Tanbih al-Ghabi bi-Tabri'at Ibn 'Arabi (Arabic: تنبيه الغبي بتبرئة ابن عربي, lit. 'Warning to the Dolt/Fool Concerning Ibn 'Arabi's Vindication') is a booklet written by the Shafi'i-Ash'ari scholar Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti (d. 911/1505) as a response to the book Tanbih al-Ghabi ila Takfir Ibn 'Arabi [ar] (Arabic: تنبيه الغبي إلى تكفير ابن عربي, lit. 'Warning to the Dolt/Fool Concerning Ibn Arabi's Heresy/Apostasy') by Burhan al-Din al-Biqa'i (d. 885/1480)[Note 1] in which al-Suyuti defended Ibn 'Arabi (d. 637/1240) against his critics in general, and against accusations of heresy and unbelief by al-Biqa'i in particular.[1][2][3][Note 2] Al-Suyuti said:[5]
The scholars past and present have differed concerning Ibn 'Arabi, one group considering him a wali of Allah (saint of God or spiritual leader of Muslims) - and they are correct - such as Ibn 'Ata' Allah al-Sakandari and 'Afif al-Din al-Yafi'i [ar], another considering him a heretic - such as a large number of the jurists - while others expressed doubts concerning him, among them al-Dhahabi in al-Mizan. Two opposed verdicts are reported from Shaykh 'Izz al-Din ibn 'Abd al-Salam, one attacking him, and one describing him as the Spiritual Pole (al-Qutb). What reconciles them is indicated by Shaykh Taj al-Din ibn 'Ata' Allah in Lata'if al-Minan [ar], namely, that Shaykh 'Izz al-Din at the beginning acted in the fashion of jurists in passing quick judgment on the Sufis. When Shaykh Abu al-Hasan al-Shadhili went to pilgrimage and returned, he came to Shaykh 'Izz al-Din before entering his own house and conveyed to him the Prophet's ﷺ greeting. After that, Shaykh 'Izz al-Din humbled himself and began to sit in al-Shadhili's gatherings...
In this book, al-Suyuti refuted the criticisms and accusations against Ibn 'Arabi, which, according to him, were caused due to misunderstandings and misinterpretations,[Note 3] or due to the distortion and alteration of Ibn 'Arabi's books and statements by the heretics and blasphemers. Al-Suyuti tried to demonstrate the veracity of the sainthood of Ibn 'Arabi and stated that, though Ibn 'Arabi was a great saint, but the reading of his writings should be forbidden to incompetent people and disciples ignorant of Sufi terminology [ar].[3]
Our shaykh, Shaykh al-Islam, the last remnant of the mujtahids, Sharaf al-Din al-Munawi [ar] replied, concerning Ibn 'Arabi, that silence was safest. And this is the stance that befits every truly Godwary person who fears for himself. For me, the last word concerning Ibn 'Arabi - and this is accepted neither by his contemporary admirers nor by his detractors - is that he be considered a wali, but reading his books is forbidden.[5] — Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti, 'Tanbih al-Ghabi bi-Tabri'at Ibn 'Arabi'
Al-Suyuti cites from Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani's list in Inba' al-Ghumr bi-Anba' al-'Umr [ar] (Tidings of the Abundance in the News of the Ages), the scholars who praised Ibn 'Arabi and/or considered him one of the righteous saints of God, such as the following:[8][Note 4]
Al-Yafi'i [ar] (d. 768/1367), a Shafi'i-Ash'ari scholar and Sufi from Yemen affiliated with the Qadiri order who wrote several works dedicated to bolstering and defending Sufism.
Isma'il ibn Ibrahim al-Jabarti (d. 806/1403), a Sufi scholar of the Qadiri order from Yemen, who was the teacher of 'Abd al-Karim al-Jili (d. 826/1422).
The Hanafi scholar Ibrahim al-Halabi (d. 956/1549) wrote a critical reply to al-Suyuti, entitled Tasfih al-Ghabi fi Tanzih Ibn 'Arabi (Arabic: تسفيه الغبي في تنزيه ابن عربي) against the latter's defense of Ibn 'Arabi.[15]
^Muhammad b. Jum'a al-Haskafi (d. 895/1490) also wrote a book in response to the book by al-Biqa'i, entitled “Tiryaq al-Afa'i fi al-Radd 'ala al-Khariji al-Biqa'i”, in which he defended both Ibn 'Arabi and Ibn al-Farid.[4]
^In this regard, Ibn Kamal Pasha (d. 940/1534), a defender of Ibn 'Arabi, states that, "Unlike the people of Kashf (vision of the Unseen) and Batin (inward, esoteric or metaphorical), people of the Outward are unable to comprehend the intended meaning of some of issues in al-Fusus [ar] and al-Futuhat."[6]Ibn 'Abidin (d. 1252/1836), in his Radd al-Muhtar (Answer to the Perplexed), writes that one of the main reasons Ibn 'Arabi is misunderstood is a lack of familiarity with his technical nomenclature. He declares:[7]
The Sufis work within a technical framework and mean by their terms things which are not known to the jurists (fuqahā'), so whoever attributes to them meanings which are known [among jurists] will consider them to be unbelievers.
^Among the Muslim scholars who also held a good opinion of Ibn 'Arabi are the following:[9][10]
Siraj al-Din al-Makhzumi (d. 885/1480) who said: "Our shaykh, Shaykh al-Islam Siraj al-Din al-Bulqini and likewise Shaykh Taqi al-Din al-Subki used to criticize the Shaykh (i.e. Ibn 'Arabi) in the beginning, then they changed their position after they realized what he was saying and the explanation of his intent."
Al-Sha'rani (d. 973/1565). Much of al-Sha'rani's work is dedicated to the defense of Ibn 'Arabi and to the popularization of his legacy. For example, al-Sha'rani's Al-Yawaqit wa al-Jawahir [ar] (The Rubies and Jewels) is a popular summary of Ibn 'Arabi's major writings and doctrines. Perhaps the huge influence and popularity of Ibn 'Arabi's ideas owe a great deal to their popularization in the writings of al-Sha'rani (d. 1565), 'Abd al-Karim al-Jili (d. 1408 or 1428), and other writers.[12]
'Abd al-Ghani al-Nabulsi (d. 1143/1731) who wrote a detailed treatise in defense of Ibn 'Arabi, entitled Al-Radd al-Matin 'ala Muntaqis al-'Arif Muhyi al-Din (The Solid Reply to the Belittler of the Learned Muhyi al-Din).[13]
^Shams al-Din al-Sakhawi (2003). الضوء اللامع لأهل القرن التاسع [The Bright Light Cast on the People of the Ninth/Fifteenth Century] (in Arabic). Vol. 9. Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah. pp. 197–198. ISBN9782745137135 – via Google Books. وقال ابن حجي: كان أفضل الحنابلة بالديار المصرية، وأحقهم بولاية القضاء. قلت: وقد قرأ على البلقيني تصنيفه محاسن الاصطلاح وغيره ممن كتبه النجم بخطه، ووصفه البلقيني بالشيخ العالم المُحقق، مُفتي المسلمين، جمال المدرّسين.