|
User talk:Dan653
We need your help testing latest huggleHello, I am sending you this message because you listed yourself on meta:Huggle/Members as a beta tester. We desperately need attention of testers, because since we resolved all release blockers, we are ready to release first official version of huggle 3! Before that happens, it would be nice if you could test it so that we can make sure there are no issues with it. You can download it packaged for your operating system (see Wikipedia:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta) or you can of course build it yourself, see https://github.com/huggle/huggle3-qt-lx for that. Don't forget to use always latest version, there is no auto-update message for beta versions! Should you find any issue, please report it to wikimedia bugzilla, that is a central place for huggle bugs, where we look at them. That is i mportant, if you find a bug and won't report it, we can't fix it. Thank you for your work on this, if you have any questions, please send me a message on my talk page, I won't be looking for responses here. Thanks, Petrb (talk) 15:10, 10 April 2014 (UTC) Autoblock
New huggle 3.1 is going to be released soonHi Dan653, we are to release a new major version of huggle, but we did receive almost no feedback from our beta testing team, which you are a part of (see https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members). It would be of a great help if you could download it (if you have windows, all you need to do is getting http://tools.wmflabs.org/huggle/files/huggle3.1.0beta.exe and putting it to a folder where you have installed huggle) and test it. You can always get a help with making it @ #huggle connect! Major changes:
In case you found a bug, please report it to bugzilla: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?product=Huggle&list_id=147663 thank you! Petrb (talk) 10:08, 30 July 2014 (UTC) HeadersHi there Dan653, thanks for catching that. I'm just trying to figure out how to do the headers accurately, a little trial and error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by W.johnson131 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 30 October 2014 (UTC) Edits to Orange County Museum of ArtHi there Dan653, My overall edits are not tests. I am actually trying to contribute to the Orange County Museum of Art page with a fuller listing of Exhibitions and Programs offered by the institution. Is there a particular reason why adding sections for "Collection History" and "Programs" are not seen as contributions when I am giving references for the information? Thanks for your help, w.johnson131 — Preceding unsigned comment added by W.johnson131 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC) Vandalism?Again, why are my edits considered "vandalism" of the OCMA site when I am providing updated information?W.johnson131 (talk) 23:11, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
In responseDan, your quite right and I suppose it's imprudent to expect everyone to appreciate my sense of humor as I much as I do. But in all seriousness having a counterpoint in that part section of the article is a lot like having someone come on and argue why the sky isn't blue. The BBC does this quite often, having a counterpoint to something that is well established as being true. Don't get me wrong, I love the BBC dearly and on the whole have a deep respect for them as an news organization but the world is not ambiguous and there are some things that simply are. If Hagelin's study seems far afield and debatable I would urge you to read the report published in Yale's Journal of Conflict Resolution. Also the section looks as if Park himself wrote it. It even uses the very dubiously ethical maneuver of reinforcing his own opinion before he states it by the selective use of the fact that the review board was composed entirely of TM practitioners. This will of course predispose one who reads it to the idea that the study was indeed an exercise in data manipulation. Which, ironically is actually what that piece of the article is doing, and not very well I might add. A constructive, as you say, balance to that might be stating that Hagelins group cooperated with the D.C. Police Department, the F.B.I. and criminologists from several major universities. So yes, the board may have been TM members, but it's not as if they were locked away in a room cherry picking the data with no independent oversight or review. I believe I have stated my position quite clearly. Once again I apologize for my antics, but if they lead to a better article I will be quite happy. Now if you'll excuse me, it's getting quite late and I've a long string of rejection letters sift through along with a deadline looming over on the horizon. Your watchdoggishness(if that's even a real word) is quite commendable. We need more people like you in this vacuumed cesspit the world seeming to being careening into. Ciao, E.C. MackintoshRedfordkicksman (talk) 05:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC) Happy Holidays!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list Seasonal Greets!.jpg) "And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord." Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version) !dea4u 10:07, 26 December 2014 (UTC) is wishing you a Merry Christmas. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove. Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Huggle messageHey Dan653! You are receiving this message because you are subscribed at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers I have recently launched a new downloads for beta testers that contains nightly builds of huggle, eg. versions that are built every day from our master branch and contains latest huggle. These builds are currently provided only for Windows and Ubuntu. You can find them here: http://huggle.wmflabs.org/builds/ Please keep in mind that these don't have any automatic updates and if you download and start using nightly build, you will need to update it yourself! So don't get yourself to running old version, it's possible to install both stable and nightly huggle, which is what I suggest. Keep the bug reports coming to phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/task/create/?projects=Huggle Many thanks! Petrb (talk) 09:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC) line about "Wags" in article about Americans for ProsperityI have seen the phrase I had added on images on Twitter, but finding those again will take a lot of time. After some searching with Yahoo the New Yorker magazine provided a cartoon by Barbara Smaller: [1] Daily Cartoon: Wednesday, April 2nd (2014) By Barbara Smaller The phrase she used was "AMERICANS for the perpetuation of the Koch Brothers' PROSPERITY" 70.234.248.46 (talk) 03:32, 22 March 2015 (UTC) Forgot to embed link to Americans for ProsperityAmericans for Prosperity — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.234.248.46 (talk) 03:34, 22 March 2015 (UTC) The Wikipedia Library needs you! We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help! With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
Robert Preston JewishRobert Preston himself makes frequent reference to his religious background in books, radio, TV, and online. It is extremely disingeous for individuals on wikipedia to remove background information on such a highly influential media commentator with deep and established links to various international Jewish communities, internatioanl finance, and the British labour party. A simple Google search brings this up on the first page: http://www.thejc.com/business/business-features/robert-peston-the-bbc-reporter-who-means-business Now why do you, PhilFrenzy, and various other related individuals keep removing basic information on UK based journalists, media personalities, and politicians? - Enquiring minds would suggest that you are censoring and sanatising information on behalf of someone. Care to inform the rest of us who you are working for? Concerned Citizen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.198.3.244 (talk) 19:14, 10 September 2015 (UTC) Hi, I DID NOT VANDALIZEREVERT IT BACK TO NORMAL — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilovebasketball90 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
I gave my reasons. + removed what now?!and asked for rebuttals. but they were ingored. Nezi1111 (talk) 19:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC) also. if you'd open your eyes instead of instantly going to oh...you'll be blocked for that, you'd realize i didn't remove any content, especially not sourced ones, i just added the personal detail to the personal life section. just like it is on so many other qb/athlete pages. Nezi1111 (talk) 19:39, 4 February 2016 (UTC) I suggest you remove your uninformed threat form my pageI didn't do anything you accused me of doing(blanking). Nezi1111 (talk) 19:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC) HAYWhy did you re edit my Gerry Adams edit? Im Irish Gerry is know as Gerry "Up the Ra" Adams over here why do you keep editing it dum dum — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hellohall243 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 14 April 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Dan653. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Edited backThat's ok I didn't know how to state the error. I was only trying to highlight that the editor gave two different ages. Sorry if it didn't seem that way. Could you somehow help notify the guy that he used two different ages? Dogblock (talk) 23:50, 14 September 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Dan653. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Dan653. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Dan653. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) happy birthday
Happy Birthday!
Happy Birthday!
Happy Birthday!  Have a very happy birthday on your special day! Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:49, 2 October 2020 (UTC) August 2022
Happy Birthday!
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Happy Birthday!
Disambiguation link notification for November 3Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bowling Green, Kentucky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I-165. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
