User talk:Sattvic7

Welcome!

Hello, Sattvic7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

– Fayenatic London 13:10, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Awadhi language has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Awadhi language was changed by Sattvic7 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954206 on 2018-09-11T15:54:29+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:54, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help! I want to make an edit but Clue Bot NG says something !

I was adding some sample phrases for Awadhi language — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sattvic7 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you managed to add the examples again, successfully.

In my opinion, the table format that you used originally was useful. You might consider reinstating it. The English translation row could stretch across all the columns, using rowspan="3". See WP:TABLE for relevant help pages. – Fayenatic London 13:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting information and citations without explanation

Hello, I'm Fayenatic london. I noticed that you recently removed content from Srivastava without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Fayenatic London 13:10, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Ramacharitmanas.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Ramacharitmanas.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. avoid editwarring on Kayastha and Chitraguptvanshi Kayastha pages. Discuss your concerns instead of undoing edits without giving reasons.Nikhil Srivastava (talk) 14:36, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I have already created a section for discussion in the talk page of the article Chitraguptvanshi Kayastha where I have put forth my concerns regarding articles quality and purpose. Let's discuss there. Sattvic7 (talk) 14:46, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for being an awesome Wikipedian!

werewolf (talk) 20:25, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
1,229		Indo-Aryan languages (talk)	Add sources
28		Lisan ud-Dawat (talk)	Add sources
17		Dili Sea Port (talk)	Add sources
375		Brahmic scripts (talk)	Add sources
56		Memoni language (talk)	Add sources
2,053		Biryani (talk)	Add sources
75		Garo language (talk)	Cleanup
83		Maulika Kayastha (talk)	Cleanup
249		Bombay Hindi (talk)	Cleanup
211		Hindi literature (talk)	Expand
20		Kalami language (talk)	Expand
3,508		Abu Dhabi (talk)	Expand
4,887		Hindi (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
110		Punjabi dialects (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
82		Ghoti people (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
540		Schwa (talk)	Merge
25		Kavigan (talk)	Merge
1,517		Polish language (talk)	Merge
101		Child's War (talk)	Wikify
42		Prabhu Communities (talk)	Wikify
163		Dungan language (talk)	Wikify
44		Khare (talk)	Orphan
10		Mithileshwar (talk)	Orphan
12		Kammari (talk)	Orphan
82		Mathur (subcaste) (talk)	Stub
22		Kullu language (talk)	Stub
16		Luwati language (talk)	Stub
3		Dr. H. B. Ward House (talk)	Stub
3		Norra Sorgenfri (talk)	Stub
68		Awadhi people (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hindustani language

Hello and Namaste, dear Sattvic7, i am Dheeraj789, you reverted the page Hindustani language, but it was sourced for me, because it was representative for the history of Hindustani language.

Re:Your edit on Hindustani language

Dear User:Sattvic7, I have restored the phrase regarding usage of the term in a modern context as you requested. I should note that today, the main way that linguists use the term is to refer to the lingua franca of the northern Indian subcontinent that has two standardized registers, Hindi and Urdu (see this article). I hope this helps. With regards, Anupam^Talk 18:06, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

great! - Sattvic7 (talk) 18:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

India-related articles and Indicscript

Please take a few minutes to read over WP:INDICSCRIPT. In general, on India related articles, don't use indic script in the article lead or infobox. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 21:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out. I didn't know that. Sattvic7 (talk) 19:23, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hindustani language

Hello User:Sattvic7, I hope you are doing well. I noticed that you removed scripts from the lede of the Hindustani language article. Note that WP:MOSIS states: Exceptions are articles on the script itself, articles on a language that uses the script, and articles on texts originally written in a particular script. As such, I am going to ask you to kindly revert your edits. If you are unable to do so, I can do that for you. I hope this helps. With regards, Anupam^Talk 11:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit at Kayastha page.

You mentioned overkill in your edit summary. Why? Shitush (talk) 16:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can ignore the above blocked contributor. However, I have reverted you at that article because the issue I raised originally, and which you overturned, was one of WP:OVERCITE, amongst other things. I suppose overciting is a form of overkill but I'm just clarifying.

If you read the section about Varna status, you will see that the core point is already in the article anyway. It really isn't a good idea to have that sort of thing scattered throughout an article because it is very frequently contentious. - Sitush (talk) 07:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Citations were of verifiable historical mentions. (Redacted) removed personal attack by impersonating account. Abecedare (talk) 14:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See this for dispute resolution. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Massive_citations_deletion_on_Kayastha_page

MY REPLY STARTS HERE: @Sitush: You had earlier removed (find the edit here : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kayastha&diff=952116428&oldid=952115854&diffmode=source) an important part of the article stating the following: "start again, please - always suspicious when someone has to compound a large number of sources to make a simple point, and those srcs do not appear to be claiming "many" did but rather "a few" did."

I had through immense research put those sources and information there to bring to forefront some neutral historical facts. I thought may be you have a problem with WP:OVERCITE or having too many sources. Thus, I removed some sources to satisfy you. Seems that you still have problem. Can you elaborate what exact suspicion do you have with this particular edit except that they are absolutely reliable and relevant? Have you even gone through sources to make a claim of suspicion? I'd rather recommend having discussion/talk on WP article before making controversial reverts. Kindly don't engage in vandalism and useless edit wars! Sattvic7 (talk) 12:00, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

Draft:Awadhi grammar concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Awadhi grammar, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barahmasa has been accepted

Barahmasa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring on Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha

Dear Sattvic, I can understand your concern and where you are coming from. However, kindly refrain from edit warring. I hope you understand as well what I am trying to point out here. I request you to use the talk page available instead of undoing the edits directly. In the end, I will have no option other than complaining about it to the administrators and bringing about extended protection for the page. I beg you once again.

I see, you have used a reference as to someone from Vallabh (Gujarat) belonging to Kshatriyahood. Is that North India? Of course, not. In such a situation, your intentions are clear. I beg you to stop maligning the status. Ayushsinha2222 (talk) 17:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

@Ayushsinha2222: Hi, Ayush, I hope you are aware of the fact that the pages Bengali Kayastha and Kayastha already exist where you could've easily posted your content (which was related to Bengali Kayastha. It is common knowledge that this page Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha was created to focus on North Indian Kayasthas. So it must be the responsibility of editors to not load the page with content that is not overtly about other Kayastha groups. Of course, it is acceptable to give a passing reference to to other groups or information provided (as you have pointed out in the case of Vallabh Kayastha) provided it is very brief and concise. I am a Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha myself and have contributed immensely to this page through proper research. I suggest you to put your content on Bengali Kayastha or Kayastha. Have a good day. Sattvic7 (talk) 18:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ayushsinha2222:

@Sattvic7: Dear Sattvic, I am extremely sorry for having done that. I am so grateful to you for all that you have done for this page. It's just because of you that this page is so informational now. I acknowledge your priceless contribution. At the same time, I am delighted to have come across you as well. Please carry on; in view of your suggestions, I have removed the content now, except for a couple of sentences. You can remove them as well if you think them inappropriate.

Once again, my sweet friend, I thank you so much for all that you have done. Lots of love! Take care of yourself.

Ayushsinha2222 (talk) 18:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sattvic7:

@Ayushsinha2222: Great. Sattvic7 (talk) 08:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, @Sattvic7, is it possible to get this page extended protection in the future if it's subject to incessant vandalisms? It seems people more interested in caste-glorification than in unbiased facts have come up with new accounts. One of them removed a small part of the content as well.

I hope you are well over there. I am enlivened by your work. My words to fail to describe how grateful I am to you. I thank you so much for all your hard work. Take care of yourself.

---

Ayushsinha2222 (talk) 21:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

user:Ayushsinha2222 aap sahi hain. Caste glorification ek mahapaap hai isiliye aapki baat ko sar aankho par rakh kar, mai yeh kadam uthane ja raha. Asha karta hoon yeh app ko aur aap jaise buddhijiviyo ko enliven karega. Ramdhari Singh (talk) 05:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ramdhari Singh: If there are disputes the best way to resolve is to create a section for talk on Talk:Chitraguptavanshi Kayasthaand put your points there. And please write in English, you're on English Wikipedia. Otherwise edit warring may lead actions by moderators. I hope you're aware that WP:ACDS are already authorized for the page. And @Ayushsinha2222: I'm not sure about extended protection Read: WP:PP Sattvic7 (talk) 05:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal war of succession. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford university reference

We have added reference from oxford university. Feedback invited. Kayastha Shiromany (talk) 15:31, 3 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked for sockpuppetry. Heba Aisha (talk) 06:43, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kayastha Shiromany: Hey, thanks for your edit and pardon for my late reply. I think that content related to varna status of Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha deserves a separate section in itself (and I have planned to create the section discussing this controversial issue for sometime). In that case, your content would be more suited under "varna-status" section. If you consent, I'd move your edit to the varna-status section on Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha at a later stage of development of this article OR you can create that section yourself if you are confident enough. Have a god day Sattvic7 (talk) 05:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kayastha Shiromany: Hi, I have recently removed some content that seems to be talking about CKPs (Kayasthas of Maharashtra) in particular. We want this article to be relevant only to North Indian Kayasthas i.e excluding CKPs and Bengali Kayasthas as there are separate pages dedicated to both of them. Sattvic7 (talk) 16:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, it seems we need extended protection for the page.

---

Ayushsinha2222 (talk) 20:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little busy nowadays, but will surely look into it soon. Sattvic7 (talk) 18:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Be very very cautious

You are treading on thin ice. Go on with your copying history from sources. Dont stir touchy subjects. Ninja Roti (talk) 14:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am myself a Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha and cautious with my sources, do you have a PhD to be cautious with yours? or anything to say that satisfies the WP:RS? If you disagree with any piece of source or information then you should discuss that on the Talk:Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha instead of trying to intimidate me or consistently trying delete WP:RS cited in the article. I have access to JSTOR, Project MUSE and what not, plus I know I have seen enough of red-link users like you, they get banned every now and then for foolishly reverting sourced pieces of information without prior discussion. Sattvic7 (talk) 15:06, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly take a look at Talk:Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha#Chitraguptavanshi Kayasthas consider themselves a separate varna. Sattvic7 (talk) 15:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not a Kayastha, that I am sure of. I have gone through your edit history. Traitors like you are a two penny a piece on wikipedia hiding behind false pretences. I have seen what you and your friends have done on Bengali Kayastha and Kulin Kayastha. You and your cheap buddies are a disgrace. You are only inviting trouble. Ninja Roti (talk) 15:58, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have not even touched the pages Bengali Kayastha and Kulin Kayastha, but those who are cleverly plotting against Kayastha mus've edited those pages. Most of my edits are on Awadhi language, the article I created Barahmasa and now this. I was the first man on entire WP to bring to notice that Kayasthas are mentioned in the inscriptions of Kushan Empire. Otherwise, some Brahmins had already had upped their propaganda that how Kayastha came out of Mughal officials despite the fact that Kayastha history dates back to Kushan and Gupta Era. As I cannot be everywhere at any given time, for some days I'll be focusing onChitraguptavanshi Kayastha. I'm currently trying to collect reliable info on British era history of Chitragupta Kayastha. After that I'll shift to Kayastha adn improve other articles too. All I can say that, Kayastha history is more glorious than Rajputs or Brahmins. Sattvic7 (talk) 16:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I knew that you were not a Kayastha and now I know that you are one of those Brahmin hating conmen. That explains your actions. Keep your sob sister story for some dimwit. You have a dozen of sockpuppet account and Ayushsinha2222 is one of them which just reverted my edits. I live in Noida and I dare you to meet me. If you are a Kayastha like you say you are, you will benefit from the meeting. But I know that all your pretences will be exposed. Ninja Roti (talk) 17:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brahmin hating conmen? Sorry, if I hurt your sentiment but I don't hate anyone including the Brahmins. They are great people and contributed immensely to the Indian history. But before making these allegations against me, have you tried to read a few books on the Kayasthas? I don't write random things. I just cite things that scholars, historians and others researchers have already published in reputed journals, books and articles in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines.. I suggest you to read the following books, (if you want to know about Kayasthas)

- Romila Thapar's -- Past Before Us (2013)

- Chitrarekha Gupta's -- The writer's class of ancient India (1983)

- Meera Vishwanathan's -- From "Lekhaka" to "Kayastha" (2014)

- Formation of Colonial State in India -- Hayden Bellenoit (2017)

- Hindustani Kayasthas -- by Lucy Caroll Stout.(1976)

- Kayasthas of Hyderabad -- by Karen Leonard. (1994)

Nothing more to say! Sigh! Have a good day. Better to stay indoors in this pandemic Take care. Sattvic7 (talk) 18:57, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And yeah I am a Kayastha from a well-to-do family. There's nothing that can take away this fact. It's for this love of my community that I have researched nigh and day into origins of my community. If you think I am wrong in some places, feel free to discuss it. I am an open minded person. I would have loved to meet you but I live too far away from Noida Sattvic7 (talk) 19:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Minor Change on Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha Page

Hi, I have made a small change on the page. Kindly rectify it if it's inappropriate in some way or other. Thank you. I hope you are keeping safe. Advaita2222 (talk) 16:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Awadhi grammar

Hello, Sattvic7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Awadhi grammar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Awadhi grammar has been accepted

Awadhi grammar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 19:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:20, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Sattvic7! Your additions to Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 17:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Karan(caste)

Hi Sattvic7 can u go through the talk page of karana caste I've provided some additional details regarding the community along with a source which could be added in the social status section of that article,the information provided is regarding the historical development of karana as a community during Eastern Ganga rule in Odisha, your help would be greatly acknowledged. AuthenticSources2546 (talk) 07:13, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AuthenticSources2546: Sure.

Regarding Ambaddeva

Hey you can add details about this king who declared independence from kakatiya rule in the kayastha page, here are some sources u could use :1)https://www.wisdomlib.org/south-asia/book/the-history-of-andhra-country/d/doc220040.html 2)https://books.google.co.in/books?id=AVIzAQAAMAAJ&dq=ambadeva&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=ambadeva 3)https://books.google.co.in/books?id=36AGEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT207&dq=ambadeva&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiZ1tnw0JX3AhUqG6YKHX-pBWc4ChDoAXoECAcQAw AuthenticSources2546 (talk) 08:17, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AuthenticSources2546: Thanks a lot for sharing. I'll add the content as soon as possible.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Your edit to Chitraguptavanshi Kayastha has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cāndāyana

Hello, Sattvic7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cāndāyana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cāndāyana

Hello, Sattvic7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cāndāyana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 15:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuktidīpikā has been accepted

Yuktidīpikā, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 13:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]