This user may have left Wikipedia. UberCryxic has not edited Wikipedia since 14 January 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
1. I will reply on your talk page unless you request otherwise. 2. Please be calm and courteous when writing. Do not troll here. 3. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~) at the end. 4. You can always send me an email if you do not wish to write on this talk page.
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Layli Fauziya1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 10:04, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
GAR
Speed Demon (song), an article that you may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article.--Tomcat(7)16:18, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that you moved the 2.4b total count down to 2.1-2.2b on the Christianity article. The discrepancy is, I believe, due to whether Greek and Ethiopian Orthodox (283m) and/or unaffiliated (110m) are included in the count. The 2.4b is cited for 2015 in "The World's Religions in Figures", by Todd Johnson and Brian Grim. I have not undone your change but I would recommend that you do so. Jtrevor99 (talk) 18:39, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Saw your message on my Talk page. I hadn't noticed that the 2.4b number was previously uncited, so I'll happily add the citation as requested. Thanks! Jtrevor99 (talk) 22:17, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Battle of Borodino edit
The French losses were sever but were made up inside of a week, thanks to the timely arrival of another corps. This did nothing for being on the wrong end of a compromised, overstretched, and hopelessly out matched logistics train, and the results changed not a wit. But you might want to rethink that line as it isn't factually accurate. Otherwise great job. Tirronan (talk) 06:05, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I did put a comment on the Talk Page, as you see I believe like many editors this article while a very good article, is too big, I believe it should be like other major figures on Wikepedia Mary Queen of Scots, Joan of arc or other figures around 10,000 words, you revert me I will not revert you , I will be positive, you seems a decent person, I' m waiting for your comment on the Talk page. Thank you.Aubmn (talk) 22:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
French L2 speakers
Given the huge disparity in the reported number of L2 speakers (85M to 195M), I think it's a good idea to give both. Probably just a difference in the criteria for L2. — kwami (talk) 02:19, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I thought maybe it was a difference in the number of people who are actually L2 speakers (use French on a daily basis, are fluent, etc.) and those who've taken it in school. I remember that being a big problem in past debates on the population. (I've taught in French, but I'd hardly call myself an L2 speaker.) If it's the same organization, wouldn't they have had to have changed their definition of what L2 is? But if it's just a matter of screwy data, go ahead and delete. — kwami (talk) 02:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, ca. 160k L2 from them would work, and they fit w the L1 population too. If you think they're more reliable, maybe use them for both figures? — kwami (talk) 02:51, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I'd love to ask for your attention on the ununseptium article; it's currently a FAC, but few people have actually reviewed the article. The WP:Physics subpage lists you as a user who might be potentially interested in an article on a superheavy element (as with all superheavies, it is more physics and less chemistry than a regular WP:Elements article), as a one-time activity or otherwise, and your attention would be highly appreciated, as the previous FAC has gained too little attention to even stand a chance to make it to the FA status; hope you can take part. Thanks--R8R (talk) 3:59 pm, Today (UTC+3)
Hi. With this edit to Qatar, I assume you were referring to this 2010 survey of Qatar? I'm only asking because I wasn't able to find a survey for 2014 as was specified in your edit. Thanks. Elspamo4 (talk) 04:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Atheism in the Arab World
Hey, it's ok if you remove the last sentence of this section, but removing the whole sections is a bit overzealous and not justified. THE VAST MAJORITY of statements in Wikipedia is supported by A SINGLE SOURCE only, just as a reminder. I will put it back and remove the last sentence. Thanks for understanding. Peteruetz (talk) 18:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
would you go back over some edits which you made there, and complete the refs to Chandler by adding the year of the book which you were citing, please?, since apparently there are 4 to choose from: 1966, 73, 95, and 2002. You can reply here. --Jerome Potts (talk) 07:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, UberCryxic. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
I have nominated Tahirih Justice Center for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. TheDragonFire (talk) 12:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Tahirih logo.jpg
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Tahirih logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello, UberCryxic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.
Maybe I have misunderstood the conversation on the China page. But I find it so sad that an editor who has been around since 2006 still has to be a little rude the way you seem to have been with Zanhe, an important Wikipedia editor on things China, on the China page today. Was there really a need to say anything in your edit summary beside a summarization of the edit you made? All I'm saying is, to my untrained eye, it looks ugly, and I think it sets a bad tone, a hostile tone for Wikipedia editors. There is literally no need whatsoever to be rude to, embarrass, or make fun of others, even if they have been rude to you. My policy is, if I have to choose between getting in the mud or giving up on an edit, then I give up and do something else: there's a lot that needs doing in other areas of Wikipedia. Unrelated- from what you said on the talk page, I was somewhat persuaded with your thoughts on adding the 2018 info, but I don't really know anything about the topic. Geographyinitiative (talk) 12:16, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]
Have your say!
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for October 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Epicurus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enlightenment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hello, UberCryxic. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]
Battle of Austerliz FAR
I have nominated Battle of Austerlitz for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. buidhe02:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FAR for War of the Fifth Coalition
I have nominated War of the Fifth Coalition for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 16:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
Napoleon, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Lennart97 (talk) 14:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I have nominated Ulm campaign for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Catholic Church has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
