User talk:Wizard191

This user may have left Wikipedia. Wizard191 has not edited Wikipedia since May 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

I'm surprised at your departure, had just begun to notice your past contributions. You had a very nice User page, and I was just starting to explore some of the metalworking articles you had worked on. I hope your departure was on good terms, with no ill feelings. Best of luck in your future endeavors! Reify-tech (talk) 04:02, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Surprised thanks from over here too. Thanks for your vandal cleanup most obviously, but also for being one of those editor names where you knew that the contributions would always be worthwhile. I hope to see you back. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:33, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What a shame you left. I always felt I could count on what you said to be accurate. I hope you decide to come back. TheMightyOrb (talk) 20:06, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	In recognition of enduring dedication to Wikipedia, with particular contributions to mechanical topics. BitterGrey (talk) 20:54, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Wizard191! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Article about Restaurant Week

Hi. I have created a new article about an event. Just wanted your feedback on it. Does it meet Wiki standards? Would appreciate your comments and feedback (and help!). Here's the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Bangalore_restaurant_week.Varunr (talk) 10:36, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article about Radha Thomas

I am currently working on the Wiki page for Ms Radha Thomas. She is an Indian jazz singer and songwriter. In fact, she is known as a diva in the Indian jazz scene. She previously was with the band Human Bondage and has sung and performed globally. The article is still under development. I haven't completed it or submitted it for review yet. You can have a look at it at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Radha_Thomas. I will be requesting your help and advice (as usual) in making it conform to all Wiki standards. If you do a Google Search for Radha (https://www.google.co.in/#hl=en&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=Radha+Thomas&oq=Radha+Thomas&gs_l=hp.3..0l2j0i30l2.1190.3159.0.3385.12.12.0.0.0.0.282.1949.0j11j1.12.0...0.0...1c.dYmnNUlMsQM&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=f6ee012440c72a74&biw=1024&bih=509) you will find dozens of articles and links to her work. As of now, the article is still under development and I will come bug you for help soon! Varunr (talk) 06:40, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have completed the article about Ms Radha Thomas and am contemplating to move it to the AFC space. Before that, I'd really appreciate if you could have a look and give me some inputs, suggestions and advice and hopefully a green signal :-). Here's the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Radha_Thomas Varunr (talk) 09:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merged in copyvio

Hello, I have flagged a copyvio in powder metallurgy, which you merged in from an article cold compaction, with this diff : [1]. 192.12.81.1 (talk) 13:12, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shim (fencing) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shim (fencing) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shim (fencing) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ReformedArsenal (talk) 13:52, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic IP

You recently posted a note on "User talk:75.169.177.160" about editing the "Laser cutting" page (adding a source). I was not logged in so I guess this message was waiting for me when I came into Wikipedia. I have never visited that page, and my guess is that that note you sent will never reach the person who did edit that page since my ISP uses dynamic address assignment, so the chances they will get the same IP address again is pretty slim. Since that note will never be delivered to the right person, I am guessing the best thing to do is just remove that reference or put a "citation needed" tag on there or something.

There is no need to reply to this. The chance of me getting a reply from you at "User talk:75.169.177.160" is again not very likely, especially since I am usually logged in for months at a time under my normal username and the chance that my IP will change before I find myself logged out again is pretty high. --75.169.177.160 (talk) 11:42, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Flatness (electrical engineering)

The article Flatness (electrical engineering) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to locate sources that talk about this in detail. I found this textbook, but the coverage it provides is not nearly enough to show that this topic merits an article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. APerson (talk!) 16:10, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bta drill listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bta drill. Since you had some involvement with the Bta drill redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 18:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain the use of "proud" as used below

Regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casting_defect, paragraph "Sand Casting", states:

Scabs are a thin layer of metal that sits proud of the casting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JTPOB (talk • contribs) 22:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bowtie cotter pin

The article Bowtie cotter pin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A patent (WP:SPS) doesn't convey notability. Only if secondary attention is paid to it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Vacuum bag" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Vacuum bag. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 15#Vacuum bag until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robustness (morphology) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robustness (morphology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robustness (morphology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wolverine XI ^(talk to me) 04:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Die casting

Die casting has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 04:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]