en User talk:Trillfendi Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Trillfendi. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome!

Hello, Trillfendi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Chris Brown have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Flyer22 (talk) 06:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Megan Fox

Thank you for having a discussion. Would you link to where on Instagram she says this? All I found was a post with four images and a hash tag saying "not the father." --Tenebrae (talk) 18:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Well, we know she made a facetious, sarcastic post on Instagram, we know she's pregnant that part is obvious, we know Brian Austin Green is the dad, but ultimately she said to E! News that's she's going to wait to talk about it (officially). So until then all we have is so-called sources whether they're telling the whole truth or the half truth. So until then we shall have to wait for the epilogue.Trillfendi (talk) 13:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nina Agdal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Max George. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brooklyn Beckham (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I would not resubmit as there's no inherited notability from his parents.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brooklyn Beckham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:18, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

I could say the same thing about Sofia Richie, look at that stub! The difference is Brooklyn Beckham is becoming a credited model and photographer instead of just celebrity spawn.Trillfendi (talk) 06:29, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brooklyn Beckham (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brooklyn Beckham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Abdullah Alam (talk) 04:53, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Trillfendi, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Abdullah Alam (talk) 04:53, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Ok, I think let's give it a few months or a year. But there are so many stub articles on wikipedia such as, well, Sonia Ben Ammar but children of famous people have to get a bit more work. Let's just give it some time then. :)Trillfendi (talk) 04:59, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lexi Boling (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

May perhaps be notable, but some of these sources are essentially simply interviews or profiles; focus with actual in-depth third-party news that were authored by actual news sources themselves.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lexi Boling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 17:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Margot Robbie.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It's like saying I want to be an astrophysicist in the future, therefore I am a musician and astrophysicist. It doesn't work like that. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:25, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

It's not "wanting" to be something, it's a contractual obligation.... But believe me I'll be back when the so-called movie is made. With you professional wikidiots you have to see this crap on screen to "believe" it. Everything is ~gossip~ to y'all.Trillfendi (talk) 01:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Robbie has been touted to produce two films in the future – she would have to have produced a substantial number of films for "producer" to even be mentioned anyway, as has been brought up in previous arguments for similar actors and actresses. Ignoring the sly dig, even if she does have a "contractual obligation", she hasn't produced a film yet, therefore you can't say that she is a "producer" yet. It's common sense. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:27, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rianne van Rompaey has been accepted

Rianne van Rompaey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—MRD2014 (talk) (contribs) 16:30, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Trillfendi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederikke Sofie has been accepted

Frederikke Sofie, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 22:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lineisy Montero

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lineisy Montero requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 00:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: GrabYourWallet (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Current sources, regardless, are simply announcements and mentions, there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GrabYourWallet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Okay, I will fix it.Trillfendi (talk) 00:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Rianne van Rompaey, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Do I have to be the one to show people how to read a clearly stated list that is a source on many other pages too? Sheesh.Trillfendi (talk) 15:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

No, but you should not call them fools. Personal attacks are not allowed on Wikipedia. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rianne van Rompaey. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please discuss all issues on the talk page of the article before reinserting rather than edit warring. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Alright, but the same should be said to that Hullaballoo Wolfowitz character on his talk page as well.... It seems to be a personal vendetta against Miss Rianne van Rompaey because I can name many other pages where the same source does keep getting vilified and disputed.Trillfendi (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

If you continue your edit warring on Rianne van Rompaey you may be subject to administrative sanctions without further warning. -!Ad Orientem (talk) 19:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

And tell the same thing to the other guy!Trillfendi (talk) 21:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adwoa Aboah has been accepted

Adwoa Aboah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Innisfree987 (talk) 01:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2010s in fashion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mules. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pyper America (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying our applied standards and notability cannot be inherited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pyper America and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:26, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

She has done notable work, it's not necessarily inherited from her more famous brother. Anyway, I'll fix it.Trillfendi (talk) 17:03, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slick Woods (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying the applied notability standards and notability cannot be inherited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Slick Woods and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 23:00, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pyper America has been accepted

Pyper America, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 15:02, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ebonee Davis (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying our basic policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ebonee Davis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 19:49, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

...care to say what those are...?Trillfendi (talk) 21:59, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Brooklyn Beckham

Hello, Trillfendi. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Brooklyn Beckham".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

The draft was rejected because some administrator said he currently lacked nobility besides being David and Victoria's son. If it will be accepted then I will continue to edit it.Trillfendi (talk) 21:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jing Wen (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Otterathome was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Appearances do not contribute to notability. Please provide sources that cover subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jing Wen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Otterathome (talk) 00:35, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

There are several sources of notability there including 3 different countries' Vogue magazines and The New York Times, but they're buried by all the work. If I didn't cite those, some d-bag was gonna just delete everything I wrote and say it was an "unsourced laundry list".Trillfendi (talk) 16:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jing Wen (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jmcgnh was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Establishing notability requires significant coverage. In its current state, this submission would likely be deleted because it consists mostly of promotional material. There is an overwhelming list of cites to the model's agency. The other coverage seems to be brief mentions and publicity, such as the paragraph in the cbsnews cite. None of this contributes to notability. If you intend to continue submitting this draft, please consider taking out ALL of the publicity and promotion and leave only the references that you believe demonstrate that this person is more than a successful model, but someone which the world outside of modeling should take notice of.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jing Wen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slick Woods has been accepted

Slick Woods, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:45, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jing Wen (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToThAc was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jing Wen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToThAc (talk) 21:03, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Lexi Boling concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lexi Boling, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Kingsman: The Golden Circle. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Your addition to the plot summary was incorrect, as it was Poppy, not Brandon, who launched the missiles at the Kingsman agents. Areaseven (talk) 04:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

I did not make that edit. Someone else must be using my computer or something while I'm still logged in (on the 365 day thing). I guess in that scenario it could be vandalism because it wasn't me and I haven't even seen that film yet or let alone the first one.Trillfendi (talk) 18:16, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ari Westphal (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Would still need improvements in relevant news and whatever of it is major independent news, and not simply casual announcements or notices as these cannot be considered for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ari Westphal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greta Varlese has been accepted

Greta Varlese, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Galobtter (talk) 05:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dilone has been accepted

Dilone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SweetCanadianMullet (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mica Argañaraz has been accepted

Mica Argañaraz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hitro talk 08:47, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ebonee Davis concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ebonee Davis, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Trillfendi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ebonee Davis has been accepted

Ebonee Davis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Innisfree987 (talk) 20:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Selena Forrest (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kiteinthewind was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Selena Forrest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Selena Forrest, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 22:51, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Selena Forrest has been accepted

Selena Forrest, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Innisfree987 (talk) 23:15, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Whoops: I clicked the wrong button and sent the notification to myself instead of you. Here it is. Thanks for your work! Innisfree987 (talk) 23:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexina Graham (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexina Graham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alexina Graham, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Mayowa Nicholas concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mayowa Nicholas, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Danielle Herrington has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Danielle Herrington. Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 01:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danielle Herrington (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danielle Herrington and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Danielle Herrington, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amanda Murphy (model) has been accepted

Amanda Murphy (model), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TeaDrinker (talk) 01:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nadja Bender has been accepted

Nadja Bender, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dial911 (talk) 05:55, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Growing Up Supermodel has been accepted

Growing Up Supermodel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 19:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julia Nobis has been accepted

Julia Nobis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:09, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Model Squad (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Model Squad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Model Squad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:42, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Jing Wen concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jing Wen, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chase Carter (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs to meet requirements at WP:NMODEL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chase Carter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chase Carter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 05:45, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maartje Verhoef has been accepted

Maartje Verhoef, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 02:31, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adesuwa Aighewi (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Cite third party sources: mainstream publication, magazines, newspapers and books. Notability isn't really established either. As of now with your current draft, she doesn't seem like a person of importance.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adesuwa Aighewi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adesuwa Aighewi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 11:16, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karena Evans (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karena Evans and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Karena Evans, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 17:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Submission

Greetings. Regarding Karena Evans, you cited a list of sources: Billboard (magazine), CBC, Complex, Vogue (magazine), Teen Vogue, Vogue España, Yahoo, GQ and even the infamous Daily Mail. Even though all these big shots have an article on her, those articles are not in-depth. No meaty, deep coverage given for her, just trivial mentions and passing mentions. Significant coverage is needed. References about the subject — at least one lengthy paragraph, preferably more. Not passing mentions, not directory listings, not just any old thing that happens to have the name in it. EROS ^message 01:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Eh, ok, fair enough. But here in someone did essentially give her notability in the realm of Wikipedia, in my opinion.Trillfendi (talk) 07:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth and Victoria Lejonhjärta has been accepted

Elizabeth and Victoria Lejonhjärta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Thsmi002 (talk) 12:30, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anok Yai has been accepted

Anok Yai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dial911 (talk) 06:13, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Ethnicelebs.com as a source

Hi Trillfendi. To expand upon my edit summary a bit: I noticed that you recently used ethnicelebs.com as a source for information in a biography article, Colin Kaepernick. Please note that there is general consensus that ethnicelebs.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See User_talk:XLinkBot/RevertList#EthniCelebs.com). The IrishCentral.com ref seems rather iffy, and would be best replaced with something clearly reliable. I don't know what the NYTimes ref was supposed to be verifying. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 04:07, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ari Westphal (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StartTerminal was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ari Westphal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ari Westphal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

startTerminal {haha wow talk page | startTerminal on irc} 19:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jing Wen has been accepted

Jing Wen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 01:43, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alanna Arrington (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NMODEL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alanna Arrington and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alanna Arrington, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 21:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasmine Sanders (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Twitter is not a reliable source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jasmine Sanders and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jasmine Sanders, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mayowa Nicholas has been accepted

Mayowa Nicholas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 02:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasmine Sanders (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NMODEL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jasmine Sanders and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jasmine Sanders, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 17:02, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hassan Al Kontar has been accepted

Hassan Al Kontar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:15, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paloma Elsesser has been accepted

Paloma Elsesser, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharam Diniz (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sharam Diniz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sharam Diniz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 14:04, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Grace Wallerstedt has been accepted

Sara Grace Wallerstedt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 12:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karena Evans has been accepted

Karena Evans, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 12:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: This Is America (Childish Gambino song) has been accepted

This Is America (Childish Gambino song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

–Ammarpad (talk) 16:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Willow Hand has been accepted

Willow Hand, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 19:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katryn Kruger has been accepted

Katryn Kruger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:32, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duckie Thot has been accepted

Duckie Thot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:49, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK for This Is America (Childish Gambino song)

On 16 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article This Is America (Childish Gambino song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "This Is America" by Childish Gambino addresses the themes of being black in America and gun violence in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/This Is America (Childish Gambino song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, This Is America (Childish Gambino song)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabina Karlsson (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:MODEL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sabina Karlsson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sabina Karlsson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 07:05, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Grace Kelly photo

Sorry, I accidentally reverted your Grace Kelly photo change without an explanation. Anyway, I do not understand your rationale. The photo works, and so do the source links. Surtsicna (talk) 23:59, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marine Deleeuw has been accepted

Marine Deleeuw, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 20:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Patrick J. Adams

Hi. I noticed you added a template at Patrick J. Adams, saying it appears to be written like an advertisement. Not sure what exactly you mean as it is a BLP and not an article for a company or product. Could you please elaborate? Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 ^talk 23:19, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

To be honest I probably placed it by accident while simultaneously editing another article and didn't get around to undoing it. But in reading this article now, one could do away with all the "puffery". Though I have seen people with personal advertising banners placed on their article (e.g. it used to be on Behati Prinsloo's) and I often see articles get rejected on the basis of "advertising" or "reading like an advertisement". It makes no sense to me either but I guess they mean it in a résumé way.Trillfendi (talk) 03:50, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlee Fraser has been accepted

Charlee Fraser, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adesuwa Aighewi has been accepted

Adesuwa Aighewi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 08:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Josh Kiszka article

Let's discuss notability on the article's Talk page. Thanks! - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) 00:43, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Danielle Herrington

Hello, Trillfendi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Danielle Herrington".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 14:00, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Someone else already created the article after that draft was declined; I forgot to request deletion myself so it should be deleted regardless.Trillfendi (talk) 16:26, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chiara Scelsi has been accepted

Chiara Scelsi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Stuartyeates (talk) 20:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Soo Joo Park has been accepted

Soo Joo Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 00:30, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

"This category is for people with only very distant or remote African ancestry"

Where are you getting this from? You've been reverted by multiple users, maybe take that as a suggestion you need to slow down and realize you might be acting outside of consensus? JesseRafe (talk) 01:01, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

I made a mistake there. I meant to remove the “American people of African descent” category with that explanation.Trillfendi (talk) 01:02, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabina Karlsson has been accepted

Sabina Karlsson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Stuartyeates (talk) 03:24, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
Country Winners
Diversity winner
High quality contributors
Gender-gap fillers
Page improvers
Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)

perry bloom r/ship

hey. when I first attempted to solve this problem it wasn't my intention to remove this information. this was agreed on later on which you probably know if you checked SNUGGUMS' talk page. My problem with this sentence was that it didn't really look right as a single sentence at the end of the section and then when trying to fit it in somehwere else it didn't work either hence I messaged SNUGGUMS and we agreed to remove it. Also, you haven't used a template for any of the sources you provided + at least one of them doesn't work. If you fix that I won't mind keeping it in the article. We need to remember that this is a FA and we need to maintain its quality. Best. ArturSik (talk) 19:14, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

I agree with you there; the way the article is set up there was simply nowhwere else to put it. Which source doesn’t work? They were all working fine before. Anywho, I’ll fix it to the best of my ability.Trillfendi (talk) 19:26, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

I think the first one. When I opened it it referred me back to the main page. ArturSik (talk) 19:30, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

I clicked it and the page loaded weirdly, basically the video was taking up half the page. That one can go.Trillfendi (talk) 19:35, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

I would still remove some of these sources. Do we really need five? I think we should get one which states that they've been in an on-and-off relationship since 2016 and that should do. ArturSik (talk) 20:16, 6 October 2018 (UTC) update: I've replaced them with one which covers everything. ArturSik (talk) 20:32, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Grande breakup

Hi. I would drop this, even though you have a point, *technically*. But the news is so widely reported, and Grande has given so many hints that more-or-less confirm it, so it seems merely stubborn to keep fighting it, except to insist that they say "reported" rather than stating it as fact. -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:28, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

It’s not stubbornness more than consistency. I felt the same when they got engaged, it was so widely reported yet in Wikipedia-land these two weren’t even deemed as in a relationship (talk about stubborn) until a month later when Pete confirmed the engagement. We came to a consensus on her page that we will not be taking TMZ’s word when they didn’t even ask representatives for comment; we decided to wait until she said it herself.Trillfendi (talk) 21:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For neutralizing that article. Well done! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:08, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Ioana Boitor

Hello Trillfendi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ioana Boitor, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: winning Miss World Romania is a claim of significance and Miss World 2006 is a suitable merge/redirect target per WP:ATD. Thank you. So Why 09:02, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Andreea Stancu

Hello Trillfendi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Andreea Stancu, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: clearly claims significance. Thank you. So Why 09:02, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

SoWhy, the single source is FashionModelDirectory which by itself does not establish notability and appearances don’t establish notability. There are no reliable sources on this model. FashionModelDirectory is the “IMDb of fashion” and we approach it just like IMDb, which by itself is not considered a reliable source because, like Wikipedia, just anyone can submit edits to that site. There are many, many models who have done high fashion, yet don’t have reliable sources. And the template says right there, this article may not meet notability requirements!Trillfendi (talk) 12:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ari Westphal has been accepted

Ari Westphal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:49, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Lena Epstein has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lena Epstein. Thanks! ProgrammingGeek^talktome 20:47, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

ProgrammingGeek (personally) I don’t think it matters much how the seat goes, I think it matters that they both have their own articles so it doesn’t redirect to the election, when there are reliable sources such as CNN, Washington Post, and Detroit Free Press profiling them, giving them their own respective notability.Trillfendi (talk) 21:01, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Trillfendi, I honestly do agree. I would have moved it if it weren't for the ongoing discussion surrounding this (it's linked at T:CENT). My rationale there is that her potential victory in under a week's time would be enough to unequivocally confirm or deny notability. Cheers. ProgrammingGeek^talktome 21:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Okay, we shall see.Trillfendi (talk) 21:13, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lena Epstein (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not currently satisfy political notability because the election hasn't been held, and does not satisfy general notability as currently sourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lena Epstein and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lena Epstein, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chase Carter (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still not seeing how she meets WP:NMODEL. Appearing in the SI issue isn't a notable feat in itself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chase Carter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chase Carter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anna Delvey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Confidence man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Trillfendi. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

→

User talk:Trillfendi/Archive 1

Welcome!

Megan Fox

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brooklyn Beckham (August 21)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brooklyn Beckham (August 26)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lexi Boling (September 17)

September 2016

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rianne van Rompaey has been accepted

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederikke Sofie has been accepted

Speedy deletion nomination of Lineisy Montero

Your submission at Articles for creation: GrabYourWallet (February 13)

February 2017

March 2017

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adwoa Aboah has been accepted

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pyper America (April 24)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slick Woods (May 1)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pyper America has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ebonee Davis (June 30)

Your draft article, Draft:Brooklyn Beckham

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jing Wen (July 30)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jing Wen (August 4)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slick Woods has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jing Wen (August 17)

Draft:Lexi Boling concern

September 2017

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ari Westphal (October 1)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greta Varlese has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dilone has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mica Argañaraz has been accepted

Draft:Ebonee Davis concern

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ebonee Davis has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Selena Forrest (January 18)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Selena Forrest has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexina Graham (January 23)

Draft:Mayowa Nicholas concern

AfC notification: Draft:Danielle Herrington has a new comment

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danielle Herrington (February 14)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amanda Murphy (model) has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nadja Bender has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Growing Up Supermodel has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julia Nobis has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Model Squad (March 1)

Draft:Jing Wen concern

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chase Carter (March 9)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maartje Verhoef has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adesuwa Aighewi (April 6)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karena Evans (April 10)

Submission

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth and Victoria Lejonhjärta has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anok Yai has been accepted

Ethnicelebs.com as a source

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ari Westphal (April 20)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jing Wen has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alanna Arrington (April 22)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasmine Sanders (April 23)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mayowa Nicholas has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasmine Sanders (April 25)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hassan Al Kontar has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paloma Elsesser has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharam Diniz (May 6)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Grace Wallerstedt has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karena Evans has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: This Is America (Childish Gambino song) has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Willow Hand has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katryn Kruger has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duckie Thot has been accepted

DYK for This Is America (Childish Gambino song)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabina Karlsson (May 17)

Grace Kelly photo

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marine Deleeuw has been accepted

Patrick J. Adams

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlee Fraser has been accepted

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adesuwa Aighewi has been accepted

Josh Kiszka article

Your draft article, Draft:Danielle Herrington

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chiara Scelsi has been accepted