|
User talk:Arthistorian1977
BBC Presenter SAMMY DARKOHello sir, please I fixed the mistakes you pointed out in relation to this wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sammy_Darko can you please review it and clear the message that displays at the top? Thanks very much TalkbackPeek-A-Boo Publishing Speedy DeletionHello, I attempted a re-write of the article you tagged for speedy deletion - please feel free to take a look and see if you think it is still unambiguously promotional. Thanks! - TeddyGetz I have unreviewed a page you curatedThanks for reviewing Jean-Christophe Averty, Arthistorian1977. Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page. Re: Speedy deletion of Zeta Chi ZetaDear Arthistorian1977, Zeta Chi Zeta is a very important local fraternity run out of Oswego, NY. and definetely should not be deleted. Zeta Chi Zeta is no less signifigant than any other fraternity page on wikipedia and therefore would be very unfair and biased to delete it. I am currently working on improving the page as I need more time to update the history of it and add more relevant content. If you have any specific helpful suggestions on the page, please let me know. thank you so much, Aaron HiHi Arthistorian, Why did you nominate article Adam Khalifa Afara for deletion? It corresponds with the standards of Wikipedia The best proof of that it was written more than one language I ask you to reconsider the article with the correct some of the mistakes that have not deleted immediately Deletion of the page FavijHi, Arthistorian77 Favij is a very famous Youtuber in Italy (i think one of the most famous) and the italian Wikipedia doesn't allow to create it, i don't know why. One Admin even banned the creating of the page and I find this strange. Is in the english Wikipedia the same, or how it works? Can I have please more infos? my regards, Thinky Winky --User:Thinky Winky ([[User talk:Thinky Winky]) 9:56, 6 July 2017 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Willie MelendezHi Historian. I just wanted to let you know I am working on the article. I will add citations as I go about it. Thanks and God bless you! Antonio el Pantolejas Martin, (loser talk) 10:28, July 6, 2017 (UTC) 00:04:22, 30 August 2017 review of submission by MG-Lon
Everything I have listed is true and accurate. 23:51:44, 5 September 2017 review of submission by 77.64.254.127
dear Authorized,My work on the draft is now over. so I published the page. and I will make it even wider in the coming days. Please be kind, please. I am wasting my time and I am so sorry that the page has been deleted. Please support me in this regard. please keep the page posted for at least a few weeks. dear Authorized,hello please please enable my dear authoritative article. Please hear me in the name of humanity. I spent a lot of time on that article. Please. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amin_Abbasov amazfithi i couldn't get the amazfit redirect to work properly, if you can make the amazfit page redirect to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Products_of_Xiaomi#Smartwatches_and_Smartbands instead of the current https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Products_of_Xiaomi then that would be great. thanks. Review requestHi Arthistorian1977, How are you doing, thanks a lot for your review of my article. It would be helpful if you could review few of my article.
New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022Hello Arthistorian1977,  Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section. Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also. Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.  Suggestions:
Backlog:  Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!
New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023Hello Arthistorian1977, 
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone! Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.) New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD. Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023Hello Arthistorian1977,  Backlog Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day. Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here. WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers. Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script. You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest. Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums). Reminders
Women in Red January 2024
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia researchHello, I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement. Take the survey here. Kind Regards, BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Ernst Neumann-Neander Hello, Arthistorian1977. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ernst Neumann-Neander". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Seva GalkinHello, Arthistorian1977. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Seva Galkin". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Alexander ShafranskyHello, Arthistorian1977. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Alexander Shafransky". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC) ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Women in Red December 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC) New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC) Women in Red January 2025
--Lajmmoore (talk 17:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Concern regarding Draft:Josep Masana
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 29 December 2024 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Drat: Lilies Not for MeHello Arthistorian1977, I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Drat: Lilies Not for Me for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles. If you don't want Drat: Lilies Not for Me to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks! Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC) Women in Red February 2025
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:56, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
