User talk:Mac Edmunds

This is Mac Edmunds's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar has been accepted

John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^talk to me! 12:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's good to see. Many congrats. KJP1 (talk) 13:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing! @KJP1, thank you for your help in getting the article to a submittable standard - it looks great.

Mac Edmunds (talk) 15:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ca, Thank you for reviewing the article - much appreciated.

Mac Edmunds (talk) 15:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome! Ca ^talk to me! 15:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arthur Wellesley, 4th Duke of Wellington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Dodd (engineer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to John Dodd (engineer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Facebook and Youtube are not reliable sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:24, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I agree that it should've been a draft. Having had my first article, John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar, approved, I can now approve drafts myself. It seems to automatically approve itself, so I am unsure as to how I can create a draft. Please could you let me know for future reference? Mac Edmunds (talk) 19:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The original article still exists, and has now been connected to the relevant WikiData page. Is there a way that it could be deleted, to avoid confusion while I work on the draft? Mac Edmunds (talk) 19:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will request the article's deletion on your behalf. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Mac Edmunds (talk) 20:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again,

Just to point out, I agree that social media platforms of Facebook and YouTube ilks, are usually unreliable sources, as not peer reviewed. However, the Facebook posts have been made by children of Dodd, who I am sure are reliably informed for obvious reasons. I can accept that this does not prove notability as it is a primary source, however I maintain that it is accurate.

As for the YouTube sources, each come from reliable independent journalists, who have columns and websites outside of YouTube. Here is a list of the relevant videos and why they're reliable:

Car & Classic: This is the platform that sold "The Beast", meaning their information would be accurate, as supplied from the Dodd family themselves.

Throttle House: Two reliable independent journalists, who have formal content outside of YouTube, and whose information would be accurate as supplied by "The Beast's" current owner.

TLBS: Presented by Jonny Smith, a reliable independent journalist who has written for magazines, and formal television programmes.

The only other video(s) are from Suzanne Dodd, daughter of John Dodd, whose information would be reliable for obvious reasons, although does not prove notability.

Mac Edmunds (talk) 21:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that they're journalists outside of YouTube doesn't affect their reliability, unless they're considered experts, in which case they might be reliable outside of publication in a traditional media outlet. I recommend working on the draft more and submitting it through AfC. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Dodd's car

Hey! I'd recommend that you make an article on "The Beast" itself, as it seems that interestingly, it has a better claim to notability than John Dodd himself. OhHaiMark (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @OhHaiMark

I did consider that when I made the page, especially considering ‘The Beast’ is the main topic of the page.

However, I think Dodd gains notability from the engineering feat of building an aero-engined car, and not the other way around. Plus, his eccentric life outside of his car is also interesting.

Mac Edmunds (talk) 15:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is about what sources say. If the sources primarily discuss the Beast, the article should be about that. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Princess Olga Dolgorouky has been accepted

Princess Olga Dolgorouky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 14:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the page!

Mac Edmunds (talk) 14:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lord Berners, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 21:18, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BlueboyLINY. Apologies for not giving a reason. When the template was added (07/12/2015), the article only had 8 citations. As it has 28, I thought that validated my removal of the template.

Mac Edmunds (talk) 06:38, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John Dodd (engineer) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Dodd (engineer). Thanks! ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^Talk to Me! 14:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Dodd (engineer) has been accepted

John Dodd (engineer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^Talk to Me! 16:06, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duncan Barber (businessman) has been accepted

Duncan Barber (businessman), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^talk to me! 00:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Duncan Barber OBE 2024.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Duncan Barber OBE 2024.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука^13 06:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:John Dodd The Beast.png

Thank you for uploading File:John Dodd The Beast.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука^13 21:25, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. To my understanding, I have now added the relevant information on the file. Mac Edmunds (talk) 22:00, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:John Dillwyn-Venables-Llewelyn

Why did you remove large parts of Talk:John Dillwyn-Venables-Llewelyn in this edit? DankJae 19:59, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because I added the suggested links to improve the article, and the name change was a while ago, and I cannot see why anyone would need its relevant information anymore. Mac Edmunds (talk) 21:59, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mac Edmunds, you could probably remove the suggested links. However you should not remove talk sections, and never delete another editor’s comments WP:TPO, regardless of age. The only option is archiving if it is needed (such years old discussions or very long/active talk page). 3 months ago is relatively new actually in terms of most small pages and the RM has to be kept to show the current title was discussed, is the consensus, and therefore be more likely respected. DankJae 00:56, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:41, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar

The article John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar and Talk:John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar

The article John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar for comments about the article, and Talk:John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:06, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thebiguglyalien - Thanks for your help raising the article to GA status. Mac Edmunds (talk) 22:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]