User talk:Dswitz10734

This is Dswitz10734's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Welcome

Hello, Dswitz10734, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:36, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is Dswitz10734's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Thank you

Thank you for the barnstar! :) ♟♙ (talk) 18:27, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Hi there. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (books) and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction before creating any more Star Wars book articles. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a database. Not all books warrant a devoted article: those that will never reasonably expand beyond mere plot summary and mention of online reviews (note: Goodreads and similar user-generated review sites are not considered reliable sources) can be mentioned at their author's article, or lists such as List of Star Wars books. Wikipedia is explicitly not for everything, and is not for summary-only descriptions of works. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 03:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cheryl Dinolfo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cheryl Dinolfo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Dinolfo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 17:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because you thanked me

Dswitz10734, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...  YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you.

22:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 05:47, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:This image is a.png image of a Minecraft building block of grass.png

Thanks for uploading File:This image is a.png image of a Minecraft building block of grass.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
57		Star Wars: Jedi Apprentice (talk)	Add sources
164		Ewok Celebration (talk)	Add sources
199		Star Wars: The Black Series (talk)	Add sources
264		Solo family (talk)	Add sources
2,636		Palpatine (talk)	Add sources
927		Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (talk)	Add sources
7		Star Wars Rollinz toys (talk)	Cleanup
18		The Woodlands School (Mississauga) (talk)	Cleanup
1,121		Sith (talk)	Cleanup
1,030		Lando Calrissian (talk)	Expand
120		Surface-supplied diving (talk)	Expand
112		Zendaya discography (talk)	Expand
117		Transportation safety in the United States (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
946		American cuisine (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
504		Marvel Universe (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
640,708		2020 United States presidential election (talk)	Merge
972		Skywalker family (talk)	Merge
658		C-3PO (talk)	Merge
41		The Courtship of Princess Leia (talk)	Wikify
1,861		Amazons (talk)	Wikify
399		Music of Star Wars (talk)	Wikify
2		Singing Skylarks (talk)	Orphan
7		Kate Mildenhall (talk)	Orphan
2		Dank Recovery (talk)	Orphan
6		Taber Police Service (talk)	Stub
14		The Crystal Star (talk)	Stub
20		Star Wars: Path of the Jedi (talk)	Stub
42		Redpoint Ventures (talk)	Stub
8		Exile (Star Wars novel) (talk)	Stub
16		Star Wars: The Clone Wars (novel) (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
240		Duel of the Fates (talk)	Add sources
110		14th Government of Slovenia (talk)	Add sources
346		Bail Organa (talk)	Add sources
27,672		Darth Vader (talk)	Add sources
12		SP FX: The Empire Strikes Back (talk)	Add sources
364		Yavin (talk)	Add sources
4,008		Yoda (talk)	Cleanup
20		The Unifying Force (talk)	Cleanup
164		Thermal lance (talk)	Cleanup
3,002		The Bachelor (American TV series) (talk)	Expand
97		A-wing (talk)	Expand
4,492		Jango Fett (talk)	Expand
2,871		Demon (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
16		Jedi Prince series (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
583		Languages in Star Wars (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
79		Star Wars: A New Dawn (talk)	Merge
430		Star Wars video games (talk)	Merge
233		Star Wars comics (talk)	Merge
46		Health in the United States (talk)	Wikify
117		Horace Andy (talk)	Wikify
45		Star Wars: The Old Republic: Fatal Alliance (talk)	Wikify
8		Elastic mechanisms in animals (talk)	Orphan
8		Abdul Aziz bin Husain (talk)	Orphan
2		2007 CIAA Basketball Tournament (talk)	Orphan
26		Tom Shone (talk)	Stub
30		Drill Master diving accident (talk)	Stub
9		Skylark DuQuesne (talk)	Stub
18		Roger MacBride Allen (talk)	Stub
10		Balance Point (talk)	Stub
24		Vampire of the Mists (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:35, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FFU

Thanks for helping out at WP:FFU, this is just a note to remeber to type {{subst:ffu b}} at the end of the request, otherwise it will wrap all of the remaining requests as well, also remeber to sign your comments. When you're uploading a free image, you can also upload it to Wikimedia Commons instead. Dylsss^(talk contribs) 01:35, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Dswitz10734! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 21:34, Saturday, November 14, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Whpq

Hello, Dswitz10734. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
Message added 16:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Whpq (talk) 16:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources multiple times

Following your Teahouse request, here goes! As you know, web citations take the form "This is the UK Google home page". which you enter into an article as <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.google.co.uk/ |title=This is the UK Google home page}}</ref>. The ref tags at beginning and end are there because you want the citation to appear in the list of references at the foot of the article rather than at the point where they were placed, which is what happens if you leave out the tags, as I did here.

So far so good. Now suppose you want to cite the Google home page twice in an article. You need to give the citation a name, and that's done in the first reference tag, not within the part in the curly brackets, which is the citation itself. It is good practice to name references in such a way that other editors will recognise them, so in this case we'll call that reference "Googlehome". For various technical reasons I need not bore you with the name should not contain blanks or capital letters except, if you wish, as the first letter. So now the full reference is <ref name="Googlehome">{{cite web |url=https://www.google.co.uk/ |title=This is the UK Google home page}}</ref>. That's what is needed for the first time you use that reference in the article. The next and all subsequent times you just need <ref name="Googlehome" /> Note how I have placed a forward slash and a blank space after the "Googlehome" bit. That indicates to the software that this is a repeat reference.

So, lets check this is all working by referencing for real the first time the Google home page[1] and then referencing it again.[1] If you look at all the underlying code by going into edit mode for this page, you'll see in more detail how it all works. Note in particular that "nowiki" tags can surround some text to tell the software NOT to do the wiki-magic that turns some special characters into, for example, citations. Incidentally, I'm using {{reflist_talk}} here, not the more usual {{reflist}} as I want the references to appear immediately below this part of your Talk page, not right at the bottom.

References

1. "This is the UK Google home page".

I'll keep an eye on this page for a few days, so don't hesitate to ask further questions here if you have them. Mike Turnbull (talk) 17:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Turnbull, Thank you! I've always wondered how to do that. I am very grateful for your help. If you want, you can see where I used this handy dandy trick: Force Heretic: Remnant. Happy holidays! Dswitz10734 (talk) 17:35, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you using this very quickly. Another tip to make editing easier when adding references and other stuff, assuming you use the source editor, is to click on the icon that looks like a pencil (top of the edit window just left of where it says "Advanced"). Once you do that the edit window gets colours which help keep track of the curly brackets and ref tags so there is less chance you will fail to close a reference that you opened. Look at this Section in edit mode and you'll see what I mean, with its green, blue and purple highlights. Happy holidays to you, also! Mike Turnbull (talk) 18:03, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Turnbull Wow! That's a helpful feature. Thanks! Dswitz10734 (talk) 19:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thrawn: Alliances (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thrawn: Alliances and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Thrawn: Alliances, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dswitz10734! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Banner

A belated "Thank you!" for this.[1] I consider myself very lucky to have been born in America. :) ←Baseball Bugs ^What's up, Doc? carrots→ 18:17, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Klaus Baudelaire

Hello, Dswitz10734. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Klaus Baudelaire".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 02:05, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Liz, indeed that draft has been abandoned. Thank you for deleting the page, as I don't know how to. Happy Holidays! Dswitz10734 (talk) 14:55, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 2020 United States presidential election seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 13:56, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To add to the above message, please don't make the same rejected edit twice (Dec. 7, Dec. 16) and please don't misuse the "minor edit" button. Neutrality^talk 16:58, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hi Dswitz10734! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Gina Carano that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Specifically, I'm referring to these two edits: [2] [3]. Srey Sros^talk 22:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your edits at The Daily Wire were marked as minor and then noticed you have been warned about this before. Please don't do that. There is actually no reason to ever mark an edit minor, so make sure that when you do it really is a "minor" edit. Such edits do not add or change any content. They only fix minor things like typos and punctuation. Your mistakes can be seen as dishonesty and deceptiveness, and you don't want that. You can be blocked if you do this again. -- Valjean (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:VFD (A Series Of Unfortunate Events)

Hello, Dswitz10734. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:VFD (A Series Of Unfortunate Events), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:13, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Star Wars: Tales From a Galaxy Far, Far Away: Aliens: Volume 1

Hello, Dswitz10734. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Star Wars: Tales From a Galaxy Far, Far Away: Aliens: Volume 1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
16,777		Spider-Man: No Way Home (talk)	Add sources
2,348		Return of the Jedi (talk)	Add sources
2,025		Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith (talk)	Add sources
358		Honey, I Shrunk the Kids (franchise) (talk)	Add sources
96		Cinderella (franchise) (talk)	Add sources
12		From Star Wars to Jedi: The Making of a Saga (talk)	Add sources
258		Stretch Armstrong (talk)	Cleanup
65		Fantasia (franchise) (talk)	Cleanup
33		FurReal Friends (talk)	Cleanup
2,198		The Empire Strikes Back (talk)	Expand
160		Comparison of Star Trek and Star Wars (talk)	Expand
11,246		Stranger Things (talk)	Expand
340		Tron (franchise) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
167		Weeble (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,387		Beyblade (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
180		Cultural impact of Star Wars (talk)	Merge
1,876		Overwatch (video game) (talk)	Merge
288		The Incredibles (franchise) (talk)	Merge
15		TFcon (talk)	Wikify
496		Bop It (talk)	Wikify
382		Walt Disney Studios (Burbank) (talk)	Wikify
2		Anton Mervar (talk)	Orphan
4		Arlene Reckson (talk)	Orphan
1		Alijilán (talk)	Orphan
10		Star Wars Tech (talk)	Stub
172		Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
16		Gator Golf (talk)	Stub
10		Science of Star Wars (miniseries) (talk)	Stub
25		Elefun (talk)	Stub
12		Designer's World (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:52, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:VFD (A Series Of Unfortunate Events)

Hello, Dswitz10734. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "VFD".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 19:17, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Star Wars: Tales From a Galaxy Far, Far Away: Aliens: Volume 1

Hello, Dswitz10734. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Star Wars: Tales From a Galaxy Far".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:10, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to George Floyd protests. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.

This is in reference to marking a controversial edit as minor as you did here.[4]. Please read Wikipedia:Minor. Minnemeeples (talk) 14:39, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charlottesville image irrelevancy claim.

If you search "trumpism" "charlottesville" on scholar.google.com, you will find that there are 557 articles out of 6790 "trumpism" mentioning articles that find some relevance between the two concepts. If this were not so, I would think you have an arguable claim, especially if the article appears to brand all Trumpists as nazi/ confederate flag wavers- which is clearly not the case. There is further discussion of charlottesville image on the talk page. I would be happier with other images available on the net, but unfortunately we are constrained by wikipedia content rules to what is available on commons or can be uploaded due to WP compatible licenses. J JMesserly (talk) 02:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@J JMesserly Thank you for your comment. Often, when my edits are reverted the editor leaves no explanation, but an occasional threat. Thank you for notifying me and explaining your reasoning. I'm sorry it's taken me so long to respond; I haven't been on Wikipedia much recently. Anyway, the problem with Google is that it can be biased, along with most news networks that have taken a clear anti-Trump position. However, my goal is that Wikipedia isn't a biased site. If there is significant, hard evidence that Trump supports these long dead extremist ideologies, then it makes perfect sense for the Charlottesville image to remain on the page. But, if this is an act out of radical Trump hate or bias, which I think it is, then the image should be removed. Dswitz10734 (talk) 23:56, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think that if there is any scholarly source that disputes connection between charlottesville and trumpism, it deserves mention in the article. First off though, I must say that there is an unfortunate confusion between the term trumpism and trump. I have read the bulk of the sources cited in that article, and I think if you took a look at some of them you would agree that when they use the term Trumpism nearly all are interested in what it means to its followers, not its current leader. From this perspective, what Trump actually confides that he believes is far less relevant than what particular sets of followers think he believes. To take Bolton at his word, Trump doesn't have any ideologies, and this dovetails with the "open signifier" analysis that this makes it easier to draw together a disparate set of followers with widely differing beliefs. As for bias? It is a human condition- every information source has a bias. I am not saying most of the news media are dishonest purveyors of propaganda, just that any information source takes a particular perspective. This is also true of academic sources heavily relied on in the article. While they too have academic biases, they correlate less directly with political perspectives, and as for the peer review journals must past muster that they have formed a coherent and supported basis for their argument. J JMesserly (talk) 23:40, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Star Wars: The High Republic: Into The Dark

Hello, Dswitz10734. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Star Wars: The High Republic: Into The Dark, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Black Spire cover art.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Black Spire cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm RossButsy. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Book of Boba Fett, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. RossButsy (talk) 20:51, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Terror on the Prairie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terror on the Prairie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terror on the Prairie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Platonk (talk) 06:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Donald Trump. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Muboshgu So this is what happens when I write a reply that I agree with someone? You tried to censor me, and when I stand up for myself you scold me. Dswitz10734 (talk) 18:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read wp:not wp:npa and wp:rightgreatwrongs, and take heed beofe you get a block.Slatersteven (talk) 18:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Slatersteven Are you threatening to block me after I stand up for myself when I was censored? Dswitz10734 (talk) 18:28, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I cannot block you I am only an admin, but if you keep up with the POV pushing I will report you, and then someone else might well block you. And no you can't use article talk pages to stand up for yourself. You are an experianced enough editor to know that.Slatersteven (talk) 18:58, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Slatersteven, WP editors has been POV pushing for a while now. And since when am I not allowed to talk on a talk page? Dswitz10734 (talk) 21:13, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See wp:forum, not you are not allowed to use an article talk page as a wp:soapbox.13:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

@Slatersteven, I 100% agree that Wikipedia shouldn't be a source for propaganda. I also think 100% that Wikipedia should be without bias as much as possible. I think we can both agree that much. Dswitz10734 (talk) 14:12, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Darth Bane

The edits on [Bane: Path of Destruction] seem to be unsourced. It asked that you please cite your sources from external websites and wikis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MommaMia1231 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laurence Fox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John James.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Candace (show)

The article Candace (show) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:WEB. The show does not WP:INHERIT notability from its host, network, or guests. The show is already mentioned on the hosts page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TipsyElephant (talk) 03:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing at Candace (show)

This is a continuation of my comments on the article's talk page....

We do not write hagiographic puff pieces here. Candace is a controversial public figure, so that type of information belongs in her article. We are supposed to add content from RS, regardless of how they "make her look". If you allow such considerations to color your editing, then you are violating NPOV.

Candace is a public figure, so we follow our BLP policy's WP:PUBLICFIGURE concept (we include even the most vile public accusations if they have been mentioned in several RS, and this is far from such a matter). RS document her vaccine denial/hesitancy, so we should document that. Trump, contrary to many of his previous vaccine denial statements, actually took her to task for her ridiculous and dangerous statements about COVID-19 and vaccines and said something very notable, so the content is notable both for him and Candace, and it happened on her show. Obviously, that content belongs in the article. Many RS noted that interesting interview.

I suggest you promptly restore that content before you end up topic banned from the article and subjects like vaccines, COVID-19, right-wing politics, and the whole AP2 area. To make sure you understand that you risk a block for what you've done, I'll leave a couple notification templates here on your talk page. It wouldn't be fair for you to get blocked without those formal notifications/warnings, even though this does constitute a warning which should affect your editing. If you ignore those warnings and repeat your objectionable editing, it won't go well for you.

I would also like to warn you that your creation of the article means you automatically have a conflict of interest, IOW, you must be careful not to exhibit any ownership behaviors. Right now you are doing just that. You need to back off and remain extremely neutral in your editing lest you draw even more unfavorable interest in how you edit everywhere at Wikipedia. Other editors have a right to edit that article and to add properly-sourced content you may not like and that is unfavorable to Candace.

You have received advice and warnings from other experienced editors, but seem to have forgotten. -- Valjean (talk) 17:53, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DS alert for post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Because of your editing at Candace (show). I looked to see if you have received such a notification in the past year but may have missed it. If so, I apologize. -- Valjean (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DS alert for COVID-19/vaccines

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Because of your editing at Candace (show). I looked to see if you have received such a notification in the past year but may have missed it. If so, I apologize. -- Valjean (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AFC review?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft%3ATerror_on_the_Prairie&type=revision&diff=1069683441&oldid=1058589534

That doesn’t seem like a fair review. May want to ask the AFC folks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1012:B1B7:9302:4857:7EC3:9B75:2FB0 (talk) 23:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Candace (show) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Candace (show) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candace (show) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TipsyElephant (talk) 14:35, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Candace Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Candace Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category "American propaganda films" on article "My Son Hunter"

Hello there, thank you for your message. I added the category to your article because I knew that the people who are making the film are strong Trump supporters and want to influence their viewers to oppose Biden and his family, but I can remove it if you want to. Petrandreev13 (talk) 15:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Petrandreev13 I would endorse removal simply because all films these days have bias of some sort, so to categorize this film specifically as propaganda seems odd, unless we were to categorize everything with a bias or POV as propaganda. Dswitz10734 (talk) 19:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on My Son Hunter. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Bilorv (talk) 16:49, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Star Wars: The High Republic: Into The Dark

Hello, Dswitz10734. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Star Wars: The High Republic: Into The Dark".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 20:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Terror on the Prairie moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Terror on the Prairie, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:17, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Al Ferraro

Hello, Dswitz10734,

Thank you for creating Al Ferraro.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This person may not meet Wikipedia guidance on notability (see WP:NPOL) - please note: "being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability,"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 14:49, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:JohnMcGowanNYPolitician.jpg

The page File:JohnMcGowanNYPolitician.jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement of NY Government portraits are not public domain. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 22:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:George Farmer (businessman)

Hello, Dswitz10734. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:George Farmer (businessman), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:George Farmer (businessman)

Hello, Dswitz10734. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "George Farmer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:42, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ronna McDaniel at a press conference.png

Thanks for uploading File:Ronna McDaniel at a press conference.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mike Zale

Hello, Dswitz10734. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mike Zale, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mike Zale

Hello, Dswitz10734. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mike Zale".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 18:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]