User talk:OrangeDog

Articles for deletion nomination of Open Watcom Assembler

I have nominated Open Watcom Assembler, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Watcom Assembler. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pcap ping 08:47, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Watcom Assembler

Hi, OrangeDog. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JWASM, a discussion in which you participated, was closed as redirect to Open Watcom Assembler. Open Watcom Assembler has now been nominated for deletion due to notability concerns. If you would like to participate in the discussion, please comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Watcom Assembler. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia keeps all history

I was led to believe that all history is kept, but this is all rather strange. When I created the NavBox I looked at all the assemblers that were available before putting the NavBox in the article. Only the assemblers with no internal article missed out and ended up red-lettered. WASM wasn't one of them. I saw the article at that time (25th Jan) and there wasn't much there, but it was there and was there since at least August with the same name. Where is that, given that the current WASM (software) only got there on 28th Jan? -- spincontrol 21:22, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 21:35, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final discussion for Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:

  1. Proposal to Close This RfC
  2. Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 02:03, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Typeface list collaboration goals

Can we set some particular goals? Please answer at: Wikipedia talk:Typeface list collaboration#Particular goals--DThomsen8 (talk) 13:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to the collaboration. I hope that others will begin to contribute when you and I have slowed down or stopped. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bishop xirouhakis.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bishop xirouhakis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 09:11, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Happy OrangeDog's Day!

User:OrangeDog has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as OrangeDog's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear OrangeDog!

Peace,
Rlevse
01:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome
Ten years!

...today's Wikipedian 10 years ago --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:30, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't edit

I did look at the Help information stored on my computer but couldn't find anything related. I'll look at the site you suggested when I'm at a library. I don't go to unfamiliar sites at home.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:41, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further information may be posted here. No one has responded, though for some reason the link I put there was wrong.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:43, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B-Rixdorf

Hi and thanks for the hint on my page, I think I will make it this way. Regards, -jkb- (talk) 18:44, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RFCU Cush

Hey you probaly missed the fact that RFCU was closed and Archived, so i reverted it. if you feel strongly about it you can bring it up again in new one but at this point that one is closed. Weaponbb7 (talk) 02:48, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, how did I miss that? Ah well, I was hoping he would get to read the second paragraph in particular. If another one does come up, could you drop me a line and I'll see if it's still appropriate. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 15:08, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly two RFCU in less than a year, it wont be long before he pisses someone else off with his anti theist crusade. Weaponbb7 (talk) 18:18, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CSD discussion

I'm taking a lot of offense at this comment, and I'm going to tell you why here rather than disrupt the discussion.

I feel very much that you are not understanding what NPPs do. We act as the screen for every single article that passes through Special:Newpages. We are not deletion-obsessed. We improve the substandard articles we find. We add tags to the articles that need them. We search for references for articles that are unreferenced. We fix incorrectly-formatted templates and links, and spelling errors and broken refs.

That's all we do for your standard "good" new article.

Most of them, however, are not "good". These articles can be one of a variety of things. Some are pure vandalism and attack pages. Some are 11-year-old kids writing about themselves, what school they go to, what their dog's name is, etc. Some are articles by corporations about corporations. And some are essays and some are neologisms. Those are the most common kinds of problem articles.

We deal with them there and then so that the rest of the wiki doesn't have to. If we're looking for references for an article and we can't find any, we tag it too. It is not a fun job. Some of the creators fight back. When you characterize us as "trying to prevent the creator from having any input", what you're really referring to is this and this and this and this. These creators are not young, bright-eyed little new users who are being stifled and driven away by our cold black hearts. We are not evil, and we do not get a kick out of this. We do an unglamourous, repetitive task that is constantly under fire from users who share your viewpoint. I would like very much to see you try new page patrolling for a week and emerge with the same opinion that you hold of us now. ALI nom nom 21:01, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No personal offence meant, I was just highlighting the picture that the comments of the proposers were painting. I confess to not paying much attention to who in particular I am replying to, so some of what I said may not apply to you. While you are entitled to your opinion, but given that, as you point out, many people disagree, have you considered that you may not be entirely correct? Perhaps try creating new articles as an IP and see how you are treated (a number of people have done this, and the reports don't paint a friendly picture).
How can you possibly judge what kind of editor User:Mandygcruz is going to be? He's two days old and has only made five edits. Admittedly, these appear to be ill-advised self promotion, but could well be a good-faith misunderstanding of how Wikipedia works. Writing him off as a good-for-nothing vandal without attempting to explain anything is not the best way to go about doing things.
Of the issues you describe above, essays are usually best dealt with by re-writing and neologisms by re-direction, not with deletion. Note that these are the two that don't have CSDs, because they are not cases when instant deletion is always the best thing to do. The main issue I have is with Timneu22's complaint about over-loaded AfD while outright dismissing the use of PROD. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 21:22, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, resentment of PROD comes from field experience. If you need to delete an unquestionably problematic article that doesn't fall under CSD, it feels better to get some eyes on the article, at least. You see, working as a new page patroller you tend to develop the same sense of haste that RC patrollers feel. You don't like to see a blatantly problematic article sit there with a PROD on it and know that nobody is there to watch it for a week except you. So AFD feels, I don't know, more reliable.
With regard to users such as User:Mandygcruz... sigh. I used to believe that too once. I used to believe that every user was fundamentally good, and every vandal could be convinced otherwise. When I first registered and started patrolling RC, I would leave every vandal a heartwarming message about how they could turn around and become a productive user. Heh. I no longer believe that. You can't think of every account as a person. Almost all of them are there for some reason or another- trolling, spamming, getting a kick out of vandalizing. SPAs. I really love it when I see a productive new user, because nowadays I see so few.
Meh, I'm getting off topic. I'm actually finding that perhaps essays and neologisms are barely sometimes notable enough that they should be handled on a case-by-case basis. Convenient as it may be to have some extra criteria... ALI nom nom 21:46, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help:English to Latin Translation

Hello! I need some help on English to Latin translation. Please help me to translate the following list of english words to Latin.

  • Bishop of Rome
  • Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople
  • Patriarch of Alexandria
  • Patriarch of Antioch
  • Patriarch of Jerusalem

Thank you. Amit6 (talk) 18:27, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They're all listed here. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 20:17, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bigs

Hi OrangeDoc, I noticed that you undid my removal of this external link. I hadn't really checked whether the link provided useful information to the article. My removal was part of reverting a string of spam link edits made by C.Bluck (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who seems to be a single purpose account on a mission to advertise this site. If you look at their home page, you can easily see that it is a commercial site, which i.m.o. does not qualify as a WP:EL, although, perhaps, like you say, in this case it might provide useful information. I checked a few other entries which clearly added nothing to the article in which they were inserted. Also note that some of this user's edits where nothing more than stressing the fact that "this is a Bigs animation". So, I have removed that particular advertising phrase from the links section entry but kept the entry. I'll leave it to your discretion to keep or decide to remove the link itself after all, if/when you might find a suitable alternative on some non-commercial site. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 09:51, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Even though the original additions does appear to have been done in bad faith, the actual resource it links to is very useful. Given that I never noticed it was advertising any products or services, I think leaving it in is a perfect application of WP:IAR. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 12:08, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't say perfect. Rather possible :-) Cheers - DVdm (talk) 12:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What does Facepalm mean?

Referring to this.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Facepalm - The mind boggles as to what they taught you when you got that BA. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 22:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There were no such things as cookies then. Nothing I learned has been useful.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 14:22, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
On this occasion I was referring to the knowledge of how to search for "facepalm". OrangeDog (τ • ε) 15:04, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, well, I was at home. I make it a practice never to Google at home. But seriously, the Internet didn't exist when I was in college, and personal computers had 64K to 256K of memory. I learned the programming languages FORTRAN, COBOL and BASIC.
Make that me learn Fortran, Cobol, Basic and hit rock against rock to me make fire. Go hunt for food. Cook food over fire me make.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions ·

Meetup Cambridge 8

Wikipedia:Meetup/Cambridge 8 will be on Saturday 24 July. As you may have seen. Hope to see you there. Charles Matthews (talk) 20:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy note

You are receiving this message because of your participation in this discussion, now continued at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Microformats. –xenotalk 13:44, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unacceptable

In invite you to remove this ad hominem, personal attack. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 14:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to read both WP:SPADE and WP:POTKETTLE. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 14:34, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk 'bout it! 22:51, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the heads-up, but it's already been closed. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 09:08, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: RfC on Microformats

No, they don't affect the output of screen readers. Graham87 00:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. You're still welcome at the RfC of course. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 10:13, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem (with me)

At VP/T, it was not difficult to get your question right at second glance. No problem. I thought your assertion was good. -DePiep (talk) 10:59, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noel Fielding's Wiki

Hello,

I see that you have reversed my edit on the Noel Fielding page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noel_Fielding). I took out the stuff about his relationship with Dee Plume because it's incorrect. He has been dating xfm presenter Lliana Bird for well over a year now. They were already dating at the time the Sunday Times article was published. She is the woman in the middle in this picture: http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/104364510/Getty-Images-Entertainment

Although this hasn't really been mentioned in the press, most fans know that Lliana is his girlfriend now. And also, the breakup mentioned by both the News Of The World and the Sunday Times was his breakup with Pixie Geldof:

"This last comment is an oblique, and slightly sad reference to Fielding’s love life, involving a break-up with Pixie Geldof much reported in the tabloids this summer." - The Sunday Times, November 28 2009. (http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article6933657.ece)

Dee and Noel haven't been trying to "fix up" their relationship because it's over.

I apologise in advance if this violates the talk page guidelines. I'm new. :)

ScarletMasquerade (talk) 01:59, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"What most fans know" doesn't cut it I'm afraid. It has to be reported in reliable sources. In any case, it would be better to re-write the material into the past tense, rather than delete it. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 17:22, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors

Hi OrangeDog! Since you've been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, I wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If that sounds like you and you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors during the current term, which started in January and goes through early May. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 17:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UK Space Agency.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UK Space Agency.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:59, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Blocked historical users

Dear OrangeDog. I just nominated Category:Blocked historical users for discussion, see here. While scrolling through the edit history of the page, I noticed you already put it on CfD once, two years ago. I can't seem to find the entry where I should find it though. Perhaps you could tell us something about it? Thanks in advance, theFace 21:05, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If Wikipedia does something scary I'd like to know about it

Well excuse me for thinking someone had done something scary to Wikipedia.

Besides, they get tired of me asking questions on the Computing Reference Desk.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:15, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That might be a hint that you should go somewhere other than Wikipedia for your general computing questions. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 21:18, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I tried other sites that were suggested, but getting answers from those was even more frustrating.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:26, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, a lot of my problems were solved when the library where I had those problems upgraded the Firefox computer to Firefox 4. I still think there should be simple answers to some of the things that were happening.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Puzzle Bobble box art.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Puzzle Bobble box art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:26, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to events: bot, template, and Gadget makers wanted

I thought you might want to know about some upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, extending functionality with JavaScript, the future of ResourceLoader and Gadgets, the new Lua templating system, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.

Check out the Chennai event in March, the Berlin hackathon in June, the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC, or any other of our events.

Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page, here or at mediawiki.org. Sumanah (talk) 16:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite

Hello OrangeDog. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 00:31, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Microformat guidelines

Wikipedia:Microformat guidelines, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Microformat guidelines and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Microformat guidelines during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. G. C. Hood (talk) 16:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC) on their talk page(s).[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Microformat guidelines

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:24, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
You are awesome Mason972310 (talk) 06:06, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Roman Catholic Church in Cambridge has been nominated for discussion

Category:Roman Catholic Church in Cambridge, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, OrangeDog. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, OrangeDog. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, OrangeDog. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Judea-maps-overlay.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Judea-maps-overlay.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Veggies (talk) 20:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of minor The Mighty Boosh characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of minor The Mighty Boosh characters, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor The Mighty Boosh characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:NPLACE" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:NPLACE and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 1#Wikipedia:NPLACE until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 21:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]