User talk:Zundark

Archives

2001–2003 2004 2005 2006–2008 2009 2010 2011

Undecidable

I undid all of my edits because math stuff is over my head. :) I tried to make a go but decided that it wasn't worth it. Thanks for the heads up though. --User:Woohookitty ^Disamming fool! 10:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would You like to Help?

Hi, I am starting Wikipedia:WikiProject Ravidassia. I would like to get help from people who are interested. You may sign up for the project on the [[1]]. McKinseies (talk) 14:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not "software"?

Your edit summary here reads: "this isn't a list of software, it's a list of formats". Kindly explain. Fleet Command (talk) 17:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Take the first item on the list (VST), for example. A VST plug-in is a piece of software, but none of the hundreds of existing VST plug-ins is listed in the table. What is listed in the table is VST itself - the plug-in format (which is basically a specification of what VST plug-ins and VST hosts are - how they are required to behave and interact with one another). --Zundark (talk) 18:21, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now, I am officially confused. You basically rephrased your edit summary in longer sentences. Could you please actually explain it? Fleet Command (talk) 06:16, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I did. I don't consider that "List of software" is an appropriate section heading for a list of formats, even when the formats are software formats (just as I wouldn't consider "List of files" as an appropriate heading for a section that lists file formats). If you would like me to explain further, it would help if you first told me what it is that you don't understand, or that you disagree with. For example, there's no point in me writing a lengthy explanation as to why VST is a plug-in format, if in fact you already agree that it is. --Zundark (talk) 08:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let's not horrify you with a statement like "define format"! I know a lot of formats; container file formats, archive formats, video formats, audio formats, music format, document formats, raster and vector image formats and even executable file formats.

I also know DirectX. It is a software library exposed through an API. I know how to install it and I know how to access it through a programming language like Delphi or C#.

So, DirectX format? It sounds like a form of predetermined data storage, say a record or class. But you say it isn't. Besides, formats, as I know them, cannot transform or synthesize anything. Yes, data related to these tasks may be stored in records and exposed through classes and interfaces (that is, formats) but but you obviously do not mean any of these.

So, please define "format". Fleet Command (talk) 12:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to define format. I would actually prefer protocol here, but the fact is that plug-in format is much more common terminology than plug-in protocol. Actually, plug-in architecture is reasonably common, and I'm happy with that. How about you?

Regarding DirectX, it isn't DirectX itself that is listed, it's the (much more obscure) DirectX plug-in protocol. --Zundark (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right. Whatever. Fleet Command (talk) 19:20, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Holy crap, you're one of the longest-running Wikipedians out there! Congratulations on all the great article cleanup and improvement work you've done since 2001 -- and here's to many more years of happy editing :) Maryana (WMF) (talk) 16:23, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Zundark (talk) 20:26, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded on that! You've been around for a long time now. And have done a lot of great work. You could do even more with some extra tools in your belt. Any interest in trying out at RfA? -- œ^™ 06:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but although some of the tools would occasionally be useful, I don't want adminship. It's a pity that more of the tools aren't available separately. --Zundark (talk) 09:40, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

.bu

Hi Zundark; after deleting the ".bu" Article over in the German Wikipedia, I decided to start a deletion debate here, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.bu - your opinion would be very welcome :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 22:26, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Triangulum Australe

On 11 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Triangulum Australe, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Southern Triangle can't be seen from Europe? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Triangulum Australe. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, thought you might be interested in how it looks now :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's certainly changed a lot in ten years (as has Wikipedia). --Zundark (talk) 08:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I find it mindboggling that the article is over ten years old...and was still pretty stubby and easily expandable. I didn't think I could find DYK candidates from such old articles but there you go....I was showing my kids Triangulum Australe along with Musca the coal sack and three brightest stars in the sky last weekend as we had a trip to the country....just forgot where the damn Magellanic clouds were supposed to be...must read up on them.....Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't notice before that most of the improvement was due to you. Good work! --Zundark (talk) 09:40, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And now we've buffed the other one for a tilt at FAC - if it gets featured might try and ask to do a twin mainpage of Triangulum and Triangulum Australe....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:17, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Invention

Hello, Zundark. You are invited to join WikiProject Invention, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of inventions and invention-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Categories

On "File:Woolbeding Fountain DSC 2006.jpg" in commons you deleted category Woolbedding as well as Category:Fountains in the United Kingdom. I can easily understand that Category:Fountains in West Sussex is correct as being at a lower level than Category:Fountains in the United Kingdom. What I do not understand is why the rather different geographical limb of the tree should be eliminated as well. Excuse my ignorance; I am only learning slowly about categories. SovalValtos (talk) 20:49, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the "Woolbeding" category, because the image was already in the more specific "Woolbeding House" category. --Zundark (talk) 20:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Obvious now. I think I was confused by not all categories being displayed, and the summary referring to 'a redundant category' being removed rather than 'redundant categories' I am grateful that you replied. SovalValtos (talk) 21:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zundark. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zundark. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IRA listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect IRA. Since you had some involvement with the IRA redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 01:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of April 1 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article April 1 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April 1 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —JJBers 23:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zundark. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Zundark. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Zundark,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 16:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 20:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Journalist reaching out

Hi Zundark,

I'm a reporter currently enrolled in Columbia's journalism program. I'm working on a story about climate change on wikipedia, and it appears to me that you were among the first to edit the page on global warming. Hoping you might be willing to talk. (Apologies if I'm using the user talk function incorrectly — still learning the ropes here.) You can reach me at [e-mail].

Hope you're well!

All best,

Alexlubbenvice (talk) 23:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I’ve made any substantial edits to that article at all. My edit on 30 October 2001‎ was just to fix a couple of typos, as my edit summary shows. All earlier edits have been lost from the history (due to the way the wiki software worked back then), so it looks like I wrote a whole article on global warming, but that is not the case. --Zundark (talk) 07:14, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

hello KonoWarspite (talk) 03:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Twenty Year Society

Dear Zundark,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more. ​

Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weaveravel (talk • contribs) 11:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Relative algebraic closure" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Relative algebraic closure and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 4#Relative algebraic closure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One Hatsune Miku for you!! :)

	Hatsune Miku
	u get a hatsune miku - Pickledsharkk (talk) 18:41, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your article East Timor

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page East Timor to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. BostonMensa (talk) 04:35, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That article is in English, and in any case it's nothing to do with me - I don't think I've ever done more on it than fix a link and correct a typo. And you're 21 years late in welcoming me to Wikipedia. --Zundark (talk) 08:52, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Albert Einstein

Albert Einstein has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Zarathustra (fictional philosopher)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Zarathustra (fictional philosopher) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 18 § Zarathustra (fictional philosopher) until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 21:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for England

England has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Hezbollah

Hezbollah has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. It is a wonderful world (talk) 20:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Milky Way

Milky Way has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Real4jyy (talk) 03:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Take Me, I'm Yours

Hello Zundark, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Take Me, I'm Yours, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take Me, I'm Yours.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DoctorWhoFan91}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 08:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't create the article. I created a redirect to a completely different article (more than 15 years ago). The article you want to delete was created by an anon nine days ago. --Zundark (talk) 10:00, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]