User talk:UU Archivist

This is UU Archivist's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Church of Our Father (Atlanta) has been accepted

Church of Our Father (Atlanta), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Northwest Unitarian Universalist Congregation

Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. UU Archivist, thanks for creating Northwest Unitarian Universalist Congregation!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. independent sources should also be used to prove notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aubrey Franklin Hess has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aubrey Franklin Hess. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:23, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aubrey Franklin Hess has been accepted

Aubrey Franklin Hess, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 11:50, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, UU Archivist. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Daniel Bragg Clayton

Hello, UU Archivist,

Thank you for creating Daniel Bragg Clayton.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi, and thanks for creating the page. Since numerous parts of the article are still unsourced, and it seems you are mostly using offline sources, could you help add some more references? Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ARandomName123}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ARandomName123 (talk)^Ping me! 20:28, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ARandomName123:

Need some help to resolve your comment "seems you are mostly using offline sources, could you help add some more references?"

Can you give an example or two? Are you referring to Clayton's Forty-seven years in the Universalist Ministry." His book is not available online. I have my personal copy. What is the solution to this situation.~~~ UU Archivist (talk) 20:55, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's what I was referring to. Not having an online version of the book is perfectly fine. I was asking if you could add more references from the book, since the rest of us probably don't have access to it. Thanks. ARandomName123 (talk)^Ping me! 20:58, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ARandomName123

All changes requested have been made. What now?

~~~ UU Archivist (talk) 14:20, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work! Looks better now. ARandomName123 (talk)^Ping me! 15:44, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm Patar knight. I noticed that you have been adding short descriptions to articles. However, the short descriptions you added are too long to be effective, such as at George Leonard Chaney. The guideline is that short descriptions should ideally be under 40 characters long, and no longer than needed. For more information, see the short description guidelines. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 14:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting the short description length UU Archivist (talk) 19:13, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Patar, I need assistance on moving a new Article (Frances C. Swift) to the main space. The content is in my Sandbox. I inadvertently moved a current article (George Leonard Chaney) to the Frances C. Swift name. I renamed the George Leonard Chaney article and that article now appears to appear correctly. However, I cannot move my Sandbox Frances C. Swift article because

The page could not be moved: a page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid.

Please choose another name, or use Requested moves to ask for the page to be moved.

I tried the "Perform requested move" option, but that returns the same error.

How can I move my Fances S. Swift Sandbox article to the main space?

Thanks UU Archivist (talk) 20:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your account has been blocked from editing because your username gives the impression that the account represents a group, team, club, organization, company, product, department, or website. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

It also appears that your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization, person or cause that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest. You may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here. You may also read our FAQ for article subjects.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change to this account.

• To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
• If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Important items to note:

• The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.
  • You are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually. Examples include: "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".
• The new username you choose cannot already be taken and used by another account. You can search here to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns, "There is no global account for [username]", that means it is available.

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, department, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 

Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 21:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

UU Archivist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The user name UU Archivist identifies me as an archivist of Unitarian Universalism material. By definition, the term "archivist" identifies an individual. It has been active for years. Please identify, who or how the account blocking was initiated. Interestingly, the blocking of my account coincides with objections I raised with a Wikipedia editor over an article I recently published George Leonard Chaney. :My description also clearly identifies me as an individual. It reads: :After a 35-year IT career, I retired and discovered that my time is now "my time." With the freedom to explore activities that truly interest me, I was drawn to exploring the history of my Unitarian Universalism faith tradition in my hometown of Atlanta, Georgia. :Unitarians and Universalists had been active in Atlanta long before Atlanta iconic institutions such as Coca-Cola or Georgia Tech came into existence. Yet the story of Unitarians and Universalists has remained largely untold. :My hope is to share the rich history of my faith movement in Atlanta and in the South on Wikipedia. UU Archivist (talk) 19:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

See below. UtherSRG (talk) 12:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@UtherSRG:I think this request makes a reasonable argument that their username represents an individual, and I also find it a bit unusual to issue a no-warning block to a username that has been around for almost seven years. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 05:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming that the block was issued because it could sound like a position as part of the church apparatus/administration(many organizations have an "archivist"), but I too find the explanation satisfactory. 331dot (talk) 10:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm good. I did, indeed, think this was a position account. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@UtherSRG, thank you (and others) for responding quickly to address my blocked user account. In my petition to reopen my account, I also asked, "Please identify who or how the account blocking was initiated." Thanks in advance for your assistance. UU Archivist (talk) 20:10, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're already communicating with the admin who blocked you, UtherSRG(who is named in the block notice above). 331dot (talk) 20:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the name and it said "position account" to me. Position accounts are not allowed. This had nothing to do with any edits you had made. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:00, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UtherSRG Again, thanks for adding your observations about blocking my account. I consider my account blocking a serious action against me and, therefore, seek a complete understanding. There is still a remaining question.

Why was your attention drawn to my username? It has been active for years, never received such attention, and never was questioned as disruptive. Please answer this last question so we can conclude this issue without the need to escalate. UU Archivist (talk) 22:36, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is there to escalate? The admin had a good faith reason for their action. It ended up being incorrect, but that happens. We're humans. I don't know how they saw your username, but all edits to every page on Wikipedia appear in the Recent Changes feed. It's not uncommon for inappropriate usernames to get away with it for awhile.

Turning this minor issue into a vendetta would be unwise and a poor use of community time. You're certainly entitled to ask questions, but there's nothing here to "escalate". 331dot (talk) 22:50, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, as 331dot says. This is a waste of time. My standard day's work on Wikipedia includes looking at my Watchlist and seeing which articles I'm interested in have been edited recently. I may have seen your name that way. I also fall down rabbit holes chasing edits to make and may have seen your name on a recent edit of an article along the way down a rabbit hole. I have no vendetta against you. You have no reason to have one against me. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:41, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	As one who keeps an eye on Burnt Corn, Alabama, I was pleased to see your article on a Burnt Corn native I'd never heard of, Frances C. Chaney. Thanks for sharing your research into UU history in the South. Great work! ℜob C. alias ALAROB 19:53, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]