If I declined your AFC- before you ask for advice, please review the comment I left and make sure you have read WP:RS and WP:NPOV and WP:Notability If you want to argue that I hate you personally and declined your article for personal reasons- please don't. Truly- I have no opinion- I make my decisions based on the sources and quality of the article and that's it. Its not personal. If you are here about a DRN case- I recommend you head back over there and post in the thread for that discussion. If I closed your DRN.... there's the DRN talk page if you have concerns- and one of the other mediators may be able to help you before I do. Or you can post here... I'll get back to ya.
There is no Thaksinomics in Thailand.Special:MobileDiff/1182484275. That page has sources that are irrelevant.When I wrote on talk page they were no response.
When I wrote on notice board it was deleted.
For example,
In 1997, Thailand had a new constitution. Clearly specifying more rights for the people. One of them is The right to receive public health services This is stated in Section 52: “Every person has the same right to receive public health services that meet standards. And the poor have the right to receive medical treatment from government health facilities free of charge. This is as provided by law..”
and Section 82 states that
“The state must organize and promote public health so that people receive standardized and efficient services thoroughly.” This is an important base that makes the trend of reforming various systems. For health that was created at many points, many karma, many agendas, combined together
Until the government led by the Thai Rak Thai Party adopted the policy of creating universal health coverage. which is part of the system reform for health came up and completed it in a short time This experience It should be used as a learning lesson for Thai people in order to lead to reform and development of health systems in other areas. Including improving and developing the parts that have already been done to be stronger and better.
https://kb.hsri.or.th/dspace/handle/11228/1557?locale-attribute=th T 124.121.4.173 (talk) 07:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, and welcome to the December 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. Don't forget that you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.
Election news: The Guild needs coordinators! If you'd like to help out, you may nominate yourself or any suitable editor—with their permission—for the Election of Coordinators for the first half of 2024. Nominations will close at 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). Voting begins immediately after the close of nominations and closes at 23:59 on 31 December. All editors in good standing (not under current sanctions) are eligible, and self-nominations are welcome. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term that ends at 23:59 on 30 June.
Drive: Of the 69 editors who signed up for the September Backlog Elimination Drive, 40 copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 661,214 words in 290 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here.
Blitz: Of the 22 editors who signed up for the October Copy Editing Blitz, 13 copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 109,327 words in 52 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here.
Drive: During the November Backlog Elimination Drive, 38 of the 58 editors who signed up copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 458,620 words in 234 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here.
Progress report: As of 20:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 344 requests since 1 January, and the backlog stands at 2,191 articles.
Other news: Our Annual Report for 2023 is planned for release in the new year.
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello Nightenbelle,
New Page Review queue January to March 2024
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Hello and welcome to the April 2024 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since December. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. We extend a warm welcome to all of our new members. We wish you all happy copy-editing.
Election results: In our December 2023 coordinator election, Zippybonzo stepped down as coordinator; we thank them for their service. Incumbents Dhtwiki and Miniapolis were reelected coordinators, and Wracking was newly elected coordinator, to serve through 30 June. Nominations for our mid-year Election of Coordinators will open on 1 June (UTC).
Drive: 46 editors signed up for our January Backlog Elimination Drive, 32 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 289 articles totaling 626,729 words. Barnstars awarded are here.
Blitz: 23 editors signed up for our February Copy Editing Blitz. 18 claimed at least one copy-edit and between them, they copy-edited 100,293 words in 32 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.
Drive: 53 editors signed up for our March Backlog Elimination Drive, 34 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 300 articles totaling 587,828 words. Barnstars awarded are here.
Blitz: Sign up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, which runs from 14 to 20 April. Barnstars will be awarded here.
Progress report: As of 23:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 109 requests since 1 January 2024, and the backlog stands at 2,480 articles.
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from Baffle gab1978 and your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Wracking.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Hello and welcome to the June 2024 newsletter, a quarterly-ish digest of Guild activities since April. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.
Election news: Wanted: new Guild coordinators! If you value and enjoy the GOCE, why not help out behind the scenes? Nominations for our mid-year coordinator election are now open until 23:59 on 15 June (UTC). Self-nominations are welcome. Voting commences at 00:01 on 16 June and continues until 23:50 on 30 June. Results will be announced at the election page.
Blitz: Nine of the fourteen editors who signed up for the April 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 55,853 words comprising twenty articles. Barnstars awarded are available here.
Drive: 58 editors signed up for our May 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive and 33 of those completed at least one copy edit. 251 articles and 475,952 words were copy edited. Barnstars awarded are here.
Progress report: As of 05:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC) , GOCE copyeditors have completed 161 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 2,779 articles.
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from Baffle gab1978 and your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Wracking.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.
Election news: Project coordinators play an important role in our WikiProject. Following the mid-year Election of Coordinators, we welcomed Mox Eden to the coordinator team. Dhtwiki remains as Lead Coordinator, and Miniapolis and Wracking returned as assistant coordinators. If you'd like to help out behind the scenes, please consider taking part in our December election – watchlist our ombox for updates. Information about the role of coordinators can be found here.
Blitz: 13 of the 24 editors who signed up for the June 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 169,404 words comprising 41 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.
Drive: 38 of the 59 editors who signed up for the July 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 482,133 words comprising 293 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.
Blitz: 10 of the 15 editors who signed up for the August 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 71,294 words comprising 31 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.
Drive:Sign up here to earn barnstars in our month-long, in-progress September Backlog Elimination Drive.
Progress report: As of 05:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 233 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,824 articles.
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we do without you! Cheers from Baffle gab1978 and your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and Wracking.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, and welcome to the December newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. If you no longer want this newsletter, you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. If you'd like to be notified of upcoming drives and blitzes, and other GOCE activities, the best method is to add our announcements box to your watchlist.
Election news: The Guild's coordinators play an important role in the WikiProject, making sure nearly everything runs smoothly and on time. Editors in good standing (unblocked and without sanctions) are invited to nominate themselves or another editor to be a Guild coordinator (with their permission, of course) until 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). The voting phase begins at 00:01 on 16 December and runs until 23:59 on 31 December. Questions may be asked of candidates at any stage in the process. Elected coordinators will serve a six-month term from 1 January through 30 June.
Drive: In our September Backlog Elimination Drive, 67 editors signed up, 39 completed at least one copy edit, and between them they edited 682,696 words comprising 507 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.
Blitz: The October Copy Editing Blitz saw 16 editors sign-up, 15 of whom completed at least one copy edit. They edited 76,776 words comprising 35 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.
Drive: In our November Backlog Elimination Drive, 432,320 words in 151 articles were copy edited. Of the 54 users who signed up, 33 copy edited at least one article. Barnstars awarded are posted here.
Blitz: The December Blitz will begin at 00:00 on 15 December (UTC) and will end on 21 December at 23:59. Sign up here. Barnstars awarded will be posted here.
Progress report: As of 22:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have completed 333 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,401 articles.
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and Wracking.
To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Hi – As a relative newcomer to Wikipedia, I'd like to request your advice about whether I should start a dispute resolution. I'm writing to you about this because you seemed like the least likely of the dispute resolution volunteers to already have strong feelings about football and the NFL.
Over the past couple years, I've made a lot of edits updating and revising a page that had fallen into disuse. In early January, I posted tables and a short explanatory paragraph to several NFL Wikipedia team pages showing the players for that team who were confirmed in autopsies to have the brain damage called CTE (from here).
My edits with the tables were removed by a couple other editors, which was the first time that had happened to me, and I unwisely reposted those same tables that were then removed again, for which I've since apologized in the appropriate places. It was suggested that I post a new topic at the NFL WikiProject page, which I did and responded to questions and concerns that are archived here.
As I expected, the other users who responded on the NFL WikiProject were opposed to the addition of the team CTE tables. One wrote that they would do some sort of merge if I tried reposting the tables to the team pages, and it was suggested that the team CTE lists should be posted to the much less visited NFL CTE Wikipedia page. I realize we should try to avoid making things personal, but I think it's relevant to point out that people who volunteer to edit general NFL pages are probably part of a self-selected (and admittedly large) group who would rather focus just on the games and not on the health consequences for players.
I don't know if you've followed football at all, but I grew up playing it and watching the NFL, and it's been a significant part of my life. As I mentioned on my WikiProject post, I think Wikipedia is doing a disservice to readers of NFL team pages by ignoring the league's -- and its teams' -- biggest controversy over the past few decades, which doesn't look to fade in the future.
I am curious what lead you to assume I didn't have strong feelings about football, but that's probably best not to pursue right now. I taught high school for many years, and that did form, if not a passion for the NFL- and awareness of the dangers of football and strong feelings about how we protect children from those dangers. So I am familiar with the injuries you speak of. And I have been part of several forums within small school districts about how to prevent them in teenagers. So please believe me when I say- I empathize with your passion. However, I read the responses to your post on the wikitalk page and I think they had some very good points. There is an entire article on CTE already, and a very long list of players with CTE. Could this not be, instead, proposed to be adopted into the Wikiproject? To give it a bit more visibility? And the point that CTE cannot be attributed to participating on a single team, but rather is a culmination of years, decades even of play across many teams from childhood through adulthood. Placing a list on the page of each team would suggest that we are attributing that players CTE to his participation with that team. Now, that's my opinion, and you can take it or leave it as you wish- but it is coming from someone with no connection or concern with the status of NFL team pages in any fashion. Honestly- I have never really looked at one. If you do want to start the dispute resolution process, I would recommend starting with a Request for Comment- to get some outside perspectives. But, be aware, you will probably get more of the same. The actual dispute resolution page works best if there are 2-5 people involved with the dispute. And, if there are more than 2 people, it works best if there are multiple people on each side. In this case its probably going to end up with you battling a large number, and you losing anyway. We rule by committee around here, and while you may have very valid and good reasons for wanting to highlight CTE on the pages of NFL teams- and I agree you do have those good reasons, it doesn't mean that the majority will agree with you, especially when they, also, have very good reasons for NOT including that information on the team pages other than "I don't want to." Their reasons are sound, they are not just a desire to cover up that CTE is a danger to NFL players. You might consider stepping away from the argument for a few weeks, or months, and consider if there are other ways to spread the message other than fighting to insert this paragraph in each team's page. For instance- is there a "Risks" section on the football page in general? If not- is that something that could be developed? Is the NFL's response to CTE as a whole noteworthy? If so- a section on the NFL page or an entirely new page dedicated to that might work. I am not saying that these things can or should happen today- but they may be more realistic paths to include this information where more people will see it. Finally- remember, we are an encyclopedia first, last, and always. Our mission here is not to persuade, it is to record information. So while CTE is important and should be documented, we have to keep concerns about raising awareness out of our decision making process. That is an opinion, and we do not allow opinions to influence our writing. Just my two cents. Take it for what its worth. Good luck! Nightenbelle (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]