original or revised content with other open content to create something new (e.g., incorporate the content into a mashup)
Redistribute – the right to share copies of the original content, your revisions, or your remixes with others (e.g., give a copy of the content to a friend)[41]
This broader definition distinguishes open content from open-source software, since the latter must be available for commercial use by the public. However, it is similar to several definitions for open educational resources, which include resources under noncommercial and verbatim licenses.[42][43]
Successor projects
In 2003, David Wiley announced that the Open Content Project had been succeeded by Creative Commons and their licenses; Wiley joined as "Director of Educational Licenses".[44][45]
In 2005, the Open Icecat project was launched, in which product information for e-commerce applications was created and published under the Open Content License. It was embraced by the tech sector, which was already quite open source minded.
In 2006, a Creative Commons' successor project, the Definition of Free Cultural Works, was introduced for free content.[46] It was put forth by Erik Möller, Richard Stallman, Lawrence Lessig, Benjamin Mako Hill, Angela Beesley, and others.[47] The Definition of Free Cultural Works is used by the Wikimedia Foundation.[48] In 2009, the Attribution and Attribution-ShareAlike Creative Commons licenses were marked as "Approved for Free Cultural Works".[49]
In 2007 the OKF gave an Open Knowledge Definition for "content such as music, films, books; data be it scientific, historical, geographic or otherwise; government and other administrative information".[52] In October 2014 with version 2.0 Open Works and Open Licenses were defined and "open" is described as synonymous to the definitions of open/free in the Open Source Definition, the Free Software Definition, and the Definition of Free Cultural Works.[53]
A distinct difference is the focus given to the public domain, open access, and readable open formats. OKF recommends six conformant licenses: three of OKN's (Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, Open Data Commons Attribution License, Open Data Commons Open Database License) and the CC BY, CC BY-SA, and CC0 Creative Commons licenses.[54][55][56]
^Kelty, Christopher M. (2008). "The Cultural Significance of Free Software – Two Bits"(PDF). Durham and London: Duke University Press. p. 99. Archived(PDF) from the original on 27 August 2008. Retrieved 5 August 2016. Prior to 1998, Free Software referred either to the Free Software Foundation (and the watchful, micromanaging eye of Stallman) or to one of thousands of different commercial, avocational, or university-research projects, processes, licenses, and ideologies that had a variety of names: sourceware, freeware, shareware, open software, public domain software, and so on
^Open Definition 2.1Archived 27 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine on opendefinition.org "This essential meaning matches that of "open" with respect to software as in the Open Source Definition and is synonymous with "free" or "libre" as in the Free Software Definition and Definition of Free Cultural Works."
^Liang, Lawrence (2007). "Free/Open Source Software Open Content"(PDF). Asia-Pacific Development Information Programme: e-Primers on Free/Open Source Software. United Nations Development Programme – Asia-Pacific Development Information Programme. Archived(PDF) from the original on 22 March 2012. Retrieved 23 June 2012.
Country house in Madresfield, WorcestershireMadresfield CourtThe court across the moatTypeCountry houseLocationMadresfield, WorcestershireCoordinates52°07′30″N 2°16′51″W / 52.1251°N 2.2808°W / 52.1251; -2.2808OS grid referenceSO8087347463Builtlate Medieval (original house), 1866-1888, Victorian reconstructionArchitectPhilip Charles Hardwick, for the Victorian rebuildingArchitectural style(s)vernacular Listed Building – Grade IOfficial nameMadresfield Court, …
University in Kaohsiung, Taiwan Open University of Kaohsiung高雄市立空中大學Motto精勤恆實[1]Motto in EnglishExpertise, diligence, perseverance, pragmatismTypeMunicipalEstablished1997 (1997)AffiliationKaohsiung City GovernmentPresidentLiu Chia-ju (劉嘉茹)ProvostKao Yi-chan (高義展)Students16,000LocationSiaogang, Kaohsiung, Taiwan22°33′58″N 120°20′45″E / 22.5662°N 120.3457°E / 22.5662; 120.3457CampusSuburbanWebsitewww.ouk.edu.…
John from CincinnatiTitolo originaleJohn from Cincinnati PaeseStati Uniti d'America Anno2007 Formatoserie TV Generedrammatico Stagioni1 Episodi10 Durata55 min Lingua originaleinglese CreditiIdeatoreDavid Milch, Kem Nunn Interpreti e personaggi Rebecca De Mornay: Cissy Yost Greyson Fletcher: Shaun Yost Willie Garson: Meyer Dickstein Luis Guzmán: Ramon Gaviota Keala Kennelly: Kai Austin Nichols: John Monad Ed O'Neill: Bill Jacks Luke Perry: Linc Stark Brian Van Holt: Butchie Yost Matt Winston: Ba…
Disambiguazione – Se stai cercando il Global Compact for Migration, vedi Patto mondiale sulla migrazione. Questa voce o sezione sull'argomento politica è stata parzialmente tradotta dalla lingua inglese. Puoi contribuire terminando la traduzione o usando altre fonti. Non usare programmi di traduzione automatica. Usa {{Tradotto da}} quando hai terminato. Se nella pagina di modifica trovi del testo nascosto, controlla che sia aggiornato servendoti dei collegamenti …
Questa voce o sezione sull'argomento stazioni d'Italia non cita le fonti necessarie o quelle presenti sono insufficienti. Puoi migliorare questa voce aggiungendo citazioni da fonti attendibili secondo le linee guida sull'uso delle fonti. Segui i suggerimenti del progetto di riferimento. Questa voce sull'argomento stazioni della Liguria è solo un abbozzo. Contribuisci a migliorarla secondo le convenzioni di Wikipedia. Quiliano-Vado Ligurestazione ferroviariaBanchina binari mentre passa…
Questa voce o sezione sull'argomento centri abitati del Piemonte non cita le fonti necessarie o quelle presenti sono insufficienti. Puoi migliorare questa voce aggiungendo citazioni da fonti attendibili secondo le linee guida sull'uso delle fonti. Sambucocomune Sambuco – VedutaPanorama LocalizzazioneStato Italia Regione Piemonte Provincia Cuneo AmministrazioneSindacoCarlo Bubbio (lista civica) dal 28-05-2019 TerritorioCoordinate44°20′N 7°05′E / þ…
20th-century American Catholic Priest and Martyr BlessedStanley F. RotherFr. Stanley Rother, 1975BornStanley Francis Rother(1935-03-27)March 27, 1935Okarche, Oklahoma, U.S.DiedJuly 28, 1981(1981-07-28) (aged 46)Santiago Atitlán, Sololá, GuatemalaVenerated inCatholic ChurchBeatifiedSeptember 23, 2017, Cox Convention Center, Oklahoma City, United States by Cardinal Angelo Amato, S.D.B.Major shrineBlessed Stanley Rother Shrine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United StatesFeastJuly 28Attribute…
اقتُرح دمج محتويات هذه المقالة مع المعلومات الموجودة في الشعيبة (الكويت). (ناقش) يفتقر محتوى هذه المقالة إلى الاستشهاد بمصادر. فضلاً، ساهم في تطوير هذه المقالة من خلال إضافة مصادر موثوق بها. أي معلومات غير موثقة يمكن التشكيك بها وإزالتها. (ديسمبر 2018)Learn how and when to remove this message هذه …
Artikel ini perlu diwikifikasi agar memenuhi standar kualitas Wikipedia. Anda dapat memberikan bantuan berupa penambahan pranala dalam, atau dengan merapikan tata letak dari artikel ini. Untuk keterangan lebih lanjut, klik [tampil] di bagian kanan. Mengganti markah HTML dengan markah wiki bila dimungkinkan. Tambahkan pranala wiki. Bila dirasa perlu, buatlah pautan ke artikel wiki lainnya dengan cara menambahkan [[ dan ]] pada kata yang bersangkutan (lihat WP:LINK untuk keterangan lebih lanjut). …
لمعانٍ أخرى، طالع غوري (توضيح). غوري الإحداثيات 42°16′47″N 94°17′29″W / 42.2797°N 94.2914°W / 42.2797; -94.2914 [1] تقسيم إداري البلد الولايات المتحدة[2] التقسيم الأعلى مقاطعة ويبستر خصائص جغرافية المساحة 3.752089 كيلومتر مربع3.753416 كيلومتر مربع (1 أبريل 20…
Private social club in New York City For the gentleman's club, see Old Colony Club. For the former private members' drinking club in London, see The Colony Room Club. United States historic placeOld Colony ClubU.S. National Register of Historic PlacesNew York City Landmark No. 0236 The original Colony Club building in Madison AvenueLocation62nd Street and Park AvenueManhattan, New YorkCoordinates40°44′44″N 73°59′5.6″W / 40.74556°N 73.984889°W / 40.74…
Series of federally protected historic sites in the northwestern United States Nez Perce National Historical ParkIUCN category III (natural monument or feature)Bear Paw Battlefield in MontanaSpaldingLocation in the United StatesShow map of the United StatesSpaldingLocation in IdahoShow map of IdahoLocationIdaho, Montana, Oregon,Washington, United StatesNearest cityLewiston, IdahoCoordinates46°26′49″N 116°49′23″W / 46.447°N 116.823°W / 46.447; -116.823Area…
Abugida for the Tai Nüa language Tai LeDehong DaiScript type Abugida Time periodc. 1200 CE – presentDirectionLeft-to-right LanguagesTai Nüa, Ta'ang, Blang, AchangRelated scriptsParent systemsProto-Sinaitic alphabet[a]Phoenician alphabet[a]Aramaic alphabet[a]BrāhmīPallavaMon–BurmeseLik-Tai scripts[1]Tai LeSister systemsAhom, KhamtiISO 15924ISO 15924Tale (353), Tai LeUnicodeUnicode aliasTai LeUnicode rangeU+1950–U+197F[a] The Semitic origin of the Brahmic script…
American classical composer (1915–2005) David DiamondPortrait of Diamond c. 1987BornDavid Leo Diamond(1915-07-09)July 9, 1915Rochester, New York, U.S.DiedJune 13, 2005(2005-06-13) (aged 89)Brighton, New York, U.S.OccupationComposer David Leo Diamond (July 9, 1915 – June 13, 2005) was an American composer of classical music. He is considered one of the preeminent American composers of his generation. Many of his works are tonal or modestly modal. His early compositions are typi…
First Lady of the United States from 1869 to 1877 This article is about the wife of U.S. President Ulysses Grant. For other uses, see Julia Grant (disambiguation). Julia GrantFirst Lady of the United StatesIn roleMarch 4, 1869 – March 4, 1877PresidentUlysses S. GrantPreceded byEliza JohnsonSucceeded byLucy Hayes Personal detailsBornJulia Boggs Dent(1826-01-26)January 26, 1826St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.DiedDecember 14, 1902(1902-12-14) (aged 76)Washington, D.C., U.S.Resting placeGen…