Teşekkür ederim @Aintabli, Üniversite olduğu için olur bence. Zaten öğrenim gördüğüm üniversitedir, baktığım zaman diğer Türk üniversiteleri açılmış kendi üniversitemin olmaması üzdü bendi :)… Bu arada eğer maddeyi açacaksan rektör değişti bu gün. 3 Ocak itibari ile Prof. Dr. Buğra Özen atandı. Ygmr01 (talk) 17:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NSCHOOL'a göre üniversiteler de bu konuda değerlendirilmeli. Önceden bir okul için sayfa oluşturmadığım için bu alanda pek spesifik tecrübem yok ama kriterler uyarınca okul hakkında yazılmış, okulun kendisinden bağımsız birkaç güvenilir kaynak lazım. Belki siz de yardımcı olabilirsiniz. Ben belli sayıda haber kaynağı buldum. Yeterince üzerinde çalıştıktan sonra okulun sayfasını yaratabilirim. Aintabli (talk) 21:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okulun kendisinden hariç pek kaynak yok galiba, bakıcam bu konuda birşey bulursam çok iyi olur… Çok teşekkür ederim bu arada… Ygmr01 (talk) 21:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
10 adet kaynak ekledim… Umarım işe yarar, yaramaz isede canın sağolsun, düşüncen bile benim için çok kıymetli…
Bu arada bana ulaşmak istersen Türkçe Viki’de aktif şekildeyim oraya yazman yeterlidir… Sevgilerle @Aintabli
Hello @Aintabli, since you undertook a GA review for the Regency of Algiers article, i was wondering if you were still on it or it's now left for another reviewer after renomination, if you're still on it, do you consider the issues raised solved ? Best. Nourerrahmane (talk) 21:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nourerrahmane, when I've first taken a look at the article, the length simply was a major issue that merited a quickfail, because it could take quite some time to solve. However, you were very responsive and tackled the issue in a few hours or days. There is still a tag, which I remember you had removed. So, if you did not readd it yourself, some other editor may believe the article still needs trimming. I can make further suggestions for the time being. Armed forces should not be a full standalone section, because it is merely made up of two wikilinks. It may still be worth reducing the number of pictures and especially removing the image "inside" the table in Mandatory royalties and gifts, because it deforms its size in my opinion. I see some references that are full citations and should be moved to the Bibliography. And some lack page numbers, such as Bloom, Jonathan M. (2020) (currently 268th footnote). Please go through all of them, so all relevant citations have a page number and are ideally fully cited in the Bibliography section. Aintabli (talk) 22:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! i think it gives an overview of Algiers against what was the general idea of it is, but i might paraphrase it, also i made some changes because i felt i needed to highlight a bit about the Dey Ben Othman Pasha, as his rule represents the Apogee of Algiers in the 18th century while i did some trimming in other subsections and included them in his rule. Nourerrahmane (talk) 20:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article Ghars al-Din Khalil you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ghars al-Din Khalil for comments about the article, and Talk:Ghars al-Din Khalil/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Friend , Hi, I saw you're request at WP:PERM/NPR and also saw you're CSD log is seems to good and I know you understand speedy deletion policy but I see you don not work as Afc reviewers on WP:AFC but I suggest to you; please starts work as Afc reviewers, on request at WP:WAC/P and It's help to increasing you're policy knowledge, and you know and admin before granting you this permission they checking your [AFC Status] and other things and if they satisfied from your knowledge and you're contributions then he grant you this advanced permission. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)04:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Aintabli. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. —Ganesha811 (talk) 04:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the horon dance: how does Kaa sing to Mowgli? "🎶 Trust in meee... Just in mee!" I knew what I was doing, for a change :)) Cheers, Arminden (talk) 00:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Can I know why you have reverted my edits. As you can see, I have removed the extra sources and extra content which is not needed for the article. Thanks. Archery minded (talk) 05:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I guess you're trying to say this is a cleanup. You have also removed a whole section, which doesn't look extra. If the issue is whether the sources are WP:RS, be sure to state that in the edit summary to avoid misunderstandings. Aintabli (talk) 05:14, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For your immensely prolific Good Article work for the Anatolian beyliks! I can't overstate how great it is for the encyclopedia to have such a committed editor in a relatively obscure area of history. Generalissima (talk) 04:11, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi anitabli I was looking at kurdistan region article in wikipedia and the information were outdated they said kurdistan have four governorate duhok.erbil.slemani.helabje but now zakho is also a governorate they didn't add it i said about it in the talk page but no one answered me can you fix it and thank you for reading this Hogirkurdish15 (talk) 21:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award
Citation Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to Aintabli for collecting 25 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t have access to the tools through my phone, but I remember that the article showed about 60% resemblance to another publication. Aintabli (talk) 21:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your tagging of this draft article was appropriate, thank you. However, for CSD G5s, when you are using Twinkle, please put the username of the sockmaster, the editor who is evading a block, in the field, not the name of the sockpuppet. This is because the Twinkle deletion rationale will appear on the article and it is more important to know that editor who is the sockmaster than the identity of any particular sockpuppet. It's also because if an admin has a question, they can go look at the most recent SPI case and those are filed under the sockmaster's username, not the sockpuppet's. Thanks again for your work on the project. LizRead!Talk!03:38, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
On 6 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eretnid dynasty, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Eretnid dynasty that ruled central and eastern Anatolia during the 14th century was founded by Eretna(coin pictured), an Ilkhanid officer of Uyghur origin? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eretnid dynasty. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Eretnid dynasty), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hi, the Turkish article is not sourced. I would have to find enough coverage of it before creating an article here. Aintabli (talk) 21:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Grand mosque name order
I'm not really convinced that there's a real rationale for these recent moves, or that it's necessarily optimal. AFAIK there hasn't been a discussion at WikiProject Islam or MOS:ISLAM that "Grand Mosque of" should be the default naming convention, and while consistency is a general principle here, it's not clear that this format is even the most common, and therefore what we might prefer as a default. On the contrary, on individual pages it often flies in the face of sources. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If there aren't English sources presented, the form closest to the Turkish is closer to the actual sources we have. Also in literature, some are grand, some are great. There's a lot of variety. I'm also not convinced there even is a definitive common form in English. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What sources are currently present in the article are irrelevant, considering that most of these articles are in poor shape. See this and this for example. This form is obviously more common. The “grand” vs “great” difference is something I do not object, and if most English sources use it for a given mosque, would vote in favor of changing. On the other hand, the town name doesn’t come first in English as per the links above. That’s two major reasons. Aintabli (talk) 16:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It still would have been better, and still would be better, if you took this up with some relevant WikiProjects rather than imposing your stylistic preference based on somewhat flimsy grounds. There are a couple factors at play. One is the trend within scholarship for the titling of Turkish mosques specifically, because on the great vs grand contrast there are actually some regional variations. More generally, as you can see from this Ngram, your chosen form is if anything the weakest of all and only accounts for the barest minority of mentions of grand mosques generally, and is statistically all but insignificant when factoring in the mentions of great mosques as well. It is for exactly these sorts of reasons that is often worth reaching out to the community before doing sweeping renaming without inquiry. Iskandar323 (talk) 17:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Ngrams results include nothing tangible. As you add more words to a phrase, it will be much rarer. Getting more instances of “Grand mosque” does not mean the location name comes before in a specific case or that it is part of a proper name in every case. I also don’t remember moving any of the articles from “great” to “grand”, so I don’t understand why you’re arguing that an unspecified page should be “great” here. On a different note, looking at the articles’ edit histories, I have now realized that you have also previously moved multiple pages to a preferred title. I have taken a bold approach and at least made moves in line with WP:CONSISTENT and per the links, a common form among scholarship. You have the right to disagree with these changes and could have instead started a discussion on a different and openly visible page instead of making behavioral comments on my user talk page. I will start that discussion when I get behind my computer if you don’t do so before. But I don’t see any specific argument here, so I am unsure what approach you prefer. If you are arguing that this should be looked at case by case, you have tried to prove “great” is more common in general, which my moves did not concern. So, do you want something like an RFC or a move request for each article? Aintabli (talk) 18:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If it's not the guidelines, I'm not sure what input you want. There are two possible choices: Change in guidelines or requesting moves on each page after determining what the common name is. I have started doing the latter. Aintabli (talk) 20:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Look, I'm not trying to be acrimonious here; just trying to ensure that sweeping changes aren't being made for not necessarily fully thought out reasons. You are arguing that your approach is consistent, but you haven't, for example, shown an expert tertiary source that consistently follows this pattern. You also seem to know Turkish, so I'm not sure why you're insisting on a format that is further from the Turkish. Name+ulucami => Name+grand mosque is a much more common sense approach than your consistency drive. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this has gotten too complicated. We can start clean, but I don't want to deep-dive into a discussion again. I think the simplest approach would be to determine the common name and then request moves on each page accordingly. Aintabli (talk) 20:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To wrap up/clarify/summarize, I am now starting a few move requests as time allows. For example, the mosque in Erzurum is better known as "great". But that was not the point of my earlier moves, which were meant to implement CONSISTENT and English conventions. Looking at your comments here and earlier moves, I do not believe you have checked any English sources on these mosques, and it appears that per your move summaries, you were "standardizing" the names rather than doing what you are telling me to do. Aintabli (talk) 19:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I performed moves previously to render Turkish names into English I believe. One obvious drawback of the "of" variant is that it is less concise – it adds an unnecessary preposition with no additional meaning or value. Secondly, it is less preferred in terms of our standard naming practice, which is to put the where before the what – I imagine principally because location names are what lend the precision, while nounal elements are generic. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are English sources on many if not most of these mosques, so rendering Turkish names is not what we need right now. When it comes to brevity, "of" is merely 2 characters long, and that is not the typical case when a "concise" title would be favorable. I believe you may want to start an RFC about including location names first when naming articles on mosques/buildings regardless of a common name. Such articles both in and outside Turkey have been in the "of" form for a long time. Aintabli (talk) 20:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, not regardless of a common name; in the absence of one. I'm not the one assuming a common form/name format for Turkish mosques. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On 19 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shah Suwar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a major parade took place in Cairo on 24 August 1472 for the hanging of Shah Suwar? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shah Suwar. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Shah Suwar), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hi Aintabli, I've moved Karasi to Karasi (horse) per the RM discussion. I've disambiguated most of the links to the new dab page, but there are still a few ambiguous links that you may want to take a look at. Like you mentioned in the discussion, there seems to be some ambiguity whether "Karasi" refers to the ruler or the dynasty more generally. Thanks – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 06:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey around 5 am in the morning, you're invited to following page, i do not know if i put enough pepper and garlic while writing the article. Would you like to check it out? Beyran_soupGöycen (talk) 21:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aintabli, thank you for your time and meticulous review of the article about cocker spaniel Joy. You've significantly improved the quality and notability of the article. The page was featured in the WP:DYK category and was viewed by over 20,000 users. Jacob0790 (talk) 00:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, you recently reverted an edit which removed blatantly biased and/or disproven information, if you'd like I'd be more than willing to leave the "Culturally Persianate," tidbit while including the contrasting view by many Scholars on the subject. Kecesi (talk) 14:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DYK for Suleiman of Germiyan
On 13 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Suleiman of Germiyan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Suleiman of Germiyan allowed the Ottoman annexation of much of his territory to pay his daughter's dowry? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Suleiman of Germiyan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Suleiman of Germiyan), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hello Aintabli. You have been invited to join WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Asia-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the participants.
If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by:
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
On 29 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shah Budak, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Shah Budak, a prince of the Dulkadir dynasty in Anatolia, blinded his nephew Shahruh in retaliation for his son's similar fate? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shah Budak. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Shah Budak), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hey Aintabli, hope you are doing well! Maybe you remember that you told me to get in touch with you if I ever work on a page on Tzamandos as you have worked with historical articles about this place. It would be great if you could add on the article in the same way like you improved Rumkale. I will also add in the coming days, but feel free to already add to it. One thing that specifically would be already helpful would be to link the mentioned places (Larissa, Hanköy, Uzun Yayla) to the right articles (if there are any). Cheers, PontiffSulivahn (talk) 23:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On 19 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Malik Arslan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ...that Malik Arslan was assassinated on the orders of the Mamluk Sultan of Egypt due to his ties with the Ottomans? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Malik Arslan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Malik Arslan), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Hi! Frankly, I am not currently interested in pre-Islamic semi-mythological stuff, so I am not well-versed in this subject. I can only go by Wikipedia’s guidelines like any other editor. But I will try to inspect this article. Thank you for letting me know! Aintabli (talk) 05:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You do not appear to be giving sufficient consideration to the responsibilities associated with your role. All the information presented in the infobox is already included within the main body of the article. The purpose of the infobox is simply to provide a concise summary of the article's content. تیران (talk) 22:09, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
As can be seen here, you have not really changed the infobox but instead added an uncited quote to the body and a paragraph to the lead that is seemingly based on your uncited addition as well as other uncited parts of the article. Feel free to readd them with a citation from reliable publication such as a paper from a journal or a book that explicitly mentions what you are adding. Aintabli (talk) 22:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct. I have added the source to the Tirgan article. However, I was referring to the Yalda article, which you deleted under the pretext of lacking a source. Please review the text of the article to understand that it is a summary of the content and restore the information you removed. Thank you for your understanding and respect. تیران (talk) 23:13, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you check that article's edit history, you may see that after my revert, I restored the referenced portions. However, I removed them again, because they did not mention Yalda or most of the information at all. The sources have to mention the information explicitly, which shouldn't be the product of any interpretation or synthesis with other sources or original research. If you think I made a mistake, you can also provide page numbers or exact quotes and what information you think they support. Aintabli (talk) 23:21, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Aintabli, someone deleted the "country", "government" and "area" parts in the infobox section of the Antakya article. It looks like vandalism. Can you fix this please? I don't know how to do it. 5.176.5.88 (talk) 10:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
