User talk:Butters.From.SouthPark

Welcome!

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Hitro talk 08:31, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kai Jurgle

Notice

The article Kai Jurgle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not meeting WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hitro talk 08:32, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Kai Jurgle.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Kai Jurgle.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:31, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kai Jurgle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kai Jurgle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai Jurgle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 02:20, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The American Football Barnstar
For great work recently in writing articles for football players, coaches, and Division I college seasons. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:57, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You Butters (talk) 18:59, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Kasper

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joe Kasper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://jcusports.com/sports/football/roster/coaches/joe-kasper/1153. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 13:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jakorian Bennett

Notice

The article Jakorian Bennett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NSPORTS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 13:23, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on 2023 Towson Tigersfootball team. User:I dream of horses, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Don't worry, I've redirected the page.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|I dream of horses}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 21:22, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jakorian Bennett for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jakorian Bennett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakorian Bennett until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 TT me 09:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2022 Stonehill Skyhawks football team into 2023 Stonehill Skyhawks football team. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 15:23, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For someone who started only two months ago, you've done excellent work in writing articles on Division I football teams and other topics. From my count, it seems all that's left in terms of Division I seasons missing articles for this year is four in FBS and 40 in FCS (out of 261 total teams). After you've completed doing that, you may be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Season articles campaign. Thanks for your contributions! BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:38, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of created articles

Please add more reliable sources to the articles you are creating or make sure there is enough of them before creating. A lot of these players probably have the sources for notability but they should be added to the article to avoid potential future deletion. Yankees10 01:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2022 Grambling State Tigers football team into 2023 Grambling State Tigers football team. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:00, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Viliami Fehoko

Notice

The article Viliami Fehoko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and does not pass WP:NSPORT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 10:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jarrett Patterson moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jarrett Patterson, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BJ Thompson

Please do not do that again. Yankees10 19:03, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What? Butters (talk) 19:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What is wrong with it? Butters (talk) 19:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Creating an article with just the letter B. It's ridiculous because you want to be the creator fo the article.-- Yankees10 19:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You've done similar things, Yankees10. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Write not right my bad Butters (talk) 19:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So what is okay and what is not? Butters (talk) 19:07, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok if I where to right out BJ Thompson for him instead would that be okay? Butters (talk) 19:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
At least put the name and team he was drafted by at the very least. An add sources.-- Yankees10 19:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You should have at least allowed Butters more than 60 seconds to do that... BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:07, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Give me a break. You don't create articles with one letter, sorry. Actually make an effort.-- Yankees10 19:12, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Butters has done some nice work here. So I was probably too harsh, especially for a newer user. I do apologize Butters for being a bit of a dick.-- Yankees10 19:17, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
its good Butters (talk) 19:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict x2) I agree that effort should be given too; it just doesn't make sense to me that you're accusing others of creating short draft articles when you've done the exact same thing (the only difference is yours have been a few words longer). BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's a hell of a lot more than creating with one letter. If he/she just added "BJ Thompson is a linebacker for the Chiefs", I wouldn't be here.-- Yankees10 19:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

B. J. Thompson (American football) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to B. J. Thompson (American football). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uncle Spock (talk) 21:57, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Banks moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jeremy Banks. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uncle Spock (talk) 21:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Matlock moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Scott Matlock. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uncle Spock (talk) 22:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tre Hawkins III moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tre Hawkins III. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uncle Spock (talk) 22:03, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Robbins (American football) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Brad Robbins (American football). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uncle Spock (talk) 22:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Antoine Green moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Antoine Green. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uncle Spock (talk) 22:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A few tips

Hi. Thanks for your articles recently on college/NFL players. A few tips:

  • In the infobox, if the position is two words, only capitalize the first - for example: Wide receiver, rather than Wide Receiver. And in the article, the position should always be spelled lowercase (for example: John Smith is an American football wide receiver...)
  • Dates should be spelled as May 3, not May 3rd.
  • Numbers under 10 should be spelled out - say, Beanie Fan caught four passes during the 2022 season, scoring two touchdowns (not Beanie Fan caught 4 pass during the 2022 season, scoring 2 touchdowns)

Otherwise, nice work! BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright thanks for the help, appreciate. Butters (talk) 21:06, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Friend!

I spotted a number of your player stub articles in the New Pages feed where I was reviewing things. You need to be careful posting up pieces on NFL Undrafted Free Agents unless they are documented with multiple pieces of published writing substantially about the subject since there is no "automatic notability" bestowed upon players who have not made an NFL roster and played a game. It is my belief that sourcing does actually exist for most such players, mind you, but one needs to dig up two or three such sources and make sure they are listed in the article or things are apt to come to grief through the deletion process.

I do not want to discourage you from your efforts, only to suggest "better fewer but better" is probably a strategy worth pursing. All the best, —tim /// Carrite (talk) 11:52, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I see above that this is already happening. The best way to protect your work is to source out your work with multiple independently-published references of presumed reliability.

Tre Hawkins III moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tre Hawkins III, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 16:14, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kendall Williamson moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kendall Williamson, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 16:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Austin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alex Austin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 16:31, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

B. J. Thompson (American football) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, B. J. Thompson (American football), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 16:31, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark,
Please do not cut and paste content from one article to a blank page. This create multiple versions of articles which we can't have for attribution purposes. It divides up an article page history. If you disagree with an article being moved to Draft space, then please move it back, do not start a new version in main space. It's preferred that you work on the Draft space version until you are ready to submit it to WP:AFC but if you want to work in main space, then return the article to main space, do not start a new version. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:31, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Got it thanks Butters (talk) 02:34, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tanner McCalister moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tanner McCalister, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pages being moved to draftspace

Why are some of my pages being moved to the draftspace when they are clearly noteable people. User:BeanieFan11 Butters (talk) 12:59, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jaray Jenkins moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jaray Jenkins, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:11, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cory Durden moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cory Durden, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:06, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you stop moving my pages they are noteable Butters (talk) 12:15, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thayer Thomas moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Thayer Thomas, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Onel5969: You really need to stop with your non-policy based moves to draftspace – Thomas and Durden most certainly are ready for mainspace. WP:DRAFTIFY says to draftify only if it meets one of the following three: it does not meet WP:STUB; or it would have very little chance of survival at AfD; or it meets any speedy deletion criterion. This clearly does not apply in this case. BeanieFan11 (talk) 13:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    And in its current condition it meets all of those. Onel5969 TT me 20:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Onel5969: And how is that? BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:06, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    He did it again @BeanieFan11 Butters (talk) 12:16, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Camerun Peoples moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Camerun Peoples, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:25, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Information icon This should not have been returned to mainspace without improvement. This sort of action can be viewed as disruptive and will often result in the item being proposed for deletion. The post above requests that it be submitted for review, but this has not been done. The item appears to be about a non-notable athlete with little if any, career to speak of; it is still subject to new page patrol and may be an AFD candidate. Eagleash (talk) 13:25, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    He is noteble ask @User:BeanieFan11 Butters (talk) 14:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Eagleash: I agree with Butters here and think this was actually an inappropriate move by Onel5969. The policy on draftification states that it only should be used when the page is "obviously unready for mainspace" and meets one of the following three: it does not meet WP:STUB; or it would have very little chance of survival at AfD; or it meets any speedy deletion criterion. – as for criterion one, the article is not a stub, for criterion two, it has a very good chance in my opinion of surviving at AFD, and for three, it absolutely does not meet the speedy deletion criterion. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:32, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @BeanieFan11: I am uncertain that it could meet WP:SPORTCRIT but as you will have seen, I left the item in article space where it is still subject to NPP. It should not have been returned to main with no improvement or effort to improve and without completing the review process. Eagleash (talk) 16:44, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Eagleash: Normally I would agree that it could be disruptive to move a draftified article back with no improvements; however in this case (and for a lot of other cases involving Onel5969) the article is in perfectly acceptable shape as-is and never should have been moved to draftspace in the first place - also, for sources to show notability: PFN, SI, HERO Sports, AL.com, Charlotte Observer, Winston-Salem Journal, etc. (I had actually planned on doing his article prior to the draft but didn't find enough time to). BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The can you please get @Onel5969 to stop moving my pages to the draftspace Butters (talk) 16:47, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    As soon as you start creating articles which do not fail WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 19:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    They do meet notabilty though Butters (talk) 19:43, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    No, they don't. For example, this particular one has zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources. Routine sports coverage, stuff from the teams, leagues, or organizations they belong to, articles from school newspapers, none of that counts towards notability. Onel5969 TT me 20:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Camerun Peoples for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camerun Peoples is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camerun Peoples until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 TT me 19:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When will the discussion take place? Butters (talk) 19:53, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion is located here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camerun Peoples. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:13, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onel5969 keeps moving the pages even though the meet everything cn you do something to stop him Butters (talk) 14:58, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Thomas (American football) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Charlie Thomas (American football), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 14:27, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Youn need to stop doing this Butters (talk) 14:56, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You need to learn what sourcing is needed to pass WP:GNG. It was explained to you above. These are tagged for improvement. You ignore the tags and do not work on them, then are shocked when, without improvement, they are moved to draft. If you add in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources, I'll be more than happy to take another look at them. Onel5969 TT me 15:04, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are independent and reliable such as sports illustrated, bvm sports, and Thomasville Times-Enterprise Butters (talk) 15:06, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Considering that less than 60% of the articles you send to AFD are deleted, I think you might be the one who needs to understand GNG better. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:21, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tanner McCalister for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanner McCalister is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanner McCalister until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 TT me 10:37, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar you!

The Content Creativity Barnstar
Thank you for making multiple good pages! Dylan | ✉ | ✓  15:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Craig Porter Jr.

Thank you for creating the article Craig Porter Jr. I originally had a draft for it, but you made the article for me. You saved me some time, so I went to the draft and redirected it to the article. Thanks! 40.142.188.18 (talk) 14:28, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ya no problem, you're welcome. Butters (talk) 15:29, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks once again

Thanks for creating 2024 Vegas Vipers season. It saved me some time and some work. I had forgotten about it until you made it. Thanks once again. 40.142.188.18 (talk) 14:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ya no problem, happy to help out. Butters (talk) 20:04, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for creating the Penn State 2023-24 article! Thanks for helping me once again! 40.142.188.18 (talk) 14:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creation over draft

Thanks for creating 2024 Houston Roughnecks season. However, a draft already exists, so you created an article over draft. This requires history merging, which is a troublesome procedure for admins. Therefore, please check if a draft exists and improve the draft instead of creating it over draft to avoid inconvenience. Thank you. Timothytyy (talk) 05:55, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MLB Draft picks

Some of the non-first round draft picks do not need notability standards, I would recommend working on these articles in drafts and not publishing directly to the mainspace until GNG is established (generally I think 4 refs should do it). Over the past couple of years there has been more of an uptick in editors keen on heightening the notability threshold for athletes and nominating them for deletion. I'll try to add some refs to the recent articles created, but there are some draft articles on a few of the second rounders where you can also find them. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thabk you i will begain to fix them in the next 48 hours Butters (talk) 15:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Malachi Wideman moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Malachi Wideman. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  16:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creating redirects

Hi there. I see you've created a number of redirects from minor league baseball player names to their associated team lists, but without adding any content to those lists. This isn't a productive activity, because it will frustrate readers when they find we don't have information about these players. Please don't create that kind of redirect if you don't intend to expand the lists. Thanks! - Eureka Lott 19:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes for the love of God please stop. You are just creating a later mess. Literally 90 percent of those players will never be notable.-- Yankees10 04:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I will stop creating them Butters (talk) 14:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2022-23 Michigan State Spartans women's basketball team

Information icon Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022-23 Michigan State Spartans women's basketball team, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

College football players

Hello Butters.From.SouthPark,

Hope you're doing well. Please do not guess a player's place of birth unless it is explicitly stated in a source. This puts a lot of misinformation on Wikipedia. A player's "hometown" listed in their college bios is very often not the same place they were born. I was born in Arizona but my hometown is 350 miles away. Other people were born in one city but grow up and attend high school in a nearby city.

Please be more careful about this. Sometimes, their college bios will state their place of birth in a "Personal" section near the bottom. For example, Jaydon Grant's Oregon State bio clearly states he was born in Portland, not West Linn. JTtheOG (talk) 02:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please double-check your spelling as well. There are multiple typos in the articles you publish. I suggest a free tool like Grammarly to help. Lastly, only capitalize the first word in each section title (College career, not College Career). Happy editing! JTtheOG (talk) 02:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ank you for the feedbackh Butters (talk) 02:06, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

The College football Barnstar
Thanks for all of your hard work churning out high-quality content for college football players; it’s very much appreciated. 👍🏼🙏🏼 2601:204:C901:B740:2552:A3A4:7FFD:39AF (talk) 17:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Dallas Gant. User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work on the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tails Wx}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails Wx (they/them) ⚧ 04:59, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

College football players

Hey Butters,

Just a reminder that the city where a player attends high school is not always where they were raised. Unless you have a source confirming where they grew up, it's better to just state where they attended high school. See the edits I made to Jaylin Williams (American football) as an example. He was born in Mississippi and lived in three other states, even attending two different high schools in two states. Cheers, JTtheOG (talk) 21:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it thanks for the help Butters (talk) 01:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some of these players are also not notable quite yet. Bleacher Report, 247, Maxpreps, etc should not be used to pass WP:GNG.-- Yankees10 23:13, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe they are with the sports illustrated Butters (talk) 23:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are also multiple noteble refrences Butters (talk) 00:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Except they are not. Please find more reliable sources before both moving the drafts back or creating these articles.-- Yankees10 00:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It appears you've been asked numerous times on your talk page here (including by me in April) to provide more reliable sources before creating articles.-- Yankees10 00:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are enough reliable sources Butters (talk) 00:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also just for a baseline what is considered a relible and a non relible source Butters (talk) 00:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Newspapers are reliable sources. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Online Athens are good sources for Georgia players for example. Edwards has literally nothing from them. Look at the sources I have at Chop Robinson' article for example. All extremely reliable newspaper sources. Edwards does not have sources like this and I'm almost certain most the random players you created also don't. It should be kept at a draft until more reliable sources are added but you are continuing to just revert.-- Yankees10 01:05, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Edwards does have a reference from Online Athens and the Atlanta Journal Consistution, and multiple from Sports Illustrated, the Moultire Observer, CBS Sports, and The Telegraph, so how come those are not notable Butters (talk) 01:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also instead od making them drafts can you nominate them for delation and make the people vote on it Butters (talk) 01:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Um most of those are either routine, short little mentions of him, or in some cases not even directly about Edwards. I mean come on the CBS "sources" are just box scores that mention Edwards a few times.-- Yankees10 01:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
for the Online Athens and the Atlanta Journal Consistution it talks about him and how he commited for Georgia and is about him, and I would suggest you nominate them for deltion and let the people decide Butters (talk) 01:16, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Those are only two sources and lean more towards routine if anything. I'm not going to move those two articles back to drafts nor am I going nominate them for deletion because they may become notable during the season (which is literally the point of drafts for articles not quite ready but whatever). Just be better with sourcing in the future. Not every single decent college football player is notable and deserves/needs an article.-- Yankees10 01:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ok but what players tend to be more notable Butters (talk) 01:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Players that when you google them numerous links to reliable newspapers (sources) that are exclusively written about said player. Those are the ones that are notable. Most college starting QB's, All-American's and overall star players are almost certainly going to be notable and have many many sources.-- Yankees10 01:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are literally doing it again. Stop creating these articles when they are clearly not ready.-- Yankees10 05:48, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously what is your justification Decorian Patterson? Literally every single one of those sources is not directly about him.-- Yankees10 05:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I can see the reaseon for deleating the other two pages, but Will Sheppard is definitely notable Butters (talk) 11:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's incredibly debatable. School newspapers and random college football blogs don't count as reliable sources.-- Yankees10 18:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

College Football Pages

@BeanieFan11 are the page Daijun Edwards and Terrion Arnold notable Butters (talk) 01:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • They both seem somewhat borderline (on the edge of being notable/not) - I don't have a strong opinion right now but make sure to be careful in what articles you create - try to get at least three in-depth articles on the players from good sources (usually a few hundred words total focusing on the player is alright - as for what types of sources, Yankees10 was mostly correct in that newspaper sources like the Atlanta Journal-Constitution are good ones; other ones mentioned by Yankees as being less-than-great such as 247Sports and Bleacher Report can contribute slightly I believe, but are not given nearly as much weight in discussions - while its usually ok to have them in the article, they shouldn't be the best sources you've got). BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:59, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Joel Wilson (American football). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tip

Remember when you create a quick stub with an under-construction tag on it, you should eventually go back and fix it within the next couple days. When I do it, I always try to make sure every one is completed before I move on to other tasks. I see your August 30 creations of Ryan Van Demark, Alex Palczewski and Junior Aho each still have the tags, so consider expanding them soon BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on McKinnley Jackson. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Logan Porter

Can you please start the Logan Porter article since you created the re-dirct. Yankees10 22:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Daniel Schneemann" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Daniel Schneemann has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 14 § Daniel Schneemann until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 20:10, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Jeff Lucas (American football). User:BeanieFan11, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Be careful in creating articles on historical players; as per WP:SPORTCRIT they're supposed to have at least one piece of WP:SIGCOV. The Wikipedia Library is useful in finding old sources (particularly Newspapers.com) - you should be able to qualify for library access I believe.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BeanieFan11}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About your creation of Shilo Sanders

Hey Butters.From.SouthPark! I wanted to let you know that you need to do some cleanup after moving drafts to mainspace. Any templates like {{Draft article}}, {{AfC submission}}, and {{Draft categories}} need to be removed to avoid having the page listed in a bunch of maintenance categories. Please also make sure to create the talk page and add associated WikiProjects so the new article can be brought to the attention of other interested editors. I've gone ahead and done all that this time, but keep it in mind for your next article. Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Shilo Sanders. User:BeanieFan11, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Note that you should try to be a little more neutral in writing recaps about the games played. Rather than something like Beanie had a stellar performance with 12 tackles and two interceptions, which helped the team defeat their rival Beansville State you could say something like Beanie helped the team defeat their rival Beansville State with a performance that included 12 tackles and two interceptions. That way we're still mentioning that he helped the team win and mentioning his stats, but not saying that he had a "stellar" or "good" performance.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BeanieFan11}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:28, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks for the help Butters (talk) 16:36, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Decorian Patterson (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 18:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 18:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Cam'Ron Silmon-Craig. User:FuzzyMagma, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please connect the article to relevant articles

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FuzzyMagma}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

FuzzyMagma (talk) 17:59, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on 2023–24 Western Kentucky Hilltoppers basketball team. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on 2023–24 UTEP Miners men's basketball team. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jeremiah Cooper

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark,

Thank you for creating Jeremiah Cooper.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hello, thanks for the article. It is an orphan. Please look for other articles that you can link.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lightburst (talk) 04:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Major Burns. User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 19:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Joey Halzle. User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for the article. Please continue to develop it.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 17:20, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Dillon Johnson. User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 23:52, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Princely Umanmielen has been accepted

Princely Umanmielen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tails Wx 02:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Yonathan Perlaza" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Yonathan Perlaza has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 8 § Yonathan Perlaza until a consensus is reached. Spanneraol (talk) 21:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Jhonny Pereda" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Jhonny Pereda has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 8 § Jhonny Pereda until a consensus is reached. Spanneraol (talk) 21:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Ryan Nutof" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Ryan Nutof has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 8 § Ryan Nutof until a consensus is reached. Spanneraol (talk) 21:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Angelo Castellano" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Angelo Castellano has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 8 § Angelo Castellano until a consensus is reached. Spanneraol (talk) 22:12, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Luis Contreras (baseball)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Luis Contreras (baseball) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 8 § Luis Contreras (baseball) until a consensus is reached. Spanneraol (talk) 22:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Tyler Herb" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Tyler Herb has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 8 § Tyler Herb until a consensus is reached. Spanneraol (talk) 22:35, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Alex Scherff" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Alex Scherff has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 8 § Alex Scherff until a consensus is reached. Spanneraol (talk) 22:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Stevie Berman" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Stevie Berman has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 10 § Stevie Berman until a consensus is reached. Spanneraol (talk) 16:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Rafael Lantigua" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Rafael Lantigua has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 10 § Rafael Lantigua until a consensus is reached. Spanneraol (talk) 16:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Gerson Moreno" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Gerson Moreno has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 10 § Gerson Moreno until a consensus is reached. Spanneraol (talk) 16:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Joel Peguero" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Joel Peguero has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 10 § Joel Peguero until a consensus is reached. Spanneraol (talk) 16:36, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023–24 Northern Iowa Panthers men's basketball team moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2023–24 Northern Iowa Panthers men's basketball team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 18:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Style issues

Butters.From.SouthPark, I appreciate all your work in recent months on college football articles. There are some recurring style issues that I want to address. As on Brashard Smith, you have a tendency to use the subjective mood ("would") inappropriately. If something happed in the past, just write about it in a normal past tense. The narrative of historical documentaries often uses the subjective mood to draw the viewer into the present moment (e.g. "the Germans would lose the Battle of Stalingrad"), but for our purposes here, that form is clunky and inappropriate; see WP:INTOTHEWOULDS. Second, linking to a college football program and piping to the name of the university, e.g. [[Florida Gators football|University of Florida]], is poor, Easter-eggy form; see MOS:EGG. Address the university or the football program, but don't write one and link to the other. Finally, in infoboxes, the place of birth for American locales should end in ", U.S.". Jweiss11 (talk) 18:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I was just coming here to say the part about the "would". You've created a few articles since this comment and you for whatever reason continue to use the word unnecessarily.-- Yankees10 01:08, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, so what should I say? Butters (talk) 02:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just generally try to avoid using the word "would"; instead of "Beanie Fan would throw for 289 yards and four touchdowns in his debut", you could say something like "Beanie Fan threw for 289 yards and four touchdowns in his debut". BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-pasting from drafts into articles

Hi, note that generally you shouldn't copy-paste the content from a draft and start it as a new article - like you did with Quinyon Mitchell / Draft:Quinyon Mitchell - as then the page history is erased. Thanks. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My bad I won't do it again Butters (talk) 02:09, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quinyon Mitchell

How is this person notable yet? Why are you continuing to just ignore what "significant coverage" is? Why did you just straight up copy/paste from the draft without moving it? Yankees10 23:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11: As the draft creator I believe you'll agree with me on the first part.-- Yankees10 23:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yankees10: I think there's a weak case to notability that could be made, although I think it'd still be best remaining in draft - the Toledo Blade has a lot of coverage of Mitchell and then there's some other brief pieces of coverage on him from various outlets, mostly in discussing him as a draft prospect - he seems to be a very promising player so I'm surprised there hasn't been more coverage of him - I had started the draft with the intention of expanding it once more coverage came but User:Dogloverr16 and Butters worked on it today and put it in mainspace. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He had multiple sources about him Butters (talk) 02:10, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes from literally one source, The Toledo Blade. Random sites like this are not reliable sources. I don't know what is so hard to grasp about this.-- Yankees10 04:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
their are multiple sources from the toldeo blade, then their is sports illustrtaed and nfl draft buzz, Butters (talk) 11:51, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Come on man, you are not seriously calling "NFL draft buzz" a reliable source. I literally explained to you in August what reliable sources are and you still I guess don't get it.-- Yankees10 23:24, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also thats not Sports Illustrated. Thats FanNation which just happens to be owned by SI. It is a blog and has questionable reliability.-- Yankees10 23:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I did not know the sports illustrated but I have been told nfl draft buzz is a reliable source and seen it used as a reliable source Butters (talk) 23:49, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not. It's just a random NFL Draft site. There has been many of them over the years, nothing special about this one.-- Yankees10 00:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2024 Ohio State Buckeyes football team

Notice

The article 2024 Ohio State Buckeyes football team has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable; this is nothing but a schedule of upcoming events - anything specific to the team can be added to Ohio State Buckeyes

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brian Kendig (talk) 14:28, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11 why has this pade be nomintaed for deletion when is it okay to start making articles about college football teams 2024 seasons, as I did this last year with the same exect format but none of them got flagged for deletion Butters (talk) 14:59, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think it might be a little too soon to start articles on the 2024 seasons, considering the 2023 ones haven't ended yet - probably for now the best option is to redirect it to the main OSU page and then in a few months restore it. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:45, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alright I just got the idea from 2024 Cincinnati Bearcats football team Butters (talk) 16:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is it okay to start making team pages for the 2024 season as I have seen multiples pages already created for teams Butters (talk) 16:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
At this point it'd probably be alright, though I would only do FBS seasons and wait some more time for FCS. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:15, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2024 NCAA Division I FBS football season moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2024 NCAA Division I FBS football season. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:10, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2024 college articles

Butters, the general rule of thumb is to await until the completion of a college football season before creating articles for next season. So we should wait until after the College Football Playoff National Championship on January 8 before creating 2024 season articles. In the meantime, there's lot of work to do on the 2023 season and all the seasons before. Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 21:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright what is their I can work on from this season? Butters (talk) 00:07, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The 2023 team season articles could use updates to the lead sections to reflect the performance of the team as the season comes to an end. For example, see my last two edits to 2023 Purdue Boilermakers football team. Jweiss11 (talk) 02:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Malachi Wideman

Information icon Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Malachi Wideman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Ethan Bonner. BeanieFan11, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Consider expanding some of these, e.g. T. K. McLendon Jr., Michael Niese, Bonner and Graham Nicholson, if you have the time.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BeanieFan11}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2024 FBS season

I was looking at your draft of next college football season, and I saw how the article got rejected because of no sources. There are more sources now, so I think maybe you should submit it.

- TakiLakjsdf TakiLakjsdf (talk) 17:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
You have made life so much easier for me by creating so many articles on notable football players (that I otherwise would've had to write! ). Thank for your contributions! BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:36, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 NCAA Division I FBS football season has been accepted

2024 NCAA Division I FBS football season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hey man im josh (talk) 03:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Team season pages

Please do not create articles for teams for the 2024 season until the previous season is over. This has always been the rule. I understand there have been some people doing this in the past and right now, but that does not make it right.--Rockchalk717 05:51, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Keon Sabb. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Butters (talk) 11:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Malachi Wideman

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Malachi Wideman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniel Rivero

Notice

The article Daniel Rivero has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable minor league baseball player.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Marcos González (baseball)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Marcos González (baseball) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 3 § Marcos González (baseball) until a consensus is reached. Hog Farm Talk 01:50, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Kyle Marman" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Kyle Marman has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 3 § Kyle Marman until a consensus is reached. Hog Farm Talk 01:54, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Another barnstar for your sports biography articles! Thank you for going the extra step to find good referencing for these articles and fleshing them out. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:35, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Decorian Patterson

Information icon Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Decorian Patterson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Josh Bissonette

Notice

The article Josh Bissonette has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable individual per WP:GNG. Why was this created in the first place?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Nate Yarnell. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Corey Hetherman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King's College. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Terrance Williams II

Hey Butters, Michigan MBB forward Terrance Williams II recently declared for the 2024 NBA draft. Can you start a draft on a page for him? I will help contribute. Thanks. 98.21.210.201 (talk) 23:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem just did Draft:Terrance Williams II Butters (talk) 00:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can help with other pages to if you need Butters (talk) 00:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks! I'll ask you if I need help. 98.21.210.201 (talk) 01:37, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dates on citations

Hello again Butters! Can you put the month before the date number while recording the date and access date on your pages? Only use the date number before the month on Australian/British articles. Just requesting. 98.21.210.201 (talk) 23:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jase Bauer

Information icon Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jase Bauer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Aaron Antonini" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Aaron Antonini has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Aaron Antonini until a consensus is reached. Joeykai (talk) 21:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Adam Scott (baseball)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Adam Scott (baseball) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Adam Scott (baseball) until a consensus is reached. Joeykai (talk) 23:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Eric Rodríguez" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Eric Rodríguez has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Eric Rodríguez until a consensus is reached. Joeykai (talk) 23:07, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Dalton Roach" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Dalton Roach has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Dalton Roach until a consensus is reached. Joeykai (talk) 23:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Grant Black" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Grant Black has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Grant Black until a consensus is reached. Joeykai (talk) 23:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John O'Reilly (baseball)

Notice

The article John O'Reilly (baseball) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I do not think sufficient sources exist for this subject to meet WP:GNG. There's this, but it strikes me as failing WP:BLP1E based on that.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Monk

add at least one source or don't bother. Yankees10 19:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know I did, can you just give me a few minutes after creation please. Butters (talk) 19:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jalen Royals

Information icon Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jalen Royals, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas

Hey Butters, do you think you'd have the time soon to expand the stub you started on Nathan Thomas (American football)? It looks like he's now the only stub on a 2024 draft pick left and I think it'd be neat if we could have every 2024 pick with at least a start-class article. (I could do it otherwise; let me know if you want me to do it instead). Thanks, BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can get to work on it in a few days if that's okay, if not you could work on it Butters (talk) 12:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
However I am leaving to California soon, so it would be nice for some help on Thomas, and Colby Suits. Butters (talk) 13:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. I think I'll work on Thomas later today. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the help on Thomas, if you don't mind do you think you could work on Colby Suits for me? Butters (talk) 04:04, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll see if I can take a look some point soon, although I can't guarantee it. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Kydran Jenkins. Another editor, Bruxton, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing articles

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 04:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Christian Roland-Wallace. Another editor, Bruxton, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for the article about an NFL player

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 04:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joey Yellen

Information icon Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joey Yellen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Caden Veltkamp

Information icon Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Caden Veltkamp, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Clemson–Ohio State football rivalry

Information icon Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Clemson–Ohio State football rivalry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Not sure if you have any interest in the Did you know process, but I think - if you add about 300 characters to satisfy length requirements - Keaton Bills would make a good candidate: "... that Bills plays for the Bills?" Let me know your thoughts. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know I don't really get the DYK's. Butters (talk) 23:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you do me a favor since you are an administrator and move the Draft:Elijah Collins to an article for me as it will not allow me to. Butters (talk) 17:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not an administrator, so I can't perform the move directly, but I'll make sure it gets moved soon. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, regarding DYK – its supposed to be a sort of showcase for new articles that have interesting facts (displaying those facts – aka "hooks" – on the main page to attract readers). I had previously considered writing an article for Bills since it seemed like a decent potential hook. If you'd like me to try to get it nominated and approved for you let me know (we have until May 30 to decide). Thanks, BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How is it written? Butters (talk) 19:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The DYK hook itself or the nomination? BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
both. Butters (talk) 22:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The hook – at least, the one I think would be best – would likely be something like I mentioned in the opening message (e.g. "... that Bills plays for the Bills?"). Nominations can be made here, but the article needs about 300 more characters of prose before it would qualify – to satisfy DYK length requirements. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I decided to expand it a bit and nominated it at Template:Did you know nominations/Keaton Bills. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and question

Hi, I believe you have some experience creating/editing college football rivalry articles. Thanks for your work in this area. We really need more of it around here. I was wondering if you have ever taken a look at Wikipedia:Requested articles/Sports/American football#Rivalries. There are numerous college football rivalry articles that have been requested for a long time and have been lingering around with no action taken. There are numerous other football subjects with requested articles on this page as well. Would you be interested and willing to help create some of these rivalry articles at your earliest convenience? 2603:6010:61F0:91B0:1423:5B55:7486:741D (talk) 01:17, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Henry Belin

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Henry Belin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Keaton Bills

On 20 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Keaton Bills, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bills plays for the Bills? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Keaton Bills. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Keaton Bills), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Caden Veltkamp

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Caden Veltkamp".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jack Herman (baseball)

Notice

The article Jack Herman (baseball) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable baseball player. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORTS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Jake Washer" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Jake Washer has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 25 § Jake Washer until a consensus is reached. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Bryce Windham" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bryce Windham has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 25 § Bryce Windham until a consensus is reached. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Drew Mount" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Drew Mount has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 25 § Drew Mount until a consensus is reached. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Steven Williams (baseball)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Steven Williams (baseball) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 25 § Steven Williams (baseball) until a consensus is reached. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Eddy Demurias" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Eddy Demurias has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 25 § Eddy Demurias until a consensus is reached. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Riley Martin (baseball)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Riley Martin (baseball) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 25 § Riley Martin (baseball) until a consensus is reached. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Hunter Bigge" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hunter Bigge has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 25 § Hunter Bigge until a consensus is reached. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Chris Williams (baseball)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Chris Williams (baseball) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 25 § Chris Williams (baseball) until a consensus is reached. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:41, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Luis Reyes (baseball)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Luis Reyes (baseball) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 25 § Luis Reyes (baseball) until a consensus is reached. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bowl games articles

Nice work on your new series of articles, which I've just reviewed. I would recommend including them in appropriate Wikiprojects, where they haven't already been added. Good job! BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 12:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drafted players

Please do not do what you did last year and create an article on every single player drafted tonight outside of the first round. Make sure you check for notability before creating them not after. A majority of them are not going to be notable. Yankees10 01:47, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Robert Wright (American football)

Information icon Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert Wright (American football), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zakai Ziegler

Information icon Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zakai Ziegler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ethan Hampton moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ethan Hampton. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and major writing should be done in draftspace rather than leaving a completely empty article in mainspace. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Scott Huff

Information icon Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scott Huff, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Terrance Williams II

Information icon Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Terrance Williams II, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lance Jones

Information icon Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lance Jones, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Scott Huff

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Scott Huff".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lance Jones

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lance Jones".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:33, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Do you have any interest in creating any older (mostly 2010's QB's) college football player articles? Random example being Purdue starter Elijah Sindelar. I can help you find sources and such. I can gradually add new names in a list under this post, just wondering if this is something that would potentially interest you. Yankees10 22:18, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Butters (talk) 22:34, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok well I found some sources on Sindelar if you are interested.-- Yankees10 22:39, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All right send them over and I'll take a look. Butters (talk) 22:45, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These were just based on a quick google search [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]-- Yankees10 22:51, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So you don't appear to be interested in this but yet you continue to create the most random run of the mill players.-- Yankees10 23:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with that? Butters (talk) 23:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
there is nothing wrong with not having interest in creating the guy I brought up. Just some of the guys you do create and completely random college football players and aren't notable. AKA "run of the mill"-- Yankees10 00:01, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Nice work on creating countless football player articles – including D'Angelo Ponds, whose article I was going to create soon after his performance against Washington; then I noticed you already created it! I enjoy reading and spending time knowing all the players as I review them time to time. Thanks for your hard work and effort! ~ Tails Wx 05:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And Justice Ellison too! ~ Tails Wx 05:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raynel Delgado

Notice

The article Raynel Delgado has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable minor league free agent

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shavon Revel

Hello, Butters.From.SouthPark,

It looks like you took a valid draft article, turned it into a redirect to a main space article which you created by copying and pasting the draft article on another page. This is really improper conduct, to usurp an article created by another editor. I hope you haven't done this before. No one cares who gets credit for creating an article so don't take that away from a fellow editor. It makes me want to investigate all of your article creations to see if they are valid. Liz Read! Talk! 00:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad I won't do it again. Butters (talk) 00:41, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You said the exact same thing after your were asked not to with Quinyon Mitchell.-- Yankees10 00:55, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jose Maldonado (baseball)

Notice

The article Jose Maldonado (baseball) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable minor league baseball player

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clemson/Ohio State football rivalry

Notice

The article Clemson–Ohio State football rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:Notability This matchup is not much of a rivalry. Aside from a couple playoff meetings, there is no real display of a rival nature between the two, especially since they have never scheduled each other in the regular season. Yes, there have been controversial moments between the two teams, but those details can be best suited in the pages for the respective games they took place, since they are all postseason games, so they will have their own pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Red0ctober22 (talk) 22:25, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MDY vs. DMY dates

Hello Butters. Please use mdy dates (month, day, year) on articles pertaining to American topics, such as American players of American football (see MOS:DATETIES). Thank you and happy editing. JTtheOG (talk) 23:01, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it seems you have reverted to guessing player's birthplaces once again after our previous discussions with @Yankees10: on 21 and 24 August 2023. JTtheOG (talk) 08:57, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Chaz Chambliss. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:42, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Josh Kelly (American football). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:42, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Mello Dotson. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:19, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on TJ Guy. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:20, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Jalin Conyers. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:20, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jason Zandamela for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Zandamela is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Zandamela until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 04:33, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Julian Humphrey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julian Humphrey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Humphrey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 04:20, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carson Vinson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carson Vinson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carson Vinson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 05:08, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination's for Deletion

@BeanieFan11, recently three of articles were nominated for deletion as seen above, and I was wondering if they are notable, and if they are not notable how should I improve them. Butters (talk) 15:21, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jared Brown

@BeanieFan11 is the page Draft:Jared Brown (wide receiver) Butters (talk) 19:26, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11 is the page Dylan Rosiek notable as I believe it is and it was just moved to the Draft space. Butters (talk) 22:34, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Pantagraph and News-Gazette each look good to me. @Yankees10: What do you think is wrong with those two? BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The player is run of the mill has won no awards, garnered any NFL draft attention or done anything of note in college. The lack of extensive coverage on this player isn't enough to warrant an article. There needs to be some sort of line here. Not every player that has 2 or so articles written about them needs or deserves an article. Butters has never seemed to understand that or cared to and just creates articles willy nilly. Others are finally starting to see that (notably @JTtheOG:).-- Yankees10 22:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also enough already with using "SI" as a source to prove notability. JTtheOG stated perfectly at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jason_Zandamela why it should not be used. This is not the same Sports Illustrated as it was years ago and should be used on a case by case basis.-- Yankees10 23:02, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, if you go by a plain interpretation of GNG, players with two pieces of sigcov would meet it. Also, I feel Cbl62 gave a decent argument for SI at that AFD, as many of the writers there are real sportswriters. Taking those who wrote the articles cited in Rosiek, there's Shandel Richardson, who also works for The New York Times, Zain Bando, who works for The Sporting News, and Jason Langendorf, previously at ESPN; Matthew Stevens, the other cited SI article, is too common a name for me to locate his prior experience. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:13, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes you can literally find 2 articles on nearly every college football player that goes to a power 4 conference school (usually college commit articles or "feel good" fluff type stuff) which is why there should be some sort of line on run of the mill players. Thats why I said the SI thing should only be case by case because there are both "real" and "nobody" writers on there. I've created articles using it but only after researching the writers first. Just being harshly honest here there is zero chance Butters has done that.-- Yankees10 23:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I can agree with you to an extent that "there should be some sort of line on run of the mill players," although, to be "harshly honest," there isn't really (we only have GNG, which offers notability to anyone with multiple pieces of sigcov – which arguably would be Rosiek). Also, what sort of credentials are you suggesting are necessary for this 'case by case basis' assessment of SI articles? Would you say that the cited Zandamela source was one worth using? What about the 3/4 SI articles in Rosiek, each of which were written by national-level sportswriters? BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:39, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well yeah like I said anything written by "notable" sportswriters. It still should be used only as a complimentary source with actual news sources.-- Yankees10 00:03, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So then how am I supposed to now what players are notable by run of the mill. Butters (talk) 01:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So I don't get how Dylan Rosiek is not notable and why you just moved his without creating a discussion Butters (talk) 01:23, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also about the writers how do I know they are good like for example would Sports writer Dan Raley be good here is his bio- Dan Raley has worked for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Atlanta Journal-Constitution and Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, as well as for MSN.com and Boeing, the latter as a global aerospace writer. His sportswriting career spans four decades and he's covered University of Washington football and basketball during much of that time. In a working capacity, he's been to the Super Bowl, the NBA Finals, the MLB playoffs, the Masters, the U.S. Open, the PGA Championship and countless Final Fours and bowl games. Butters (talk) 01:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've just draftified another article, Draft:Craig Woodson, to allow for more sourcing to be found. JTtheOG (talk) 23:26, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is Craig Woodson not notable he has multiple sources and is an NFL draft prospect. Butters (talk) 01:58, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How is the Daily California not good, and how do I know if a source counts toward GNG Butters (talk) 01:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Happy New Year, Butters. The Daily Californian is Cal's school newspaper and thus not independent of the subject, who is a Cal student-athlete. Sources must be reliable, independent, and provide significant coverage of the subject to count towards WP:GNG. JTtheOG (talk) 01:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright thanks Butters (talk) 01:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am just confused mainly on why Dylan Rosiek is not notable Butters (talk) 02:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't the one to draftify the page as I (usually) take it to a discussion first, but it does seem borderline. The News-Gazette piece is mostly quotes and regurgitated quotes, but there seems to be some solid coverage there. The Pantagraph piece, however, has some seven sentences of direct coverage of Rosiek, which is less than solid. The rest of the sources are pretty routine and from less-than-ideal publications. JTtheOG (talk) 02:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All right do you think it would be ok to re-publish it to take it to a discussion? Also what does the notable writer mean for sports Illustrated and how do you tell? (P.S. thank you for your help) Butters (talk) 02:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Your work is definitely appreciated, though I think you perhaps got a little excited creating all of these pages before fully understanding what is required of them. But alas, we are all constantly learning. Basically, these team-specific sites hosted by SI (like Florida Gators on SI, Indiana Hoosiers on SI, etc.) can be hit-or-miss due to the wide variety of writers who publish articles there. For example, Dan Raley seems to have extensive experience (40+ years) writing for well-established newspapers, such as the three you mentioned above. Meanwhile, to pick another random writer, Zach Dimmitt of Texas A&M Aggies on SI has a completely blank bio. A quick Google search shows that he graduated from university in 2022 and does not seem to have written for any actual publications, except for similar blogs like Longhorns Country. There is no cut-and-dry way to tell, but for this reason I think actual newspapers are much much better, since they have complete staffs and well-established editorial policies. JTtheOG (talk) 02:42, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All right thanks. Also would it be ok to re-publish Dylan Rosiek to take it to a discussion? Butters (talk) 02:49, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're free to do so, although I would personally !vote to draftify at the moment until more sourcing is found. JTtheOG (talk) 03:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All right Butters (talk) 03:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Source assessment table prepared by User:JTtheOG
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
No School newspaper Yes Yes ✘ No
Yes Yes No Stats database ✘ No
No School newspaper Yes Yes ✘ No
Yes Yes Yes The article discusses the subject directly and in detail, despite only half the article being about him. ✔ Yes
Yes Yes Despite it being a contractor-operated team-specific microblog (Cal Golden Bears on SI), it is written by a notable sportswriter. No Couple sentences of routine coverage. ✘ No
Yes Yes No Stats database ✘ No
Yes No Contractor-operated team-specific microblog (GoldenBearReport.com) written by non-notable sportswriter. I can't access this source, although it looks like routine coverage of a college commitment, and most likely an interview. ✘ No
Yes I've never used this website so I can't speak to its reliability. No Routine interview of the subject with no in-depth coverage. ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Butters.From.SouthPark. Thank you for your work on Emmett Mosley. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Baylor Bears football team moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Baylor Bears football team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 21:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Utah Utes football team moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Utah Utes football team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 21:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Texas Tech Red Raiders football team moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Texas Tech Red Raiders football team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 21:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Duke Blue Devils football team moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Duke Blue Devils football team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 22:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2025 TCU Horned Frogs football team moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 TCU Horned Frogs football team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 22:04, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2025 West Virginia Mountaineers football team moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 West Virginia Mountaineers football team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 22:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets football team moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets football team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 22:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Maryland Terrapins football team moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Maryland Terrapins football team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 22:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts

@JTtheOG why did you just draftify a mass amount of my articles @Jweiss11 said it's ok to start creating 2025 articles. Butters (talk) 22:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because they are not ready for mainspace. It would be helpful if you answered messages on your talk page, too. JTtheOG (talk) 22:18, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JTtheOG How are they not ready? They are definitely notable.
A bunch of databases and primary sources do nothing to indicate that. JTtheOG (talk) 22:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JTtheOG But the article for the season gives it automatic notability just look at @Jweiss11 message from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football on the 2025 season articles section.
Just because something has "automatic notability" does not mean you can immediately copy-paste 50 season articles with misinformation and weak sourcing. JTtheOG (talk) 22:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JTtheOG I'm trying to get a head start and help out. How about before you draftify all my articles you create a discussion o Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football.
  • Unless there's errors in the season articles, I think I'd side with Butters here. The odds that the upcoming Arizona Wildcats, Baylor Bears, Clemson Tigers etc. football seasons would be non-notable are exactly 0%. While sports biographies are required to have more than just databases, there is no similar requirement for season articles. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There were errors in all of them that Jweiss11 has gone in and corrected one by one, as well as errors in scheduling I have seen, which is expected when something is done in such a flurry. JTtheOG (talk) 22:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which Jwiess11 had notified me and I have been going back and fixing them and I am currently looking through the articles to fix them. You could have just told me instead of mass dratifying them

So then perhaps we should answer talk page messages that address your work instead of ignoring them and continuing to do as you please. JTtheOG (talk) 22:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JTtheOG What messages have I ignored?
Note that I didn't exactly say it was "okay". I said that if and when you create 2025 articles, please do X, Y, and Z. I would still prefer that we wait until the conclusion of a season before creating articles for the next season. Jweiss11 (talk) 22:42, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair but @Jweiss11 did you not also say that they will be fine in about three weeks so there is no need to draftify them. Also, I apologize for messing up but I have been going back and fixing the mistakes and if everything is in order there should also be no reason to draftify the pages. Right?

Let's see. You continue to disregard Beanie11's tips from 3 May 2023 about date and number formatting. You ignored Jweiss11's 14 November 2023 message about styling issues until he called you out on it a week later. On 28 November 2023, Yankees10 called you out for "continuing to just ignore what "significant coverage" is". Earlier that day, BeanieFan11 asked you to stop copy-pasting drafts into new articles, even though you received warnings before then. You were then warned again for the same reason by Liz on 8 November 2024, for which Yankees10 called you out on for saying you wouldn't do it again again. On 29 November and 29 December 2023, you were asked to not prematurely create season articles, which you have started doing again this year. On 29 April 2023, Yankees10 asked you to stop making literal one-letter drafts, which he re-warned you for several months later. You disregarded multiple messages from Yankees10 regarding non-notable creations on 27 August and 10 September 2024. You completely ignored my message on date formatting on 10 November 2024, and then continued to place unsourced birthplaces even after my message way back on 1 August 2023. I'm sure there are more instances on talk pages and the such. JTtheOG (talk) 23:05, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JTtheOG I have not ignored them and I have been fixing them

Right. Cheers, JTtheOG (talk) 23:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Arizona Wildcats football team moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Arizona Wildcats football team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 22:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2025 California Golden Bears football team moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 California Golden Bears football team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 22:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Clemson Tigers football team moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Clemson Tigers football team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 22:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Woodson moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Craig Woodson. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 23:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Caden Curry

He is literally the definition of run of the mill for gods sakes. Just stop with guys like this please. Yankees10 02:39, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He's got the sources and is going to be a starter next season in all likelyhood. Butters (talk) 03:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What are your thoughts @BeanieFan11 and @JTtheOG Butters (talk) 03:10, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The sources do look pretty weak when looked at individually, and I don't think they would satisfy WP:THREESOURCES if looked at closely. I don't know. He might be a run of the mill player, but college football in the U.S. gets a ridiculous amount of coverage. Perhaps you could focus on creating quality articles over quantity. To this day, there are all types of mistakes on spelling, grammar, date and number formatting, locations, simple stats, wikilinking, etc. You still seem to be ignoring my suggestion to use mdy dates instead of dmy, for example. JTtheOG (talk) 03:28, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Date formatting

Hi Butters. Please use mdy dates (month, day, year) on articles pertaining to American topics, such as American players of American football (see MOS:DATETIES). This is at least the fourth time this specific issue has been brought to your attention, including yesterday. Happy editing, JTtheOG (talk) 03:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All right, quick question what does that mean? Butters (talk) 05:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, did you read what it says at MOS:DATETIES? JTtheOG (talk) 05:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I am pretty sure I understand it. Butters (talk) 15:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, cool. So yeah, basically, articles on American topics use the month before the day (December 25, 2024 instead of 25 December 2024). Shoot me a message if you have any further questions. JTtheOG (talk) 20:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]