User talk:BOZHappy New Year, BOZ!BOZ, Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages. Salem Ander (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC) A New Year to Gnome!
HeyBlast from the past i know. Was thinking of you today, Stephen R Marsh has a group on facebook where he's developing a companion for B/X, thought you might be interested.You might even be in there. Um. I wish I knew how to link you to it. Hiding T 16:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Hidden races for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hidden races is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hidden races until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC) "Review" linksAgain, it's still not helpful to add external links to "Reviews" for boardgames, especially when those links are to some kind of catalogue entry that just gives a neutral one-sentence description of the game and where to buy it from. That might be a useful source for production information about the game, but it's not a review. A "Reception" section is definitely the right way to approach this. Belbury (talk) 11:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Just noting here long after the fact, that "Reviews" sections can lead to good things: [1]. :) HI BOZ Happy New Year BOZ! I hope 2024 will be an awesome year for you ! ^_^ Thank you for being on Wikipedia !
Higher Further Faster (talk) 02:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC) Restored pages and moreMy congratulations on some of the pages you restored for Space Phantom and Solarr. As there is a AFD discussion for the fate of the Death-Throws, I ask that you help in transferring the information of it's members that redirect there to their respectful List of Marvel Comics characters pages like you did with the members of the Circus of Crime. As for your comment in the AFD discussion for Hidden races, I agree with your reply to me and that some of the information will have to be transferred to the target page in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE. Right? --Rtkat3 (talk) 02:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Judge Dredd sourcesHi BOZ! :) Do you see any sources for Judge_Dredd#Major_storylines? Was wondering can you help with this. Timur9008 (talk) 16:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Aldo Ghiozzi has a new comment
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aldo Ghiozzi. Thanks! Ca talk to me! 09:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Aldo Ghiozzi has been accepted Aldo Ghiozzi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! Ca talk to me! 10:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Happy First Edit Day!
Hey, thank you! :) BOZ (talk) 03:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC) Gameplay sectionsHi BOZ! :) Can you do gameplay sections sections for these articles? Just wondering
Timur9008 (talk) 12:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi BOZ! :) Sorry for the double topic but I don't see any more sources aside from the CGW one already used in the article for this game. Maybe worth redirecting the page? Timur9008 (talk) 15:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi BOZ. Here are some sources about the subject:
Cunard (talk) 09:14, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
VultureCan you add stuff about Earth-65B Vulture (photo only, the pages behind the photo has some info about him) and Earth-42 Vulture (He is only referenced in the movie through his two companies and mentioned indirectly by JJJ)? Vulture (Blackie Drago) is mentioned to be existing in 1610B in ITSV Also Earth-31913 universe's Vulture (Ik that it ain't a concept and just was an idea pitch but eh) Marc Webb-verse also have Vulture Swordjetska (talk) 20:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Great Library of GreyhawkHey there, BOZ!! Just wanted to say "hey"! So, I'm sure you recall, but a few years ago, the Great Library of Greyhawk wiki on Caonfire! went down due to software not being updated, and a massive amount of spam accounts and spam articles. Anyway, a few years ago (2018) the wiki was moved to a new host, and has been growing and flourishing over at Greyhawk Online. So, I thought I would invite you to visit us there, since you used to be pretty active on that wiki. ... we've even exported some of your edits from here on Wikipedia to be on the GLoG! We'd love to have a fan who's as great at writing and editing as you are back as a registered User on our wiki! It'll be great to see you! Take care, and I hope you have a great day! — IcarusATB (talk) 15:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Leonard Balsera has a new comment
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Leonard Balsera. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 08:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
The article Ed Healy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing The article M. Alexander Jurkat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing G.I. Joe articlesSo, you have said that the G.I. Joe character articles I redirected need improvement. Thing is, I don't think there's that much that could be used to improve them. There are a lot of G.I. Joe characters, and most aren't going to be notable. 2605:B40:13E7:F600:4853:7CAA:3670:F77 (talk) 00:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Kitty PrydeI listen to this soundtrack quite often, can recite most of the lyrics from memory. I don't know how to cite my own extensive knowledge on the subject. Why do you continue to remove this factual information? Kitty Pryde is referenced in "Missing Link" by Del the Funky Homosapien and Dinosaur Jr, on the Judgement Night soundtrack. "..Bowing, praising, now when I phase in Like Kitty Pride City wide.." 2605:8D80:5C1:2D8A:4B81:8D8D:A391:EE92 (talk) 18:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Cheesecakehttps://twitter.com/AlliterAndy/status/1665399791101132801 122.171.20.111 (talk) 04:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
"Warhammer (game" listed at Redirects for discussionThe redirect Warhammer (game has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 3 § Warhammer (game until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 18:16, 3 March 2024 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Don Bassingthwaite has been accepted Don Bassingthwaite, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! ANUwrites 16:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Rhino, Shocker and SandmanAleksei was supposed to be in ITSV (616B) also and not just ATSV with the most comic book looking design to be in a movie He was supposed to appear in Peter B Parker's backstory along with Venom and Hulk He also is referenced to be a member of Sinister Six in Earth-42 (he owns - Rhino Casino) Shocker appeared in ITSV in a photo in 1610B along with Hammerhead (who was in ATSV), Chameleon (who also was in ATSV) and Enforcers (Only as AU in ATSV, also Ox never appeared instead Big Man was a part of the team (Ox was in the concept art though)) and in ATSV as a prisoner from an unknown universe Shocker also exists in Earth-42, one of the villains who ain't a part of Sinister Six (his company isn't named in the movie and only the logo is seen) Sandman is also referenced to be a member (also in concept arts) of the Sinister Six (he owns - The Sandman (seems to a bar or something), Sandman (a watch company) and Sandman Slots and Resort https://intothespiderverse.fandom.com/wiki/Earth-42 (all of their companies are there, Shocker's company's name is sepculative though) 122.171.21.196 (talk) 06:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC) Goblin and Doc Ock616B Goblin aappears in the Peter's origin flashback scene (hand only) The main Goblin in ATSV is the one from the Atari game A variant of him from an unknown universe is seen above Gog with a glider in ATSV (doesn't match any of the concept arts by Kris Anka, so someone else had to have designed him). Also a glider (Unknown if it is 2099 like Vulture's Arm peice/Multifactor's Jaw or AU like the three Doc Ock tentacles, despite being in the concept art of the lab, ots the only thing not mentioned about). There one more supposed Goblin holding a pumpkin bomb (could also be Hobgoblin but seems like Jesús Alonso Iglesias was the only one who worked on Hobgoblin) Doc Ock appears again in Peter's flashback as tentacles only and later in the flashback there's a photo of him along with Kingpin, Rose, Hammerhead, Mysterio and supposedly Silvermane, can't really tell (Tombstone and Goblin are also there, there are also some other unidentifyable photos) 12 different variants of Doc Ock appear (two as tentacles only) (one being comic book accurat-ish) (10 of them being Otto) appear as prisoners, one being Pirate Doc Ock who is female (Boomernag and Clam are also female in the movie btw) plus Superior Spider-Man (this varant uses tentacles instead of the normal arms). A pic of Lego Doc Ock appears on a newspaper and a hologram of 616 comic Dock Ock appears with the line from No Way Home He also is referenced to member of Sinister Six in Earth-42 (He owns two comapnies- Eight Ock and Oct 8). According to the concept art original instead of him and Rhino, Goblin and Mysterio were meant to be members 122.171.21.196 (talk) 07:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC) Earth-42 charactersProwler Miles Aaron Davis Rio PDNY - Jefferson (dead) Daily Bugle - JJJ Mayor Manfredi (Silvermane) (mentioned by JJJ) Kraven (on screen only) (is running for President) Sinister Six Cartel - Doc Ock, Vulture, Scorpion, Rhino, Sandman and Electro Hammerhead Gog Shocker Slyde Grizzly 122.171.21.196 (talk) 07:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC) Every non anomaly villain to appear in ATSV (excluding Earth-42)65B Vulture (photo)
Spot (returns from ITSV) Chameleon (appeared as a photo in ITSV) (flashback) Hammerhead (same as Chameleon) (flashback) Frog-Man (should actually be Leap-Frog but Marvel and Sony messes up naming them, having their names be interchanged) (flashback) Beetle (flashback) Grizzly (flashback) Spider-Slayer Mark V (flashback) Armadillo (voiced by Andy Leviton)
Doc Ock (photo on a newspaper)
Hobgoblin (flashback)
Kingpin (on screen) (flashback) Walrus (flashback) Puma (flashback) Diamondhead (flashback)
Vulture (arm piece) Multifactor (Jaw)
Doc Ock (tentacle) Doc Ock (tentacle) Doc Ock (tentacle) 122.171.21.196 (talk) 07:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
GrizzlyHe appears in 616B also and the unknown universe one is voiced by Andy Leviton and Earth-42 like I already said before He also appears in Spider-Man 2 working for Kraven 122.171.21.196 (talk) 17:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Bumbler Bee-LuxeHello, BOZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bumbler Bee-Luxe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Super Nova (card game)Hello, BOZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Super Nova (card game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC) Nomination of The Mammoth Dictionary of Symbols for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Mammoth Dictionary of Symbols is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mammoth Dictionary of Symbols until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Staraction (talk | contribs) 03:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC) Nomination of Dan Gelber (game designer) for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Gelber (game designer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Gelber (game designer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC) Claude J. Pelletier accepted Claude J. Pelletier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! BuySomeApples (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Samantha Henderson has been accepted Samantha Henderson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! Spinster300 (talk) 21:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Marvel Super Heroes Adventure GameHi BOZ! :) I found this source for Marvel Super Heroes Adventure Game [4] Not sure where to put it though Timur9008 (talk) 08:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Gridiron! helpHi BOZ :) Vrxces is currently trying to get Gridiron! to GA. Was wondering maybe help expand the page? (gameplay) Either way it's pretty cool that your article will maybe soon be a GA article :D Timur9008 (talk) 09:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Yggdrasil (Dungeons & Dragons) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 5 § Yggdrasil (Dungeons & Dragons) until a consensus is reached. ltbdl (talk) 10:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC) Draft categoriesI'm fully aware of that template. The thing is, however, it isn't the same amount of work either way: it takes more time to wrap categories in the template than it does to remove them: removing is just a handful of clicks on the minus signs in HotCat, and thus only takes a few seconds, while wrapping can be more complicated: it requires opening the page, finding the categories (which aren't always in the place they're supposed to be, because sometimes novice editors place them in unconventional places in the article, and sometimes there are even multiple groups of categories in more than one place in the page), and typing the template out by hand. So categories that take just a few seconds to remove can take anywhere up to a full minute to wrap — but the polluted category reports only run once per week, meaning that by the time the report runs there are several hundred categorized drafts to clean up all in one shot. Which in turn means that it's already going to take me a few hours to get through all of them even the quicker way, and would take me days to get all of them cleaned up if I took the longer way. But I don't have a responsibility to dedicate days and days to the task without doing anything else, which means I need to be able to get in and out of each page in the absolute shortest amount of time possible. I mean, sure, if one comes across just one or two categorized drafts, then taking a small amount of extra time to wrap them instead of removing them isn't that big a burden. But when one has to power through hundreds of categorized drafts all at once, the extra time piles up into a much, much longer project than anybody actually has a responsibility to take on. I've asked numerous times in the past for a bot to automatically disable categories on drafts (literally 90 per cent of the job would be eliminated just by a category-disabler bot running through Category:All content moved from mainspace to draftspace a couple times a day), so as to vastly reduce the amount of time that human editors actually have to invest in it — but it still hasn't happened, which means humans still have to do it. So those of us who take on the job have to be allowed to do whatever it takes to minimize the amount of time we actually have to devote to it. Bearcat (talk) 16:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Gorr the Golden Gorilla for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gorr the Golden Gorilla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorr the Golden Gorilla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Trailblazer101 (talk) 01:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC) The article Mind Lords of the Last Sea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing Mutants-relatedIf you have a moment in the days to come, would be so kind as to help with restoring the purged entries of the different Mutants in the Morlocks and Acolytes category that have media appearances (like X-Men: The Animated Series, it's sequel X-Men '97, and Wolverine and the X-Men to name some examples) in them on their respectful List of Marvel Comics characters pages like I had to do with the Dark Riders. I'm just making a suggestion here if you are interested. --Rtkat3 (talk) 01:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Category queryI'm surprised to find no categories for wargaming people: designers, artists, and publishers. There is a top level Category:Wargames and a sub-category Category:Wargamers, which is unpopulated and vague. Are you aware of anything? -- GreenC 15:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
The article Bez-MX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing Rocky Mountain Trophy Hunter: Interactive Big Game HuntingHowdy, Let's discuss the Rocky Mountain Trophy Hunter article and the adaptation section. My rationale for mentioning the GBC port in the lead part of the article comes from many other articles doing this. See Need for Speed: ProStreet, 50 Cent: Bulletproof, and Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2. Thus, I believe the adaptation belongs in the lead. As for the expansions, I agree they belong in their own section since that's how other, larger articles do it. Battlefield 2 comes to mind. I am currently attempting to get an article on Xantera off the ground, and find citable reviews for their games. If I can get enough sources for RMTH, I will create a Game Boy Color version subheading, but as it stands, I see no justification to combine its mention with additional content for the PC version. Kaceydotme (talk) 03:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
The article The Dinosaurs (1981 book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing Nomination of Bez-MX for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bez-MX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bez-MX until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Waxworker (talk) 12:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC) Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Many mall sections decrease readability in mobile view, because in it the sections are collapsed. In particular, the visible lede
is much less informative than
- Altenmann >talk 21:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC) The article Xenos (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC) The article Blowtorch Brand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing The article Posthuman Studios has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing Also: This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Centaur (Dungeons & Dragons)
A tag has been placed on Centaur (Dungeons & Dragons) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centaur (Dungeons & Dragons) (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – sgeureka t•c 10:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruce Harlick has been accepted Bruce Harlick, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 05:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Bumbler Bee-Luxe sourceHi BOZ!:) Found another review for this that was listed on Dadgum's website [5] Not sure if enough to move Bumbler from Draft though. Timur9008 (talk) 11:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC) Asking questionHi there. I just thought that you're into fictional characters. I just wanna ask if you can weigh in at Ada Wong's peer review if its okay with you and you do have free time. Many thanks = ) 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 00:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
The article Truck Stop (Car Wars) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 July 2024 (UTC) Nomination of Centaur (Dungeons & Dragons) for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Centaur (Dungeons & Dragons) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centaur (Dungeons & Dragons) (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.– sgeureka t•c 10:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC) re Andrew Finch editThe bit about Theatrix is from the ENWorld piece that I added as a cite a little further on. Perhaps I should have cited it twice? As to "early", I agree rereading the source that that's inaccurate, I'll take that out. It was "ahead of its time", but that's different.Brianyoumans (talk) 23:37, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
G'iahG'iah appeared in the MCU first, before she appeared in Marvel Comics. Captain Marvel premiered February 2019, while Meet the Skrulls premiered March 2019. 86.43.114.255 (talk) 11:44, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Regarding StryfeWhy would you restore the links when the original pages no longer exist and you get redirected to that spot anyway? ParXivalRPT (talk) 21:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Heyson of a b1tch 191.5.84.152 (talk) 22:23, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Miner 2049er ThanksThank you for all the extra reviews on Miner 2049er. Not bad for a game I only really tried playing around 2023. :) I have since removed the ones I know we can't really use (Video Game Critic, per Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources). I tried to pull out some more specific quotes as so many reviews just say "what else can be said" or similar terms. Not sure about woodgrainwonderland.com as I know MobyGames uses it for reviews, but it seems very...bloggy? Not sure if it would muster as a reliable source. I'll try to look at the foreign language reviews as well as I find those really interesting, and hope I can pull something from it, but the reception section is already getting huge! Any suggestions would be great, but no pressure as you've already done a ton of work. Thank you again as I've been feeling really out of it for editing wikipedia, gestures like this really help. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
The article Pandora's Dice Wheel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing August 2024When adding links to material on external sites, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. I see you did the same at e.g. Xenophobe (play-by-mail game). Linking to copyright violations is not allowed in general: creating the copyright violation in the first place by uploading the image to image hosting sites, and then linking to it yourself, is worse. Fram (talk) 10:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: 1989: Dawn of Freedom has been accepted 1989: Dawn of Freedom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! OhHaiMark (talk) 17:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)August 2024This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Way of the Phoenix, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 86.122.129.38 (talk) 14:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
The article Star Warriors (Ral Partha) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing "Cowled Wizards" listed at Redirects for discussionThe redirect Cowled Wizards has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § Cowled Wizards until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:50, 2 September 2024 (UTC) The redirect The Kraken (Forgotten Realms) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § The Kraken (Forgotten Realms) until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:54, 2 September 2024 (UTC) Dark Champions vs Dark Champions: Heroes of VengeanceI got interested in the Dark Champions: Heroes of Vengeance wiki for some reason. When I started looking at how to improve it, I ran across the separate wiki for Dark Champions (which apparently had two editions, in 1993 and 2004.) In reading the article, I assumed the 1993 edition of Dark Champions was the first in the series, and Heroes of Vengeance (also 1993) was a supplement. But the more I started to dig into it, the more puzzled I became. I can't find any articles for Dark Champions published in 1993, only for the 2004 edition. The only Dark Champions publication I can find that was released in 1993 is Dark Champions: Heroes of Vengeance. So here's what I think is the actual timeline:
I think some of the confusion lies in the fact that several reviewers in 1993 shortened Dark Champions: Heroes of Vengeance to Dark Champions (such as Mark Arsenault in Shadis #9:p.36, or Jean Belcesak in Casus Belli #79:p.17 -- although the illustration beside the Casus Belli article clearly shows the cover for Dark Champions: Heroes of Vengeance.) So if my timeline is correct, both articles need some clean up to differentiate them from each other. Does this make sense to you? Do you have any further info to add to this before I get started? Guinness323 (talk) 05:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
I've created this category and I am slowly populating it, adding relevant categories from Category:Products and services by year of discontinuance - feel free to help, I think a lot of entries from Category:Collectible card games need to go there :) Friendly ping to User:Guinness323 Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Anon tried to make it into an aritcle, but, sigh. Redirect back to the publisher, as you intended, or to WARS Trading Card Game, which has more content? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Montenegro (comics) for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Montenegro (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montenegro (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.QuietHere (talk | contributions) 07:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC) Nomination of Impasse (comics) for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Impasse (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impasse (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Rorshacma (talk) 00:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Nomination of Star Warriors (Ral Partha) for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Star Warriors (Ral Partha) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Warriors (Ral Partha) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Advice on What Page to "Some basic properties of nds rolls" (if anywhere)Hi there, BOZ! I thought quite a while before adding the "basic properties" subsection to Dice because of exactly the concern you raised (too detailed; better put elsewhere). I did finally put it in DIce as it seemed the best option. Before I did, I searched for other articles in which to put the section's info, but could find none that quite fit; the closest I found Dice Notation, but that article really was about notation, not properties. In your comments re reverting the entry, you indicate that there is an article where this information would better fit....could you tell me its name? I'd like to check it out! More generally, given your long experience with this area and Wikipedia editing and administration, I'd also much appreciate you advice more generally as to where this information would best be placed on Wikipedia, if at all. The info does seem useful to d20 players (it has been to folks I play with) and I think some folks more generally (those interested in probability theory, for instance). Still, the topic does not seem important enough to warrant its own page...but maybe I'm wrong about that. Or perhaps the info is too esoteric to include in Wikipedia at all? Of maybe there should be a more general discussion of this issue in some appropriate forum (e.g., a page's Talk page)? Any guidance would be much appreciated. Eclectucator (talk) 20:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Super Nova (card game)Hello, BOZ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Super Nova". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Computer Third Reich question and refHi BOZ! :) Found an additional source for Computer Third Reich [7] Also, I think this source is about the 1996 game? [8] [9] (this game?) Timur9008 (talk) 14:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
The article Negator (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing The article Lords of Madness has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing Also: This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Battleship Bismarck: Operation Rhine - May 1941 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. benǝʇᴉɯ 15:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Action in the North Atlantic (video game)
A tag has been placed on Action in the North Atlantic (video game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. benǝʇᴉɯ 15:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC) Thanks right backThank you for all the "thanks" for the work on the Alien atari 2600 game article. Its been one that has been fun to build up upon, and getting that little ping of a thanks is appreciate in knowing that somebody cared. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a researchHello, The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey. You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement . Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. Kind Regards, BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) DMG, and Reception and reviews format?Hey there, BOZ! I've got a question for you! Well ... two, actually. So the first is about the new DMG. I can't help but notice that there's no information on it, yet. Which is ... surprising, to say the least. With the millions of Users on Wikipedia, I would've thought there'd be a whole bunch, honestly. But, the only thing is a small infobox. Is there a policy I don't know about regarding not publishing info 'til it's available in print to the general public, and the preview and digital copies already available on DnDBeyond don't count? The second is if maybe you could help me understand how reception and reviews are listed. On 26 September 2024, Oknazevad (who, granted, edits a lot so in theory knows, unless they're just being a jerk) removed all of the "Further reading" and a list of places reviews of the various DMGs could be found. All of them. (link to compare deletions in History) Like, didn't move them to a single section together, or reformat them properly(?), or note that they're not correctly formatted, or whatever. Just deleted all the content entirely. ... this seems to go against Good Faith, and doesn't seem to follow general Wikipedia policy ... and I feel like there's something I'm missing. Can you help me understand what was wrong with the citations and Further reading? —IcarusATB (talk) 13:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Since my name was invoked, I just wanted to drop in and say that removing those "Reviews" sections that do nothing but list magazines and issue numbers that contained reviews is actually Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia is not an index, and if a review isn't actually being used as a reference, it does not belong in the article text. It's fine to list them on the talk page or in a hidden comment as a suggestion for future use, but not in the article itself. Also, we don't need to mention every review something got in the reception section, especially if it's a fairly routine capsule review of a few paragraphs in a magazine that does dozens of them a month, as was common historically. oknazevad (talk) 10:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC) ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Question regarding games 1995- presentHi BOZ! :) Is there a list of games (1995-Present) that you created? Maybe I can have a look and expand those pages since It's my easier to find info on games from 1995(When the Internet started) than before 1995. Timur9008 (talk) 11:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
IcemanHello mr BOZ. Iceman can regenerate his entire Body not only as ice but also as water or water vapor. That means he has regeneration. And Cellular Replacement it means he can reform/replaces the cells of his body. Its a form of regeneration.Also happy new month.2A02:1388:2086:97F1:0:0:4735:B61B (talk) 17:28, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Recognition at work on "BG: DAII" articleHi, I want to tell you that I am glad that you saw my work on BG: DAII which I made it yesterday. I thought to contact you earlier, but I was busy. I was also the one behind BG: DA last year in November. On both cases, my aim was to reorganise and rewrite the articles as possible. I tried to make it as fair and constructive as possible while also avoiding mistakes as much I could. Some of the things include reducing the quotes, especially in Reception section while maintaining the same meaning that various reviewers wrote, and also to keep text flowing and simple in all sections as possible and not too much cluttering. I am not the only one who does this - there are some others who are doing it in the same way. This is seen in some, if not all, franchises, and some individual games, especially in some modern indie games. I know one user who is doing it in the same way. For others I don't know who they are, but I am sure there are others like that. Sometimes I do well on some examples, in some not, but I do my best. Probably you can understand this what I am saying. Also, thank you for small fix that you gave, I did not notice it earlier. 141.136.161.212 (talk) 17:13, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Happy Holidays!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message. ★Trekker (talk) 07:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC) Happy holidays!Hello BOZ: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC) Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC) New category?The current categories for historical era of board wargames are:
Although I'm unsure of the exact dates for these categories, there seems to be a gap between Middle Ages and Modern history, approx 1400-1850. If I were to set up a new category, what should the title be? Guinness323 (talk) 20:17, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
Abishe (talk) 21:54, 24 December 2024 (UTC) Merry ChristmasTo one of the very small number of people here I've met in person. Once. Like 20 years ago. Best wishes! Hobit (talk) 11:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC) Yuletide greetingsHappy holidays and a Happy New Year to you Boz! North America1000 11:51, 25 December 2024 (UTC) ChristmasHi Boz! I do not have a fancy picture or anything, but I wanted to wish you the best and merriest christmas ever! Thanks for the well wishes - I always appreciate them, and I hope that things are great with you. :) - Bilby (talk) 13:27, 25 December 2024 (UTC) December music
Thank you for your note! My first Christmas story is about Gelobet seist du, Jesu Christ, BWV 91, 300 years today, and its song, 500 years old. Enjoy the season! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |