User talk:T3avisSc00t

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, T3avisSc00t, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! DM5Pedia ^(ctr) 05:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hello. I have noticed that one or more of your edits has been unconstructive, and may qualify as vandalism. It would help if you stop with it. Thank you! Note- I am not in any significant power, and this is a preemptive warning. Jayson (talk) 00:33, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nah lmao T3avisSc00t (talk) 00:18, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nahhh I won't lmaoooooo

Sol Pena

Can we PLEASEEE talk about the cultural impact Sol Pena has has on all of our lives? T3avisSc00t (talk) 00:18, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism - Last warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia.

Hello, I have noticed that despite the warning that was given to you few days ago, your edits has continued to be unconstructive, and may still qualify as vandalism. I also noticed that you showed intent to disregard that very warning that was given to you a few hours ago. I kindly ask that you stop with the unconstructive edits. Thank you! I'm also not in any significant power and this is your last pre-emptive warning. Pikachu3408 (talk) 01:50, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:T3avisSc00t with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 00:20, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also removed your personal attack from User talk:Donnowin1. Please be civil. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 00:30, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

stfu internet nerd T3avisSc00t (talk) 20:58, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Troutfarm27. Your recent edit to the page Jimmy Butler appears to have included premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been undone for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Troutfarm27 ^(Talk) 02:03, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read

Wikipedia has policies that should generally be followed. You should read help:introduction to get an idea of what is expected. Giving your now removed comment here and some of your edits, your account may get wp:blocked. If you are unsure why this is happening, or what you need to do, you could ask at the wp:Teahouse for suggestions. Please remember to cite reliable sources to support your edits. See help:referencing for beginners. Note that citations are required per policy. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 00:29, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dude yall make me sound like a damn terrorist, i just made a few false edits, so what? What exactly does that make me? A freak? Damn bro, I've had like 70 people come up to me, i get it, damn T3avisSc00t (talk) 22:46, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saul Pena

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saul Pena requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Holy fuckin nerd T3avisSc00t (talk) 08:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Incivility

It seems you've misread the room here. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia with incivility toward other users as you did here [1] and countless other places. _signed, Willondon (talk) 21:09, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^bons mots 21:13, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• This is likely the only timed block you will receive for your persistent and unacceptable incivility.-- Ponyo^bons mots 21:13, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  stfu😁😁❤️❤️❤️💕💕

  that better? T3avisSc00t (talk) 01:16, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  yall corny asf lmao KanyeKendrickJpegAREGOATS (talk) 00:34, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:41, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Block Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

T3avisSc00t (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

KanyeKendrickJpegAREGOATS was an alternative account I created in my time of a week block and I apologize for creating it. I should have served my ban properly and respectfully, now I am blocked indefinitely. But I am here to appeal that. I have used Wikipedia to edit/update pages. Notably Neymar, Luka Doncic, Jimmy Butler, etc. As of these past 24 hours, I have been unavailable to edit some pages that have STILL not received edits. I apologize for any 'attacking' or previous 'inappropriate behavior' used towards fellow editor, the previous reason for my week-long block. It was wrong and hurtful and I apologize for it. I hope my appeal can be recognized and at minimum, a shorten time for a block. Thank you to whoever reads this and have good rest of your week. T3avisSc00t (talk) 04:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your nastiness has earned you a long break from Wikipedia. Congratulations. The standard offer is available to you. --jpgordon^𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 05:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

T3avisSc00t (talk) 04:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]