User talk:Petrandreev13

Welcome!

Hello, Petrandreev13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 19:28, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Death wish

Hi. We seem to disagree as to whether the plot summary needs the names if the guns in in. I started a discussion on the talk page, please comment before re-adding the content. Scribolt (talk) 06:57, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Petrandreev13! You created a thread called Change an article name. at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:07, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Umka is Looking for a Friend moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Umka is Looking for a Friend, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umka is Looking for a Friend (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Umka is Looking for a Friend and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Umka is Looking for a Friend, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 13:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Petrandreev13! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 13:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Margarita Korabelnikova moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Margarita Korabelnikova, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 08:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yuri Yakovlev (writer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yuri Yakovlev (writer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 10:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Margarita Korabelnikova moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Margarita Korabelnikova, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 08:30, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yuri Yakovlev (writer)

Hello, Petrandreev13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yuri Yakovlev".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Margarita Korabelnikova

Hello, Petrandreev13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Margarita Korabelnikova".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:40, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rabbit Over the Void, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mikhail Yefremov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Othello (1956 film)

Hi. You recently made an edit to Othello (1956 film) saying the release date was 1955 and not 1956. Do you have a reliable source for this? If so, please let me know and I'll update the release date and also move the page. Thanks! Lugnuts ^Fire Walk with Me 15:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Umka is Looking for a Friend

Hello, Petrandreev13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Umka is Looking for a Friend, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Petrandreev13

Thank you for creating Aleks Le.

User:TheTechnician27, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The article is well-made; however, without reliable, independent sources (MyAnimeList and Behind the Voice Actors are, to my knowledge, WP:UGC and therefore are not acceptable as reliable sources), I cannot mark the article as reviewed. Please find at least reliable, independent sources discussing this subject in substantial detail, and I can mark the article as reviewed, releasing it for catalogue by search engines. Please also see the WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, and WP:ARTIST for why this is the case. As example of a reliable, independent source would be this Polygon article were it to actually discuss Le in any substantial detail (it doesn't). Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TheTechnician27}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 01:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mikhail Nazvanov moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mikhail Nazvanov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 07:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Umka is Looking for a Friend

Hello, Petrandreev13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Umka is Looking for a Friend".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 03:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aleks Le moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aleks Le, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 15:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category

Hi, Petrandreev13! I'm Dswitz10734, and I wanted to talk to you bout your edit on the My Son Hunter page. First, thank you for your copyediting on the page improving several details I missed. About the category you added, American Propaganda Films, I don't necessarily agree about that. Usually propaganda is produced by the government to make you think a certain way. This movie is being developed by an independent producer (The Unreported Story Society) and isn't like a documentary where people are actively presenting the facts. This is meant to be a film based on a true story, but certainly some elements will be fictional, like Gina Carano's character, who is supposed to bring a comedic take to the film. If your argument is that this will have political messaging or a biased POV, then I'd agree. However, it's hard to find a movie these days that doesn't have political messaging. In that case, the category would be full with every Disney movie produced since 2013. We both know that political messaging has become too engrained in the film industry, but to put this film in a propaganda category I wouldn't agree with. I hope to hear from you soon, Dswitz10734 (talk) 15:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notice

I have reported Radiohist to AN/I for their behaviour here on your Talk page. This is the discussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#WP:OWNTALK_violations Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 18:12, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Liza Ross moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Liza Ross, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 14:13, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Language of sources

Hi. You asked: And the sources in the English page must be in English language? No, they needn't be. What matters is that it is a reliable source. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 17:51, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nikolai Sergeyev (actor)

Hello, Petrandreev13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nikolai Sergeyev (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 08:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The reason I choose not to fill in the summary field is because it memorizes the text I write, which then uses as a suggestion in later edits. And I don't want suggestions to keep adding up and popping up when I write the text, but I don't know how to turn them off. But alright, I'll write the summaries from now on. Petrandreev13 (talk) 10:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marina Kondratyeva

Thank you for adding precision to Marina Kondratyeva. I don't understand, however, why you change working redirects to piped links. Why not show per redirect that Leningrad was indeed a former name for Saint Petersburg (while anything could be said in a piped link)? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:32, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Piped links and redirects

Hi,

Regarding your your recent edit at "List of film director and actor collaborations", please note that it's not generally recommended to replace redirects with piped links. Please see WP:NOPIPE, MOS:NOPIPE, and WP:NOTBROKEN.

N [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Mozart]]

Y [[Mozart]]

Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 21:27, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jean-de-Nivelle.

Yes, I'm aware that it's not recommended to do that. However, when I click on a redirect, for example, of Leningrad to Saint Petersburg, the article of Saint Petersburg will have the "Redirected from Leningrad" message beneath the title, and when I see it, it:

1) distracts me, forcing me to refresh the article to make it disappear

2) gives me the impression I didn't enter the name correctly, thus ending up on a possibly unrelated article.

Long story short, redirects hurt my OCD. Petrandreev13 (talk) 09:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that unnecessary pipes hurt my OCD, which puts us in conflict. If you go around changing redirects into piped links and I go around doing the reverse, we're just wasting each other's time. There are good reasons that the guidelines are as they are. Shouldn't we all follow them? Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 10:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Liza Ross

Hello, Petrandreev13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Liza Ross".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 08:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]