As of Indigenous Peoples' Day 2019, these are the ground rules around these parts: do not leave messages here unless it pertains to article creation, a Good Article nomination, an automated comment from a bot, a barnstar, an invitation to join a WikiProject, requesting help, or something important. Anything else will not be entertained. DISCRETION IS ADVISED.
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Women in Religion have a monthly virtual edit-a-thon and the next session is December 2nd 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. CST. For Zoom meeting details, contact Dzingle1 or RosPost. Women in Red members are welcome to join the Zoom Meeting here
Tip of the month:
Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.
Hello there! I noticed you recently participated in a discussion of a requested move for the article Brian Thompson (businessman). That discussion was closed without an ultimate consensus decision for procedural reasons. There is a new discussion open on the article talk page, and all participants in the prior move discussion are encouraged to participate. Thank you! FlipandFlopped ツ22:27, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hate coffee, have glasses, and the ability to show you the edit you made then.[1].
Where in the source does it back your edit saying ". The dress's designer, Aurora James, also invited her boyfriend Benjamin Bronfman, the son of a billionaire. Critics, both conservative and liberal, rebuked Ocasio-Cortez for attending an event where guests were not required to wear masks (employees and event staff were required to do so), and one known for its opulent display of wealth and social status. She responded"? I've checked and can't find boyfriend, masks, etc. in the NYT article. Doug Wellertalk17:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Look, I don't know what possessed you to come to my talk page about some random edit I made 1,186 days ago, showing me a diff between two editors I've never interacted with. But I truly don't care, let alone never asked for your admonishment over how I comported myself 3 years ago. If you want to remove or change anything I did... 3 years ago... over something I never got into any conflict about, you don't need my permission to do that. So Merry Christmas and casse-toi. Trillfendi (talk) 17:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I won't get lost yet. I saw the removal of your text and with my pretty insatiable curiosity used "Who wrote that" to see who made the edit, and it was you. Looks like you've never been warned before, I think most people would agree it was a serious BLP violation, but again, not something you've repeated. End of story so far as I'm concerned. Doug Wellertalk08:37, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Had this been the old me, I would’ve went back and forth with you and stood 10 toes on whatever I did but like I said, I don’t care. If you’re happy, I’m happy for you…. Trillfendi (talk) 17:37, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2024 has wrapped up, and what a full year it was for WikiProject Women in Green! Over the past year, we hosted two edit-a-thons, one themed around women's history and another on women around the world. We also managed to achieve most of our 2024 annual goals, nominating 75 articles for GA, reviewing 64 GA nominations, nominating 8 articles for FAC, peer reviewing 3 articles and reviewing 10 FAC nominations. Excellent work, and thank you to everyone involved!
For 2025 we have a new set of goals for nominations and reviews. In particular, we would like to see more articles on our Hot 100 list being improved and nominated for GA this year. If you take a look at the list and see an article you are interested in contributing to, feel free to add it and yourself to our Hot 100 project discussion. You might even find someone interested in collaborating with you!
This year, as with every year, we hope you will join us in helping improve our coverage of women and women's works on this encyclopedia. Every contribution helps. We'll see you around!
.jpg)
