約翰·帕斯莫爾(英语:John Passmore)的《人類對自然的責任》(Man's Responsibility for Nature)是最早的闡述環境倫理學的論文之一[10],這篇文章因其傳統的人類中心主義論調而受到了深層生態學捍衛者的抨擊[11],人類中心主義的支持者指出为了人類的幸福,維持一個健康、可持續的環境是有必要的,這個論點並不是十分以人類為中心,但是威廉·格雷說:“這個膚淺的觀點之所以錯誤並不是因為其專注於人類幸福,而是因為它沒有考慮到何為真正的幸福。”[12][13]
發現研究所的威斯利·J·史密斯(英语:Wesley J. Smith)認為是人類中心主義使人們產生了對彼此的責任感,並能人道地對其他動物。他曾寫道:“因為我們‘是’無可爭議的獨特物種——唯一可以關注道德問題并確立職責的物種——我們肯定可以理解對待其他動物何為對錯、善惡、是非,更簡潔地說,做人若不必善待動物,那麼到底應該怎樣?”[16]
^Naess, A. 1973. 'The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement' Inquiry 16: 95-100
^Plumwood, V. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge
^Plumwood, V. 1996. Androcentrism and Anthrocentrism: Parallels and Politics. Ethics and the Environment 1
^Passmore, J. 1974. Man's Responsibility for Nature London: Duckworth
^Routley, R. and V. 1980. 'Human Chauvinism and Environmental Ethics' in Environmental Philosophy (eds) D.S. Mannison, M. McRobbie and R. Routley. Canberra: ANU Research School of Social Sciences: 96-189
^Grey, W. 1993. 'Anthropocentrism and Deep Ecology' Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71: 463-475 [1] (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆)
^Taylor, Sandra G. Naturalness: The concept and its application to Australian ecosystems. Saunders, Denis Allen; Hopkins, Angus John Malcolm; How, R. A. (编). Australian ecosystems : 200 years of utilization, degradation and reconstruction. Australian Ecosystems : 200 years of utilization, degradation and reconstruction : a symposium held in Geraldton, Western Australia, 28 August-2 September 1988. Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia 16. Chipping Norton, N.S.W.: Surrey Beatty & Sons, for the Ecological Society of Australia: 411–418. 1990. ISBN 0949324264.
^Mortimer J. Adler, The Difference of Man and the Difference It Makes, (New York, Fordham University Press, 1993), p.264.
^A Rat is a Pig is a Dog is a Boy: The Human Cost of the Animal Rights Movement[2] (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆), (New York, Encounter Books, 2010), pp. 243-244.