User talk:Visite fortuitement prolongée

2009-10

Welcome!

Hello, Visite fortuitement prolongée, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! RP459 (talk) 17:16, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009-11

Hi, who is this? --Killing Vector (talk) 22:30, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• • Hi, I am a Wikipedia editor. Nice to meet you. What else? Visite fortuitement prolongée 22:47, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Madrid–Valladolid high-speed rail line

Thank you for your addition to Madrid–Valladolid high-speed rail line. There are some Spanish phrases I have not been able to translate with confidence, e.g. Puesto de Banalización and Puesto de Adelantamiento y Estacionamiento de Trenes. Can you help with these please? Biscuittin (talk) 11:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LAYOUT

Thank you for your edits to various high-speed rail articles. I have reverted the changes to High Speed 1 as they do not conform to the WP:LAYOUT policies: WP:FOOTERS requires that navboxes be places at the very end of an article. Could I also draw your attention to WP:SEEALSO: a "See also" section should ideally be empty—if a link is already used within the body of an article, if should not be added to the See also section, and if possible the linked in See also should be moved into the article body. Once again, thank you for your edits! —Sladen (talk) 03:22, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:High-speed rail

Hi. Just wonder why you put USA before Turkey (it is alphabetically sorted)? And why you link to High-speed rail in Spain and not AVE? Prillen (talk) 19:36, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• • Hello.
  • "why you put USA before Turkey (it is alphabetically sorted)? " Yes it. Howewer I sorted by the main word ot the names ("Arabia" in "Saudi Arabia" and "States" in "United States"), so feel free to sort by the first word of each name ("Saudi" in "Saudi Arabia" and "United" in "United States"). Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • "why you link to High-speed rail in Spain and not AVE" Because the template's section is about High-speed rail in Country, not "name of high-speed rail service in this country". Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Please acknowledge that until a few days High-speed rail in Spain was a redirect to AVE. See also Talk:TGV#Suggested_re-name. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Then I changed the order back to alphabetically (take a look at a category "by country" and you will see that is the common practice). And I changed the link back to AVE – and added a talk at Talk:AVE#Merge_with_High-speed_rail_in_Spain. Prillen (talk) 09:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hotcat

From the look of my watchlist you appear to be moving quite a lot of articles from Category:Megalithic monuments to Category:Megalithic monuments in Europe & I wondered if you knew about HOTCAT which makes this sort of process much easier.— Rod ^talk 19:22, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't know HOTCAT. Maybe i'll try next time I rename a lot of articles. Thank you for the tips. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:22, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it is quite usefull, thanks. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:49, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Minaret of Freedom Institute

Just wondering ... why is Minaret considered a libertarian think tank?--Epeefleche (talk) 20:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Things like "Minaret of Freedom Institute: A free market Muslim perspective on economics, democracy, terrorism and Middle East conflict" in http://www.minaret.org/ , "the operation of a scholars exchange program both to allow institute associates to make presentations to academics and policy makers in Muslim countries and to permit libertarian Muslims from abroad to spend time in contact with market-oriented Muslim scholars in America and to have access to resources not available in their home countries." in Mission Statement of the Minaret of Freedom Institute, link to http://atlasnetwork.org/ in every page of the web site, "Minaret of Freedom Institute (Bethesda, MD - USA)" in http://atlasnetwork.org/for-think-tanks/free-market-think-tank-links/ , and of course http://www.google.com/search?as_q=libertarian&as_epq=Minaret+of+Freedom+Institute . Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:49, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tx. I guess I just never equated free-market with libertarian.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:17, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see the disconnect in the wiki article on libertarian: "Libertarian socialists such as Noam Chomsky and Colin Ward have stated that the term libertarianism is considered throughout the world a synonym for anarchism, despite the fact that within the United States in recent decades it has become more usually associated with free market positions"--Epeefleche (talk) 07:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

International Institute for Research and Education

Why did you remove International Institute for Research and Education from the category for think tanks?--Duncan (talk) 23:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because International Institute for Research and Education is included in Category:Political and economic think tanks based in Europe which is included in Category:Political and economic think tanks which is included in Category:Think tanks by topic which is included in Category:Think tanks. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 19:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good work -- but wouldn't you think a bot could do this stuff? Would save you time.--Epeefleche (talk) 19:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

College Sports Information Directors of America

I have reversed this edit. There was no explanation for it.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:51, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Students for a Free Tibet

I have reversed your recategorisations of Students for a Free Tibet; as the article's History section explains, it is not merely a US organisation and so I am puzzled that you chose to recategorise it as such. NebY (talk) 19:07, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Foreign policy and strategy think tanks in the United States

With categories, the parent categories should be ones that correctly include all of the articles in the category. As you get closer to the top, this is difficult or impossible to do. As an example, if the category is about a company and includes people and products, it really should not be a child of say, Category:Companies based in New Jersey. So there is the pseudo parent category of Categories named after that allows these to be grouped without adding them to poorly selected or inappropriate categories. The top of the tree is really at Category:Eponymous categories. Hope this helps. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

not sure what you are doing here?

Why are you removing categories on so many articles? Weaponbb7 (talk) 16:00, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly because Template:Category diffuse. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 16:03, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I dont understand what you mean, I am tempted to revert you recent edits as vandalism. You have been removing very legit Cats form articles Weaponbb7 (talk) 16:13, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

Some articles are the "lead article" of their category. They usually have the same name or a similar name to the category, such as Religion in Sri Lanka and Category:Religion in Sri Lanka, and are usually alphabetized before all other articles in the category. Such articles are exempt from the general rule that articles do not belong in higher-level categories. The reason for this is that when a user is browsing a category like Category:Sri Lankan culture or Category:Religion in Asia, he expects to find the relevant articles right there in the category, and not have to go burrowing through subcategories to find it. In general, no lead article should be in only its own category and no others; it makes the article too difficult to find. For comparison, see Michael Jackson, which is the lead article of Category:Michael Jackson but is also in a host of other categories as well. +Angr 16:14, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Religion in Asia currently include 63 sub-categories, and 4 articles: Religion in Asia, East Asian religions, Eastern religion, Religion in Sri Lanka. That's a clue of no need to put Religion in Sri Lanka directly in Category:Religion in Asia. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 16:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

I have opened an ANI thread on your rapid removal of Cats. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Removal of categories by a Visite fortuitement prolongée

I have made comment at the ANI thread - and realise that sometimes some editors can be unaware of the problems created by over-categorisation and combination adult child categories in either articles or category pages - good explanations and over-obvious ed it summaries are always helpful too SatuSuro 12:54, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in France

Hello, I've reverted your 2nd removal of the citation of "Western Civilization: Beyond Boundaries" in the Islam in France article.

I have no idea if there is a problem with this citation or not, but if you are going to remove it, please give a reason; preferably on the article's talk page.

Thanks Kiore (talk) 22:03, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did not removed the citation of "Western Civilization: Beyond Boundaries" in the article Islam in France. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 18:01, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Embarassing. Looking at the logs I can see you just moved it further down the article. Please accept my apologies. Kiore (talk) 18:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Accepted. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:22, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in Germany

Do not use my expressions and sentences again or i will report you for vandalism (you even copied my own spelling mistake). You certain belong to such persons who dont want to see the truth because the outcome of it would be too unpleasent. Don't wonder if truth turns out to be based on reality and not on social manipulation. --Santiago84 (talk) 02:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"You certain belong to such persons who dont want to see the truth" (Santiago84) RTFM Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:13, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Hampshire Liberty Alliance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Hampshire Liberty Alliance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Hampshire Liberty Alliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rostz (talk) 15:16, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

the map on the eurabia-page

dear vfp,

i have some issues about the map you created on the eurabia-page. the map is fully appropriate on pages about european islam, but not on the pages of conspiracy theories. i think it's undue. do you have any strong opinions about keeping it? -- mustihussain  11:38, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

No, I have no "strong opinions about keeping it". However:

• I think that "images are an important part of any article's presentation" in an encyclopedia, as writen in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images;
• the map is currently the only illustration of the article; do you know some other picture which could fit? the picture in http://oyvindstrommen.be/2011/11/06/profeten-peder-jensen/ is likely not free;
• the map is at least moderatly relevant since it show the actual percentage of Muslims in Europe, debunking some parts of the Eurabia thesis;
• the map is not very different from "Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis"'s cover;
• why would you delete this map? why do you think that "the map is [not] appropriate [...] on the pages of conspiracy theories"?

By the way, have you seen Paul Moreira's "Islam, Antéchrist et jambon beurre"? Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 22:41, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dear vfp, thanks for the reply. i don't think that the map appropriate as the theme is a conspiracy theory, and not european demographics. the map thus becomes quite misleading. the pictures you found on øyvind strømmens' page is much more appropriate. you could mail him and ask for the sources. haven't read or seen anything produced by paul moreira, however, i am reading strømmen's latest book, published by cappelen-damm, an eye-opener indeed.-- mustihussain  22:55, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

strømmen

strømmen's new book will be published in french by "actes sud" next spring. keep an eye open.-- altetendekrabbe  12:11, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:51, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page discussing Breivik's manifesto

I picked up the weblink which you present at Talk:2011 Norway attacks. I am collecting references to discussions of the content in 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence at a Facebook page, Analyzing Breivik's Manifesto, so if you have or come across more references to such discussions I would appreciate if you can share them. __meco (talk) 10:07, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

quote

hi, could you please translate the quote you added here? -- altetendekrabbe  09:30, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. PS: done. Please check my translation. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:40, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

here is my suggestion (dunno if it's good enough though):

"What is outrageous and unacceptable in Bat Ye'or's approach, is to see her reproducing an intellectual conspiracy-theory, a shameless propaganda, a way of thinking which she herself was a victim of, as well as millions of her coreligionists. Because, basically, these cries of outrage are not very different than "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion", this hoax created by the tsarist police in order to demonize the Jews, all jews. It mimics, in some way, "The Jewish France", the book of the nineteenth century anti-Semitic journalist Edward Drumont who suggested that his country was dominated by Jews."

what do you think?-- altetendekrabbe  21:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This sound better than mine. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:33, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

suggest you include it then. by the way, did you read strømmen's new book?-- altetendekrabbe  22:16, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:33, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have buy and read The dark web. Many thanks to you (for pointing it to me) and to Actes Sud (for translating and publishing it). However, I have not yet read Strømmen's paper to the 22/07 commission. And I made here a request for translation from German. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:33, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

great, glad you liked it. make good use of it as well. a lot of relevant info in that book. the bat ye'or-page needs to be written according to neutral point of view.-- altetendekrabbe  21:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eurabia

Hi. Though I do not consider you to be a typical gnome, your recent and excellent edits were of the tedious and gnomish type. I highly appreciate that you have taken the time to go through the references and make these small corrections, and I award you this barnstar:

		Wikignome barnstar
		This barnstar is for excellent work of the small, tedious and gnomish type on the Eurabia article benjamil (talk) 22:13, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Best regards --benjamil (talk) 22:13, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:51, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another barnstar

		The Literary Barnstar
		For your efforts on the List of Eurabia literature benjamil ^talk/edits 19:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:43, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sifaoui

Hello. For instance at a time when he was promoting Geert Wilder's movie "Fitna" on his blog in 2008: [1] (in french, but easily translated). - TwoHorned _{User_talk:TwoHorned} 21:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

sources

dear visit,

what shall we do with the adi schwartz-source? right now, it is only used to quote wistrich while it should have quoted bat ye'or's nonsense (after all she is the subject of his piece). regarding the gilbert-source, i agree with you that it has to go. it seems that he actually believes that "eurabia" is a reality, rather than a conspiracy theory. i can take it to rs/n if you want.-- altetendekrabbe  23:01, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

user shrike removed schwartz along with sifaoui. schwartz was just a waste of space, dunno about sifaoui. he does not look like a reliable source to me, but perhaps you have additional info? anyway, gilbert is worse, as he, unlike schwartz and sifaoui, believes in bat ye'or's fantasies.-- altetendekrabbe  20:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i didn't remove sifaoui and my knowledge of the guy is non-existent. why not take it to the rs/n? that would clear things up. anyways, i suggest to remove the gilbert sources, like you initially suggested. "believers" are not reliable sources, especially when they believe in conspiracy theories.-- altetendekrabbe  21:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

but why don't you take sifaoui to the rs/n? you know the author, his work, his affiliation to cnrs and so on. the rest of us dunno much about the man.-- altetendekrabbe  22:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gibpedia

'Gibraltarpedia in an international and multi-cultural collaboration' Welcome We would like to invite you to contribute to the GibraltarpediA project, the world's first WIkipedia City. The project needs writers, photographers, translators and others to help build the first wiki city which bridges Europe and Africa. We are going to transform Gibraltar and the surrounding areas in Morocco and Spain into areas rich with encyclopedic content immediately accessible using QR codes and NFC on plaques for visitors and local people. There are prizes to reward contributors in the Gibraltarpedia Multilingual challenge for the best editors, photographs and cartographers... whoever you are. More at Gibraltarpedia.org

'Gibraltarpedia in an international and muli-cultural collaboration'

you helped a bit .... care to help more?

Gates

Bonne soiree. You have a nice user name but the last subtraction you did was not nice. All the same, I respect your choice. Take care. --E4024 (talk) 19:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I proposed the deletion of that article. --E4024 (talk) 17:28, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Islam in Europe. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Darkness Shines (talk) 08:51, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Srebrenica Genocide

Hello Visite

Thanks for your message. My prime interest at Wikipedia is the Bosnian War and its aftermath and in particular the Srebrenica Genocide article and the ongoing Wikipedia conflicts involving attempts to deny and minimise the genocide. Given limited time available, my interest in the Counterjihad movement has to remain a secondary consideration and stay focused mainly on Counterjihad support for the Srebrenica genocide denial efforts. I'm not interested in drawing special attention to the Counterjihad movement as a whole in the current conflicts over the Genocide Denial section as I am to ensure that its significance in the denial "alliance", as represented by Geller and Trifkovic in particular, is not overlooked. Srdja Trifkovic is the most obvious participant, given his membership of the Karadzic kitchen cabinet during the genocide itself and his ongoing mobilisation of anti-Islamic sentiment in the Serb cause, but Geller has clearly been the most publicly influential member of the group. If I had time I'd be taking more part in the wider Counterjihad discussions, but at least for the time being my main focus has to stay on the Srebrenica Genocide article, with which I've been involved for a number of years and is a routine target for parties with an agenda. It just happens that it's currently the target for the post-Breivik damage-limitation squad, trying to limit exposure of Geller's more extravagant views (part of the general Counterjihad clean-up after Breivik ended the era of "anything goes"). But don't hesitate to contact me any time anything interesting comes up. All the best. Opbeith (talk) 21:38, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledged. All the best to you too. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 19:03, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Opbeith (talk) 21:08, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

Hi. You are aware that you are relentlessly edit-warring at the article? Subsuming reliably sourced material from the three leading French newspapers under totally unrelated comments is so WP:SYN that one wonders whether your unfamiliarity with WP rules or your bias is the bigger problem. I see you have been blocked two times for one full month at the French WP - intransigeance is not really appreciated by the French admins either, I guess.

As an aside, I don't object principally against your racism against <insert people> as you may believe. Fill these sections with reliable material based on WP guidelines and everything is fine concerning me. What I object to is this WP:IDONTLIKEIT attitude of removing or downplaying the racism against one particular group. If this continues, I may be inclined to address the noticeboard for ethnic problems; I am not sure if they are that patient with your intransigeance in a matter so sensitive. Best thing btw is you avoid following around me altogether, nothing good ever comes of this. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 19:50, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am waiting your apologies for claiming that I made "unexplained removal of reliably sourced contents". Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:58, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Military Units of the United States Army in Europe

Please see Category:Military Units of the United States Army in Europe (which you have edited) for my proposal to delete it. Hugo999 (talk) 04:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of cities in the European Union by Muslim population

Are you kidding me? I'm the one whose deleting the formatting? Why is the cell 'city proper' above the city list and 'metro area' above the country list? Shouldn't they be above the percent of Muslims living in those two areas? --Երևանցի ^talk 23:10, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Are you kidding me?" (Yerevanci) I am not. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"I'm the one whose deleting the formatting?" (Yerevanci) Yes, you are, deleting the exclamation mark labelling "this cell is a header cell" on "City" and "Country" cells. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Why is the cell 'city proper' above the city list and 'metro area' above the country list? Shouldn't they be above the percent of Muslims living in those two areas?" (Yerevanci) Yes, they should. And they are, in both your and my revision. Uh wait. It was the reverse with javascript enabled. My mistake. My apologies. This should be fixed now. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

attempted to uploaded new file to commons with corrected frequencies on commons

If I dont put the new map up in the next 24 hours you need to fix your islam map 209.236.86.221 (talk) 00:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

hi

Nottruelosa (talk) 02:00, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gift

Gift[2]. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:57, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thx. But as you may assume, I already got it... ;-) Pluto2012 (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in Europe-2010.svg

Hi, could you please update the map and make Ireland green? Because there are 49,200 Muslims in the Republic of Ireland, which is above 1% of the total population. I momentarily don't have access to a SVG editor. Thank you.--Kohelet (talk) 02:51, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:13, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again.--Kohelet (talk) 00:06, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

High-speed railway lines

Hi. You created this template and put the restriction not to have the US Northeast to be part of that template. Would you mind sharing your thought now about lifting that restriction as the US Northeast is now recognized by UIC to be part of world's high-speed lines. Please share your thought in this Template talk:High-speed railway lines. Thanks. Z22 (talk) 02:45, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOFIXIT. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 19:46, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gatestone Institute

You have recently marked the source from Gatestone Institute as unreliable in the Elaph article. Can you please explain your move, thanks, Egeymi (talk) 19:33, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See for example Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 134#Gatestone Institute and Taybeh and Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 142#Quality of sources. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 19:44, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see that in the past 2 days you engage in wonton deletion or tagging of citations from articles published by journalists from the Gatestone Institute, reaching at times 3-4 or 5 separate deletions in 5 minutes in at times random, unrelated articles. I will need to issue a complaint to the appropriate noticeboard regarding this continued behavior. N1of2 (talk) 23:02, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And now you're spamming a bunch of articles with links from the Gatestone Institute. If you know that it's not reliable, why add it? If you're trying to make a WP:POINT, please stop.

Also, the refernces you are adding are quite poorly formatted. TDL (talk) 19:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Danlaycock:

1. "And now you're spamming a bunch of articles with links from the Gatestone Institute." Yes, I am updating references.
2. "If you know that it's not reliable, why add it?" Because those adresses are the new adresses of the referenced articles. http://www.hudson-ny.org/ now redirect to http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/ , you can verify yourself.
3. Updating references and tagging them are orthogonal.
4. "If you're trying to make a WP:POINT, please stop." I am not trying to make a WP:POINT, I am not disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate a point.
5. "the refernces you are adding" I am not adding references.
6. "quite poorly formatted" Indeed.

Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 19:41, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I understand what you're doing now, it wasn't very clear from your edit summary. I saw the discussion above and your edit warring on Israel and the apartheid analogy over this source, and assumed that the issue was carrying over to other articles.

Rather than just adding the new WP:BAREURLs, it would better to just replace the old url with the new one. TDL (talk) 20:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this: "Many sources are reliable for statement "X," but unreliable for statement "Y" in WP:RSN as well as "Reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective. Common sources of bias include political, financial, religious, philosophical, or other beliefs." and "Whether a specific news story is reliable for a specific fact or statement in a Wikipedia article will be assessed on a case-by-case basis." in [[3]]. One cannot blindly tag every article written by journalists at Gatestone as unreliable; each case needs to be considered separately. N1of2 (talk) 15:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you continue to drive-by tag tens of citations as unreliable at a few minutes intervals from each other in a variety of different articles. This is unreasonable and has to stop. N1of2 (talk) 06:54, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.N1of2 (talk) 06:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion moved to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive810#User talk:Visite fortuitement prolongée#Gatestone_Institute. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:11, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Claims to be the fastest-growing religion

Hi, I saw your reverts at Claims to be the fastest-growing religion because of unrealiable sources, and copyright violations. I appreciated that. But NarSakSasLee reverted back to the last version by Mumtaz muhammed (just the same deleted sources, and softened words toward Islamic forced conversion and wars against other religions for mass conversions (evidence [4]). I suggested those users (maybe they are just one) to created what they want in the main article of Muslim population growth and just leave a short summary like others, but they didn't, they just want to make the Islam's section longer and attrach more attention. Thank you.Angelo De La Paz (talk) 17:22, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Islam section is indeed bigger than any other section in Claims to be the fastest-growing religion. I suggest you to add Template:Undue-section. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 19:59, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gatestone/Stonegate/Hudson Institute

Thanks, Visite fortuitement prolongée, for catching the ambiguous Robert Spencer, that was sloppy of me. If you have time, could you please add citations for your additions of "Stonegate Institute" and "Hudson New York Institute" to the lead sentence? Thanks again. --72.66.30.115 (talk) 23:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC) --72.66.30.115 (talk) 02:13, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted

I reverted your edit on Poe's_Law due to WP:ELNO's #2 and #12, respectfully. Tutelary (talk) 20:37, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki links

Hi there. We don't use Interwiki links anymore. Instead, it's all saved in Wikipedia:Wikidata.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:43, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and happy new year ! Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What was this about considering all I did was tell you to use Wikidata?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:49, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, no Wikipedia project formats interwiki links like that anymore. It is done through the new WP:Wikidata software. Stop adding the links in this matter.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:19, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Challenged thesis

I can't tell if your objection to the thesis is serious, but anyway it is now in front of the RSN for outside opinions. — Brianhe (talk) 21:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at No-go area

Your recent editing history at No-go area shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. This is now your third revert inside 24 hours. — Brianhe (talk) 03:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised you did this after my warning. One more removal of sources without prior consensus, and I will open an editwarring case against you. — Brianhe (talk) 00:23, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 23:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is possible that you will be blocked based on the complaint at WP:AN3#User:Visite fortuitement prolongée reported by User:Brianhe (Result: ). It may be in your interest to respond there. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:03, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notif

Salut Vfp,

• J'utilise énormément l'anglais dans mon travail, ce qui fait que parfois je mélange les 2 langues
• C'est juste pour LL, je me souviens maintenant que les députés quittaient même l'hémycyle quand il prenait la parole en guise de protestations contre qqch face auquel ils ne pouvaient rien
• Ne mène pas de "bataille" pour des "détails" même si tu es dans ton droit ; c'est épuisant en énergie et ça ne rapporte pas grand chose en définitive

Pluto2012 (talk) 01:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Je viens seulement de comprendre que Gemini1980 t'avait bloqué indéfiniment. C'est évidemment une dérive. Mais je ne peux rien faire pour toi. Je suis personna non grata sur ces requêtes...

C'est peut-être l'occasion de tourner la page. Une aubiane...

Pluto2012 (talk) 05:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re,

L'admnistrateur à qui j'ai fait part de ton blocage à mes yeux un peu trop expéditif s'en fout et il n'a même pas accusé réception. Je ne peux rien faire de plus. Comme je doute que tu puisses créer un faux-nez qui ne soit pas identifié en 2 échanges sur un pdd, je ne peux que te conseiller de vogueur vers d'autres cieux.

Bonne continuation. Pluto2012 (talk) 20:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salut,

J'ai encore essayé mais on m'a envoyé paître...

Ils préfèrent tous laisser bloquer et bloqué un contributeur borderline que de rectifier les dérives d'un administrateurs. Quoi de plus logique finalement... Pluto2012 (talk) 02:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GFLOPS/W

Why have you removed GFLOPS/W from List_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units and List of AMD graphics processing units? I could see a point in making the tables more eye friendly and one could of course calculate the value easily by hand. BUT: This is quite an important number when it comes to comparing efficiency. Having these numbers ready to compare (new cards) is a big help an time safer. Removing the die-count, well no argument here. I would even remove the die size in mm. But even without 2 or three more columns these comparison tables are unwieldy. So why not reconsider the GFLOPS/W? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.253.95.166 (talk) 00:04, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Why have you removed GFLOPS/W from List_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units and List of AMD graphics processing units?" →‎ See Talk:List of AMD graphics processing units#GFlops/W and Talk:List of AMD graphics processing units#Rx 300 table width. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 19:09, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of QBasic on Rails

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on QBasic on Rails requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Keiyakins (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Visite fortuitement prolongée. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ganser

• https://web.archive.org/web/20150412040157/http://sochi2014-nachgefragt.blogspot.de/2014/11/daniele-ganser-und-sein-umfeld-iii.html --AlternativesLebensglück (talk) 05:44, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Visite fortuitement prolongée. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Visite fortuitement prolongée. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zen 3

If you think the article is based too much on speculation or something like that, or have some other reason for having through it should be a draft, let me know. I didn't see the harm in it being in article space like that. —DIYeditor (talk) 04:07, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eurabia

Thank you for the link. One of the authors has a .fr wikipediapage! Lucien Bitterlin Maybe you can tell User:John Maynard Friedman about this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victor50 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RfC notice

This is a neutral notice sent to all non-bot/non-blocked registered users who edited Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics in the past year that there is a new request for comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics § RfC: Where should so-called voiceless approximants be covered?. Nardog (talk) 10:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RfC notice

"Postmodern_Neo-Marxism" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Postmodern Neo-Marxism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 28#Postmodern_Neo-Marxism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Antiquark (talk) 12:18, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Alder Lake (microprocessor). Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:14, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Thomas Sowell, may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. GenQuest ^"scribble" 15:57, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After reading A Lethal Obsession

When the most famous historian of antisemitism your country support a conspiracy-theory very similar to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, then maybe maybe something is rotten in the kingdom of Denmark. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 04:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Intel disputes

Hello Visite. You probably know something about these Intel disputes. Thanks for your recent post at WP:AN3. CristoCalis and Xselant are on opposite sides, am I right? Do you think either one has any additional registered accounts? LeaveMeB was probably the same as Xselant. No full-scale SPI has yet been filed that I can find. I noticed Azul120 making some reverts about the order of certain tables. It is possible that some of the Intel-related articles could be semiprotected, if the socking is too messy to stop. EdJohnston (talk) 17:59, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

«CristoCalis and Xselant are on opposite sides, am I right?» => I do not remember Xselant , so i can not anwser this question. But CristoCalis made edits about Intel 7 which are similar to LeaveMeB's edits about Intel 7.

«Do you think either one has any additional registered accounts?» => I do not know.

Any other question? Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 19:07, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Stars named from the Arabic language has been nominated for renaming

Category:Stars named from the Arabic language has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Eyesnore 01:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023-07 Indo-European

@VIGNERON: you write: «Matěj Suchánek, Visite fortuitement prolongée, Pasleim, Infovarius, Le Loy, عُثمان: what do you think?» => I think that your friends prevent me from editing Wikidata, talk pages included. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 16:03, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revert without a message?

Would you explain your rationale for the Intel revert without an explanation?

The issues were addressed.

Ivy Bridge differs more significantly from Sandy Bridge than Rocket Lake does from Alder Lake etc. Homei (talk) 11:57, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Names for Meteor Lake tiles

You are making up your own names for the tiles, which others may disagree. Digital27 (talk) 11:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

«You are making up your own names for the tiles, which others may disagree.» => Indeed. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 11:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest that we stick with Intel's names unless there is consensus for some other names.

To use a different example, I may think Intel's "smart cache" name is misleading but I wouldn't change the name to my own liking. Digital27 (talk) 11:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think that Intel's "smart cache" name and AMD's "Infinity Cache" name are misleading and I will change that. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 11:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was giving an example and NOT suggesting you to change those. Digital27 (talk) 11:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yet i decided one year ago to make those changes. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 11:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023-12 table

early 21th century

	New York	Washington
Post	The New York Post: far-right, unreliable	The Washington Post: right-wing, mostly reliable
Times	The New York Times: right-wing, mostly reliable	The Washington Times: far-right, unreliable

Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 17:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Happy New Year, Visite fortuitement prolongée!

Thank you for your contributions, especially to computer tech articles.

You might want to consider archiving your user talk page – this can be done manually, or set up automatically using a bot. It's up to you whether or not you want to do it, however do keep in mind that long talk pages can be difficult to read and load slowly on low bandwidth connections. WP:TPG suggests archiving old discussions when the page reaches 75KB in size, which, this one is at 78KB. You can ask me for help if you need it in regards to archiving your talk page!

Kind regards, — AP 499D25 (talk) 11:42, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fast simple instructions are at Help:Archiving (plain and simple). Valereee (talk) 11:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nova Lake (microprocessor) (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Encoded was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nova Lake (microprocessor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Encoded  Talk 💬 15:41, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Visite fortuitement prolongée! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Encoded  Talk 💬 15:41, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unreliable source tommy robinson

hi! what parts werent sourced right? the source was the event holders website themself where i quoted where it was held and how they described him NotQualified (talk) 16:54, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.trykkefrihed.dk/sappho-award.htm Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 17:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yeah thats the event holders NotQualified (talk) 19:10, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]