User talk:47thPennVols

Welcome

Hello, 47thPennVols, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! clpo13(talk) 08:35, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Project

Greetings, I saw your edit to Reading, Pennsylvania and noticed your interests. "We" are always looking for editors at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history. Please drop by and take a look.--Georgia Army VetContribsTalk 19:37, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Milhist!

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:03, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
• updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, 47thPennVols, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have a new member interested in military history. Let me know if ever you need any help or experience any problems. You are of course also welcome to contribute to our WiR talk page. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 at Women in Red

		Welcome to Women in Red's April 2018 worldwide online editathons. Focus on: April+Further with Art+Feminism Archaeology Military history (contest) Geofocus: Indian subcontinent Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

--Ipigott (talk) 06:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "47thPennVols", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to represent a group rather than an individual person. Shared accounts are not permitted. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Diannaa: Thanks so much for reaching out and for the welcome. I've actually been a member of Wikipedia since October 2015, and have had the same username since that time. My username does not represent a group, nor is it a shared account. I chose this username in 2015 in honor of an American Civil War regiment since one of my major areas of research is American Civil War History. So I don't believe that I need to request a change of username since my username doesn't violate Wikipedia policies. Again, many thanks for reaching out. Kind Regards, 47thPennVols (talk) 19:09, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for confirming it's not a shared account. That was my main concern. Best, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:58, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rehabilitation and reintegration of child soldiers

@Gog the Mild: You've been such a great help to me that I'm happy to return the favor. (I've attended conferences on child soldiers, and would say you've done an admirable job with a very difficult subject. So, first, thank you. Not many folks would want to write about this very depressing, but important and underreported subject.) Second, I agree with you that it's B-Class, and would happy to re-classify it that way. Before I do, there are a just a few minor formatting things that need to be fixed (see redlink for "comprehensive peace agreement" in South Sudan section, and the items highlighted in red under the Ref List in #4, 17, 30, 32). If you can tweak those and ping me back, I'll reclassify for you tonight. 47thPennVols (talk) 01:19, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think that I have sorted the issues. I couldn't find anything wrong with refs 30 or 32. That red link was the first case sensitive Wikilink I have come across. Thanks for assessing this. It is a big, dense article on an unpleasant topic and I thought that it might sit for some time.

I stumbled across Children in the military while copy editing for WP:GOCE. It was a bloated sprawling 15,000 word mess, but fascinating. And the topic was worthy of better. So I hung around to sort it out. Ably assisted by Fugitive Dave. It was assessed as B class this week. As part of the tidy up I exported a large amount of text on rehabilitation and reintegration to the already existing but sadly neglected article. I have been meaning to get back to finish sorting it for a while. I had it tagged as only needing a lead writing, which is my excuse for missing the other issues. (I also created History of children in the military to handle some of the text. I ought to sort that out too, but I don't think that I have the time or the stomach for it.)

Were your attendances at conferences in a professional capacity? Gog the Mild (talk) 08:44, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gog the Mild: Looks great. Thanks for tweaking the ref list. (I'm even more impressed now that I've heard the background on the article.) I just finished adjusting the article's WikiProject Milhist section on the Talk page. (All of the B-Class criteria are now checked off, and the article classification now reads B-Class.) My conference attendances were as an audience member in both a professional and personal capacity. (In a prior life, I helped to create and manage educational programs for healthcare providers on behalf of a major university. While working on pain management programs, I developed an interest in the potential links between chronic pain and PTSD, which led me to multiple conferences, further reading, etc. At some point along the way, I met Peter Eichstaedt, the author of "First Kill Your Family: Child Soldiers of Uganda and the Lord's Resistance Army," a depressing, but engrossing book, which further fueled my interest and led me to interactions with the late Martina Knee, who was involved for many years with Save Darfur. I then ended up writing about her work for a series of newspaper articles about genocide prevention and response.) But all of that was a few years ago. Again, many thanks for working on this article. Have a great remainder of your weekend! 47thPennVols (talk) 15:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

I think that you have earned this after slogging through Rehabilitation and reintegration of child soldiers. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:03, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It was my pleasure to help. And again, many thanks for all of the guidance you've provided this month. I'd give you the The Guidance Barnstar for your work on the Rehab article and on Reading Artillerists, etc., but I haven't been able to figure out how to add it to your page. (More coffee is in order before I try to teach myself another new skill this morning.)

April backlog drive

G'day, just to clarify, unfortunately this one isn't eligible for the backlog drive: [1]. It is, however, eligible for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Contest. The relevant part of the backlog drive instructions can be found in Note 6, which says "improvement of stub-class articles (or other articles that already exist in article space prior to the start of the contest) will not attract for points in this contest, although editors are encouraged to enter such contributions in the monthly Milhist writers' contest." Sorry for the confusion. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 06:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@AustralianRupert: I wasn't quite sure where to list the 52nd Pennsylvania article; so, many thanks for the clarification. Have a great week! 47thPennVols (talk) 08:52, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, in hindsight, I think the drive concept is a bit complex and confusing (which is my fault). I think next time I will recommend a simpler approach, but anyway, live and learn! Take care. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@AustralianRupert:I'm glad we've had the chance to interact because I've been wanting to thank you for all of your hard work and for the opportunity to participate more actively on Wikipedia. The drive has been a great way for me to do that. Many, many thanks. 47thPennVols (talk) 16:38, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Hetty Voûte) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Hetty Voûte, 47thPennVols!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed, well done!

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 22:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Denise Vernay

Hi. This is looking good now. I was going to make a couple of suggestions, but if you want to put it up for GAN - I think that it is ready - I can do it formally. There are still a fair number of areas for improvement, but they are mostly superficial. Obviously, if you would rather hang on a while, or not submit it at all, that's your call. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:08, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gog the Mild: Glad to hear it's looking better, and thank you for offering to put it up for GAN. That would be great. But before we do, I'd welcome hearing what were you thinking re: additional improvements. (I really want to make sure her bio is as good as it can be.) 47thPennVols (talk) 22:24, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, finally got back to this. I will be doing some straight forward copy editing, revert anything you don't like, and using the article talk page to put up some of the comments I would be making if it were a GAN review. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:06, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gog the Mild: Hi. Thanks for the offer. I think I'm going to ask you to hold off for a week or two. I'm feeling a bit drained by the recent burst of writing for the Women in Red/Milhist Drive, and quite honestly, a little bruised by the issues you were raising with @Cinderella157 re: my self-asssessments. I just need a short break to get my head back into the game. Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 13:17, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, saw this comment. I think that Gog's comments at my TP were much more about the comp and not about you personally. There are "events" from earlier this year that you are unlikely to be aware of but seen in that different light, Gog's concerns were reasonable, particularly as I was closely involved. I can understand why you might be a little bruised, particularly without having the fuller context. I would hope that you can see past this, as I think that there is great potential for a constructive collaboration. Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 23:55, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018 at Women in Red

		Welcome to Women in Red's May 2018 worldwide online editathons. File:Soraya Aghaee4.jpg New: "Women of the Sea" New: "Villains" New: "Women in Sports" New: "Central Eastern European women" Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

April's MilHist comp

Hi, I am one of the MilHist coords and I checked your entries for this month's comp. Just a note of "good form", while B-class is an individual assessment, it is done by an independent editor (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Requests. In checking your entries, I did a cursory check of each of the articles you self assessed, against the criteria, and was moderately satisfied that the assessment was warranted but this might reasonably be contested by other contestants (@User:AustralianRupert?). Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 10:53, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Cinderella157: Thank you for reaching out. Although I've been writing articles for Wikipedia on and off since 2015, I'm still relatively new to the system of classification and assessment. (The April 2018 Military history backlog drive was, in fact, my first real exposure to it so I'm still learning all of the ins and outs.) I believe that my assessments actually did follow the standard. My articles re: Evelyn Tucker, Denise Vernay, and the Reading Artillerists were all independently assessed by other Milhist members earlier on in the process as B-Class, and Mathilde Verspyck and Yvonne Chollet were just assessed by @User:AustralianRupert as B-Class. (I had planned on submitting the others for independent assessment as well, but was waiting on the assessments for Verspyck and Chollet to be completed because I didn't want to monopolize the time of my fellow Milhist members by submitting too many articles for independent assessment at the same time.) Regarding my self-assessments of the other articles (Tillie Pierce, Paulette Duhalde, Hetty Voûte, Ina Boekbinder, Willemiena Bouwman, Gerritdina Benders-Letteboer, and Riet van Grunsven): Each was asssessed by me as only being C-Class (which you can still see when you view the "Edit Source" text). When I self-assessed those articles against the B-Class standards (which I did based on my understanding of the self-assessment guidelines, which state that "Editors can self-assess articles against the five B-class criteria"), the template changed the rating to B-Class on the "Read" tab (but still left my self-assessment as C-Class on the "Edit Source" text). So I did only self-assess each of those as C-Class. (If there were any issues of "form," they weren't intentional; they were technical - due to the Milhist template.) 47thPennVols (talk) 11:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Your intent wasn't clear (to me) but I did WP:AGF. It would have (perhaps) been better to assess them to C-class without checking the B-class criteria off with a note on the TP by way of explanation. Nonetheless, I think that congratulations are due. I don't think that they will be contested but it might depend on other coords. For my part, I have checked and awarded the points. Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 23:20, 2 May 2018 (UTC) PS. I intended reaching out to you (above) prior to the discussion at my TP and my post to you would have been similar, if not the same, regardless of that. I did AGF from the start. There has been a misunderstanding of your intention (mine). Your fuller explanation justifies my initial assumption of good faith. While I can appreciate how you feel, I hope we can all get past this since it is essentially a series of miscommunications. Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 23:04, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • @47thPenn: G'day, it is an automatic aspect of the template that if you check "yes" for all five criteria it will display as "B class" in read only mode regardless of what is written in the "class=" field. Hence even start class and C-class articles can and do meet aspects of the B-class criteria, but they can't meet all of them (otherwise they would be B-class). Additionally, the template won't display C-class unless certain B class criteria are ticked as yes. By custom within MILHIST we have encouraged editors to seek independent assessment for B class (while allowing self assessment for stub, start and C-class), but it isn't something that is prominently displayed (I think it appears on the contest instructions page, though), so I wouldn't worry too much about it... live and learn as they say! Anyway, thanks for your efforts with those articles. @Cinderella: thanks for your efforts with verifying the entries. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 05:39, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 MILHIST Backlog Drive

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded this barnstar for your efforts during the April 2018 MILHIST Backlog Drive. Thank you for your contributions. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 Military History Writers' Contest

		The WikiChevrons
		On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I hereby award you the WikiChevrons, for placing first in the April 2018 Military History Article Writing Contest with a total of 75 points from 14 articles. Well done and congratulations, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Parker Converse

I'm sorry for stepping into your work; I do tend to move quickly when newpage patrolling. Mind if I recommend putting up an {{inuse}} template? I generally find those keep editors out of the way...I use them myself often when I'm editing

And for the record...I haven't used AWB in several days. All of the edits were manual. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^Che dicono a Signa?_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 23:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely appreciate the apology, @Ser Amantio di Nicolao:. I do feel that I need to respond here, though, because the simple fact of the matter is that your edits were so hasty that I wouldn't have had time to post the inuse tag you recommend. You began your new page patrol and editing at 21:24 today just 3 minutes after I had first posted the page (at 21:21), and then proceeded to bombard this new page with a series of edits (including three edits at 21:24, two of which used HotCat, and another four edits, which took place literally one second later at 21:25, all of which used HotCat), etc. I use the term "bombard" here not to be unkind, but to convey to you a sense of how it felt to be on the receiving end of your rapid fire edits. As a gentle reminder, Wikipedia's own guidelines recommend that editors, new page patrollers, et. al. "wait at least 15 minutes to give time to the creator to add content," adding, "Care should be exercised when reviewing very new pages. Tagging anything other than attack pages, copyvios, vandalism or complete nonsense only a few minutes after creation may stop the creation of a good faith article and drive away a new contributor." You came very close to doing that today with me. So, with respect, I suggest that, whether you're using a bot or performing your edits manually, that you may wish to: a.) give article creators more time before you begin to tag or edit, and b.) consolidate your edits and/or slow down your pace once you do begin so that article creators aren't feeling overwhelmed by your efforts to help. Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 01:12, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June Editathons

		Welcome to Women in Red's June 2018 worldwide online editathons. New: WiR Loves Pride New: Singers and Songwriters New: Women in GLAM New: Geofocus: Russia/USSR Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Women's History Barnstar
		For your ongoing contributions in this area, particularly for their quality and the research behind them. Thank you. Ira Leviton (talk) 12:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Yvonne Chollet) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Yvonne Chollet, 47thPennVols!

Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Very nice job on the article, keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Onel5969 ^TT me 12:03, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018 at Women in Red

		Hello again from Women in Red! July 2018 worldwide online editathons: New: Sub-Saharan Africa Film + stage 20th-century Women Rock Continuing: Notable women, broadly-construed! Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): Are we losing momentum? London calling (the Mayor of London!) Publication about Wikipedia's coverage of women mathematicians Women in Red is featured in Toolhub
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

American Civil War

Since you know more about the American Civil War. Are you prepared to clean up each state and disregard any "useless" information. I'm referring to the both as a "Category" and "List". You know I'm frustrated with it all and you'll list ALL Companies, Battalions and Regiments as redlinks so other users know what is not created. Adamdaley (talk) 07:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• If you and me can come up with a list of ALL of the Regiments etc, then we can see where we can start. I'm going to bed, 9:30 pm here. Adamdaley (talk) 11:27, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I've come to you to show you that I've typed out most of the Regiments from Dyer that can be viewed from a subpage. The question I have for the Alabama Union regiments. Would it be like 1st Regiment Alabama Siege Artillery (African Descent)? If so could you show me to right way? I've got 2 done from Illinois because on the National Park Service they have the names. Adamdaley (talk) 09:27, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for reaching out, Adam. As a native Pennsylvanian, I'm more familiar with the history of Pennsylvania's volunteer regiments, emergency militia units, etc. than the regiments which were raised by Alabama, but because I've done a fair amount of Civil War research in general, my recommendation would be to always check with the state archives for any state you're researching (in addition to using the resources of the U.S. National Archives and U.S. National Park Service). I realize that it's time consuming to do this, but I've found that personnel at the individual state archives facilities across America are very knowledgeable about the tiniest details regarding their respective state histories, and are generally happy to help fellow researchers because they want to see those state histories presented correctly.

I went ahead and did a quick search of the website for the Alabama Department of Archives and History, and found that the State of Alabama's archives division has a really wonderful website. Although it doesn't appear that staff have digitized all of their Civil War-related records, they have posted a great deal of helpful content online here, and have a searchable online soldier's database similar to the U.S. National Park Service's Soldiers' and Sailors Dbase online (and to Pennsylvania's Civil War Veterans's Card File). The access page for that Alabama database provides links to Willis Brewer's Brief Historical Sketches of Military Organizations Raised In Alabama During the Civil War and Confederate military unit histories, which may be of help since you're researching multiple regiments from Alabama. (The second of those two links takes you to digitized copies of actual correspondence written by members of various Confederate regiments during the Civil War. So, you might find some really fascinating data there to include in your individual regimental histories.) In addition there are links to the Muster Rolls of Alabama Civil War units and Militia and Home Guard units. (Although the muster rolls don't appear to have been digitized, these two pages do show the naming conventions used by the state archives for Alabama's Civil War-era military units.)

The other thing you might try doing is to reach out directly to a staff member of the state archives, and ask for guidance. If I were working on an ambitious project like yours, I'd start by emailing the director of the Archives Division, Mary Jo Scott (maryjo.scott (at) archives.alabama.gov) to explain your project and ask for guidance. Explain that you're located quite a distance away (so visiting the archives in Alabama isn't an option for you right now), describe your project clearly, but briefly (that you're working on creating a comprehensive list of all of Alabama's Civil War-era regiments, and are trying to ensure its accuracy by listing the correct titles for each regiment), and ask if the archives has a finding aid which lists all of the Alabama regiments (that she could direct you to online or send to you in PDF format). Hopefully, she'll have something she can just point you to online or can email to you, but if not, I'd then ask her if she or one of her staff could provide you with guidance regarding the best way to name the individual regiments. (Maybe even ask her which source(s) they used to create their naming convention?) Hope this helps. It actually looks like Alabama has a wealth of information that could help you do a really great job for Wikipedia. Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 13:39, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I found the 1st Regiment Alabama Siege Artillery (African Descent) here at NPS [2] – It indeed change designation to the 6th U.S. Colored Heavy Artillery in March 1864 and it changed again in April 1864 to the 7th U.S. Colored Heavy Artillery then in January 1865 it changes again to the 11th U.S. Colored Infantry (New Organization). As for the other Alabama I've not search those. Adamdaley (talk) 03:48, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018 at Women in Red

		An exciting new month for Women in Red! August 2018 worldwide online editathons: New: Indigenous women Women of marginalized populations Women writers Geofocus: Bottom 10 Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative Notable women, broadly-construed! For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards. It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August. Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): Call for members for the Gender Diversity Visibility Community User Group (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your GA nomination of William Henry Egle

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Henry Egle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 09:41, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:William Henry Egle/GA1

Greetings. Thank you for your thanks for the hyphens edit. I haven't actually reread the article yet, but I have done most of the fussy GAN bits, which flagged up a couple of minor actions for you. I shall try to get back to a proper look at the prose and/or references later today. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:12, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for agreeing to perform the review. I was just re-reading the lead, and noticed that I'd omitted a word ("documented") in the revised version I did yesterday. So, I just fixed that particular spot because it was bugging me. But, I'll hold off on any further tweaks so that you can do what you need to do. Again, many thanks. 47thPennVols (talk) 10:26, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of William Henry Egle

The article William Henry Egle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Henry Egle for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 08:41, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

207th Pennsylvania Infantry

I am minded to assess this as B class. What do you think? Kges wants it in a hurry because the deadline for contest entries is 2400 UTC. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:53, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Gog the Mild: I'm a little concerned because it has seemed, at times this month, that the quantity of the articles posted is more important than the quality. (Several reviewers have used the word "barely" or similar adjectives to qualify their B-class reviews of articles submitted for assessment by at least two different editors in July.) In one instance, KGES stated that there was little to no information available about the Pennsylvania regiment he was profiling - even going so far as to state that there were "no" (his word) Harrisburg newspaper articles about the regiment, which was incorrect. (I did a quick search, turned up several, and let him know, which he thanked me for and then incorporated.) So, I'm a little concerned by his claim that there is "no" (again his word) source for info on the complement for the 207th Pennsylvania. (One would think the original registers for the 207th which are digitized and available on the website of the Pennsylvania State Archives might be helpful in this regard if nothing else exists, but going through those might be too time-consuming a task.) That being said, he has been responsive to other requests from me to improve other submissions, including one that initially had only three references. Adding to my concerns at this point, there have been a couple of comments by several editors on the Mihilst assessment board recently that seem to discount the service of regiments which served on garrison duty (as if having not been "under fire" has made their service less important and/or not noteworthy enough to merit articles about those regiments). I just wish I didn't feel as if so many of the articles about Pennsylvania's Civil War regiments are being given less effort than they deserve right now. (P.S. I just found another source which will add a citation to the 207th Pennsylvania. So, go ahead and tell KGES that it's B-Class while I add the new data to his article for him.) Thanks. Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 22:54, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am inclined to agree with you. I think that Kges has the bit between his teeth and scents a first place - I know that feeling and sympathise. I suspect that this is, as you suspect, causing him to churn out items without giving them the time and effort they should really have. Hopefully he will revert to his more thorough self after 2400.

Can I suggest that, clearly being more conversant with the period and conflict, you try to assess all of his ACW articles - obviously not as an obligation, if you are busy, he creates a silly number, etc. Including this one, please. And perhaps gently give other editors who assess them a similar message to this one. Your assessing seems perfectly reasonable and flexible to me, but should be knowledgeable enough to keep Kges on the straight and narrow. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:13, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About the complement, there really is no sourced number that wouldn't be OR (I do not trust my counting abilities enough to total up all of the names on the regimental roster). The only reason that I was able to cite complement numbers for the Philadelphia regiments was because the original source (Taylor) probably counted up the number of names on the muster roll. As for the Harrisburg, I was wrong about it, but I was not aware of the PSU archive at the time. On newspapers.com there were no Harrisburg newspapers available for the period - their archives of the Harrisburg Telegraph began after the end of the war. I admit that I rushed too much this contest, and anyway it turns out to have been irrelevant since I am too far off from 1st place this time, after finally doing the math. Kges1901 (talk) 23:29, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kges1901: Aw, that's a shame. After you left me in the dirt I was hoping that you would take first place. I assume that Parsecboy has it with all of those Imperial German ships? I suspected that it was close and was trying to help by assessing your last minute submissions before the deadline. But after reading 47thPennVols' interjections I realise that I was out of my depth. I was, as you can see, trying to encourage them to take a lead role in ACW assessing as they are clearly knowledgeable in the area. In fact, 47th, have you assessed any GANs yet. Perhaps you should consider it, if only as QPQ for the GA you now have? Gog the Mild (talk) 00:10, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re Peacemaker, I think that he is simply concerned with notability and has nothing specific against 30 day regiments. Of course, he may suspect that a unit which only existed for 30 days is less likely to be notable than one which served for 4 years but if they meet the policy guidelines I am sure that he will treat them fairly. Gog the Mild (talk) 00:10, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ruth E. Hodge. great article!

I enjoyed reading about Hodge's life and work. Great research! MauraWen (talk) 10:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @MauraWen: Thanks so much for your kind words. I'm glad you enjoyed learning more about her, and hope others will as well. I was so pleased to see your article about Julienne Lusenge. She is another of those trailblazers who has shown her community and world that one woman really can make a difference. Best wishes for continued success with your research and writing! 47thPennVols (talk) 16:04, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a great article, but please remember to make redirects from other versions of her name, to help readers to find it and to reduce the risk of some other editor creating a duplicate at a slightly different name. In particular it's important to create Ruth Evelyn Hodge because people are often listed in articles about award recipients etc with their full name; I've also created Ruth Hodge because it's the wikipedia norm (and is used in at least one of your sources), and Ruth Evelyn Perry and a hatnote at Ruth Perry, just in case. PamD 22:09, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: Am I required to do multiple redirects and hatnotes for WIR articles? 47thPennVols (talk) 12:02, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is certainly no "requirement" to spend a lot of time on redirects and hatnotes. (I rarely spend much time on them myself but as you know, women's names are generally more demanding than men's.) By far the most important task is of course creating the articles themselves. I think PamD has been rather hasty in some of her comments. She seems to have completely overlooked the considerable number of fine articles you have created over the past three years, all with impeccable sourcing. I must say she frequently tries to help people along, offering useful advice and tips, but in this case she wrongly assumed you were a relative newcomer. I have seen how upset you feel about all this on your talk page. I hope nonetheless that given the excellent standard of your work, you will continue to contribute to our Monthly achievements. As far as I can see, up to now no one else has produced B-class articles. Yours should be an inspiration to others. This seems to be the second time I have tried to persuade you to contribute to Women in Red -- hopefully the last. I'm glad to see I'm not the only one to appreciate your recent contributions. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:34, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Citation style

Hallo, I hesitate to say this because I see you're an experienced editor with a Good Article to your name, as well as being a "published non-fiction author and humanities researcher-writer", but... you did say on @Ipigott:'s talk page that you're back editing after a break and that you feel yourself to be a relative newbie, so I will.

Looking at both Ruth E. Hodge and Mary Lowe Dickinson, I see that you use an unusual citation style for English Wikipedia. It's more akin to what I'd expect in a printed journal. In enwiki it's more usual either (a) to split the sources out from the list of citations, or alternatively (b) to just have the one list of references, in which multiple occurrences of a reference are re-used by giving the reference a name and citing it by name. Looking at the four Featured Articles on today's main page as a small but random sample of Wikipedia's finest, I find that Bill Brown (cricketer), Loss of MV Darlwyne and Ian Smith use the former system and Baby Boy (Beyoncé song) the latter. With your system, on finding a reference like "”Marcus L. Hodge,” The Sentinel." I have to skim back up through the list of references to find it expanded: with the two-list system there would be a separate shorter list of the sources where I could find that one quickly. Or with the second system, there would just be a whole lot of links to the one reference. There's also a template{{rp}}, "reference page" which can be useful when you want to refer to different pages within a particular source, though perhaps it clutters the text of the article.

There are various documentation pages about referencing. They all offer lots of options, and the instruction not to change the established citation style without very good reason. WP:INLINECITE is a guideline, while Help:Footnotes is a how-to guide.

I don't know what the people who consider GA and FA nominations would say to your current style of doing citations but I think they would probably object. But who am I to talk? I don't write long and thoroughly-researched articles, I just create well-sourced stubs with a full panoply of incoming redirects, and I wiki-gnome around, stub-sorting and generally tidying things up! Welcome back to editing, and congratulations on the two major women's articles I've seen. Oh, another point: subjects are only referred to by surname throughout their article, with some complexity about birth names, name when getting married, etc. But in general it's surname only: not "Ruth E. Hodge has been the recipient of multiple honors" but plain "Hodge has ...". Happy Editing! PamD 09:27, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I see now that your William Henry Egle is a GA and has, for example, multiple references to "Kelker, History of Dauphin County." which aren't combined. I'm surprised. I now see that Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Repeated_citations only says "For multiple use of the same inline citation or footnote, you can use the named references feature", rather than "... should ...", as I'd always thought. Ah well. PamD 09:41, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD: I am personally more interested in the fond than in the forme. In other words, providing information is clearly sourced, I'm not too bothered in early versions of articles, whether the references follow the more common Wikipedia practices or not. From the editor's point of view, it might nevertheless be less cumbersome to use "the one list of references, in which multiple occurrences of a reference are re-used by giving the reference a name and citing it by name", especially if several of them refer to the very same page. In any case, I think 47thPV should be congratulated on being so thorough in his sourcing. As far as I can see, all the details in each of these two articles are unusually well referenced, bringing the articles up to at least C class.--Ipigott (talk) 09:50, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Ipigott: Many thanks, Ian. 47thPennVols (talk) 11:52, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD: I sincerely appreciate your enthusiasm and willingness to try to be of assistance; however, I have to say that I am very uncomfortable with several of the messages you have posted on my talk page recently.

Although I did mention to @Ipigott: (via a message which was a communication *to* Ian and for response *from* Ian if he had time to respond) that I was back after having taken a break (because he and I had had previous communications about that). I took that break only from Women in Red – and not from writing and editing for other Wikipedia projects, as you’re mistakenly assuming above. (My Wikipedia contributions last month were largely done on behalf of the Milhist WikiProject; in addition, I worked on a variety of professional writing projects outside of Wikipedia as well, including a new book-length project which takes up the bulk of my time).

Please be assured that I absolutely do understand how to cite articles correctly. I spent the majority of my professional career working for two major university systems in the United States. (One of my jobs involved coordinating and participating on academic monograph peer review committees; another involved the development and management of post-graduate programs, including coordinating the American academic side of an international collaboration between three major universities.) In addition, as you note above, I am a published author. Although I tend to use Chicago-Turabian or MLA styles when writing, I have become comfortable with AMA, APA, AP (and some very odd "house style" guides) over the years.

Regarding your statement, “I don't know what the people who consider GA and FA nominations would say to your current style of doing citations but I think they would probably object,” actually they haven’t. My GA review went quite smoothly, as have the various WikiProject peer reviews for the multiple B-Class articles that I have produced to date. (Several of my reviewers, in fact, have urged me to submit more of my articles for GA review.) Sometimes citations changed during these reviews; sometimes they didn't. (In short, what may be an uncomfortable citation/referencing style for you, has not been for other experienced Wikipedians.) In addition, as Ian has observed, both of the WIR articles of mine that you've chosen to critique are still in their early phase of development. (I literally hit "publish" on the one we're discussing right now during what was my late afternoon on Aug. 2; the other was published on Aug. 1.)

With respect to your other comment that “subjects are only referred to by surname throughout their article, with some complexity about birth names, name when getting married, etc.” your statement here is also not completely accurate. The reviewer of my GA-class article and I recently spent a fair amount of time analyzing the finer points of Wikipedia’s MoS re: naming conventions for the subject of another one of my articles – prior to my submitting that one for GA review, and we ended up learning that the MoS does not require that the subject's last name be used throughout. (In fact, because it gets confusing when discussing people with the same surname - a daughter and her parents/siblings or a wife and her husband - the MoS actually directs authors to use the first names of subjects rather than surnames. Per the MoS: "To distinguish between people with the same surname in the same article or page, use given names or complete names to refer to each of the people upon first mention. For subsequent uses, refer to them by their given names for clarity and brevity.... For example ... Correct: Ronald and Nancy Reagan arrived separately, Ronald by helicopter and Nancy by car.... Correct: The Reagans arrived separately, Ronald by helicopter and Nancy by car.... Correct: Jacob Grimm was 14 months older than his brother Wilhelm." Incorrect: Using sentences such as "'Clinton met Clinton while they were students at Yale.'")

Quite frankly, to be critiqued so intensely (and repeatedly during a short period of time) when I've worked so hard on the Hodge and Dickinson articles (compared with other editors who are submitting non-sourced or barely-sourced stubs across a range of WikiProjects) is more than a little overwhelming and disheartening. (You may not have meant for your messages to have that impact on me, but they did. Furthermore, I'm utterly baffled as to why you felt the need to bring up my article about Egle when it is unrelated to this discussion.) I had planned on working on another new woman's bio for WIR this weekend, but am no longer feeling motivated to do so. I wish you continued success with your own work. Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 11:52, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that you find my well-intentioned comments demotivating:please continue with your WiR work. I mentioned Egle because I'd followed the link there from the green GA symbol on your page. I will say no more. Happy Editing. PamD 12:48, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear. I was a bit taken aback by the implicit criticism of my GAN assessing re reference style, especially as I noticed after I had approved Egle that I had sloppily omitted to specifically comment on it. (Me bad.) Interesting that 14 minutes after commenting on your reference style there is an acknowledgement of actually having read the appropriate guideline. I thought that I was going to have to point it out. I am (I had just deleted an immodest "obviously") aware of it, not least because one of my WiR GAs (Female Red Guards of the Finnish Civil War - the one you encouraged me to take to GA when I had no intention of so doing) uses a variant of your Egle style. You write a 1,600 word article with 41 citations[!] and get critiqued on a technicality[!!] because PamD thinks it is "unusual". I can only agree with Ipigott. I am reminded of the words Bernard Shaw puts into Caesar's (or is that Ceasor's?) mouth:

BRITANNUS (shocked): Caesar: this is not proper. CAESAR (recovering his self-possession): Pardon him, Theodotus: he is a barbarian, and thinks that the customs of his tribe and island are the laws of nature.

- Gog the Mild (talk) 21:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Gog the Mild:. I'm still feeling bewildered by the intense dialogue which resulted from what I thought was a reasonably good start on the article re: Mary Lowe Dickinson, and remain particularly perplexed as to how and why the article of mine you reviewed for GA status (Egle) could even have been brought into the discussion re: my Dickinson article when those two articles were totally unrelated. My apologies for any discomfort that you may be feeling as a result of this awkward situation. You were only trying to do a good deed by assessing and improving a GAN as part of Milhist's efforts to reduce the number of GANs needing review (something you have done quite successfully for multiple other Wikipedians I might add). I hope you know that the critiques and counsel that you offered during that process for the Egle article were constructive, and very much appreciated. Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 03:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. If I assess a GAN there are a set of criteria. If I miss on one then it needs to be pointed out to me. I was pretty sure that I hadn't this time so - well, I was going to say "I was relaxed", but that's not true; like most people I dislike being criticised, even when it is well intentioned and uninformed. I am not surprised that you feel bewildered and the main reason that I chipped in above was to reinforce what you already knew - that your articles were fully Wiki-compliant AND good exemplars.

To one side, I try to AGF and I am aware that I have posted comments which have, reasonably, caused you distress in the past and so am in a poor position to throw stones.

Also, I like your generous but firmly assertive responses to some of your correspondents. I have tucked some of your phraseology away in case I ever find myself in need of similar.

To end with a series of clichés: Keep on generating your good quality articles; Damn the torpedoes; It is better to beg forgiveness than ask permission. Gog the Mild (talk) 09:46, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Denise Vernay

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Denise Vernay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Catrìona (talk) 03:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Catrìona: Thank you so much for conducting the GA review for Denise Vernay. I began researching her as part of the Women in Red/Milhist challenge back in April and, after just a short time, was awed by her life story. So, I've been working really hard to make sure that the article about her is the best that it can be. I look forward to your feedback. Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 03:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! She certainly has an interesting life story. I've added some initial feedback on the review page. Catrìona (talk) 03:55, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in study

Hello,

I am E. Whittaker, I am working with Wikimedia’s Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at [e-mail] in order to schedule an interview.

Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 20:26, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018 at Women in Red

		September is an exciting new month for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons! New: Women currently in academics Women + Law Geofocus: Hispanic countries Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative Check it out: Monthly achievement initiative All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards. It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in September. Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): Call for members for the Gender Diversity Visibility Community User Group Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red#The Endless Night of Wikipedia’s Notable Woman Problem (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A page you started (Morton L. Montgomery) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Morton L. Montgomery, 47thPennVols!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice job!

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Robertgombos (talk) 19:38, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks so much for reviewing and for your kind words ("Nice job!") in the edit summary. Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 19:41, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Denise Vernay GA nomination

Hello, it looks like you have found the problem with the image upload. The standard hold period is one week. The article has now been on hold for 14 days. I'm happy to leave it as long as you need to resolve the issues that I brought up, as long as you are still intending to do so. In the current state, I cannot pass it. Catrìona (talk) 21:14, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Templebreedy

Hiya. No biggie. But was wondering about this assessment note. In particular "b1 <!- - Referencing and citations - -> = no". Do I read this as an assessment that the b1 criteria ("suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations") are not met? Given that (almost) every sentence in the article is supported by a reliable/inline ref, I'm interested to understand which of the major points could benefit from additional (or better) cites? I'm happy to help improve any that are lacking. If you have any in particular in mind... Guliolopez (talk) 01:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Guliolopez: Thanks so much for reaching out. The one area I saw that might benefit from an additional citation was in the History section - par. 3, 1st sentence, but I also agree with you that, overall, you've done a great job on citations. (I just took another look, and the error was definitely on my end. So, I've gone ahead and checked off B1, and raised the rating to C-Class.) Thanks so much for your hard work. Kind regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 01:31, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 01:48, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Military Importance in WP:MILHIST

Where is the template source for the "Importance" in WikiProject Military History? There is none, therefore I clearly moved it to the WP:Biography with a Mid importance as you had it in WP:MILHIST. Adamdaley (talk) 06:10, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gog the Mild: Since you were the primary reviewer on the Egle article, and just approved it for GA status on July 31, 2018, could you explain to Adam why the article is/was appropriate for the military history category? (Adam seems to feel there are changes needed to the GA classification.) 47thPennVols (talk) 06:25, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I've not changed the "GA" assessment. I clearly moved the invalid code from one WikiProject where it was clearly not being maintained as "Mid", to WikiProject Biography where it is being actually useful. Adamdaley (talk) 06:37, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Adam: I'm not going to get drawn into a back and forth by you on this. I've asked @Gog the Mild: to share his insights. Please be patient and wait for a reply. In the meantime, you might want to turn your attention to one of the 24,062 other articles that are listed by Milhist coordinators as needing attention. (These articles haven't had B-class checklists added, and the majority have never been assessed in any capacity. Additionally, many are at stub or start-class level - far below the Egle article which has already been awarded GA status.) Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 06:50, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• That's where I came from a week ago. That's what I was doing. I'm not argue here, I'm just telling you that it was in the wrong place, otherwise every WikiProject Military History would have an importance section. Adamdaley (talk) 06:59, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Adam: You are being argumentative. I've politely asked you to wait for a reply from @Gog the Mild: but, instead, you have continued to post argumentative content. Because you're unwilling to wait for potential input from Gog the Mild, and because you've been warned about this type of hostile behavior on Milhist discussion threads in the past, I'm now officially asking you to stop posting on my talk page. I will not engage with you any further. 47thPennVols (talk) 07:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Well he'll eventually come. You're just as bad as me, if you wanna do this all day, knowing he hasn't come quite yet. If you don't reply, I won't either. He'll eventually come and comment. Adamdaley (talk) 07:17, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Denise Vernay

The article Denise Vernay you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Denise Vernay for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catrìona -- Catrìona (talk) 04:01, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXLIX, September 2018

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Indy Beetle and Nick-D on the Katangese Gendarmes and India during World War II Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at two important treaties of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Fold3

Hello! I see you have fold3 access. I was wondering if you can clear up some questions I have. I requested access, and was accepted, but I was unable to actually gain access to the full website. I was emailed with instructions to give account info (username); I did, and nothing has happened since. The Fold3 system indicates that I only have a Basic Free Membership account. Is that what I'm supposed to have? Am I supposed to have premium, or something else? Many thanks. -Broichmore (talk) 11:27, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Broichmore: Thanks so much for reaching out. Yes, I do have Fold3, and I've found it quite helpful for my research. I initially had a similar problem in which I was approved but was unable to access anything but the basic content. As I remember, it took more than a month. The Wikipedia coordinator for the Fold3 service, Iazyges (courtesy ping: @Iazyges:), is a volunteer, and is quite busy. It also apparently took a bit of time for the coordinator on Fold3's end to review and process the application. How long have you been trying to access the premium content? 47thPennVols (talk) 15:12, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  @Broichmore: Apologies; I like to send the info to their coordinator two weeks after I send out the email telling everyone to create a free account, to allow for most to respond. I meant to send it out on monday but forgot; it has been sent now, and you should receive access soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 01:16, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Iazyges: Thanks for responding so quickly, and again, thanks for all you're doing to help us obtain (and maintain) access to Fold3. I just found another amazing document in the Civil War pension file of a Medal of Honor winner that I'm writing about for Wikipedia. (That carte de visite photo that I found in a different file a few weeks ago for an entirely different officer was also pretty amazing. Fold3 is turning out to be a gold mine.) Have a great weekend! 47thPennVols (talk) 01:25, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. Broichmore (talk) 10:34, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• My pleasure. Best of luck with your research. 47thPennVols (talk) 14:27, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Anderson (Medal of Honor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Appomattox Court House (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This is an apparent bot error. Just checked every link throughout the article (with the name "Appomattox"). There were no dabs. 47thPennVols (talk) 14:58, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ferdinand F. Rohm) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ferdinand F. Rohm, 47thPennVols!

Wikipedia editor SkyGazer 512 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Just so that you know, I've requested that you be given the autopatrolled right at WP:PERM/AP. Don't worry about this: it doesn't affect the way you edit or what you can do at all, it just means that if you are granted the right by an administrator, your pages will automatically be marked as reviewed to reduce the workload of new page patrollers. If you have any questions or objections, feel free to let me know. Cheers!

To reply, leave a comment on SkyGazer 512's talk page.

• @SkyGazer 512: What a pleasant surprise to see this message pop up on my talk page. Thanks so much for reviewing the Rohm article and for taking the initiative to ask that I be granted autopatrolled right. I'll also post my thanks to your talk page in a sec, but just wanted to express my thanks here as well. Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 06:43, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Learn more about page curation.

SkyGazer 512 ^Oh no, what did I do this time? 02:49, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi 47thPennVols, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! (Swarm ♠ talk) 05:59, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Swarm: Thanks so much for your kind words and also for granting my account autopatrolled status. Kind regards, and have a great week! 47thPennVols (talk) 06:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good for you, or I should say, good for all of us. Thanks for your help in the ACW area of interest. BusterD (talk) 02:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @BusterD: Thanks so much for your support and for your kind words as well. Have a great week! 47thPennVols (talk) 02:59, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have your say!

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:28, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018 at Women in Red

		Please join us... We have four new topics for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons in October! New: Clubs Science fiction + fantasy STEM The Mediterranean Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

September 2018 Military History Writers' Contest

		The Writer's Barnstar
		On behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I hereby award you the Writer's Barnstar for placing second in the September 2018 Military History Article Writing Contest with 124 points from 22 articles. Congratulations, Kges1901 (talk) 09:46, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you! 47thPennVols (talk) 16:01, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CL, October 2018

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the use of so-called "substandard" manpower in armies Interview: On the Bugle turning 150 (issues that is!) Op-ed: TomStar81 on the collapse of empires at the close of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: September 2018

Wikipedia Education globe

This Month in Education

Volume 4 | Issue 9 | September 2018

This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

In This Issue

From the Community

Edu Wiki Camp 2018: New Knowledge for New Generation Education loves Monuments: A Brazilian Tale “I have always liked literature, now I like it even more thanks to Wikipedia”. Literature is in the air of WikiClubs․ History of Wikipedia Education programme at Christ (Deemed to be University) Preparation for the autumn educational session of Selet WikiSchool is started Wiki Camp Doyran 2018 Wikicamp Czech Republic 2018 Wikipedia offline in rural areas of Colombia

From the Education Team

Presentation on mapping education in the Wikimedia Movement

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 01:14, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Get ready for November with Women in Red!

		Three new topics for WiR's online editathons in November, two of them supporting other initiatives New: Religion Deceased politicians Asia Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): WikiProject AfroCine launches (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: November 2018

Wikipedia Education globe

This Month in Education

Volume 4 | Issue 10 | October 2018

This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

In This Issue

From the Community

A new academic course featuring Wikidata at Tel Aviv University How we included Wikipedia edition into a whole University department curriculum Meet the first board of the UG Wikipedia & Education The education program has kicked off as the new academic year starts The education program has kicked off as the new academic year starts in Albania The first Wikimedia+Education conference will happen on April 5-7 at Donostia-Saint Sebastian Using ORES to assign articles in Basque education program What to write for Wikipedia about? Monuments! Wikifridays: editing Wikipedia in the university Writing articles on Wikipedia is our way of leaving legacy to the next generations

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 05:55, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo request petition - please sign

Can you please sign this petition requesting certain historic photos be released for Wikimedia Commons? (Many of them are needed for WiR and Milhist projects) Please do spread the word of the petition to other Wikipedians too. Thanks, --PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:51, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLI, November 2018

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67 looks at the Sydney Wars Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 47thPennVols. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 47thPennVols. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 91st Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 91st Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 10:41, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@AustralianRupert: My apologies for the delay in responding. I've been off of Wikipedia and the computer in general, and am just now only seeing your posts. In addition to it being Thanksgiving vacation week for many of us in the U.S. right now, I've been recovering from a rather nasty accident. I was nearly hit by a car while I was crossing a street several weeks ago, and fell while trying to get out of the car's path. (I had the right of way, by the way, and the police have confirmed that the driver was clearly at fault.) I'm feeling oddly fortunate at this point because if I hadn't fallen, I would actually have been hit by the car. Unfortunately, I sustained significant injuries to my hand and arm - injuries which have are still making computer use somewhat difficult. So, first, I'm grateful that you've been willing to initiate the GA review for this article. And, second, I genuinely appreciate all of your suggestions. I haven't had the chance yet to review all of them, but many of those I did review seemed sound and insightful. Third, I'm relieved that you've now put the GA review on hold (per your message below) because I'm going to need a bit more time in order to work through your list and complete the items you'd recommend be adjusted. Would it be possible for me to have until mid-December? (I would not normally ask this, but my doctor has advised me to continue to limit the use of my hand, wrist and arm for a few more weeks.) Again, many thanks for your help. Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 09:26, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 91st Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment

The article 91st Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:91st Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 03:01, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@AustralianRupert: My apologies for the delay in responding. Per my message above re: your launch of the GA review for this article, I've been off of Wikipedia and the computer in general, and am just now only seeing your posts - due to it being Thanksgiving vacation week for many of us in the U.S. right now, as well as to my recovery from a nasty accident. (Please see the message above for details.) I'm relieved that you've now put the GA review on hold (per your message below), and am requesting that I be given a slightly longer hold time (to mid-December) to allow for recovery from injuries, as well as to complete the items you've recommended be adjusted. (Again, I would not normally ask this, but my doctor has advised me to continue to limit the use of my hand, wrist and arm for a few more weeks.) Many thanks. Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 09:30, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018 at Women in Red

		The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone. New: Photography Laureates Countries beginning with 'I' Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): BBC 100 Women 2018 (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 13:54, 27 November 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: November 2018

This Month in Education Volume 4 • Issue 10 • October 2018 Contents • Single page view • Subscribe In This Issue WikiEducation - Report from Wikimedians of Albanian Language UG Wikipedia Education Program in ICETC 2018, Japan Wikipedia has become the inseparable part of my daily life Wikipedia is a world in which anyone of us has his own place Wiki conference for teachers in Ohrid Our baby is 3! Highlighting work of Sailesh Patnaik Important updates from Wikimedia Education Team Welcome Melissa to the Education Team What has the education team been up to? Year end review and updates!

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 18:18, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Indy beetle looks at military newspapers in East Africa

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 91st Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment

The article 91st Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:91st Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 05:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness

Wishing you an appropriately merry and appropriately relaxed Christmas. Your words and sentiments have made Wikipedia a more enjoyable place, certainly for me and I am quite sure for many others. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019 at Women in Red

January 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1, Numbers 104-108 Happy New Year from Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual editathons. January events: Women of War and Peace Play! January geofocus: Caucasus New, year-long initiative: Suffrage Continuing global initiative: #1day1woman2019 Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list Image attribution: Nevit Dilmen (CC BY-SA 3.0) --Rosiestep (talk) 17:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

2018 Military History Newcomer of the Year

		2018 Military History Newcomer of the Year
		As voted by your peers within the Military history WikiProject, I hereby award you the WikiProject Barnstar for being nominated for the 2018 Military History Newcomer of the Year Award. Congratulations, and thank you for your efforts in 2018. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

Hello 47thPennVols, I wanted to say happy New Year and hopefully you'd have a great 2019. Because of timezones is it highly posible that I'm living in 2019 when you see this message. That's why I'll say it now already, even it is still 2018 there. I would say: "you Americans follow us the Europeans into the future". Cheers and have a great day, year and be save. CPA-5 (talk) 13:36, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Year in Review

		The WikiChevrons
		For your work on William Henry Egle you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 19:43, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Epic Barnstar
		For your work on William Henry Egle you are hereby awarded The Epic Barnstar. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 19:43, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Biography Barnstar
		For your work on William Henry Egle you are hereby awarded The Biography Barnstar. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 19:43, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The American Civil War Barnstar
		For your work on William Henry Egle you are hereby awarded the American Civil War Barnstar. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 19:43, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at Albert Speer Op-ed: Factotem on common problems affecting infoboxes Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:57, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019 at Women in Red

February 2019, Volume 5, Issue 2, Numbers 107-111 Happy February from Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual editathons. February events: Social Workers Black Women February geofocus: Ancient World Continuing initiatives: Suffrage #1day1woman2019 Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage: Socialites Twitter - Forgotten African American Suffragists Women in Red image uploads to Commons Image attribution: Johntex (CC BY-SA 3.0) Subscription options: English language opt-in International opt-in Unsubscribe --Rosiestep (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: January 2019

This Month in Education Volume 8 • Issue 1 • January 2019 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue Registration for Wikimedia+Education Conference is open Collaboration with Yerevan State University of Languages and Social Sciences after V. Brusov Meet the first Programs & Events Dashboard sysops More than a hundred students gathered in Ecuador to edit Wikipedia Selet WikiSchool continues to teach young Tatar language Wikipedians The WikiClub contributes to the development of our human qualities Third prize for Wikipedia in schools project We've updated the design of Education space! The WikiChallenge Ecoles d'Afrique is back Wiki Advanced Training at VVIT Creating our first WikiClub WikiClubs participate in edit-a-thon of cartoons Wikimedia and Education in Portugal: Where are we now Wikimedia Israel: “Wikipedia Ambassadors” program for Arabic-speaking schools is launched

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 04:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on the Japanese battleship Mikasa

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019 at Women in Red

		March 2019, Volume 5, Issue 3, Numbers 107, 108, 112, 113 Happy Women's History Month from Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual events: March: Art+Feminism & #VisibleWikiWomen Geofocus: Francophone Women Continuing initiatives: Suffrage #1day1woman
		Other ways you can participate: Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred Subscription options: English language opt-in International opt-in Unsubscribe --Rosiestep (talk) 22:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Welcome back

Welcome back 47thPennVols happy to see you back. Yes I know I'm a little bit late to say "welcome back" but I am in a really busy period (with my family) so couldn't be here on Wikipedia most of the time. But I am happy to see you back. PS happy (late) Valentine's Day. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:44, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CPA-5: Many thanks for the warm welcome and Valentine's Day wishes. I'm still needing to limit my time here because I'm still having a few problems with my left hand (related to the accident), but am happy to be able to at least research and type for a little bit. Hope all's well in your world. Looking forward to reading more of your work. 47thPennVols (talk) 19:50, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• You're welcome 47thPennVols. I'm happy to hear your recovery. Yes I know this sounds a little awkward to say but I will take a little break on Wikipedia to finish those damnson family stuff. In the meantime please be safe and careful especially with your left hand. I will be back as soon as possible which would be in begin March. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 20:25, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: February 2019

This Month in Education Volume 8 • Issue 2 • February 2019 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue Wikimedia User Group Nigeria in Collaboration with AfroCrowd Celebrate Black Month History with a 2Day Editathon Wikimedia+Education Programme announced Wikipedia in Education, Uruguay Oslo Metropolitan University hires “Wikipedia-assistants” Basque Education Program: 2018 in review Wikimedia Israel introduces Wikidata to Education Wikimedia Serbia made tutorials in Serbian language on editing Wikipedia Seminar on wikis in education Wikimedia, Tourism and Education: Launching project ISAL The Swiss Lab: Wikipedia as a game Meet Hungary

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 17:52, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on US Navy aviation safety and Australian war crimes trials

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019 at Women in Red

April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117 Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual events: New topics: Gender studies / United Nations / Dance Geofocus: Portuguese-speakers Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman Other ways you can participate: Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: March 2019

This Month in Education Volume 8 • Issue 3 • March 2019 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue Wikimedia at UNESCO Mobile Learning Week 2019 Wiki Education publishes evaluation on how to get subject matter experts to edit WikiGap brings editors to close WikiGap and open Wiki Pathshala Education Mapping exercise is open for public review Wikimedia movement projects and activities presented at EDU RUSSIA 2019 forum “Edit-a-thons give us opportunity to distract from common interests” The club members write articles about New Year WikiClub as a non-formal educational centre in rural communities Mini MediaWiki Training at VVIT

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 06:31, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bring your idea for Wikimedia in Education to life! Launch of the Wikimedia Education Greenhouse

Apply for Education Greenhouse Are you passionate about open education? Do you have an idea to apply Wikimedia projects to an education initiative but don’t know where to start? Join the the Wikimedia & Education Greenhouse! It is an immersive co-learning experience that lasts 9 months and will equip you with the skills, knowledge and support you need to bring your ideas to life. You can apply as a team or as an individual, by May 12th. Find out more Education Greenhouse. For more information reachout to mguadalupewikimedia.org

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:16, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67, Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at three books focussing on the World Wars Op-ed: Indy Beetle on the fall of Idi Amin

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: April 2019

This Month in Education Volume 8 • Issue 4 • April 2019 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue Launch of the Wikimedia & Education Greenhouse! Wikipedia Student Scholar Wikimedia Commons: a highly hostile place for multimedia students contributions Wikimedia+Education Conference highlights

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 01:27, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May you join this month's editathons from WiR!

May 2019, Volume 5, Issue 5, Numbers 107, 108, 118, 119, 120, 121 Hello and welcome to the May events of Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual events: New topics: "May" women / Mayors / Environentalists Geofocus: CEE countries Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman Other ways you can participate: Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia's leadership and medical services in World War II and Peacemaker67 on Israel's targeted assassinations Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the fate of the German fleet at Scapa Flow

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:03, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June events with WIR

June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125 Check out what's happening in June at Women in Red: Virtual events: New topics: Pride / Royals / Space Geofocus: Mediterranean Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman Other ways you can participate: Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: May 2019

This Month in Education Volume 8 • Issue 5 • May 2019 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue Education in Wales Wikimedia & Education Greenhouse: Applications closed! Wiki Camp 'Meet Germany' Seniors also count! Mandatory internship at Wikimedia Armenia Wikimedia Experience Survey by VVIT WikiConnect OFWA Wikipedia Education Highlights April 2019 Wikimedia Education at "Wikicamp Chattogram 2019" Edit a thon about flora and fauna to celebrate the earth day

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 07:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the Dambusters, and Hawkeye7 at Allied code breakers and Australia in New Guinea and Vietnam Op-ed: TomStar81 on the treaty that ended World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:07, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July events from Women in Red!

July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128 Check out what's happening in July at Women in Red... Virtual events: New topics: Sports / Education Geofocus: Microstates Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman Initiatives we support: Atari Women University of Edinburgh 1000 Women in Religion Editor feedback: Check out the conversations regarding Sports, Sports, Sports! Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Removing stub tags

Hi, I'm confused why you've removed stub tags from articles that are clearly stubs such as here and here. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:21, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for your inquiry, @User:Eagles247. As a native Pennsylvanian and longtime student of Pennsylvania and American History, I've been bothered by the historical lack of activity on WikiProject Pennsylvania. (At one point, this lack of activity contributed to WikiProject Pennsylvania being labeled as "semi-active" by Wikipedia, and clearly has been a key factor behind the proliferation of articles on the project being tagged as stubs by bots when they are, in fact, start class or better when compared to articles from other state wikiprojects. (With respect, I humbly disagree with your assessment that the articles you're referring to above were "clearly stubs." Although the 1841 Pennsylvania gubernatorial election does not have extensive text content, it includes far more content than many other existing stubs on Wikipedia today including, among other things: the beginnings of a Reference section with an initial inline citation; an image of the winning candidate, David R. Porter, and a wikilink to his biographical article on Wikipedia; a chart listing the candidates by name, party affiliation, vote count, and percentage of votes garnered; a graphic (statewide map) showing the election results by county. And while the Dan Ficca article is a short one, the creator did take the time to create an Infobox showing Ficca's basic career highlights - so, it's really more than the mere stub that many articles are on Wikipedia.)

As an educator, I've been equally bothered by the fact that many of my fellow educators prohibit their students from using Wikipedia as a source for articles about Pennsylvania's history and its people. (I've been told by more than a few that one of their reasons is that the articles appear to be lesser quality because they have been labeled as stubs or otherwise tagged as lacking appropriate references and/or supporting materials.)

For these two reasons, I decided to begin work on stub sorting, retagging/detagging, and adding new content with new inline citations to as many Pennsylvania articles as I can get to with my limited free time. So, it's troubling to me that you reverted my removal of the stub tags for both of these articles at 18:18 (Ficca) and 18:19 (1841 gubernatorial) on July 3 before posting your query to me at 18:21. I believe it would have been more appropriate for you to assume good faith and initiate the appropriate dialogue as to why I took the actions I did before reverting me because, as you can see from my explanation above, there has been no malicious intent on my part. I have simply been following Wikipedia's guidance to be bold with respect to removing stub status.

So, now that I've explained things, I'm formally asking that you undo your revert to at least the 1841 gubernatorial article because I believe your action was incorrect for that particular article. (Since you're a sports expert, I'll leave the decision re: the Ficca article to you, but the gubernatorial article is clearly not a stub.) Thanks for your cooperation. (I'll also post my response to your query on your talk page as well just to make sure you see it.) Best wishes for continued success with your own research and editing. Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 19:21, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. It is admirable to see your dedication to Pennsylvania-related articles on Wikipedia, but I believe you are missing the intention of articles being labeled as "stubs". The templates at the bottom of stubs are used to encourage readers and editors to expand the pages, they aren't red letters saying these articles aren't good enough to be read by an average user of the site. Per WP:STUBDEF, a stub is typically subjective in length but in general it is agreed that they are less than 10 sentences, 250 words, or 1500 characters of prose. According to the editing guideline you cited (WP:DESTUB), "Once a stub has been properly expanded and becomes a larger article, any editor may remove its stub template." Many of the articles you removed the templates from were not expanded, and thus do not meet the guideline to remove the templates. I stand by all of my reversions, as two sentences of prose and two infoboxes are not enough for these articles to be considered "start" class. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:09, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being willing to discuss your thinking on this, @User:Eagles247, but again, I must respectfully disagree with your assessment since, in my opinion, the gubernatorial articles are somewhat more than the stub definition of "a very basic description of the topic" (due to the features I mentioned above, including the charts which list the candidates, their respective party affiliations, vote totals and vote percentages). I firmly believe these articles provide "some meaningful content" (start class and even some elements of C-class) as opposed to "very little meaningful content" (stub class). I'm puzzled by your assertion that, "in general it is agreed that [stub articles] are less than 10 sentences, 250 words, or 1500 characters of prose" (since the actual phrase from that paragraph reads: "Over the years, different editors have followed different rules of thumb to help them decide when an article is likely to be a stub. Editors may decide that an article with more than ten sentences is too big to be a stub, or that the threshold for another article may be 250 words. Others follow the Did you know? standard of 1,500 characters in the main text. AutoWikiBrowser is frequently set to automatically remove stub tags from any article with more than 500 words"). Furthermore, Wikipedia's stated criteria for article assessments (Template:Grading scheme) simply describes the differences thusly:

• Stub Class: "A very basic description of the topic. However, all very-bad-quality articles will fall into this category.... Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant...."
• Start Class: "An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete. It might or might not cite adequate reliable sources.... Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more...."

So, because we disagree on this point, but can both point to Wikipedia guidelines to support our respective positions, I am asking again, respectfully, that you undo your reverts on the history-related articles. (I will defer to you on the sports-related articles since you're the sports expert, but ask that you respect my level of expertise as an educator, published author, and experienced Wikipedia editor.) I'll also post my response to you on your talk page for consistency sake. Again, many thanks for your collegiality and cooperation. Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 20:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I pointed you to WP:STUBDEF which details the general length of a stub as I described. I'm not sure why you believe being an educator and author gives you more of a qualification to edit certain articles on Wikipedia than me, especially since the subject of the articles is irrelevant in this discussion about policy (of which I am supposedly an expert). Again, I will not undo my reversions and I suggest you start a discussion at an appropriate talk page (such as Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pennsylvania or WT:STUB) to gain a consensus for your edits. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: June 2019

This Month in Education Volume 8 • Issue 6 • June 2019 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue The introduction of the Wikipedia into the educational program has expanded Welcome Vasanthi to the Education Team! Wikimedia Education SAARC Conference happening in India "Won't somebody please think of the children?" The first Annual Report of VVIT WikiConnect An effective collaboration of WikiClubs and schools Wikiclassroom: New way for students' inspiration Wikipedia as a classroom activity kicks off in Kosovo

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 17:39, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLIX, July 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Haweye7, Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on recent books covering the world wars

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019 at Women in Red

August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131 Check out what's happening in August at Women in Red... Virtual events: New: Film+Stage / Indigenous women / Millennial countries Continuing: Sports (through August 31st) / Suffrage / #1day1woman Editor feedback: Check out the conversation regarding: August's Indigenous Women event and the REDress Project Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Rosiestep (talk) 06:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: July 2019

This Month in Education Volume 8 • Issue 7 • July 2019 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue First WikiEducation gathering in Mexico SEABA school in India has hired a Wikimedian to teach Wikimedia project in their school. Selet WikiSchool: results of first half of 2019 Students Use Archival Documents in a Competition, WMIL Stepanakert WikiClub: Meeting with the Speaker of the Artsakh Parliament - Ashot Ghoulian Collaboration with American University of Armenia Finalizing the Collaboration with Armenian Education Foundation Wikimedia Education SAARC Conference Journey

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 09:53, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Peacemaker67 look at Italian, German and Australian forces in World War II

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Peacemaker67 look at Italian, German and Australian forces in World War II

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog Banzai

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019 at Women in Red

September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135 Check out what's happening in September at Women in Red... Online events: New: Law / Military history / Writers / Geofocus: defunct countries Continuing: Suffrage / #1day1woman Editor feedback: Check out the conversation regarding: Missing articles about notable women by "nationality" vs. "country of citizenship" Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I just visited some of the articles I wrote a while back on Vermont Medal of Honor recipients in the Civil War and noticed you significantly expanded many of them. Thank you! Vermont (talk) 15:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vermont: My pleasure. Thank YOU for researching and starting the articles in the first place. Anyone who has one a Medal of Honor deserves to be remembered, IMHO, so your work in this regard has been really important. Best wishes for continued success with your own research and writing, and many thanks for your kind words and the "warm fuzzy" you sent by way of the barnstar! 47thPennVols (talk) 17:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Richard "Dick" Wheeler

Thanks for starting the article Richard "Dick" Wheeler. I think the title needs to be changed however, to be more inline with WP:NCP guidelines, and to more clearly distinguish from other Richard Wheelers. The military historian seems to be most prominently known as simply "Richard Wheeler" (e.g. the name used in his books, and by others in reviews). "Dick" might be used by friends and family, but does not seem to be most common name, and there are other notable Dick Wheeler's which may warrant future Wikipedia articles. What do you think of moving the article to Richard Wheeler (historian)? "Richard Wheeler (author)" is too ambiguous, and can be confused with the novelist Richard S. Wheeler. --Animalparty! (talk) 18:18, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Animalparty: Many thanks for your input. I went back and forth with myself over the naming because, although the name used for many of the books he authored was "Richard Wheeler", a number of military historians have referred to or cited him over the years as "Dick Wheeler." Further complicating the matter are the multiple instances of newspaper editors (including those at major newspapers) who regularly referred to him as "Richard 'Dick' Wheeler" (and who still do in 2019), which I suspect may have been/may be an editorial choice because there have been/are so many "Richard Wheelers" and "Dick Wheelers" out there. In addition, the problem with using "Richard Wheeler (historian)" is that there are actually other Richard Wheelers out there who were/are/may become historians, including at least one who has also been involved with films/documentaries (Richard Wheeler, the National Specialist in Garden History with the National Trust, who worked on "The First Georgians"; here's his LinkedIn profile, fyi). I do understand that Wikipedia has a style guide with respect to the names of biographical subjects, but after reading and re-reading it more than a few times over the years, I believe that it provides significant flexibility, particularly with respect to the usage of middle names. So, for these reasons, I'm not convinced that the name of the article should be changed. IMHO, I think changing the article title could potentially make it more confusing for readers, rather than less so, but if you have further thoughts, I'd welcoming hearing those. Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 18:37, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: August 2019

This Month in Education Volume 8 • Issue 8 • August 2019 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue Summer WikiCamp for secondary school students 2019 in Armenia Together, we can create an environment that promotes Quality Education International Days and pop culture motivate primary and secondary education students to write on Wikipedia and Wikidata Quality learning and recruiting students at Edu Wiki camp We spend such wonderful days in WikiCamps that noone wants to return home

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 01:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXI, September 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the legacy of World War II

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October Events from Women in Red

October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140 Check out what's happening in October at Women in Red... Online events: New: STEM / Fashion / Geofocus: landlocked countries / Stub Contest Continuing: Suffrage / #1day1woman Editor feedback: Check out the conversation regarding: Women vice Chancellors in Top 200 universities Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: September 2019

This Month in Education Volume 8 • Issue 9 • September 2019 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue Learning history by expanding articles about novels Organizing the Education space at Wikimania 2019 - A conversation with Shani Evenstein Wiki Goes to School is back in three cities in Indonesia Wikipedia workshop at the Summer IT School for Teachers WikiChallenge Ecoles d'Afrique 2019 is over Wikipedia Education Program held at Netrokona Government College, Bangladesh Stepanakert WikiClub turns 4! Wikimedia Indonesia trained the trainers through WikiPelatih 2019 Students learning Wikipedia editing by attending Wikicamp at Nabran What is happening at Wikimedia Space?

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 19:34, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Carrie B. Wilson Adams

Your thanks for my rating on Talk:Carrie B. Wilson Adams is appreciated. I am writing to you about using the very helpful tool, WP:Rater, which I used on the talk page. You can too.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 23:29, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXII, October 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at three works Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on writing a military biography

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:31, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

This Month in Education: October 2019

This Month in Education Volume 8 • Issue 10 • October 2019 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue Wikimedia Chile launched its new online course for school teachers Wikimedia Norway is developing an education program for Sámi students and universities teaching Sámi subjects Teachers Association of the Republic of Indonesia (PGRI) Keeps Improving Teachers’ Digital Literacy Through the Use of Wikipedia Lectures on Wikipedia at the the University of Warsaw Wikicamp in Armenia through the Eyes of Foreigners New Wiki Education evaluation report of Wikidata courses published courses. Wikimedia 2030 Strategoy Youth Salon by VVIT WikiConnect Wikimedia & Education Greenhouse – Highlights from the first unit of the online courses. What is happening at Wikimedia Space?

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 08:30, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019 at Women in Red

November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143 Check out what's happening in November at Women in Red... Online events: New: Librarians / Leaders / Geofocus: Asian Women Month Continuing: Suffrage / #1day1woman / Stub Contest Editor feedback: Check out the conversation regarding: Disappearing articles Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXIII, November 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Willbb234 on Allied pilots, Hawkeye7 on the defence of Australia and logistics in Indochina, Nick-D on Australian commandos Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports back on a high-profile history symposium

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December events with WIR

December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147 Check out what's happening in December at Women in Red... Online events: New: Parliamentarians / Classical musicians / 2019 deaths / Geofocus: Arab world Continuing: Suffrage / #1day1woman / Stub Contest Editor feedback: Check out the conversation regarding: Disappearing articles Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: November 2019

This Month in Education Volume 8 • Issue 11 • November 2019 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue Wikimedians aim to make a difference in the lives of students in Ghana with support from the Wikimedia & Education Greenhouse The Third "Editatón WikiUNAM" Spreading Free Knowledge in the Land of Minangkabau What can we learn from the Open Education movement about attaining educational SDG in the digital age? We are highlighting the work of User:Ixocactus this month‎ “Olympic sports through history” on Serbian Wikipedia courses. Workshops with Wiki Club members "Learning about other Culture" SEABA School, Lehragaga. What is happening at Wikimedia Space?

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 03:15, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXIV, December 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at works on aspects of the Second World War and Cold War

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020 at Women in Red

January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153 Happy Holidays from all of us at Women in Red, and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020! Online events: New: Activists / Public domain / Geofocus: Central America / Year-long campaign: Sports! Continuing: 2019 deaths / #1day1woman Editor feedback: Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

The Bugle: Issue CLXV, January 2020

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Jim Mattis

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February with Women in Red

February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155 Happy Valentine's Day from all of us at Women in Red. Online events: New: Explorers / Black Women / Horror / Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports! Editor feedback: Schedule planning at the Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: January 2020

This Month in Education Volume 9 • Issue 1 • January 2020 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue Meet this month's featured Wikimedia & Education community member: User:Parvathisri Alva's college collaboration EtnoWiki strikes again in Poland! Internship program: Engaging New Volunteers to Join the Community Joint translations as language studying tool in Karvachar’s Wikiclub Selet WikiSchool introduces Wikinews and other Wikimedia projects Training of Trainers for Teachers in South Sulawesi Was Organized For the First Time Twenty video tutorials in Serbian language on editing Wikipedia Updates from Wikimedia Education database edit-a-thon Wiki Club Ohrid grows Wiki Masuk Sekolah (Wiki Goes to School) Involved the Students in Producing and Sharing Knowledge Through Wikipedia Wikiclassroom as a New Means of Gaining Knowledge Wikimedia & Education Greenhouse – Highlights from the second unit of the online course WoALUG collaboration with educational institution BONEVET in Prishtina

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 07:26, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: IssueICLXVI, February 2020

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at a failed German counterattack in the Battle of Normandy

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

This Month in Education: February 2020

This Month in Education Volume 9 • Issue 1 • February 2020 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue Featured education community member of February 2020 Wikipedia in Mayan Language Open Education Week - events with Wikimedia Poland Youngest wikimedians ever editing Txikipedia Fashion and digital citizenship at Bath Spa University WoALUG and REC Albania continue their collaboration in Wikimedia Education Respati Project

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 22:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Rosalind P. Walter

On 6 March 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rosalind P. Walter, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Indefensible (talk) 23:41, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXVII, March 2020

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020 at Women in Red

April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162 April offerings at Women in Red. Online events: New: Gender studies / Dance / Geofocus: Caucasus Photo and image campaign: #VisibleWikiWomen Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports! Editor feedback: Schedule planning at the Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: March 2020

This Month in Education Volume 9 • Issue 3 • March 2020 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue An Update on Wikimedia Indonesia’s Education Program Education Program in CUC Sur, Jalisco, México Meet this month's featured Wikimedia & Education community member: Amber Berson Enhancing Armenian Wikipedia with professional articles How collaborations and perseverance contributed to an especially impactful educational project Wikimedia Argentina carried out the first training program in education and Human Rights for the Wikimedia Movement

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 15:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXVIII, April 2020

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the logistics behind the Crusades and the USAF's early Cold War nuclear deterrant

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020 at Women in Red

May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166 May offerings at Women in Red. Online events: New: Healthcare / Women and their animals / Marys and Mays/ Geofocus Central & Eastern Europe Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports! Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: April 2020

This Month in Education Volume 9 • Issue 4 • April 2020 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue Wikipedia Reveals New Sides of Translation Education Webinars organized by Wikimedia México Fact checking tool with library under cc-license Fast help for schools: An interactive platform for Open Educational Resources Meet this month's featured Wikimedia & Education community member Wiki Club Ashesi Welcomes Onboard a New Patron Wiki-school. A new program for teachers in Poland Wikimedia Serbia was organized action on improving students assignments on Wikipedia

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 10:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXIX, May 2020

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at fortifications, the German Army, and post-Cold War conflict

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020 at Women in Red

Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169 Online events: New: Pride / United Nations / Geofocus on reducing gender imbalance Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: May 2020

This Month in Education Volume 9 • Issue 5 • May 2020 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse EduWiki challenge México by Wikimedia México Featured education community member of May 2020 Sharing Wikimedia Education Projects in the Philippines Turkish professors are giving Wikipedia assignments during Covid-19 days Wikidata introduced in Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade Wikipedia as career counseling tool for teenagers

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 16:39, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXX, June 2020

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the naval siege of Japan in 1945

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: June 2020

This Month in Education Volume 9 • Issue 6 • June 2020 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse Understanding Wikimedia Affiliates Evaluation in Education Report Understanding Wikimedia Community as Research Fellows Participants of Wiki/Ponder online workshop in Kosovo edit Wikipedia Wikimedia & Education Greenhouse – Celebrating the final unit of the online course! Wikipedia in schools competing for innovations in teaching award Meet this month's featured Wikimedia & Education community member: Oleh Kushch

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 03:54, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020 at Women in Red

Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173 Online events: New: July Julies / Disability / Women from Where? ... and starting for an extended period: BLM/Anti-discrimination Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports! Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXI, July 2020

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Hadrian's Wall and Hawkeye7 on the British military Op-ed: Nick-D on diversity and military history

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020 at Women in Red

Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175 Online events: New: Indigenous women | Countries headed by women Interwiki collaborations: Interwiki Women Collaboration | Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman | BLM/Anti-discrimination Ending August 31st: Sports (returning for the next Olympics) Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: July 2020

This Month in Education Volume 9 • Issue 7 • July 2020 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse About Education at the Wikimedia Polska Conference Featured education community member The importance of having an Education and Human Rights Program The Welsh Wiki-Education project Wikimedia Chile faces the challenge of mandatory virtuality WoALUG and Canadian Institute of Technology write about women in tech

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 05:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXII, August 2020

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Nick-D on 1945

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: August 2020

This Month in Education Volume 9 • Issue 8 • August 2020 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse Collaboration between Karvachar Armath laboratory and Karvachar’s Wikiclub as a new educational platform for the teenagers Education cycle “Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: an instructional strategy for the teaching practice” 3rd edition of Wikipedia Education Program in Hebron, Palestine. (COVID-19 edition) Introductory Wikipedia Workshop with Future Engineers: First Step of Education Program A picture is worth a thousand words: history students research pictures on Commons

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 13:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September Women in Red edithons

Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177 Online events: New: Women writers | Women in conflict zones Interwiki collaborations: Women of WWII Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman | BLM/Anti-discrimination Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue Issue CLXXIII, September 2020

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review Essay: Nick-D on the Historical Aircraft Restoration Society

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October editathons from Women in Red

Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179 Online events: Annual Ada Lovelace Day celebratiaon: Women in STEM Contest (Oct-Nov-Dec): Women in Asia Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman | BLM/Anti-discrimination Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: September 2020

This Month in Education Volume 9 • Issue 9 • September 2020 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse Active autumn in the Polish wiki-education Cycle "Caminos y voces de la educación con Wikipedia" Featured education community member of September 2020 The Use of Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons as tool for Module Development in the Philippines Wikimedia Indonesia Education Team Launched Their Books About Wikipedia Wikimedia Serbia is organizing the first online Edu Wiki camp

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 12:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXIV, October 2020

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Franklin Roosevelt in World War II and Hog Farm on the Battle of Chancellorsville

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: October 2020

This Month in Education Volume 9 • Issue 10 • October 2020 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse Collegiate Students Fight Historical Revisionism Through Online Wikipedia Edit-a-thon Digital skills using Wikimedia Art + Feminism Editathon “¡No se olvida!” (We don’t forget!) Education news bytes Featured education community member of October 2020 Teaching Wikipedia at University of Tromsø with support from the Sámi Parliament

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 12:59, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red

Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181 Online events: New: Textile arts | Stage+Screen+Radio+Podcast Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman | BLM/Anti-discrimination Contest (Oct-Nov-Dec): Women in Asia Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, November 2020

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D & Hawkeye7 look at two aspects of 20th Century warfare Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Unknown Soldiers

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December with Women in Red

Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183 Online events: New: Women who died in 2020 | Philanthropists Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman | BLM/Anti-discrimination Contest (Oct-Nov-Dec): Women in Asia Other ways to participate: Help us plan future events Join the conversations on our talkpage Become a member Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

RfC - scope and title for the American Revolutionary War article

I am forwarding this RfC notice to you, along with the ongoing Discussion Summary Chart because you are listed as a History Project member interested in American history. The RfC and discussion is found at Talk:American Revolutionary War. Please feel free to delete this notice if it does not fit your current interests. - TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 10:37, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American Revolutionary War, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RFC for value. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 23:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which title best defines the SCOPE for the American Revolutionary War?
discussion summarized by TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 09:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A. "American Revolutionary War”

B. "War of the American Revolution"

continuity - used at this WP article and sister articles for 19 years - scope - British-American insurrection in continental North America - participants British & US Congress with respective allies, auxiliaries & combatants - war aims -- Brit: maintain First British Empire with mercantile system -- US: independence, British evacuation, territory to Mississippi-navigation, Newfoundland-fish & cure - results - US independence & republic; Britain the biggest US trade partner & finances US expanding business & Treasury - reliable scholarly reference Britannica for the general reader - prominent adherents - all 15 history Pulitzer winner scholars on the topic

modern update - uses 'vast majority of sources' found in a browser search - scope - British-American insurrection in continental North America, spread to Anglo-Bourbon (Fr.&Sp.) War-across worldwide empires, Fourth Anglo-Dutch War-North Atlantic, Second Mysore War-Indian subcontinent & Ocean - participants British & US Congress, France, Spain, Dutch Republic, Kingdom of Mysore - war aims -- Brit: maintain First British Empire with mercantile system -- US independence, British evacuation, territory to Mississippi-navigation, Newfoundland-fish & cure -- Bourbons: Gibraltar, Jamaica, Majorca, expand Gambia trade, expand India trade -- Dutch - free trade with North America & Caribbean -- Mysore wider east-Indian sub-continent sphere of influenced results - Second British Empire, Spanish Majorca, French Gambia, further decline of Dutch Republic - reliable scholarly reference [world military dictionary] for the military specialist - prominent adherents - Michael Clodfelter, more to follow

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, December 2020

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the war in Ukraine

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:48, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: November 2020

This Month in Education Volume 9 • Issue 11 • November 2020 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse Celebrating 10 years of student editing in the United States and Canada Cooperation in digital education – Wikimedia Polska conference Education Team 2020 Year End Review Featured education community members of 2020 Fifteen years of implementation of the Wikipedia Education Program in Serbia Hablon User Group and UP Internet Freedom Network Wikipedia Edit-a-thon Online trainings on Wikipedia with high school students of Kosova Photographics and free culture training in Cameroon and Switzerland The article about Wiki-education in the science magazine The first Online EduWiki Camp in Serbia Wikimedia Mexico’s Education Program celebrates Open Access Week 2020 Wikipedia as a Tool to Educate and to Be Educated

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 07:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

^Walter Elmer Schofield, Across the River (1904), Carnegie Museum of Art.		Best wishes for a safe, healthy and prosperous 2021.
		Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 14:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] Oneupsmanship: This painting turned the friendly rivalry between Edward Redfield and Elmer Schofield into a feud. Schofield was a frequent houseguest at Redfield's farm, upstream from New Hope, Pennsylvania, and the two would go out painting together, competing to capture the better view. Redfield served on the jury for the 1904 Annual Exhibition of the Carnegie Institute; at which, despite Redfield's opposition, Across the River was awarded the Gold Medal and $1,500 prize. It was not until a 1963 interview that the 93-year-old Redfield revealed the painting as the cause of the 40-year feud between them. Schofield may have painted it in England, but a blindsided Redfield knew that it was a view of the Delaware River, from his own front yard!

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

A New Year With Women in Red!

Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188 Online events: New: Climate and environment | Public domain Contest (Jan-Feb-Mar): Africa contest Year-long initiative: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2020 Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, January 2021

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks Australian artillery in World War I Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on no-win scenarios

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: January 2021

This Month in Education Volume 10 • Issue 1 • January 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse Featured education community member of January 2021 Open Education Global 2020 Conference Reading Wikipedia in Bolivia The impact of war on young Wikimedians in Stepanakert The Possibility of Open-Access Learning Portals in the Philippines Training Resources about Author’s Rights published by Wiki in Africa

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 17:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: January 2021

This Month in Education Volume 10 • Issue 1 • January 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse Featured education community member of January 2021 Open Education Global 2020 Conference Reading Wikipedia in Bolivia The impact of war on young Wikimedians in Stepanakert The Possibility of Open-Access Learning Portals in the Philippines Training Resources about Author’s Rights published by Wiki in Africa

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 15:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191 Online events: New: Black women | Classicists | Folklore Contest (Jan/Feb/Mar): Africa Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Works on the Gallipoli Campaign, Battle of Perryville and US 1st Infantry Division

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Works on the Gallipoli Campaign, Battle of Perryville and US 1st Infantry Division

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: February 2021

This Month in Education Volume 10 • Issue 2 • February 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse Wikimedia Education news bytes Featured education community member of February 2021 Karvachar Wikiclub continues its activities online Over 4,000 more references added! 1Lib1Ref campaign in Poland Philippines Climate Change Translate-a-thon

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 07:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193 Online events: New: Art+Activism | VisibleWikiWomen Contest (Jan/Feb/Mar): Africa Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXIX, March 2021

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on female computers, Nick-D on the Israeli Defence Forces

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April editathons from Women in Red

Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196 Online events: New: Plants & gardens | Gender studies New Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Women in Europe contest Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: March 2021

This Month in Education Volume 10 • Issue 3 • March 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse A Wikipedia Webinar for Indonesian Women Teachers Educational program of GLAM Macedonia Filling the Gaps & Open Education Week Meet this month's featured Wikimedia & Education community member: Bara'a Zama'reh Using Wikipedia and Bridging the Gender Gap: In-Service training for Teachers in Philippines

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 11:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXX, April 2021

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Montgomery's doctrine and Nick-D on Mussolini's wars

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: April 2021

This Month in Education Volume 10 • Issue 4 • April 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse Collaboration with Brusov State University Editing contest "Meet Russia" Educational project: Wikipedia at the University with the University Center for Economic-Administrative Sciences (Centro Universitario de Ciencias Económico Administrativas (CUCEA)) of the University of Guadalajara Regional Meeting of Latin American Education by the EWOC Students of the Faculty of Philosophy in Belgrade have started an internship program

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 22:47, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198 Online events: New: May Mays | Mental Health Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Women in Europe contest Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman See also: Wikimedia District of Columbia: 100 DC Women contest Wikimedia CEE Spring: Central and Eastern European Women contest The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXI, May 2021

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick- D and Hawkeye7 look at intelligence gathering, doctrine and strategy

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: May 2021

This Month in Education Volume 10 • Issue 5 • May 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue A Multimedia-Rich Wikiversity MOOC from Brazil Meet this month's featured Wikimedia & Education community member: Maria Weronika Kmoch Offline workshop with Nikola Koperniku High School in Albania Wiki Education Program Organized with the University Students for the First time in Bangladesh Wikimedia Commons workshop with high school students in Kosovo Wikipedia training for the Bearers of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Poland “Writing a Wikipedia article isn’t as difficult and unimaginable as it seems”: A case for Wikipedia Education Program in Ukraine

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 17:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201 Online events: New: Wiki Loves Pride | June Junes | Jewellers & Watchmakers Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Women in Europe contest Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Editing "too soon" by other editors

Hallo, I spotted your note on a talk page on my watch list. Could I make a couple of suggestions?

• Most of their edits seem to be changing curly/slanted apostrophes to the straight " ' ". If you can find that on your keyboard it might be as well to use it, as it is required by Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Apostrophes, and it would save a lot of editing by other people. (I create a lot of redirects, and starting to add a "Rcat" "redirect category", partly because it was tedious seeing them all crop up on my watchlist when someone else added the Rcat, so I started to do it myself. It's a bit similar.)
• I find {{under construction}} useful when I'm starting a new article. I tend to put together just a couple of sourced sentences which establish notability, add that template, save the stub in mainspace, then sort out links to other language wikis, create incoming redirects, talk page with wikiproject banners, and so on before coming back to pad it out, and that template hopefully deters other people from slamming it with templates as being too short, undersourced, etc. Then there's {{in use}} while you're actively editing, which can help avoid those annoying edit conflicts. Regular WikiGnomes don't always check whether an article is still being actively worked on, as doing so would add proportionately a lot of extra time - I stub-sort things as soon as they appear in Category:Stubs, which can be very early in their existence, and don't routinely look at the history.

Hope that helps, a bit. Happy Editing! PamD 09:44, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205 Online events: New: July Julies | Finance, economics & banking | Olympic & Paralympic Games New contest (Jul/Aug/Sep): Latin America contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: "Mind your elders" Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: June 2021

This Month in Education Volume 10 • Issue 6 • June 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue Can children write articles for a wiki encyclopedia? Editing contest "Biosphere reserves in the world" Training & workshop on Wikidata and Wikimedia Commons with students from Municipal Learning Center, Gurrakoc Wiki for Human Rights Campaign in the Philippines Wikipedia makes children and teachers happy! Workshop with the students of Language Faculty of Philology, University of Prishtina "Hasan Prishtina"

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 19:57, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXII, June 2021

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on RAAF aircraft, Hawkeye7 on mission command and nuclear secrecy

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

creating in user space

I always do. It just lets me work without worrying about anything. Also, please consider setting up archiving on your user talk, it's really long, and that's not helpful to other editors who are trying to communicate with you. Best to you. —valereee (talk) 22:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Valereee: Thanks so much for your help earlier, and for reaching out with your suggestions. I've actually tried to archive my user talk several times using the manual Cut and paste procedure, but have been running into a problem with Steps 2 and 3. When I try to "Create an archive by searching for 'User talk:username/Archive N' where N is the lowest whole number for which no archive exists. Your archive will be the N-th archive," instead of "Searching should say that this page does not exist" in order to "Click the provided link to create/start it," I'm being sent to this page, User talk:Username/Archive N," which does not give me a link to create an archive page. Any guidance you can provide would be most welcome. Kind Regards. - 47thPennVols (talk) 01:35, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the archiving instructions are, like many of our how-tos, written by our more technically-inclined editors, many of whom don't understand that they need to also write for those of us who are, um, less technically-inclined. I finally gave up on trying to get dead-simple instructions inserted, and I created Help:Archiving for dummies. Er, that title was aimed at me. :) If you copy/paste that at the top of your page, you'll get a nice little archives search box, and in a little while a bot will start coming through and you'll never have to think about it again.

After you've done that, you might want to install OneClickArchiver, which will put a little "Archive" link at the top of talk page sections. You can use that when you want to manually archive a section. (The OneClickArchiver instructions also give a link to the Scriptinstaller gadget, which makes installing/uninstalling scripts a one-click procedure too, I highly recommend it.) —valereee (talk) 10:56, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August Editathons at Women in Red

Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207 Online events: New: Indigenous women | Women's leadership & empowerment Contest (Jul/Aug/Sep): Latin America contest Continuing: Olympic & Paralympic Games | Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Interwiki Women Collaboration Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIII, July 2021

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: July 2021

This Month in Education Volume 10 • Issue 7 • July 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue University celebrates 10th anniversary with an Editathon A paper on Students' Attitudes Towards the Use of Wikipedia Announcing the Training of Trainers program for "Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom" MOOC Conocimiento Abierto y Software Libre Updates on the Leamos Wikipedia en Bolivia 2021 Virtual lessons on Wikipedia from Wikimedia Polska for schools

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 19:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Eliza Kennedy Smith

On 4 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eliza Kennedy Smith, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Eliza Kennedy Smith's investigations of municipal corruption in Pittsburgh led to the mayor's arrest and imprisonment? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eliza Kennedy Smith. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Eliza Kennedy Smith), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 12:02, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: August 2021

This Month in Education Volume 10 • Issue 8 • August 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue GLAM-wiki Summer in the City: Polish Teachers met in Warsaw Wikipedia for School – our largest article contest for Ukrainian teachers The importance of Social Service: Modality of educational linkage with ITESM, Querétaro campus and Wikimedia Mexico Wikimania 2021 and the unschooling vibes around Wikipedia by Wikimedia Polska, Education team Open Foundation West Africa Introduces KIWIX Offline to the National Association of Graduate Teachers

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 13:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208 Online events: New: Women writers & their works Contest (Jul/Aug/Sep): Latin America contest Continuing: Women's leadership & empowerment | Olympic & Paralympic Games Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Interwiki Women Collaboration Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Learn more about our proposed one-day online recruitment initiative in October. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIV, August 2021

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Commonwealth armies and an Australian spy, Nick-D on the American Revolutionary War and RAAF mine laying Op-ed: RobDuch on United States coastal defenses

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia and the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan Op-ed: Nick-D on writing about military procurement

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia and the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan Op-ed: Nick-D on writing about military procurement

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: September 2021

This Month in Education Volume 10 • Issue 9 • September 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue Cultural history on Wikipedia Education program in Ukraine is finally back to offline! Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom Module Distribution in the Philippines Senior Citizens WikiTown 2021: Týn nad Vltavou #WikiXLaEducación: New contest to include articles about education on Wikipedia

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 19:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211 Online events: New: Women in STEM New Contest (Oct/Nov/Dec): Women in Oceania contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman Special event: 12 October: Ada Lovelace Day 24-Hour Global Edit-a-thon See also: Women in Green Good Article Edit-a-thon Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

November 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213 Online events: New: Film + Stage | Endocrine health Contest (Oct/Nov/Dec): Women in Oceania contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Wikipedia Asian Month 2021 Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, October 2021

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on British conscription and German warship raiders

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: October 2021

This Month in Education Volume 10 • Issue 10 • October 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue 1st joint contest Wikimedia UG Georgia and the Ministry of Education of Georgia Promoting more inclusive and equitable support for the Wikimedia Education community The Second Online EduWiki Camp in Serbia Higher and further education courses in the UK Wikipedia on Silesia Cieszyn in Poland and in Czech Republic

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 15:40, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: November 2021

This Month in Education Volume 10 • Issue 11 • November 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue We talked about EduWiki Outreach Collaborators and how Wikimedia Serbia played a role being a part of it Welcome to Meta! Wikipedia Education Program in Ukraine in 2021 Wikipedia and Education Mentorship Program-Serbia and Philippines Partnership Launch of the Wikimedia Research Fund! Education projects in the Land of Valencia A Hatch-Tyap-Wikipedia In-person Training Event Celebrating Sq Wikipedia Birthday with the Vasil Kamami High School students Celebrating Wikidata with the Nikola Koperniku High School students

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 16:18, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: November 2021

This Month in Education Volume 10 • Issue 11 • November 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issue We talked about EduWiki Outreach Collaborators and how Wikimedia Serbia played a role being a part of it Welcome to Meta! Wikipedia Education Program in Ukraine in 2021 Wikipedia and Education Mentorship Program-Serbia and Philippines Partnership Launch of the Wikimedia Research Fund! Education projects in the Land of Valencia A Hatch-Tyap-Wikipedia In-person Training Event Celebrating Sq Wikipedia Birthday with the Vasil Kamami High School students Celebrating Wikidata with the Nikola Koperniku High School students

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 16:19, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216 Online events: New: "Double the lede!" | Women who died in 2021 Contest (Oct/Nov/Dec): Women in Oceania contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Women in Climate Change and preparations for our 2022 Climate initiative Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, November 2021

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Canadian junior officers in World War II

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Survey about History on Wikipedia

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, [e-mail] Apolo1991 (talk) 09:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022 Women in Red

Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219 Online events: New: Climate (year-long initiative) | Women in business | US territories Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2021 Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month. Go to Women in RedJoin WikiProject Women in Red Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, December 2021

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Franklin–Nashville campaign Review essay: Military History Wikiproject Coordinators' reading list

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: January 2022

This Month in Education
Volume 11 • Issue 1 • January 2022

---

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

---

In This Issue

• 30-h Wikipedia Article Writing Challenge
• Announcing Wiki Workshop 2022
• Final exhibition about Cieszyn Silesia region
• Join us this February for the EduWiki Week
• Offline Education project WikiChallenge closed its third edition
• Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom ToT Experience of a Filipina Wikimedian
• Welcoming new trainers of the Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom program
• Wikimedia Israel’s education program: Students enrich Hebrew Wiktionary with Biblical expressions still in use in modern Hebrew

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 17:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, January 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Army in Somalia Review essay: Hog Farm on American Civil War sites in the South and Midwest

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February with Women in Red

Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222 Online events: New: Black women | Hong Kong and Macau | Women in sport Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our main page. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

March editathons

Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225 Online events: New: Women's History Month Art+Activism | Feminism and Folklore | Dutch Caribbean Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman | Women in sport (Feb/Mar) Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our main page. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:36, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: February 2022

Please help translate to other languages.

This Month in Education

Volume 11 • Issue 2 • February 2022

---

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

---

In This Issue

• Open Foundation West Africa Expands Open Movement With UHAS
• Celebrating the 18th anniversary of Ukrainian Wikipedia
• Integrating Wikipedia in the academic curriculum in a university in Mexico
• Results of "Reading Wikipedia" workshop in the summer school of Plan Ceibal in Uruguay
• WikiFundi, offline editing plateform : last release notes and how-tos
• Writing Wikipedia as an academic assignment in STEM fields
• The Learning and Connection – 1Lib1Ref with African Librarians

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 15:09, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIV, February 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D on World War II in Europe

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April Editathons from Women in Red

Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228 Online events: New: Gender studies | French overseas territories New Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Translation contest Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our main page. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: March 2022

This Month in Education

Volume 11 • Issue 3 • March 2022

---

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

---

In This Issue

• Arte+Feminismo Pilipinas:Advocacy on Women Empowerment
• The edit-a-thon on Serbian Wikipedia on the occasion of Edu Wiki Week
• Call for Participation: Higher Education Survey
• Collection of Good Practices in Wikipedia Education
• Conversation: Open education in the Wikimedia Movement views from Latin America
• EduWiki Week 2022, celebrations and learnings
• EduWiki Week in Armenia
• Open Education Week at the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
• Wikipedia + Education Talk With Leonard Hagan
• Wikimedia Israel cooperates with Yad Vashem in developing a training course for teachers

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 16:57, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, March 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Hitler as a military leader

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: April 2022

This Month in Education

Volume 11 • Issue 4 • April 2022

---

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

---

In This Issue

• Audio-Educational Seminar of Wikimedia Mexico
• Dagbani Wikimedians using digital TV broadcast to train Wikipedia contributors in Ghana
• Digital Education & The Open Space With Herbert Acheampong
• HerStory walks as a part of edit-a-thons
• Join us for Wiki Workshop 2022
• The youngest member of Tartu Wikiclub is 15-year-old student

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 12:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, April 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on military logistics and rebuilding Nagasaki

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May Women in Red events

Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230 Online events: New: Women in the Ancient World | British Overseas Territories Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Translation contest (second month) Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Wikimedia District of Columbia: 100 DC Women contest The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCIII, May 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on a World War II summit and the American space program

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June events from Women in Red

Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233 Online events: New: LGBTQ+ women | Greenland and the Faroes | Women in music Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Translation contest (third and last month) Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: May 2022

This Month in Education

Volume 11 • Issue 5 • May 2022

---

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

---

In This Issue

• Wiki Hackathon in Kwara State
• Introduction of the Wikimedia Fan Club to Kwara State University Malete
• Education in Kosovo
• Bringing the Wikiprojects to the Island of Catanduanes
• Tyap Wikipedia Goes Live
• Spring 1Lib1Ref edition in Poland
• Tyap Editors Host Maiden Wiktionary In-person Training Workshop
• Wikibooks project in teaching
• Africa Eduwiki Network Hosted Conversation about Wikimedian in Education with Nebojša Ratković
• My Journey In The Wiki-Space By Thomas Baah

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 02:43, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: May 2022

This Month in Education

Volume 11 • Issue 5 • May 2022

---

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

---

In This Issue

• Wiki Hackathon in Kwara State
• Introduction of the Wikimedia Fan Club to Kwara State University Malete
• Education in Kosovo
• Bringing the Wikiprojects to the Island of Catanduanes
• Tyap Wikipedia Goes Live
• Spring 1Lib1Ref edition in Poland
• Tyap Editors Host Maiden Wiktionary In-person Training Workshop
• Wikibooks project in teaching
• Africa Eduwiki Network Hosted Conversation about Wikimedian in Education with Nebojša Ratković
• My Journey In The Wiki-Space By Thomas Baah

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 02:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in July 2022

Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235 Online events: New: Alphabet Run: A to B | Baltic States Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Women in Green's Good Article Editathon: July 2022 – Women and the Environment Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCIV, June 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: June 2022

This Month in Education

Volume 11 • Issue 6 • June 2022

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• Black Lunch Table: Black History Month with Igbo Wikimedians User Group
• Bolivian Teachers Welcomed Wikipedia in their Classroom
• Educational program & Wikivoyage in Ukrainian University
• The Great Learning and Connection: Experience from AFLIA
• New Mexico Students Join Wikimedia Movement Through WikiForHumanRights Campaign
• The school wiki-project run by a 15 year old student came to an end
• The students of Kadir Has University, Istanbul contribute Wikimedia projects in "Civic Responsibility Project" course
• Wiki Trip with Vasil Kamami Wikiclub to Berat, the town of one thousand windows
• Wikiclubs in Albania
• Wikidata in the classroom FGGC Bwari Experience
• Wikipedia and Secondary Schools in Aotearoa New Zealand
• А large-scale online course for teaching beginners to work in Wikipedia has been developed in Russia

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 18:50, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVI, July 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Falklands War artillery and Nick-D on the Battle of the Ruhr

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 20:27, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in August 2022

Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239 Online events: New: Alphabet run: C and D | Indigenous women | Refugees | Comedians, Comics and other Performers Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Interwiki Women Collaboration focus on UEFA Women's Euro 2022, August 8–21 Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: July 2022

This Month in Education

Volume 11 • Issue 7 • July 2022

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• Wikimedia Chile launched a teacher guidebook with Wiki tools for Heritage Education
• Wikimedia Serbia received a new accreditation for the professional development program
• Wikimedia for Illiterate Persons
• Polish Wikipedia is enriched with new EtnoWiki content
• Career Education through Wikipedia

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 17:38, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVII, August 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Falklands War

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:57, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in September 2022

Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241 Online events: New: Alphabet run: E and F | Women writers and their works Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Request for help: Participate in preparations for our trend-setting contest in November Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: August 2022

This Month in Education

Volume 11 • Issue 8 • August 2022

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• The Making of a Certified Trainer of Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom
• Wikimania SDGs 2022: The Kwara Experience
• An adapted Module teacher’s guide in Yoruba and English about Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom in Nigeria is now available on Commons
• Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom Kwara, Nigeria: The Trainers Experience
• Edu Wiki Camp 2022 in Serbia: Together again
• Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom Program Nigeria: The Teacher experience
• Wiki For Senior Citizens
• WikiLoves SDGs Nigeria Tours Kwara State University Malete
• Wikiteka project in Poland - summertime

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 16:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, September 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian military leadership and Nick-D on the First Crusade's Byzantine connection

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2022

Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244 Online events: New: Alphabet run: G and H | Women in STEM / Ada Lovelace Day | Geofocus West Asia Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Women in Green's "Wildcard Edition" Good Article editathon Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: September 2022

This Month in Education

Volume 11 • Issue 9 • September 2022

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• OpenEdu.ch: centralising training documents, a platform for the teachers' community in Switzerland
• Senior Citizens WikiTown 2022: Exploring Olomouc and its heritage
• Wikimedia Research Fund
• Wikimedia Youths Commemorate the International Youth Day 2022 in an exciting way across the globe
• Wikipedia, Education, and the Crisis of Information

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 16:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, October 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Meet some of the project coordinators

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2022

Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247 Online events: New: Alphabet run: I and J | Women in Education | Geofocus Central & Southern Asia Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Wikipedia Asian Month November Contest Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXCIX, November 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the 1991 Gulf War air campaign Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:31, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2022

WiR Women who died in 2022 Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250 Online events: New: Alphabet run K & L | Geofocus Southeast Asia | Women who died in 2022 Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Women in Climate Change collaboration runs 1 December 2022 - 31 January 2023 Tip of the month: Remember to search slight spelling variations of your subject's name, like Katherine/Katharine or Elizabeth/Elisabeth, especially for historical subjects. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CC, December 2022

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at British Territorials in India Interview: On turning 200 (issues of the Bugle!) Review essay: Coordinators' 2022 reading list Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: End of the 2022

This Month in Education

Volume 11 • Issue 10 • October–November 2022

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• 2nd Latin American Regional Meeting on Education
• Adopting Wikipedia for Secondary School Students in Nigeria Classroom
• Celebrating 2022 Vibrance in Kwara State University Malete
• Celebrating the Wikipedia and Wikidata Birthday in school
• Report on school libraries in Poland for the Wikiteka project
• Wiki For Senior Citizens Network
• WikiEducation, Educational practices and experiences in Mexico with Wikipedia and other open resources
• Wikimedia & Education Workshops: a Wiki Movimento Brasil initiative
• An event at the National History Museum in Tirana
• Students 24-hour competition on Wikipedia article writing
• Wiki-Data a Giant at 10
• WikiGraphers: Visualizing Open Knowledge
• Wikimedia Israel’s Educational Innovation: “Students Write Wikipedia” as a Matriculation-Exam Alternative
• Wikimedia Morocco User Group Empowers Moroccan Teachers to Use Wikipedia in the Classroom
• Wikimedia Russia has released the "Introduction to Wikipedia" textbook
• “Wikipedia for School” contest was held in Ukraine for the third time
• Announcing the Wikipedia & Education User Group Election Results

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 06:56, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2023

Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254 Online events: New: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run M & N | Geofocus East Asia Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2022 See also: Editing For Effie collaboration with the Smithsonian, January 8 & 9 (global event) Tip of the month: De-orphan and incorporate an article into Wikipedia using the Find Link tool Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the key contributions of two Australian scientists in World War II Review essay: Nick-D reports on his recent visits to British military sites

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry for any confusion or misguided edits to your excellent American Civil War contributions. I appreciate the focus you bring to that important era. Hope we can find some ways to work together in the new year. Keystone18 (talk) 06:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Laflin, Pennsylvania

Thanks for your tag at Laflin, Pennsylvania. I made a few edits which seemed to improve the layout. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:40, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your prompt work on this! The article is definitely easier to read. All the best! 47thPennVols (talk) 05:51, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in February 2023

Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259 Online events: New: Alphabet run O & P | Black women | Justice | Folklore Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: Explore Wikipedia for all variations of the woman's name (birth name, married name, re-married name, pen name, nickname) Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: January 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 1 • January 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• Educational Projects 2023-1 in Mexico
• Integration of Wikipedia in Ukrainian universities – teacher-led and student-led
• Transitional Justice in Kosovo edit-a-thon and Partnership with Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering - University of Prishtina
• Wikidata Citation Hunt Program for secondary school students, Dubai
• Wikipedia edit-a-thon with students from Art Faculty - University of Prishtina
• Тeacher from Belgrade got a reward for using Wikibooks in teaching

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 17:31, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 202, February 2023

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on translation and Eisenhower's armies Review essay: Catlemur on military museums in Athens

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red March 2023

Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261 Online events: New: Geofocus Mediterranean | Art + Activism | Alphabet run Q & R Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman| Folklore See also: #Visible Wiki Women Wikimedia challenge to add more images of women to Commons Tip of the month: Mobile phone readers may only see the article "lead" – take some time to make it shine! Include something to keep people reading. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Assessment of Carole W. Stroller

Thanks, 47thPennVols, for responding to my stub assessment of Carole W. Troxler. You might have been surprised that I did not give it Start like the others but in fact the article has only 186 words of running text. For start class, the break point is usually around 250 words. The problem here is that despite the bot assessments a substantial proportion of the article consists of the bulleted "Writings" section which, together with the lengthy references, provides a basis for a bot-based Start. One way of improving the presentation of the article would be to comment in running text on her writings and articles, in particular by looking for independent critical assessments. I probably don't need to go into further detail as I see from here that you have been writing women's biographies up to a high standard of quality. Keep up the good work and please let me know if I can be of further help. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 19:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I always appreciate your perspective, Ian. Thanks so much for taking the time to write and for your positive thoughts about my work. It helps to know that it's appreciated. I went back and forth a few times on whether or not to reassess the Troxler bio as start class because I also felt it could (and should) have additional text. I finally came down on the side of start class, though, because I keep coming across bios of men (a significant number) that have long been classified as stubs, but which are so much shorter than the current version of the Troxler bio. As I mulled over how to assess her bio, it genuinely seemed, to me, like an injustice to leave her bio at stub.

Again, I truly appreciate your perspective. Just as a point of reference, here are just a few of the many examples of the really short, longtime stubs that I've found: Donald Seibert, Dork Sahagian, Dorn Taylor, Doug Piatt, Doug Russell (American football), Fred C. Noye, and Fred E. Heckel. Quite honestly, I suspect that at least several of these, if they had been bios of women, would have been challenged, and very likely deleted, as non-notable.

It genuinely baffles and frustrates me, as I know it does many Women in Red members, that an academic like Carole Troxler, who achieved quite a bit in her career as a history scholar, would be challenged when so many bios of not-terribly-notable male actors and athletes (or even stubs of notable male scholars) are allowed to remain thin on details about their subjects for a decade or more. Happily, the Women in Red project does seem to be making significant headway in educating the broader Wikipedia community about fighting to keep women's bios posted in order to give them time to be improved. I continue to hope for the day when an award-winning female history scholar is finally considered by everyone on Wikipedia to be as notable as a high school baseball coach who ended his career with a losing record. Best wishes for continued success with your own research and writing, Ian, and thank you for all you're doing to make sure women are celebrated for their contributions.47thPennVols (talk) 20:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you find blatantly incorrect assessments, you should just change them. If it's any consolation, I frequently assess the new articles from the Scandinavian and Nordic countries which always include biographies of men. I assess them on the same basis as those of women. It seems to me that there should not be one rule for DYK submissions (which rely on the extent of running text) and another for non-DYK articles. Our overall aim is to encourage improvement of our biographies and you are certainly one of those who have been paving the way. Keep in touch and keep up the good work!--Ipigott (talk) 21:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 203, March 2023

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hog Farm on the Trans-Mississippi Theater of the American Civil War

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: February 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 2 • February 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• A Strategic Direction for a Massive Online Course for Educators in Brazil
• Alliance Funding for Wikipedia as a school resource in Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland, New Zealand
• Call for Submissions to Wiki Workshop 2023
• Collaboration with Charles University on the creation of Czech Wikipedia started in January
• Open Education Week 2023 in the Wikimedia Mexico Education Program
• Wikiclubs with different schools in Albania

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 21:08, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Readability

I gotta say, you're getting a bit out of hand with the readability issue. One left aligned picture is not a big deal. Famartin (talk) 21:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully, you appear to be speaking from an ableist perspective. One mis-aligned photo, map, chart, or other image most certainly can be a very big deal for readers who have visual impairments. Per Wikipedia's own Manual of Style/Accessibility Standards, "Avoid placing images on the left hand side as a consistent left margin makes reading easier." Sandwiched text is also a particularly difficult problem for many readers with visual impairments. (One reason, per Wikipedia, is that "Left-aligned images may disturb the layout of bulleted lists and similar structures that depend on visual uniformity, e.g. by pushing some items on such lists further inward.")

If it's just as easy to place a photo on the right-hand side of an article, as it is on the left-hand side, and it makes it easier for someone who has low vision, someone who is blind and uses a screen reader, or someone who has a reading comprehension disability (particularly students who might need to use the articles they find on Wikipedia for their studies), why would any Wikipedia editor insist on placing their images on the left-hand side?

Placing images on the right-hand side of an article is simply just an act of kindness, and it also makes Wikipedia articles MOS-compliant. Please refrain from reverting me again in the future. Thank you. - 47thPennVols (talk) 21:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from reverting me again. Oh, you're rich, really. I'll revert what I please if I feel you're being too aggressive. Famartin (talk) 21:38, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you realize how angry you're coming across, but I'm asking you, at this juncture, to stop now. Please consider your motivations. If it's just as easy to place a photo on the right-hand side of an article as it is on the left-hand side, why are you still feeling the need to continue to place images on the left (particularly now that it's been explained to you that it makes it harder for people with disabilities to read and comprehend Wikipedia articles when the images are placed on the left instead of the right)? 47thPennVols (talk) 21:47, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Please refrain from reverting me again in the future" Do you realize how saying that makes YOU sound? Just who do you think you are exactly? Certainly not someone I'm going to pay much attention to, after saying something like that as if you were some sort of Wikipedia god. Famartin (talk) 21:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I'll quote the very top of that MOS page: "This is a guide to editing pages for accessibility". Not hard fast rules... a GUIDE. So, relax. Famartin (talk) 21:47, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully, again, you're coming across as an angry person. Please stop and consider my question above. If it's just as easy to place a photo on the right-hand side of an article as it is on the left-hand side, why are you still feeling the need to continue to place images on the left (particularly now that it's been explained to you that it makes it harder for people with disabilities to read and comprehend Wikipedia articles when the images are placed on the left instead of the right)? 47thPennVols (talk) 21:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to ignore you now. I didn't even place that image that I reverted on US 22, I just felt like it was time to put some brakes on your relentlessness. Famartin (talk) 21:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That seems to be a very angry and unkind action on your part. How sad for you that you felt it was more important to try to make me feel badly than it was to allow a simple correction to an article to stand (a correction that would likely have helped many readers with visual disabilities). 47thPennVols (talk) 22:03, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2023

Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266 Online events: New: Gender studies | Health | Dance | Alphabet run S & T | Books by women Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman| See also: Women in Red is supporting Every Book Its Reader through our Books by women event. Tip of the month: When writing about a book, check WP:NBOOK for notability, then see MOS:NOVEL, WP:NONFICTION or WP:POETRYSTANDARDS for guidance. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 204, April 2023

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial and the South China Sea raid, Hawkeye7 on the 1999 East Timor intervention

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: March 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 3 • March 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• Audio-seminar project of the Wikimedia Mexico Education Program
• Empowering Nigerian Female Artists: Through Art & Feminism Edith-A-Thon at KWASU Fan Club
• Exploring How Wikipedia Works
• Florida graduate students complete Library History edit-a-thon for credit
• Improving hearing health content in Brazil
• Media Literacy Portal to become a key resource for media education in Czech Libraries
• Wikeys in the Albanian language
• Wikimarathon is an opportunity to involve students and teachers in creating and editing articles in Wikipedia
• Wikimedia Polska short report
• Wikimedia Serbia participated in the State Seminar of the The Mathematical Society of Serbia

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 18:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hi, just a note in thanks for all the good work you do here. I enjoyed reading your new articles, which filled important gaps. If you ever have any questions I can help with, don't hesitate to drop me a line. Best wishes and happy editing, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Eddie. Thank you so much for your kind words and positive feedback. It's good to know that the work I've done has been helpful. I always enjoy reading your articles, as well. I often wish I could meet the individuals you write about (with the help of a time machine, if need be). I also appreciate your offer of help; I often have moments of "Now, how do I...?" So, it's good to know I can reach out to you for advice. I look forward to staying in touch! And best wishes to you, too, for happy editing! - 47thPennVols (talk) 01:29, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and I completely agree- there are so many fascinating untold stories out there! And it's great to do a small part in telling them. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thank you for your notice of misunderstanding left on my talk page - it has taught me to be more observant. BillClinternet (talk) 01:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply] Thanks so much for the cookie, Bill! That was very kind of you. And thanks, too, for your understanding. Best wishes to you for many years of successful editing ahead! - 47thPennVols (talk) 01:57, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2023

Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270 Online events: New: Alphabet run U, V, W | Disability | Women in Education | CEE women Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman| See also: Wikimedia CEE Spring 2023/CEE Women - Wikimedia contest with postcards and prizes The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th Tip of the month: Use the Google translate app and camera on your phone to translate text from an article or book Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your war against left aligned images

Seriously, its as bad as Keystone18 insisting that all images needed to be uprighted and enlarged. Yes, there are SOME articles that overdo it, but this is one of those places you need to look at things with, as MOS says, "common sense" and not a club. Please refrain from your blanket actions in this area. I recently saw an article where you added a gallery for a single image becuase you couldn't figure out how to fit it into its respective section. That's just plain silliness, and if that's the sort of editing you do, its not entirely constructive. I'm not saying stop (I can be grouchy), but I am saying "think a bit harder about whats good for all." Famartin (talk) 03:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have not been engaged in any kind of "war," nor have I been involved in "blanket actions" as you falsely claim. I was simply making good faith edits that are supported by Wikipedia's MOS/Accessibility Standards. You, however, reverted my good faith edits a total of five times on one article (Pennsylvania Route 88) in violation of the three-revert rule (3RR). (I was literally in the middle of making appropriate changes to the Route 88 article, including fixing spacing mistakes and incorrect grammar, when you began reverting my edits, which undid all of my previous clean-up efforts.) As for your claim that you were merely being "grouchy," please don't try to minimize your behavior. Your tone of voice in your post above and on your recent edit summaries was not appropriate. You have made the choice to be uncivil not just to me on several occasions (most recently when you implied above that I "couldn't figure out" how to make an edit), but to other editors (as you did above re: your disparagement of another editor who was not even involved in editing the article you are disputing). Purposefully labeling editors' work as "silliness" when that work was simply done in good faith or accusing your fellow Wikipedians of "whining" when they try to interact constructively with you is unhelpful and is not the type of collegiality that the majority of editors strive for on Wikipedia. In addition, your telling editors to "Stay out of areas with which you have little expertise," is not only uncivil, it conveys that you feel a sense of ownership over articles, which is a violation of WP:OWN. So, at this juncture, I am respectfully asking that you take a step back and consider what you might do to improve your interactions with your fellow Wikipedia editors and consider whether they may have points of view and levels of editing experience that are equally as valid as yours. Kind Regards. - 47thPennVols (talk) 04:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: April 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 4 • April 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• Auckland Museum Alliance fund project update
• Introducing Wikipedia to Kusaal Language Teachers
• KWASU Fan Club Leads the Way in 21st Century Learning with Wiki in School Program
• On-line Courses for Educators in Poland
• Online meeting of Ukrainian educators working with Wikipedia – four perspectives
• Wikiclubs Editathon in Elbasan, Albania
• Wikipedia at the Brazilian Linguistics Olympiad
• Wikipedia at the University of Łódź Information Management Conference

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 16:26, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - June 2023

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273 Online events: New: Alphabet run X, Y & Z | LGBTQ+ women | Wiki Loves Pride | Women in Music Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Women in Green: June 2023 GA Editathon event page Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride/2023 global campaign The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th Tip of the month: Looking for new red links? Keep an eye out for interesting and notable friends, family, or associates of your last article subject, and re-examine group photos for other women who may still need an article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 206, June 2023

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D review three recent works

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red July 2023

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276 Online events: New: Women in Red's 8th anniversary | Alphabet run A & B | Sports Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: Look out for contributors interested in writing about women and invite them to join Women in Red Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Thanks

I appreciate your spotting (and reverting) my erroneous addition of an "Unreferenced section" template to Arthur Hohl. Somehow I failed to see the citation in the section's second paragraph. I have added a "Citation needed" template for the first paragraph, which is what I should have done last night.

I always try to be accurate in my edits, but it's good to have someone correct them when I do something wrong. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership

Seeing a recent comment by you in Onel's Talk Page, I feel it is important to remind you that you do not WP:OWN any articles and have no right to dictate the style because you created or edited the article. Nor should you be telling an editor to avoid your articles to avoid discord. Please refrain in the future from such actions as they have no place here Slywriter (talk) 16:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, I'm puzzled as to why you have felt the need to insert yourself into a minor matter that has already been resolved. The editor in question promised to be more attentive in his editing, after I mentioned my concerns about his accuracy in mid-June, and has already archived our discussion. We had a civil discussion (one in which I did not claim "ownership" as you assert above). Your comments above, however, feel to me as if you did not assume good faith about me when you wrote your post. Moving forward, I hope we can have more positive interactions. Kind Regards. - 47thPennVols (talk) 18:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: June 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 5 • June 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• Africa Day 2023: Abuja Teachers celebrates
• From editing articles to civic power – Wikimedia UK's research on democracy and Wikipedia
• Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom Program in Yemen Brings Positive Impact to Yemeni Teachers
• Using Wikipedia in education: students' and teachers' view
• The Journey of Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom Lagos State
• WMB goes to Serbia
• But we don't want it to end!

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 08:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

3rd Louisiana Native Guards

This subject doesn't appear to have an entry. Might be interesting? I started Draft:81st Regiment Infantry U.S. Colored Troops. Take care. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:46, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for reaching out. I'm currently focused more on creating new articles and improving existing articles for Women in Red and stub sorting for WikiProject Pennsylvania, right now, rather than Milhist-related work, but wish you continued success with your own research and writing. I'm so pleased to see that you're working on USCT units, so many of which have yet to have their storied service told via Wikipedia. Keep up the great work! - 47thPennVols (talk) 21:58, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. I found an entry on the above subject. Always a relief not to have to create it!!! Take care and thanks for all your great work. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:12, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 207, July 2023

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on alleged Australian war crimes and Hawkeye7 on the 1944–45 Philippines campaign and the Australian Signals Directorate

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello 47thPennVols!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:45, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• My apologies for the delay in responding. I appreciate the invitation to apply for NPP status; unfortunately, the timing isn't good for me because I'm currently focused on article creation and improvement for the Women in Red project and for WikiProject Pennsylvania. I wish you all the best with your own research, writing and editing. Kind Regards. - 47thPennVols (talk) 23:04, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red 8th Anniversary

	Women in Red 8th Anniversary
	In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap!

--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A piece of cake for you!

	Women in Red 8th Anniversary
	A piece of cake for you! Thank you for participating.

WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 22:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks so much for making my day! And thank YOU for all of the great work you've been doing with Women in Red. (I enjoy reading your articles!) - 47thPennVols (talk) 22:58, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Reverting your edits on Dorothy Granada

Hello. Thank you for your message on my talk page. I am in fact a relatively new Wikipedia editor, so I still have quite a few things to learn (for instance, how a new article is auto-connected to its corresponding Wikidata entry). I was also unaware that it's recommended to wait at least half an hour before editing another user's article; I'm mostly been helping out newer editors by adding some of the frequently omitted components (the "Reflist" template, a DEFAULTSORT value, categories, etc.) of a brand new article. I apologize if I made the edits to your article too hastily, and I will keep your suggestions in mind. Again, thank you for your message. ★ The Green Star Collector ★ (talk) 20:55, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your quick response, and no worries. I've seen the good work that you've been doing (because you've been making helpful edits to a number of articles that I follow on my watchlist), and I just wanted to reach out because I know how steep the learning curve can be on Wikipedia at first. There are so many big and little policies regarding editing and etiquette, or guidance statements that are not considered to be policies but that are guidelines that are still considered to be important, that it's impossible to learn them all at once. So, I just thought it would be good to give you a heads up about the "good idea to wait at least thirty minutes" tip. (One of the more challenging aspects of Wikipedia is that it has felt like an unfriendly environment for many new editors because, historically, there have been editors who have begun making significant changes to new articles by those new editors before those new editors have barely had a chance to proofread the articles they've just posted. For example, someone once created a new talk page for one of my new articles literally within a minute or so of my having posted the article while I was working on creating the new talk page for the article myself. It got so bad for while that it finally prompted a review of the disruptive impacts those types of edits were having on the editing process and of the negative impact they were having on attracting and retaining new editors to Wikipedia, particularly women.) And since you've been doing such good work so far, I didn't want you to have an administrator or someone else give you a hard time about "editing too soon" because Wikipedia needs enthusiastic, dedicated editors like you. So, keep up the great work and stay in touch to let me know how you're doing! - 47thPennVols (talk) 21:59, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your kind words and consideration. Best of luck with your future editing! ★ The Green Star Collector ★ (talk) 22:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2023

Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280 Online events: New: Alphabet run C & D | Indigenous women | Film and stage | Geofocus: Arab League Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Wikimania 2023 will be held in Singapore, 16–19 August, and will be facilitated by the affiliates in the ESEAP (East/South East/Asia/Pacific) region. Tip of the month: Read the essay Determining Native American and Indigenous Canadian identities to understand the criteria for status as Native American or Indigenous Canadian. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Wir post

Reading your recent post, I saw "The bio isn't an orphan; it's linked to several pages, including ..." and checked the article, but I think you meant "The bio isn't an orphan; it's linked from several pages, including ...". Some editors confuse them. You might like to tweak your post to clarify, to save other editors checking. ( Yes, I know you're an experienced editor: I forgot). Yes, definitely not an orphan, but only in last few hours: I don't know whether that's the problem? PamD 06:27, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I began linking the article immediately after posting; so, there was no delay on my part that could or should have caused this glitch. Also, I've not ever had an article labeled as an orphan so soon after posting. (In fact, I posted 2 other new bios for Women in Red this month; neither was listed as an orphan on the new pages feed.) Chances are, I'm probably not the only editor experiencing this problem. - 47thPennVols (talk) 10:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 208, August 2023

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Adam Cuerden on finding and using images

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: July 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 7 • July 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• Wikimedia Kaduna Connect Campaign
• Wikimedia Serbia published a paper Promoting Equity in Access to Open Knowledge: An Example of the Wikipedia Educational Program
• Wikimedia and Education Kailali Multiple campus
• WikiCamp in Istog, Kosovo: Promoting Knowledge and Nature Appreciation
• Wiki at the Brazilian National History Symposium
• US & Canada program reaches 100M words added
• Renewed Community Wikiconference brought together experienced Wikipedians and newcomers
• Kusaal Wikipedia Workshop at Ajumako Campus, University of Education, Winneba
• Join us to celebrate the Kiwix4Schools Africa Mentorship Program Graduation Ceremony
• Activities that took place during the presentation of the WikiEducation book. Educational practices and experiences in Mexico with Wikipedia and other open resources in Xalala, Veracruz from the Wikimedia Mexico Education Program
• 62+ Participants Graduates from the Kiwix4Schools Africa Mentorship Program
• “Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom” course launched in Ukraine
• OFWA and Goethe Institute Host Wiki Skills For Librarians Workshop-Ghana

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 15:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rater.js

Hey, noticed that you manually assessed an article from stub to start. You might find the User:Evad37/rater script useful, it makes the whole workflow really light weight, Sadads (talk) 23:51, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023 at Women In Red

Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283 Online events: New: Alphabet run E & F | Women writers & their works | Geofocus: Celtic nations Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: The books she wrote might be notable, too; learn 5 quick tips about about book articles. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Oppenheimer biopic

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2023

Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286 Online events: New: Alphabet run G & H | Women in STEM | Geofocus: Sub-Saharan Africa Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article editathon Tip of the month: When creating an article, check to see if there is an entry in the sister project Wikidata. If your subject is listed, the Wikidata information can be useful Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 210, October 2023

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on an American general and the first female astronauts, Nick-D on Roman fortifications

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: September 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 7 • September 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• Inauguration of the Kent Wiki Club at the Wikimania 2023 Conference
• Letter Magic: Supercharging Your WikiEducation Programs
• Réseau @pprendre (Learning Network) : The Initiative for Educational Change in Francophone West Africa
• WikiChallenge Ecoles d’Afrique closes its 5th edition with 13 winning schools
• WikiConecta: connecting Brazilian university professors and Wikimedia
• Wikimedia Germany launches interactive event series Open Source AI in Education

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 05:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - November 2023

Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289 Online events: New: Alphabet run I & J | Geofocus: Indian subcontinent | Women in Politics Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also Wikipedia Asian Month November Contest Tip of the month: When translating articles from another language Wikipedia, don't forget to include attribution in your first edit summary. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: October 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 8 • October 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• 3 Generations at Wikipedia Education Program in Türkiye
• CBSUA Launches Wiki Education in Partnership with PhilWiki Community and Bikol Wikipedia Community
• Celebrating Wikidata’s Birthday in Elbasan
• Edu Wiki Camp 2023 - together in Sremski Karlovci
• PhilWiki Community promotes language preservation and cultural heritage advocacies at ADNU
• PunjabWiki Education Program: A Wikipedia Adventure in Punjab
• WikiConference on Education ignites formation of Wikimedia communities
• Wikimedia Estonia talked about education at CEE meeting in Tbilisi
• Wikimedia in Brazil is going to be a book
• Wikipedian Editor Project: Arabic Sounds Workshop 2023

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 11:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 211, November 2023

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at English Civil War logistics and Peacemaker67 at Austro-Hungarian torpedo boats Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on how WP:SIZE matters

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2023

Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292 Online events: New: Alphabet run K & L | Women who died in 2023 | Honoured Women Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: Avoid copyright problems by rewriting in your own words. You can check any article or draft with Earwig's copyvio detector. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 212, December 2023

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the Russian invasion of Ukraine Op-ed: Nick-D on writing Rhodesian military articles

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: November 2023

This Month in Education

Volume 12 • Issue 9 • November 2023

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• 4th WikiUNAM Editathon: Community knowledge strengthens education
• Edit-a-thon at the Faculty of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa de São Paulo
• EduWiki Nigeria Community: Embracing Digital Learning Through Wikipedia
• Evening Wikischool offers Czech seniors further education on Wikipedia
• Expansion of Wikipedia Education Program through Student Associations at Iranian Universities
• Exploring Wikipedia through Wikiclubs and the Wikeys board game in Albania
• First anniversary of the game Wikeys
• Involve visiting students in education programs
• Iranian Students as Wikipedians: Using Wikipedia to Teach Research Methodology and Encyclopedic Writing
• Kiwix4Schools Nigeria: Bridging Knowledge Gap through Digital Literacy
• Lire wikipedia en classe à Djougou au Bénin
• Tyap Wikimedians Zaria Outreach
• Art Outreach at Aje Comprehensive Senior High School 1st November 2023, Lagos Mainland
• PhilWiki Community holds a meet-up to advocate women empowerment

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 08:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2024

Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296 Online events: New: Education (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run M & N | Temperance women Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2023 Announcement In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part of the #1day1woman initiative! Tip of the month: Check out the new navigation on our Women in Red Project home page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

The Bugle: Issue 213, January 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at three diverse works Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the state of the Wikiproject

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red February 2024

Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298 Online events: New: Alphabet run O & P | Black women Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcement Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event. Tip of the month: AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 214, February 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Pickersgill-Cunliffe review four books

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: January 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 1 • January 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• Cross-Continental Wikimedia Activities: A Dialogue between Malaysia and Estonia
• Czech programme SWW in 2023 – how have we managed to engage students
• Extending Updates on Wikipedia in Education – Elbasan, Albania
• Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom Teacher’s guide – now available in Bulgarian language
• Summer students at Auckland Museum
• WikiDunong: EduWiki Initiatives in the Philippines Project
• Wikimedia Armenia's Educational Workshops
• Wikimedia Foundation publishes its first Child Rights Impact Assessment

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 10:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red March 2024

Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301 Online events: New: Alphabet run Q & R | Art+Feminism | Find Her Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements Celebrate Women – All content gender gap events, in every language Wikipedia, in March 2024 Francophone Women★ Writers Fortnight 2024 Feminism and Folklore 2024 Writing Contest Tip of the month: When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 215, March 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: February 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 2 • February 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• 2 new courses in Students Write Wikipedia Starting this February
• More two wiki-education partnerships
• Open Education Week 2024 in Mexico
• Reading Wikipedia in Bolivia, the community grows
• Wiki Education Philippines promotes OERs utilization
• Wiki Loves Librarians, Kaduna
• Wiki Workshop 2024 CfP – Call for Papers Research track

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 18:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2024

Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304 Online events: New: Alphabet run S & T | Gender studies | Health Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman. Tip of the month: If you run into technical problems, you might find help on our Tools and technical support page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 216, April 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7, Nick-D and Pickersgill-Cunliffe discuss six (count 'em, six!) works comprising eight volumes Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on a lecture by the Australian official historian

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2024

Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307 Online events: New: Press women | Alphabet run U, V & W | Central and Eastern Europe Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Wikimedia CEE Spring 2024 - contest with certificates of participation and prizes The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th Tip of the month: Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: March 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 3 • March 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• Reading Wikipedia in the classroom, Kaduna
• Reading Wikipedia in Ukraine – the course for educators is now available on demand
• Wiki Movement Brazil will once again support the Brazilian Linguistics Olympiad
• Wikipedia within the Education Setting in Albania

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 07:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 217, May 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at a diverse range of works Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the "center of gravity"

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: April 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 4 • April 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• EduWiki Updates From Uganda
• Good news from Bolivia: Reading Wikipedia Program continues in 2024
• Hearing Health Project: Impactful partnership with Wiki Movement Brazil
• Wikimedia Spain, Amical Wikimedia and the University of Valencia develop Wikipedia educational project

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 03:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June 2024

Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310 Online events: New: LGBTQ+ women | Wiki Loves Pride | Women in Music | Alphabet run X, Y & Z Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Women in Green Good Article Edit-a-thon June 2024 - Going Back in Time The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th Tip of the month: Find a Grave is NOT a reliable source (as it is user-generated content). It can be used to look for biographical clues. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 07:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Disability rights activist BLP

Hi 47thPennVols, nice to meet you. I'm reaching out to you as a member of WP:Disability and a WP:BLP, regarding some updates to disability rights activist, Jay Ruderman's, page. If you agree that these changes improve the article, would you mind implementing them? Thank you! LiatDo (talk) 12:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 218, June 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the Tokyo war crimes trials

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: May 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 5 • May 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• Albania - Georgia Wikimedia Cooperation 2024
• Aleksandër Xhuvani University Editathon in Elbasan
• Central Bicol State University of Agriculture LitFest features translation and article writing on Wikipedia
• Empowering Youth Council in Bulqiza through editathons
• We left a piece of our hearts at Arhavi
• Wiki Movimento Brasil at Tech Week and Education Speaker Series
• Wikimedia MKD trains new users in collaboration with MYLA

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 13:29, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Vlaemink (talk) 21:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red July 2024

Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313 Online events: New: Translation contest 2024 | Science Fiction and Fantasy | Women in Sports Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Wiki Loves Sport 2024 22 July - 22 September Tip of the month: A foreign language biography does not guarantee notability for English Wikipedia. Check the guidelines before you start. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 14:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: June 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 6 • June 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• From a Language Teacher to a Library Support Staff: The Wikimedia Effect
• 5th WikiEducation 2024 Conference in Mexico
• Lviv hosted a spring wikischool for Ukrainian high school students
• First class of teachers graduated from Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom 2024
• Empowering Digital Citizenship: Unlocking the Power of Open Knowledge with Participants of the LIFE Legacy
• Wiki Movimento Brazil supports online and in-person courses and launches material to guide educators in using Wikimedia projects
• Where to find images for free? Webinar for librarians answered many questions
• Wikimedia MKD and University of Goce Delchev start a mutual collaboration

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 06:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 219, July 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:07, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2024

Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315 Online events: New: | Women in film and stage | Indigenous women Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) | Translation contest 2024 (July, August, September) | Women in Sports (July, August) Announcements from other communities TBD Tip of the month: Check your athlete's notability before researching and creating her bio. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 220, August 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at two works on logistics and one on the Battle of Arnhem

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:16, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 at Women in Red

Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317 Online events: New: Women writers & their works | Geofocus: Islands A - H Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) | Translation contest 2024 (Jul, Aug, Sep) Announcements from other communities August 30 is the tenth anniversary of WikiProject Women writers! Tip of the month: Try her pen name when searching for sources, and remember to add her to any of these that apply: List of pen names, List of literary initials, and Category:Pseudonymous women writers. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: August 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 7 • August 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• Cross-Cultural Knowledge Sharing: Wikipedia's New Frontier at University of Tehran
• Let's Read Wikipedia in Bolivia reaches teachers in Cochabamba
• Results of the 2023 “Wikipedia for School” Contest in Ukraine
• Edu Wiki Camp in Serbia, 2024
• Wikimedia Human Rights Month this year engaged schools in large amount
• Strengthening Education Programs at Wikimania 2024: A Global Leap in Collaborative Learning
• Wiki Education programs are featured in a scientific outreach magazine, and Wiki Movimento Brasil offers training for researchers in the Amazon
• Wiki Movimento Brasil aims to adapt a game about Wikipedia, organize an academic event for scientific dissemination, and host the XXXIII Wiki-Education Workshop

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 13:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 221, September 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hog Farm looks at the bayou battles for Vicksburg

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2024

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320 Online events: New: Women in STEM | Geofocus: Islands I-P | Women in archaeology Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities October is Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article Edit-a-thon Tip of the month: Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323 Online events: New: Asian women | Geofocus: Islands Q-Z | Women in engineering Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Annual Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) is an online campaign designed to boost Asian content on Wikipedia each November. Unreferenced articles backlog drive. These Wikiproject clean-up lists offer a start to November's backlog drive, e.g. Women's History and Women writers Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed images at search.creativecommons.org/ Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 222, October 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on US Army divisions in the Pacific War, Nick-D on the First Indochina War

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Richey

Hi, You made some edits to the Richey article in December 2022, specifically about the name of the plane used during her record-breaking flight with Frances Marsalis in December 1933. You say (with refs to contemporary newspapers) that it was the "Flying Boudoir", but I suggest it was "Outdoor Girl", as per my earlier edits in 2020. Unfortunately I don't have full access to Newspapers.com, but I strongly suspect this edit is somehow in error. I wonder if you could get in touch, and I'm sure we can sort things out. Best, MinorProphet (talk) 20:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: October 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 8 • October 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• CBSUA Wiki Education turns 1 year
• 7th Senior WikiTown took place in Becov nad Teplou, Czech Republic
• Edit-a-thon about Modern Architecture in Kosovo
• Empowering Digital Literacy through Wikimedia in South Sudan
• Many new articles and contributions in September and October for Wikimedia MKD
• New Record: 5 Events in Municipal Library within a Month
• Wiki-Education programs in Brazil are centered around the Wikidata and Wikisource platforms
• WikiChallenge African Schools wins the “Open Pedagogy” Award 2024 from OE Global
• Wikipedia helps in improving cognitive skills
• Wikipedia in Graduate Studies: Expanding Research Impact
• WiLMa PH establishes a Wiki Club

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 14:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 223, November 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at battles of Operation Veritable in 1945

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2024

Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325 Online events: New: Women who died in 2024 | Religion Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Women in Religion have a monthly virtual edit-a-thon and the next session is December 2nd 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. CST. For Zoom meeting details, contact Dzingle1 or RosPost. Women in Red members are welcome to join the Zoom Meeting here Tip of the month: Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: November 2024

This Month in Education

Volume 13 • Issue 9 • November 2024

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• Auckland Museum Wikipedia Student Programme
• Citizenship and free knowledge on Wikipedia in Albanian language
• Engaging students with Wikipedia and Wikidata at Hasanuddin University’s Wikimedia Week
• Minigrant initiative by empowering the Rrëshen community in Albania
• Wikidata birthday in Albania, 2024
• Wikidata birthday in School
• Wikimedia Education Workshop at Lumbini Technological University
• Wikimedia MKD's new collaborations and new content
• Improving Historical Knowledge on Persian Wikipedia through a continuous Wikimedia Education Program: Shahid Beheshti University Wikipedia Education Program

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 15:12, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 224, December 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Franco-Prussian War Op-ed: Nick-D visits the Swiss Air Force Museum

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:41, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2025

Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329 Online events: New: Music (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run A & B | Internet personalities Continuing: #1day1woman (year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2024 Announcements from other communities Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2025 Participate in #1Lib1Ref Jan 15 – Feb 5, 2025 Tip of the month: Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:47, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 225, January 2025

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Pickersgill-Cunliffe and Nick-D look at Germans in the Flanders Campaign and 50 years of Australian military history Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the state of the Wikiproject

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red February 2025

Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331 Online events: New: Black women | Alphabet run C & D Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed ones on Creative Commons search Suggestion: Consider helping to promote women under In the news and On this day on Wikipedia's main page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:56, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

This Month in Education: January 2025

This Month in Education

Volume 14 • Issue 1 • January 2025

Contents • Headlines • Subscribe

In This Issue

• Advancing Education Pillar in Kosovo: 2024 Journey
• Auckland Museum Wikipedia Students Making Progress
• Celebrating 10 Years of Wiki Education
• Empowering Multilingual Students: Expanding Wikipedia Through Collaboration of foreign languages faculty's students of the University of Tehran
• Ensuring accurate and authentic information with 1Lib1Ref Campaign in Anambra
• Experiences of Wikipedia in the classroom with a gender perspective in Monterrey
• Fine Arts University Students exploring Wikipedia in Tirana, Albania
• Lviv hosted Ukraine’s first student photo walk for Wikipedia
• Many new trained volunteers and new articles at the end of the year in Macedonia
• Wikimedia and Scientific Events in Brazil
• Wiki Workshop- Call for Contributions

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: ZI Jony 15:55, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]