User talk:IndexAccount

This is IndexAccount's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|IndexAccount}}), so that I will be notified. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified. Please click here to leave me a new message.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

WikiCup newsletter correction

There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter; L293D should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead, Dunkleosteus77 should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2020 Zagreb earthquake

On 27 March 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2020 Zagreb earthquake, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Kees08 (Talk) 05:30, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2020 Zagreb earthquake

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2020 Zagreb earthquake you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dawnseeker2000 -- Dawnseeker2000 (talk) 03:21, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2020 Zagreb earthquake

The article 2020 Zagreb earthquake you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2020 Zagreb earthquake for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dawnseeker2000 -- Dawnseeker2000 (talk) 03:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:EuroBasket 2021

A tag has been placed on Category:EuroBasket 2021 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 15:54, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 KK Crvena zvezda season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derrick Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

Hello IndexAccount. Regarding this edit summary, there is no rule that infoboxes should only show major parties. {{Infobox legislative election}} is designed (and meant) to show all parties that won seats in an election. The question of which infobox to use on articles ({{Infobox election}} or {{Infobox legislative election}}) is generally about which is the more effective summary. Infobox election is not good at showing multiple parties, so is better for countries with two/three party systems (like the US). Infobox legislative election is better when there are multiple parties, usually countries with proportional election systems. On the Croatian example, Infobox legislative election is able to show the reader all 14 parties/groups that won seats in slightly less space than Infobox election shows only the three main ones. I think the latter has to be considered a more effective summary of the election result.

Infobox election is still used on most articles as Infobox legislative election was only created relatively recently as a solution to the problem of Infobox election not being an effective summary for multi-party systems, and there are plenty of places that probably should be changed, but haven't been. Cheers, Number 57 09:18, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1945 Yugoslav First Basketball League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AP Vojvodina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Serbian college men's basketball players in the United States has been nominated for discussion

Category:Serbian college men's basketball players in the United States has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rikster2 (talk) 18:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Serbia national under-20 football team results

The article Serbia national under-20 football team results has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't see how this would pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 06:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mega-bemax-logo2018.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mega-bemax-logo2018.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for deaths due to COVID-19 and related RfC

Hi. Thanks for commenting at the recent AfD for the above list. There is now an ongoing discussion around the best way to split the list, if any, if you wish to comment further. Lugnuts ^Fire Walk with Me 17:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Zabranjeno Pusenje BG Beerfest 18-08-2017.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Zabranjeno Pusenje BG Beerfest 18-08-2017.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Sejo-Sexon-Sarajeno-20171111.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sejo-Sexon-Sarajeno-20171111.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Images of Zabranjeno pušenje

A tag has been placed on Category:Images of Zabranjeno pušenje requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 16:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Grb hd.png

Thank you for uploading File:Grb hd.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Zastava hd.png

Thank you for uploading File:Zastava hd.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:NBA G League players from Serbia has been nominated for discussion

Category:NBA G League players from Serbia has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rikster2 (talk) 14:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Milan Bandić

On 1 March 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Milan Bandić, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2019 Serbia FIBA Basketball World Cup team for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019 Serbia FIBA Basketball World Cup team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Serbia FIBA Basketball World Cup team until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

User:Namiba 13:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IndexAccount (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 188.252.196.187. Place any further information here. IndexAccount (talk) 13:50, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed proxy. Yamla (talk) 13:56, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Coat of arms of Hrvatska Dubica

The article Coat of arms of Hrvatska Dubica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability for this coat of arms of a small village

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:28, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:I Came To Play players

A tag has been placed on Category:I Came To Play players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 16:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prince Tomislav of Yugoslavia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Escutcheon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note

more source showing fmp logo changed as my summary says, try to add from their social pages/website Sportski recenzist (talk) 20:18, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Read sources before calling on dead links. Sportski recenzist (talk) 00:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

EuroBasket 2022 squads

I corrected clubs to which players are currently signed for Serbia national team and you reverted that saying: "The clubs are the ones for which they last played before the tournament, not those for which they signed. Per consensus." What consensus are you talking about when in all other teams players clubs are those which are in this moment, not previous clubs, except for Serbia. Also in the second sentence of this article says:"Age and club as of the start of the tournament, 1 September 2022." Finally, on the official FIBA website, under rosters, players' clubs are the current one. Correct this or at least stop correcting others who are doing this right. 176.104.104.102 (talk) 21:55, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is the Wikipedia:WikiProject Basketball, gathering all editors who are fans of the game. In 2016, there was a discussion on "current team" matters. Consensus has been reached that the rooster should list last team played before the start of the tournament. Discussions could be found here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Basketball/Archive 10. Also, you should avoid arguments based on WP:WHATABOUT. Cheers. -- IndexAccount (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply][reply]

I understand what you are saying and I don't have any problems with that, but it seems you don't understand what I'm saying. :) I checked all national team squads and found that in all cases listed clubs ARE their CURRENT ones, except for Serbia. So consensus you have made is applied only for Serbia ?! I think you should gather again because somebody of you are not doing it in the way of consensus you all agreed on. And I especially don't know why you only keep correcting Serbia but not all the other teams, because they are all wrong judging by your "consensus" ??? 176.104.104.102 (talk) 22:15, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Serbia EuroBasket team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercedes-Benz Arena.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:KK Vršac sections

Template:KK Vršac sections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fkborackd.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fkborackd.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1995–96 in Yugoslav basketball has been nominated for renaming

Category:1995–96 in Yugoslav basketball has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Joy (talk) 15:48, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KKZadar-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KKZadar-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]