|
User talk:Neuralia
Welcome!Hello, Neuralia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Gastric_bypass_surgery. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place WikilinkingHi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
Thanks and my best wishes to you! Tony (talk) 02:35, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 2Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eva Neer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Black (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC) A page you started (James I. Ausman) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating James I. Ausman, Neuralia! Wikipedia editor Barney the barney barney just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Barney the barney barney's talk page. Learn more about page curation. January 2014
Talkback Message added 01:27, 26 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Blank it again, the only reason I undid it was because there was no G7 tag on the article or explanation in the summary, my bad. Dan653 (talk) 01:27, 26 January 2014 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Jose F. Caro.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Jose F. Caro.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC) Stefan 2: Evidence of Permision (email) to use file https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jose_F._Caro.jpg was just forwarded to permissions-en@wikimedia.org as indicated. Thank you  You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Neuralia (talk) 19:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC) Replaceable fair use File:James I. Ausman.jpg Thanks for uploading File:James I. Ausman.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC) Replaceable fair use File:Helen M. Blau.jpgThanks for uploading File:Helen M. Blau.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC) Talk:Surgical_neurology_international#Re Tone and Writing like Advert
 The article Surgical neurology international has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Nomination of Surgical neurology international for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surgical neurology international is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surgical neurology international until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 14:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC) Assistance requiredDear Neuralia, Researching a proposal for a new entry for Surgical Neurology International, I found you had attempted to create an entry for it but it was rejected by several editors. I don't know exactly why they were so critical of the entry. SNI is a notable journal and I think you were correct in trying to establish a Wikipedia entry for it. I have obtained permission from one of the Wikipedia administrators to re-submit a new "draft" entry for SNI. I suspect I may need your help. I think you were too much of a gentleman, because if you had looked at the contributions of journals created by the principal editor who rejected your proposal, you would have found that most of his journal creations do not pass the standards that he demanded of your submission. Since you already have experience with this entry, I thought perhaps you could help me in the approval process on the talk pages. The administrator has been very nice and I think we may even get his support. But I also suspect that the trio that assailed you may return for another round, as I believe this is a turf battle. Feel free to come to my talk page to follow this development and render me the assistance I may need. If the struggle becomes intense, I'm prepared to demonstrate how most of the entries made by one of the aforementioned editors are faulty because of lack of "verifiable secondary sources," guilty of the same offenses you were accused of. If I can render you assistance in the future with an entry, let me know.LeBassRobespierre (talk) 19:54, 14 May 2014 (UTC) Neuralia, all I ask is that you study both the SNI Draft page and its Talk Page and render your opinion, whatever it is, about the new entry for SNI. You have more experience than most on this specific entry. Specifically about Notability of this journal, abiding by guidelines, and fair treatment for all — Nothing more! SNI Draft Talk Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Surgical_Neurology_International SNI Draft Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Surgical_Neurology_International You never know when you might need assistance from others!LeBassRobespierre (talk) 10:25, 15 May 2014 (UTC) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. LeBassRobespierre, I just provided a favourable opinion in the Draft talk:Surgical Neurology International. I did it because I think it is fair, not so much thinking about my eventual need for other's assistance. Good luck. Neuralia (talk) 12:20, 15 May 2014 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
May 2014
Oh how frightening !!How do you call such executioners? Are they your subordinates Randikitty? And what do they do to ill-judging editors who do not even offer apologies for their missdeeds.? When you said I was not being serious were you not making a personal disqualification? So maybe you can consider blocking your own self as an editor. Neuralia (talk) 19:32, 30 May 2014 (UTC)  This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Jose Esparza, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Jose esparza. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history. It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:47, 7 July 2014 (UTC) UNINTENTIONAL DUPLICATION: mistake corrected Error was taken care of by blanking Jose esparza and leaving Jose Esparza. Our sincere apologies. Disambiguation link notification for July 8Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited José Esparza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equine encephalitis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC) Your José Esparza entryExcellent entry, Neuralia! I have also left a note at the Talk page for José Esparza. Oops! And Thanks for the Original Barnstar! -- LeBassRobespierre (talk) 20:34, 9 July 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 15Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lorenzo Mendoza Fleury Science Prize, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Universidad de Los Andes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Maternity by Jose F. Caro.pngThanks for uploading File:Maternity by Jose F. Caro.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 13:21, 10 September 2014 (UTC) Note taken, action under wayThank you for the above piece of advice, User:Rohnjones Neuralia (talk) 14:48, 10 September 2014 (UTC) Neuralia (talk) 15:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 A tag has been placed on File:Permission to use File ((Maternity by Jose F. Caro.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Green Giant (talk) 13:33, 11 September 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 1Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pierre De Meyts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Receptor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Neuralia (talk) 13:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC) Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Blackbox revisited by Pierre De Meyts, alias Chuck.jpgThank you for uploading File:Blackbox revisited by Pierre De Meyts, alias Chuck.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:39, 2 October 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 15Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul R. Cunningham, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dean and Trauma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC) File permission problem with File:José G. Esparza-Bracho.jpgThanks for uploading File:José G. Esparza-Bracho.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 03:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC) Hi Neuralia, I noticed you created that "draft". There is a better way to do exercises -- every editor has a "sandbox", which you can find in a link at the top of the page. The purpose of the sandbox is to use for testing and exercises without creating junk that clutters Wikipedia. Best regards, Looie496 (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2015 (UTC) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Hi Looie496, thanks for the advice. Do you know how often sandboxes are cleared by the system? I have cleared Draft:Momentary editing exercise already as suggested. Neuralia (talk) 19:03, 26 February 2015 (UTC) Neuralia (talk) 19:09, 26 February 2015 (UTC) Did you get your question answered about the foreign language cites?Naraht (talk) 14:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)  This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:Vladimir Volegov, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.tuttartpitturasculturapoesiamusica.com/2011/07/vladimir-volegov-russia.html. It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues. If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:58, 5 June 2015 (UTC) License tagging for File:Thomas Dodd playing the harp.jpgThanks for uploading File:Thomas Dodd playing the harp.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information. To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 27 June 2015 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Thomas Dodd playing the harp.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Thomas Dodd playing the harp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 29 June 2015 (UTC) Replaceable fair use File:ThomasDodd 400x400.jpgThanks for uploading File:ThomasDodd 400x400.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 04:14, 1 July 2015 (UTC) The DreamHi, I think you need to use a different name for this image ! GrahamHardy (talk) 21:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC) Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sapientia by Lorena Kloosterboer.jpgThank you for uploading File:Sapientia by Lorena Kloosterboer.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 10:45, 3 August 2015 (UTC) Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Dream Within A Dream.jpgThank you for uploading File:Dream Within A Dream.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 17:06, 14 August 2015 (UTC) Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hope by Thomas Dodd.jpgThank you for uploading File:Hope by Thomas Dodd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 17:07, 14 August 2015 (UTC) Reference errors on 7 October
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 8 October 2015 (UTC) Reference errors on 10 October
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 11 October 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 11Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Allan Gorman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Art fair. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC) Hi, JSTORYou should have received an email from me with a link to a registration form for JSTOR - can you please either complete the form, or email me if you did not receive it? Please be aware that because of the large waitlist, not responding could lead to your slot being passed on to another editor. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Neuralia (talk) 21:52, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Jan A. Nelson: notable?After reverting your addition of the redlinked Jan A. Nelson article to Fremont, Nebraska, I looked at your contribution history and found your draft of the article. Unless there are stronger sources than the ones you've cited so far, I don't believe that Nelson meets Wikipedia's notability standards. The standards call for:
None of the sources that I see in your references section appears to meet these three standards. We've got things like Microsoft and LinkedIn, which are not independent; like YouTube and Wordpress sources, which are neither reliable nor independent; and like an IBDB page and oldfriends.com, which don't provide significant coverage. I don't want to discourage you from contributing to WP, but neither do I want to see you spend a lot of time and effort on an article that's at a high risk of being deleted. I haven't made a serious effort to find out whether Nelson actually meets notability standards; but if the article was posted and then nominated for deletion, and I couldn't find any sources stronger than those in the current references list, I'd have to !vote for deletion. Could I suggest that you try to find sources that meet the notability guidelines before proceeding further with this draft? If you could find something like a reasonably long (more than a few paragraphs) profile in a technology magazine independent of Microsoft, or in an independent art journal, then it'd probably be worth continuing to work on this article. Otherwise, however, it might be better for you to spend your time and effort on a subject whose notability is less questionable. I hope you don't think that I'm trying to dissuade you from contributing to the encyclopedia. The opposite is true: the amount of research that you've apparently put into this article suggests that you might well be a valuable contributor. For exactly that reason, I'd hate to see you suffer the disappointment of working hard on an article only to have it deleted for failure to meet notability standards. — Ammodramus (talk) 22:33, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Neuralia (talk) 11:39, 24 December 2015 (UTC) Draft:Christine Swann concernHi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Christine Swann, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC) A tag has been placed on File:Tempus ad Requiem V by Lorena Kloosterboer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: no proper licence, its a 3D work of Art, its definetely not "oil on canvas". So the uploader has lost any credit in view of his/her other statements --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 13:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Eingangskontrolle (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Christine Swann Hello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Christine Swann". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC) Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. HazelAB (talk) 17:45, 21 March 2016 (UTC) TWL HighBeam check-inHello Wikipedia Library Users, You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer. Thank you. 20:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Niels Birbaumer (June 19)
having to do with Draft:Niels_Birbaumer . There must be a mistake somewhere. Neuralia (talk) 12:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC) MfD nomination of Draft:Jan Nelson
Neuralia (talk) 18:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Blame The Monkey
Hello. A tag has been placed on Blame The Monkey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RahulText me 19:08, 11 September 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 12Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 2Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brent Funderburk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faculty. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC) Nomination of Brent Funderburk for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brent Funderburk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Funderburk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:22, 2 October 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Neuralia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Draft:Albemarle Gallery copyright concernYour initial revision of the above draft was copied from http://www.albemarlegallery.com/, a copyright web page. Please don't add copyright material to this wiki, not even temporarily. Do your edits before you save the page, or use an external editor please. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Neuralia (talk) 14:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyHello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Niels BirbaumerHello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Niels Birbaumer". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 23:11, 15 January 2017 (UTC) Nomination of Albemarle Gallery for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albemarle Gallery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albemarle Gallery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 15:03, 18 February 2017 (UTC) Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyHello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now. If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again. About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Mauricio Goihman YahrHello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Mauricio Goihman Yahr". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 11:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:David Kordansky Gallery
A tag has been placed on Draft:David Kordansky Gallery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 19:06, 26 August 2017 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Brent Funderburk (August 27)
ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Neuralia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Draft:Brent Funderburk concernHi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Brent Funderburk, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 2 February 2018 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Brent FunderburkHello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brent Funderburk". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 03:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC) Deletion discussion about Stev´nn HallHello, Neuralia, I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Stev´nn Hall should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stev´nn Hall . If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. Thanks, TheLongTone (talk) 15:09, 14 July 2018 (UTC) Nomination of Jan Anders Nelson for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jan Anders Nelson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Anders Nelson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theredproject (talk) 18:58, 21 July 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Neuralia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Ways to improve Gonzalo CalzadaHello, Neuralia, Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Gonzalo Calzada! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill and it's nice to meet you :-) I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. signed, Rosguill talk 22:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC) A page you started (Victor Wang (painter)) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating Victor Wang (painter). I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Lopifalko (talk) 17:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC) Hello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Stev´nn Hall. In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:46, 21 January 2019 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Vladimir Volegov
A tag has been placed on Vladimir Volegov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Boleyn (talk) 17:22, 12 February 2019 (UTC) Image without licenseUnspecified source/license for File:Vladimir Volegov, Russian visual artist.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Vladimir Volegov, Russian visual artist.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), For more information on using images, see the following pages: This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 12:45, 13 March 2019 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 19)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Anton Smit (sculptor) (November 5)
Neuralia (talk) 19:07, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. Which of these do you think he passes? Theroadislong (talk) 19:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Your draft article, Draft:FstoppersHello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fstoppers". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:17, 21 November 2019 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Arlon Bayliss has been accepted You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! ~~ Alex Noble - talk 10:20, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonio Vidal-Puig (February 20)
Draft:Anton Smit (sculptor) concernHi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Anton Smit (sculptor), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 9 April 2020 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Jan Kaláb (April 15)
Your draft article, Draft:Anton Smit (sculptor)Hello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anton Smit". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:10, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Craggs (May 17)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin Krautgartner has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Lopifalko (talk) 11:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)A barnstar for you!
Draft:Scott_Waldman looks good, but unfortunately iam no one related to edit or review an article. Im sure DGG will definitely accept it, if we see his views about professors and academic persons its clear. So have a great time here... Rahulsomantalk - contribs 01:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Chris Craggs has a new commentWaldmansee my note on the hlep desk. And next time you ewrite for the English WP, if its a person in a English languagecompany, try to use English sources. DGG ( talk ) 10:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott Waldman has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! DGG ( talk ) 02:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Your draft article, Draft:James RushforthHello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "James Rushforth". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis Tartaglia (November 3)
I now expect you will check your other work for these points. Looking at your work on artists, remember that describing the style must be based on a published source. Try to avoid adjectives like "important" (etc.). The article should make this evident by its contents. Don't for example say "represented in the art collections of notable institutions like X Y and Z" but "represented in the art collections of X Y and Z"" It's great to have a non-COI person working in this area, but , considering the extent of COI editing in Wikipedia , you might want to add on article talk pages a statement that you do not have conflict of interest. (or, should it be the case, that you have a nonmonetary conflict of interest) It should stop people asking about it. DGG ( talk ) 17:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC) SigningPlease rember to sign your comments on talk pages with your username and the date. You can do this by tying four ~ marks like this: ~~~~ DGG ( talk ) 17:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis Tartaglia has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! DGG ( talk ) 17:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)Kzatja LoherIt seems possible from the wording that some of this article may have been translated or copied from some external source, probably a non-English source;
Also in that article, Gallerysite turns out not to be a publication called Gallerysite but the site of the galery which was exhibiting her work--the various fields in cite web should be able to clarify it--and remember that for a commercial gallery this is not an independent site, its what the artist or her publicist or the gallery's publicist chooses to write in order to sell her work. Don't go by the way many articles on contemporary artists are written--most of them have extensive COI which will take the good volunteers in the field many years to cleanup. DGG ( talk ) 17:45, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Your submission at Articles for creation: Silvan Loher (November 25)
Katja LoherHi, Italian language article reviewed as requested. Please, read it again. Utente:Neuralia/Sandbox Duval (talk) 10:56, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Chris Craggs
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 11:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC) Katja LoherHi, the article in Chinese has been revised as requested. Please check it out here: zh:User:Neuralia/sandbox. Bear in mind that it's better utilising the Chinese title 卡蒂雅·洛涵 in place of Katja Loher. Uriel1022 (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Chris CraggsHello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chris Craggs". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! サシャ セベン (タク|コヌタリビュシャンス) 15:33, 12 March 2021 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Silvan Loher has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. Thanks again, and happy editing! DGG ( talk ) 02:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of Tim Gorski
A tag has been placed on Tim Gorski, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 TT me 02:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Timothy Gorski (May 6)
AfC notification: Draft:Timothy Gorski has a new comment
Naomi Locardi moved to draftspaceAn article you recently created, Naomi Locardi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Gorski has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Nightenbelle (talk) 14:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Ways to improve Tim GorskiHello, Neuralia, Thank you for creating Tim Gorski. I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. Nightenbelle (talk) 15:19, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on List of fellows of IEEE Nuclear and Plasma Sciences Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Whiteguru (talk) 21:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Timothy Gorski
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Naomi Locardi
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC) In suggested back in Dember that you merge it with merge with Elia Locardi. DGG ( talk ) 05:53, 5 March 2022 (UTC) ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
WikiProject Neuroscience/Verification & Referencingid like to improve the article Neuroscience so recently I sent it for peer review. one of the problems found is that there are many unsourced sentences and paragraphs. I would like help in finding sources for the unsourced parts of the article. I'm requesting that you look over the article and try to find sources for anything that needs sourcing and delete the parts that cant be verified. -thank you RJJ4y7 (talk) 14:53, 24 November 2021 (UTC) Aroha ParishA now-blocked vandal, Aroha Parish (talk · contribs) reverted an edit of yours on User:Neuralia/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Please feel free to restore your edits as needed. My apology for that disruption! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 13:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Anton Smit (sculptor)Hello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anton Smit". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:13, 1 January 2022 (UTC) Nomination of Whitehot (magazine) for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitehot (magazine) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Netherzone (talk) 23:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Gaynor has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 15:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)=SuggestionsYou're doing excellent work, as I hope you realize. So, since I'm one of the admins most frequently reviewing scientific bios, I hope you won't mind if I offer further suggestions. They're just suggestions, aimed at having some consistency in style. I'm making some adjustments--I'm in the middle on this article. What I'm trying to do is deemphasize he parts that are less important--memberships on committees don't really count for much--chairmanships do; being an editor in chief is noteworthy, but not other editorial positions. Peer-reviewed primary research articles count to show notability as a researcher, but not really reviews.In listing the most cited articles, give numbers, preferably from google scholar, because everyone has access to that. And, as a matter of style, don't repeat too much in the introductory paragraph. When someone has an academic career followed by a management career or public service career, it's usually best to clear separate the two. There'salways a problem in articles on executives, or just what to give them credit for. It's not necessarily correct that they really have main responsibility for the developments that happen while they are in charge; it is sometimes best to say something like, While they were president of the company, it .... For pharmaceuticals,, when we say they led the devlopment of ...., it can be unclear just what is meant: did they come up with the concept, or did they just greenlight the staff's? But you don't have to send them to draft any more. They're basically OK. You might want to recheck some of the earlier ones in view of what I've suggested. DGG ( talk ) 05:38, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Neuralia (talk) 15:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.  Neuralia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 200.82.174.66. Neuralia (talk) 10:30, 11 March 2022 (UTC) Decline reason: Confirmed p2p proxy. Please visit the help page for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:58, 11 March 2022 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Your contributed article, Neuralia/sandbox9
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Neuralia/sandbox9. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Paula Caligiuri. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Paula Caligiuri. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page. If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 12:36, 12 March 2022 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 16Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural agility, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digitalization. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Manuel Álvarez-Uría has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! DGG ( talk ) 07:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Nomination of James I. Ausman for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James I. Ausman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. valereee (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC) DEFAULTSORTHallo, when you created A Fortress in Brooklyn (now moved to the shorter title), you included
Speedy deletion nomination of Jimmy Wright (disambiguation)
A tag has been placed on Jimmy Wright (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 07:46, 24 May 2022 (UTC) The article Jimmy Wright (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing Speedy deletion nomination of Neuralia/sandbox/books6
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Neuralia/sandbox/books6, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 09:58, 25 May 2022 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, Neuralia Thank you for creating La Lupa (Swiss singer). User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) scope_creepTalk 18:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, Neuralia Thank you for creating La Lupa (Swiss singer). User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) scope_creepTalk 18:06, 6 July 2022 (UTC) Nomination of Victor Wang for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Victor Wang, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted. The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Wang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:06, 26 July 2022 (UTC) October 2022 Hello Neuralia. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Kimberly Eddleston, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Neuralia. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:
AfC notification: Draft:Kimberly Eddleston has a new commentConcern regarding Draft:John Beacom
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 30 October 2022 (UTC) ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Your submission at Articles for creation: Kimberly Eddleston has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 15:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexei Kharitonenkov (January 8)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexei Kharitonenkov has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 4 February 2023 (UTC)Your draft article, Draft:John BeacomHello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Beacom". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:30, 26 May 2023 (UTC) ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher Newfield has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Pollak (December 13)
March 2024Hello Neuralia. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Chris Klein (visual artist), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization. Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Neuralia. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:
Concern regarding Draft:Laura Pollak
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruth Aguilera (June 15)
Your submission at Articles for creation: RadiantPhoto (September 24)
Your submission at Articles for creation: RadiantPhoto (September 25)
Your submission at Articles for creation: RadiantPhoto (September 27)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Your draft article, Draft:Ruth AguileraHello, Neuralia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ruth Aguilera". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:02, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
|
