User talk:Ivan AkiraPlease add all comments, suggestions, or anything at the bottom of this talk page to communicate with Ivan Akira. Thank you. Another editor has added the Another editor has added the Welcome from the 1.0 Editorial TeamHi, and thanks for signing up for the 1.0 team. We've been testing a bot for article selection, and you can see the preliminary results here. We're currently tweaking the algorithm and writing more parameters, so we can select 20-30,000 articles for the next offline release (Version 0.7). In the meantime, we're (very) slowly reviewing manual nominations for V0.7, as well as trying to coordinate assessment work with WikiProjects - right now we're looking at considering a rewrite of the parameters. We also aim to encourage improvements to core topics and the core supplement (which are important but often weak articles) through the Core Topics Collaboration (though this has been poorly supported of late). So, do any of these things interest you? Please let me know how you'd like to participate. Thanks again, Walkerma (talk) 05:23, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Chemical compound etcHi Ivan - Selamat bertemu! (Did I spell that right - I studied Indonesian 20 years ago!). There are quite a few terms chemists use that can appear very similar, but they are not quite the same.
Is this clear? If not I'll try and explain further, but the subtleties can be hard if you're not a chemist! I think it's great if you're helping to improve the Indonesian Wikipedia, particularly if you're translating some of the more important chemistry articles. Cheers, Walkerma (talk) 05:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC) DidymoteichoHi Ivan - Thanks for getting back to me. Would you be able to make the image right side up again? My apologies if this is something ridiculously simple... I just don't know how to do it. Thanks, Kafka Liz (talk) 09:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
WP:COMPUTING InvitationI have noticed that you are already a member of a related project and thought you might be interested in this wikiproject also and hence leaving this note ... - From the outreach dept
I have three questionsI made an edit today--one edit--to the article Carrie Prejean and have not made an edit to the article in days, but yet another editor reversed my ONE edit and then reported me on the 3RR notice board. I find this to be a clear use of Wikipedia to win a debate about article content and direction. Prejean was called a series of negative things by Perez Hilton, most of the words are contemptuous and vile, such as the b-word and c-word. There are editors that believe that each and every one of Hilton's use of those words MUST be included in the article about Prejean. Now, I don't see the need to have an article about Prejean dominated by the words and comments of ONE individual (highly negative words at that) dominate the life story of Prejean. It is tantamount to having the words of Saddam Hussein concerning George W Bush dominate the Wikipedia article about Bush. It violates Wikipedia avowed goal of NPOV and it violates BLP. Now, I know that consensus in Wikipedia editing is one of the goals, but consensus does NOT override other valid Wikipedia ideals such as BLP. There can be a compromise made where the gist of Hilton's highly negative opinion is included in the article, but at the same time it does NOT dominate the life story of Prejean. Prejean is notable for many, many reasons, not just her public fight with Hilton. She is notable for being a successful model; she is notable for participating in Deal or No Deal; she is notable for being the current Miss California USA; and she is now notable for being a TV personality. My first question is: Can you at least review the article and see if the second, third, fourth, and fifth repetitions of the b-word and c-word violates BLP? I believe that it does. And my second question is: Is it appropriate to make a report on an editor for violating 3RR even though that editor has only made one edit? And my third question is: Is misusing 3RR to win a debate on the proper interpretation of BLP appropriate? I don't think so.--InaMaka (talk) 15:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
EnglishI think you could be considered an advanced (level 3) speaker of English now. You have an advanced vocabulary and can discuss articles and simultaneously learn words. The only problem I can find with your English is that you lack subjects of sentences, but that is to be expected, I think, as you came from a language where they did not. -Panther (talk) 01:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Beta test of Version 0.7?Ivan, if you're interested in testing out Version 0.7, please download the collection from here. BE WARNED - it's a big file (about 1 GB if I recall) so use broadband! Okawix is the offline reader software. There is a problem we know about - there are some broken and missing links in the topical index file. If you find any other errors, please let us know. Contrary to what I had said before on WP, the Okawix software is GPL and open source. Once this has been completed and published, we will be ready to start discussing Version 0.8. All the best, Walkerma (talk) 05:09, 9 October 2009 (UTC) Ram NarayanHi Chris, of course I can help you. But today, 1st February, I have a final test. So I will start to translate the introduction at tommorow, 2nd February. How it is sound? And oh yeah, you can just simply write to me via my talk page, okay? Ivan Akira 23:54, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
About OkawixHi Ivan, maybe you are very busy; in this case, do not worry about my question. I downloaded Okawix;it is really good! However, I have installed the corpus on a removable disk, sometimes windows changes the drive letters. and I receive the message "en.wikipedia vanished, do you want to remove it?", according to whether or not the drive letter has changed. Is there a way to tell Okawix where to find the corpus in your disk? (of course, I could try to change the drive letter!). I've seen that you have discussed something about okawix here, maybe you know how to solve the problem, I have not found a solution using google. By the way, I have asked the question also in Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team. Thank you anyway! --Popopp (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Welcome back!
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Anthroponymy at 07:04, 26 January 2011 (UTC). Feb 2011 Newsletter
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Anthroponymy at 06:33, 2 February 2011 (UTC). WP:APO template deletionsHey guys, a couple of templates used by WP:APO have been nominated for deletion. We could use your help to Oppose their deletion. If you agree the project needs them, as per WPAPO:HN then please vote Oppose here: Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion#Template:Aboutgivenname Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Anthroponymy at 04:05, 24 February 2011 (UTC). WP:APO March Newsletter
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Anthroponymy at 09:45, 3 March 2011 (UTC). RFC on the inclusion of a table comparing SI units and Binary prefixesNotice: An RFC is being conducted here at Talk:Hard diskdrive#RFC on the use of the IEC prefixes. The debate concerns this table which includes columns comparing SI and Binary prefixes to describe storage capacity. We welcome your input You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Computing --RaptorHunter (talk) 18:35, 10 April 2011 (UTC) Hi, ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Ivan Akira. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! Discussion at Talk:Sarah AzhariI invite you to please join the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari. Hello, we are seeking help with the Sarah Azhari article, created in 2013 & recently the subject of a deletion proposal. At issue was whether or not the Indonesian language sources establish notability. I am inviting you to the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari#Help with Indonesian language sources because you are in the Category:User id-N & have a minimum of 1,000 edits across all Wikimedia projects. I realize that some of you are very busy while others may no longer be editing. Nevertheless, I thought it wise to consult with you. Thank your for the work that you do on Wiki[mp]edia! Peaceray (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC) |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia