User talk:Amin

Speedy deletion nomination of Gran Meliá Ghoo

Hello Amin wordie,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gran Meliá Ghoo for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:22, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gran Meliá Ghoo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gran Meliá Ghoo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gran Meliá Ghoo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 20:39, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Hello and welcome to you dear amateur persian wikipedian! I'm also glad to be fiend, so "درود برتو هموطن نازنین". It seems you've traveled couples of countries, hopefully we'll be witness your contribution. At least you can help me in my "Planning for escape" project of "جیم فنگ طیاره زدن" to netherlands. keep in touch, Amin. Amir R. Pourkashef 12:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Background of the 2016 Nice attack

Hi, in case you find yourself reverting the article again in the future, please include a link to the discussion of the article, where doubts have been raised regarding the relevance of that information. And if you know for sure the information is not relevant, please add that to the discussion. Thanks. --Jan Winnicki * 18:18, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jan, Many attacks have been claimed by ISIS, just like many cyber-attacks have been claimed by the group Anonymous. Both without any further proof besides the 'claim after the fact' itself. It is a good idea to start discussing this on the Talk page if any further reverts happen. Amin wordie (talk) 18:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to point out WP:3RR on 2016 Nice attack. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@EvergreenFir: Thanks, I am relatively new to Wikipedia. User2534 is using a sockpuppet account (Emile Zoula) to prevent getting punished for reverting more than 3 times. Is there anything we can do about this? Amin wordie (talk) 20:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can go to WP:SPI but you'll need evidence that they're socking. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Your recent editing history at 2016 Nice attack shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mathsci (talk) 20:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Snapp (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Multinational. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you dear bot. I have fixed it 👍 Amin (talk) 11:22, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^Che dicono a Signa?_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:07, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Challenge accepted! I regularly edit pages that are in some way related to Asia so I am in 😬 Amin (talk) 02:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Thanks for the stroopwafels - just the thing for tomorrow's breakfast. :-)

Happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^Che dicono a Signa?_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, I'm MBlaze Lightning. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Iran without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MBlaze Lightning ^T 13:55, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MBlaze Lightning:, this was a mistake on my behalf. I will re-edit the page, this time providing an edit summary. Amin (Talk) 14:05, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of First World privilege for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article First World privilege is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First World privilege until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Letsrestoresanity (talk • contribs) 05:11, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will vote in favour of deleting this page. Amin (Talk) 13:47, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Amin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciation

Thank you for that.I felt is time to start doing good at a young age.Harrison-Montsho (talk) 22:28, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amin, in my opinion, you gave some advice at the Teahouse which was not the best for a 16 year old providing a lot of personal information. I disclose quite a bit of personal information on my user page, but I am 64 years old, self employed, and have chosen to speak out in public for decades. I have a mature understanding of the risks and benefits of disclosure which a 16 year old lacks. If you want to answer questions at the Teahouse, please reflect accepted policies and guidelines instead of expressing your own personal opinion. Thank you. Cullen^328 Let's discuss it 01:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Cullen328: I gave this some thought before posting my reply. I believe smart kids are sometimes held back by adults who are too careful, and that it's better for kids to learn from their mistakes, than to keep them from taking risks. The options have been presented to him in an honest way, and now it's up to him to make a good decision.

I do appreciate you taking the time to look out for others. I want to abide with ethics in general, and with Wikipedia's guidelines, I hope I have not crossed the line. Stay well, Amin (Talk) 02:56, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amin, your response is very thoughtful and reasonable, and I probably would have advanced a very similar argument in the past. I do not want to get into any type of argument with you since it is clear to me that you are acting in good faith. I will limit myself to expressing the opinion that we should be a bit protective of legal minors while encouraging young legal adults to develop independence and autonomy in a thoughtful way. As for the young man in question, I offered him good faith advice and did not try to tell him what to do. Thank you, and I wish you well. Cullen^328 Let's discuss it 03:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let's drink a cup of coffe sometime.

Wikipedia community will proud to have contributors like us. By the way, New changes made your about user article better... Stay close. Amir R. Pourkashefsky (talk • contribs) 13:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Amir R. Pourkashef: Thanks my friend. You are always welcome in my crib to have a cup of coffee or tea :).

Amin (Talk) 14:33, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance required

Good afternoon

I am requesting for help regarding adding a location map to an article?

Thank you

Harrison-Montsho (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Harrison-Montsho: Hi friend. Sure, can you link the article? To be fair I have never added a map before, but I can help guide you in the right direction :). Amin (Talk) 17:24, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I managed to insert it thank you very much for being so willingly to help me.

Harrison-Montsho (talk) 08:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Park Elementary School shooting

A tag has been placed on Park Elementary School shooting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A7 - NOTNEWS/TOOSOON; no indication of enduring notability

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Outline (website) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Outline (website) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Outline (website) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Amin. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk) 14:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Amin. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DoABarrelRoll.dev(Constable of the WikiPolice)(Chat!) 17:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Userbox

Wiktionary has a user page for Amin.

Would you like to to add this userbox to your page? The code is {{User WTUP|Amin}} Enjoy, and happy editing! DoABarrelRoll.dev(Constable of the WikiPolice)(Chat!) 18:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DoABarrelRoll.dev: Yes, cool! I did not know this userbox existed. I have added it to my profile. Amin (Talk) 18:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights

This might help Wikipedia:Copyright assistanceDoABarrelRoll.dev(Constable of the WikiPolice)(Chat!) 18:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DoABarrelRoll.dev: The page you linked, still requires me to dive deep into a bunch of articles, probably costing me 150 minutes of my times (and half a days worth of attention, which is an even more finite resource than time is), just to understand what I have to select to successfully upload a book cover.

This (having to do homework, to compensate for poor design) is my no. 1 pain point when wanting to contribute to Wikipedia. I have written a little bit about it in this blogpost.

I'm ranting to you just to spread awareness about this to other users. I do appreciate you pointing me towards the right direction.

Amin (Talk) 13:34, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus for image inclusion

Before putting the image back in and possibly violating WP:3RR, please look for consensus on talk first.--Joobo (talk) 15:35, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It says "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page" I reverted exactly three times. Not four, please get to know the WP guidelines first before putting these warnings on my talk. Get consensus first for the image, then you can include it.--Joobo (talk) 15:40, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emmanuel-Macron.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Emmanuel-Macron.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:18, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Emir of Wikipedia: Hi Emir, thank you for bringing this up. I will investigate the license of this photograph further today, and see if we can keep it. Alternatively, we can delete it and I can re-upload it once I have more concrete evidence. Thank you Amin (Talk) 12:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emmanuel-Macron.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Emmanuel-Macron.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Palestine Expo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Palestine Expo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palestine Expo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 05:44, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Amin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Iranians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ube (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DS alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Electronic cigarette topic area, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

QuackGuru (talk) 14:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of edit 830214968 on toilet WP article

Yes this discussion is happening- I wanted to ask why you felt this edit was unconstructive. Seeing as not a single one of these is representative of a tankless public toilet.

--Simtropolitan (talk) 14:12, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Simtropolitan: Hello Simtropolitan, thank you for reaching out regarding the added photo on the Toilet article. The regular western toilet is already represented in the top of the article. I don't see why the tankless version should be up there as well. Especially since there are already three images next to each other. It would be a bit overkill :). 14:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

I mean it's a toilet, I see that it's your photo so I understand the defense, but perhaps we should remove one of them then and replace it with one that is a bit more indicative of what is typical. I think it's a fair comparison to say that placing that image in its place is similar to placing this image instead of a lightbulb. Wouldn't you say? --Simtropolitan (talk) 14:34, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures of yourself

We would all like to be a little famous, but adding a picture of yourself kissing someone on the Kiss article is not constructive and could be considered a form of self-promotion. Please reconsider before re-adding. Thanks ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 04:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@El cid, el campeador: I think you're making a valid point. I apologize. Amin (Talk) 04:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Involuntary celibacy

You need to either read the reliable sources or stop editing that article. In fact, you should not be doing much editing of the article in the first place. Love shyness is sourced from multiple sources. One is the Washington Post. In the terminology section there are three sources right next to the mention of the term. Plus, you are now past 3RR on the article. So consider this a warning. Dave Dial (talk) 18:00, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dave Dial: I have checked the three references mentioned in the Terminology section, and none of them equate incel to love-shyness, redendering your argument invalid. That's why I removed it from the first sentence. I don't have a problem with the statement in the Terminology section that says that the term love-shynes is "used alongside other terms" for incel.

"In fact, you should not be doing much editing of the article in the first place."

This is condescending and uncalled for. I'm trying to help the article to be more accurate, as I have always tried to do in my contributions. Amin (Talk) 18:35, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are ignoring the Washington Post link I gave you, and you are not reading the scholar ref. I'm not going to continue this here when it's obvious you don't seem to really want to improve the article, but fashion to your own personal opinion. Dave Dial (talk) 18:52, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dave Dial: I think the root of this problem is your failure to assume good faith. Amin (Talk) 19:06, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, I think editors assumed good faith with you, until they saw you were removing referenced material, claiming it was not referenced. All of that material that was referenced was describing the people who identify as "incels" in the manner reliable sources describe them. But you removed the descriptions over and over, claiming they were unsourced. Now, it's not assuming bad faith, it is expectations from past actions. Dave Dial (talk) 19:58, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dave Dial: For the bits that I removed, there was either no reference, or the reference did not remotely state what was written in the article. I also simplified the introduction and made it more readable. Wikipedia has strict rules when it comes to references. Also, in this edit I removed a double-statement (search for "but are unable to do so" to see for yourself). Amin (Talk) 21:10, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gamergate controversy discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Woodroar (talk) 22:38, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Woodroar: Can you explain what the problem is here?

There's no problem and I hope it stays that way. This is simply a notification that the Zoë Quinn article is subject to discretionary sanctions because of past disruptive behavior. Editors working on articles related to Gamergate are expected to understand and adhere to the five pillars and our conduct policies. Editors who don't may be blocked or banned by uninvolved administrators. In short, if you follow our policies and guidelines and take some advice from WP:CAREFUL, you'll be fine!

Also, an unrelated note, but pings usually don't work without a signature. See WP:Notifications for more about that!

Let me know if you have any questions at all. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 23:57, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Woodroar: I'd like to know if I understand this correctly: On top of the basic rules on Wikipdia, Administrators can use extra-severe punishments if a dispute is specifically related to Gender or Gamergate. Is that correct? Amin (Talk) 00:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, those and other areas with a history of disruption. You can see all of the topics with discretionary sanctions at WP:DSTOPICS. Woodroar (talk) 01:57, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Woodroar: I'm relieved to see the list is long, and has expectable, controversial topics on it. For a moment I thought something Orwellian was going on, and that the cucks of Wikipedia had voted in some rule to unfairly favour gender/women lol. Amin (Talk) 02:39, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"It's important to hold users accountable for their words in order to keep them sharp"

It is even more important to know when to stop digging and drop the stick. You managed to pick a fight with one of the most diplomacy-savvy editors on the site when (as far as I can tell) you do not even disagree about what should go in the article. (Notice that I am not saying you are wrong: regardless, past some point, it is not worth pressing on.)

Also: are you aware GorillaWarfare is a past arbitrator, which is pretty much the top of the food chain here? That does not make her immune to mistakes, but you better be damn sure because you go out of your way to "keep her sharp". She must know her shit better than you (or me) in 99% of Wikipedia. Tigraan^Click here to contact me 15:05, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tigraan:

"You managed to pick a fight""

Civil discourse is not a fight. I have a lot of respect for many members that I have disagreed with in the past, whether that's here, Wiktionary or IRL.

"it is not worth pressing on"

I will decide for myself.

"are you aware GorillaWarfare is a past arbitrator, which is pretty much the top of the food chain here?"

I do not, and will not treat people different, based on their status or hierarchical position. I accept any negative consequences that might come from that.

Amin (Talk) 15:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just for the record: my "top of the food chain" comment was not intended as a threat, or implying that she could retaliate strongly based on her position, although I now see it can be interpreted that way. I merely wanted to point out that GW knows the ins and outs of Wikipedia as well as anyone else here.

I agree none should treat another editor differently based on status/tenure. The distinct impression I had reading your comments was that of a talking down (which you should not do to newbies, but even less to veterans) but I may have misinterpreted it. As for the rest, well, I have said my bit and you have said yours. Tigraan^Click here to contact me 15:33, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Amin! You created a thread called Your opinion is welcomed in a dispute/argument on the Incels article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Amin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Amin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Amin! You created a thread called How do I access Gale/Wikipedia Library Card Platform? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of White roll

Hello, Amin,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TheLongTone and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, White roll, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TheLongTone (talk) 13:36, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TheLongTone: It's a work in progress. You don't leave me any time to contribute to the article and flag it for deletion within literal seconds. Not cool. Amin (Talk) 13:38, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Always better to make something look like an article before putting it up.TheLongTone (talk) 13:40, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TheLongTone: I'll try to remember that from now on 😑 Amin (Talk) 13:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Digikala logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Digikala logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Riley Reid

You shouldn't readd information that are cited to tabloids like the Daily Star and MEAWW[1] per WP:BLPSOURCE Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Morbidthoughts: Can you show me where it was concluded that Meaww cannot be used? And since Meaww's article on Reid just quoted her exact words from a video on her YouTube channel, then perhaps I can just go ahead re-add the section by referencing the YouTube video in which you can hear her say those quotes ("Reid said in a YouTube video that..") Amin (Talk) 21:14, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I linked to the discussion on RSN. Further, it doesn't matter if the site faithfully recounts her YouTube video. The issue is not whether the information is true, but what kind of weight we want to assign to include this information in the article that is only covered in these weak sources per WP:WEIGHT. Readding the information and citing to the youtube video itself violates WP:BLPSPS. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:55, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AppLovin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AppLovin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AppLovin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 22:48, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betcart (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Betcart and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PICKLEDICAE🥒 14:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PICKLEDICAE🥒 14:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Betcart

Hello, Amin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Betcart, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]