User talk:Trampikey

Archive
Archives

Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 4
Archive 5
Archive 6
Archive 7
Archive 8
Archive 9
Archive 10
Archive 11
Archive 12
Archive 12.5

Please leave me a message!

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 20 12 May 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Denise Wicks

{moved from User talk:Trampikey/Archive 12.5)

Hi, I am confused about something and I wonder if you could help me. On Denise's profile it states that Owen was her ex-husband. I don't think that that is right, but nonetheless I put her name to Denise Celeste Wicks (nee Fox, previously Turner). Is that right? And if not, then shouldn't someone change the relationship between Owen and Denise?

Thanks Gossipking (talk) 11:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's no evidence to suggest that she ever took Owen's name, especially as Libby's name is Fox, not Turner. We can't just assume that she was previously called Turner unless it is stated. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 15:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas EE

Hey, do you still have that old Christmas page saved in your userspace? Or did you get it deleted? I'm trying to find a ratings reference that I know was on there, but I cant find it anywhere online anymore :( Gungadin 13:13, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should be in the history of one of my sandboxes... I don't really have time to look for it now, but it should be there somewhere! -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 21:35, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's ok, I already got an admin to userfy the page for me.Gungadin 22:28, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You know you changed all the caps to lower on Christmas Day? well the D in day should actually be capitalised according to English language rules. So should all seasons, which I never do. Check out wiki's Christmas page. Whenever they say Christmas Day, the d is capitalised. Not that i'm being anal, it will just save you having to change them again :) Gungadin 00:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh OK, sorry about that! You learn something new every day! I didn't know about the seasons either - they look weird capitalised! -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 19:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, we were right the first time about seasons. I must have read the MOS too hastily the other day. Seems seasons only begin with a capital letter in poetry! but not in every day usage :) Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters)#Calendar items Gungadin 20:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:Barryevans2dtv.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Barryevans2dtv.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:41, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:Beppedimarco2dtv.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Beppedimarco2dtv.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:Billymitchell2dtv.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Billymitchell2dtv.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please DO NOT Revert MY Edit TO Jack Branning, and Ronnie Mitchell kind regards 88.111.154.220 (talk) 09:22, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey Trampikey, look I'm going to come clean I'm a sock of User:WJH1992 but please please don't tell User:Fram or User:Rodhullandemu cos they'll block me indef I personally dont like indef blocks but please since I've told you please don't block me I just thought I'd be honest but please User:Trampikey don't put me on a Indef block because at the end of the day I've come clean ain't I cheers Tramp --HSSHire (talk) 18:07, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 21 19 May 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Volume 4, Issue 22 26 May 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:49, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tanya and Jack

I was wondering if you have a photo from last night's episode of EastEnders that can be uploaded onto either Jack or Tanya's profile of them together. I meant to do it last night, but completely forgot.

Thanks 213.40.116.238 (talk) 09:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kate and Gin

Any particular reason for this? Am I missing something? Neıl 龱 07:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 23 2 June 2008 About the Signpost
Board elections
Board elections open
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:12, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Abi Branning EE.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Abi Branning EE.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 24 9 June 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:59, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Lucy Beale

I had to delete it to remove a couple of edits from the history. It's restored now. Sorry for the confusion. ... discospinster talk 20:34, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did not leave a warning for him/her; you are welcome to do so. ... discospinster talk 20:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Touche! It's User:82.21.21.195. ... discospinster talk 20:41, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 25 23 June 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor — From the editor
Features and admins
Features and admins
Volume 4, Issue 26 26 June 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:42, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Terence

Hello, what do you think about Terence having his own page? I found a source :) [1] Gungadin 22:39, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should do a list of pets, in the style of the minor lists... -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 18:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea.Sheriwhinge 19:49, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Zoeslater2dtv.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Zoeslater2dtv.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pat Evans and Joe Wicks

Hello, this is not a question based on something to be changed on either of their pages, but I was wondering if you could tell me what their relationship was like whilst on EastEnders. I understand that they were grandmother and grandson and I didn't watch EastEnders unfortunately during Joe's time in Walford. I would really appreciate it because I have been interested in Pat's relationships with her family members, as she always seems to be helping other people in the square, and having recently viewed her relationships with her other grandchildren Steven Beale and Bianca Jackson I was wondering what their relationship was like.

Thanks 213.40.125.118 (talk) 13:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really sure, sorry... -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 20:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sharonrickman2dtv.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sharonrickman2dtv.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ronnianconaassharonwatts.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ronnianconaassharonwatts.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stan porter.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stan porter.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stan porter 1960s.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stan porter 1960s.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ianshameless.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ianshameless.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ronnie beale.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ronnie beale.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Harry.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Harry.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Albert beale.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Albert beale.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 27 30 June 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Summer Swann

I would just like to ask you about your editing of the "Summer Swann" character page in EastEnders.

Firstly, you state that the first child to play Summer was Harry Swash. This is not the case. The Summer storyline was rewritten in May 2007 (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6682939.stm) whereas Harry wasn't born until mid June of that year (http://www.celebrity-babies.com/2007/06/eastenders-joe-.html)

I understand from an administrator that you are unfortunately within your rights to edit my change that Daisy Fitter (my daughter) was one of the original actors to play the role, as I do not have a web link to prove it. But I have found evidence to prove Harry swash was no the original actor.

FYI Abbie Hackworth is not a currently playing the part of Summer either. For someone clearly so passionate about EastEnders I would have thought you would have researched the facts, not gleamed a "truth" from parts of articles that do not state that fact.

I would also ask, why are you so passionate that Daisy not get her credit? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SLVC (talk • contribs) 11:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SLVC, I did not change the article to say that Harry Swash was the first baby to play Summer, and have sorted it out now, because as you correctly pointed out, Harry was born too late. As for your point about Abbie Hackworth, I was only going by what the article in The Sun said, though it is clear from the show that Summer is now played exclusively by the Hegarty twins. I am not "passionate" that your daughter should not get credit for the role, but we have a problem as there is no verifiable source to back you up. I have an idea though, and if you're interested, don't hesitate to contact me off-Wikipedia by using the "E-mail this user" link on the left side of the screen. Thanks. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 12:30, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i would like to confirm that my baby Abbie Hackworth played Summer Swann as a newborn! She only did 3 days of filming in June 2007!! The Sun picked up on this and made up their own story! I never even knew The Sun article was being published. I do have her childs performing arts license for the dates she did, I also have video footage and photos!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Busymummy (talk • contribs) 06:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have my daughter's childs performing arts license and photos too - they had to have a few different children playing Summer at first as they had to hastily reshoot the entire storyline and there are laws protecting the number of hours babies can work. Daisy was in fact 3 months old at the time, hence why Summer appeared to suddenlt "grow" during the course of one episode! —Preceding unsigned comment added by SLVC (talk • contribs) 13:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you could post a link to a picture that confirms Daisy played Summer, we could try and use that as a source... -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 15:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ben mitchell ee.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ben mitchell ee.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:21, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I would like to confirm that my baby Abbie Hackworth played Summer Swann as a newborn! She only did 3 episodes of filming in June 2007!! The Sun picked up on this and made up their own story! I never even knew The Sun article was being published! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Busymummy (talk • contribs) 19:16, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mitchell, Archie.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mitchell, Archie.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:44, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I heart this

[2] -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 16:42, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


LOL!. ^__________^. He is what Homer Simpson describes as "A Damn Weiner Kid". (Conq) 12:05 13 July (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 7, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 28 7 July 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor — From the editor: Transparency
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request to move article List of Minor Characters 2001 incomplete

You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page List of Minor Characters 2001 to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:

  1. Added {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
  2. Added {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved, to automatically create a discussion section there.
  3. Added {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 05:54, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the bureaucracy, should all be fixed now. --Elonka 18:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dranthonytrueman2dtv.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dranthonytrueman2dtv.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 29 14 July 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor — From the editor: Transparency
Features and admins
Features and admins
Volume 4, Issue 30 21 July 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:33, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Mitchell

Indeed! I was on Facebook browsing Eastenders groups and there are three types: "Sean Slater can use and abuse me" groups, "I love Heather from Eastenders" and "Please kill Ben Mitchell" (which is the most popular). I'm sure there must be articles that discuss his lacklustre reception.~ZytheTalk to me! 23:31, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ben: "You're lying I can tell!"

Future academy award winner. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Pulis (talk • contribs) 17:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Leona Lewis on The X Factor - nominated for deletion (again)

The article Leona Lewis on The X Factor has been nominated for deletion again. I noticed that you were a contributor on the discussion for the first nomination, and your opinions on this topic would be valuable once again. Please feel free to offer your comments to the discussion. Thanks — Wiki edit Jonny (talk) 11:40, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Debs Cross?

I noticed that you have put "Debs Cross" as a sister to Tanya Branning on her family. I was just wondering how you know this; has Tanya mentioned her on EastEnders" or is she going to be a character?

Thanks 78.148.38.35 (talk) 15:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

She was mentioned when Tanya first arrived. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 22:38, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Video - 00:38 secs. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 00:13, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.

Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 06:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 31 28 July 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Volume 4, Issue 32 9 August 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Volume 4, Issue 33 11 August 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Volume 4, Issue 34 18 August 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor — From the editor: Help wanted
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 35 25 August 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Volume 4, Issue 36 8 September 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:39, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox EastEnders character 3

Hi. Do you know the difference betweem {{Infobox EastEnders character 3}} and {{Infobox EastEnders character 2}}? Can we just merge them? -- Magioladitis (talk) 01:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3 is for the minor character lists and is more compact, 2 is for individual character articles and is split into in-universe and out of universe information. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 11:14, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thin we could use Infobox EastEnders character 2 for both cases. Do you disagree? -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well I disagree, we made the infobox because it suited the needs of minors particularly. Why the need to interfere in this? We know what we are doing here.GunGagdinMoan 00:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think the generic {{Infobox soap character}} can do the job. Moreover, someone added some many detailed relationship options in the templates that is becoming confusing. WP:SOAPS reads that they should not be some distant relationships referenced. I think we have to stick in the relationships mentioned in the generic template. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:32, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SOAPS is nothing to quote at. It's a wikiproject, and we have our own one. We dont answer to them, they only really work as a parent project to US soaps and have little to do with us as they accept we are independent. I certainly disagree with what you are proposing, and I think Trampikey will do too. A vote has already been done on this topic. We decided to have a complete family section. It was the EE wikiproject who came up with the solution for the soap family infobox in the first place, anyway. We will be keeping our own infobox, thankyou. What harm is it doing? GunGagdinMoan 00:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I copletely agree with everything Gungadin's said. (Would write a longer reply but I really can't be bothered as it's clear that Maioladitis has something against WP:WPEE and there's no use. We'll be keeping the infoboxes, thanks.) -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 14:07, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have nothing against the project! Still I don't think anyone has WP:OWNERSHIP to any article. I am trying to improve the articles by improving the templates. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:10, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No one claimed ownership as far as I can see. We're the ones who have improved articles by changing the templates to suit them, as we have tried different ways of doing it, and making a more compact infobox was the best solution. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 14:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coronation Street durations

I just saw you message. I am not planning to touch any Eastenders article before discussion. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:21, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 37 15 September 2008 About the Signpost
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tmoretoee.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tmoretoee.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:45, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kathy Mitchell

Hey, can I get your advice please? I wrote up a study about Kathy and Phil's domestic violence. I bunged it in "Reception". Should it go there there, or should I put it as a sub-section under "Domestic Violence" in the development section? Similar to what I did on Honey Mitchell with the Down's plot. I cant decide what's best...GunGagdinMoan 17:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh damn it. Have you seen on youtube, all those documentaries ee revealed things have been taken off! They were brilliant for getting info from. I wont be able to finish my Sam Mitchell page now. I was poaching everything from there, until I got bored. You dont have them do you? GunGagdinMoan 00:53, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think probably a subsection for Kathy, and the YouTube thing is annoying - the BBC opened an EastEnders channel then decided they wanted to be the only one, so went round getting rid of all other EE vids on YouTube. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 08:41, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of births, birthdays, marriages and deaths in Emmerdale

I have nominated List of births, birthdays, marriages and deaths in Emmerdale, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of births, birthdays, marriages and deaths in Emmerdale. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Magioladitis (talk) 21:05, 16 October 2008 (UTC) Magioladitis (talk) 21:05, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brenda Boyle

Can I ask why you reversed my edit to Brenda Boyle in the EastEnders cast list page? I can find no source that verifies that the character is part of the main cast, and the character has not been seen in EastEnders for several months! Although the character is referred to in the dialogue, at this stage (or unless a source proves otherwise) she cannot be considered main cast surely? Bleaney (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Cunter

He was a great villain and killed off way too early. CUNTER! ANDY CUNTER! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Triffic Tone (talk • contribs) 21:13, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I posted the section with the same name on my talk page. Could you take part in discussion ?

User: Shotwell suggested (on my talk page) "I would endorse a WP:EXPERTADVICE page that outlined the wikipedia policies and goals for researchers in a way that enticed them to edit here in an appropriate fashion. Perhaps a well-maintained list of expert editors with institutional affiliation would facilitate this sort of highly informal review process. I don't think anyone would object to a well-maintained list of highly-qualified researchers with institutional affiliation (but then again, everyone seems to object to something)."

We could start with that if you would agree ... - could you help to push his idea through Wikipedia bureaucracy ?

In my view people nominated as "expert reviewers" should be willing not to hide under the veil of anonymity. They should be able to demonstrate some level of the verifiable accomplishment / recognition in the domain of professional science . BTW, I do not see any reason why the anonymity of editors on Wikipedia is considered to be a "good thing". Above is my general opinion, so please don't take my statement personally. There is obviously a choice given for everyone in Wikipedia either to act "in open" or to hide behind meaningless assumed pseudonym and I accept this situation. BTW, I do understand current Wikipedia concept that in order to produce good Wikipedia science article, one does not need to be a professional scientist ... - that is fine with me ... But I propose to have (at least optionally) ability to review/qualify such article by the professional scientist. Cheers, Apovolot (talk) 15:20, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Patevans2dtv.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Patevans2dtv.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Clark

Hello Mr. We dont seem to get to chat as much as we used to back in the day, do we :( Hope u ok. Anyway, you might possibly know this. CC's dob was altered and I dont know whether to revert or not. Can you confirm? I think we should start adding refs to dobs where we can, so that we can revert any random changes.GunGagdinMoan 21:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, sorry for the late reply. I have no idea about CC's dob, sorry. We don't talk as much :( I've been working on the Walford Web who's who for a while, so a bit distracted. I've been trying to get it up to date and tidy etc. lol -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 18:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Great. I didnt know you had input into that site! I've not been able to do as much here as I used to, due to work commitments. I just dont have the energy to do major edits in the evening like I used to and weekends i'm ususally busy. I was hoping to at least get the character articles that I wrote up to encyclopaedic standard before this happened, but doesnt look like I will now. Though perhaps i'll just try and do a paragraph every so often instead of giving up all together.GunGagdinMoan 14:08, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Slater

This user 90.218.84.180 is making unsourced edits to the Amy Slater article. It has not yet been revealed whether Sean or Jack is the father and they are continuing to edit the page as though it has been revealed. Please could you give them a warning or possibly prevent the article from being editied until the real father is revealed? Thanks Ammera (talk) 19:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not an admin, sorry. I think we're trying to get page protection for it though.

Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.

Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 42 8 November 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor — From the editor
Features and admins
Features and admins
Volume 4, Issue 43 10 November 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Volume 4, Issue 44 17 November 2008 About the Signpost
Wikimedia Deutschland case
Lawsuit briefly shuts down Wikipedia.de
Wikimedia events
Wikimedia Events Roundup
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 11:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dotty Cotton

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dotty Cotton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional character who doesn't even exist yet. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Maybe after this character appears in the TV show, it might (emphasis on might) be notable to justify a Wikipedia article. For now, it doesn't satisfy WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Truthanado (talk) 01:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Fowler Jr.

Mark Fowler Jr. is Michelle Fowler's son by Grant Mitchell Skitzo (talk) 20:59, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware of that. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 23:38, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya you twatty bastardly fucking wanking arsing bitchy cocking shitty bloody bugger-sod

Hiya you tit-bashing penis-pikey gypo

Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.


The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 45 24 November 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor — From the editor: 200th issue
Features and admins
Features and admins
Volume 4, Issue 46 1 December 2008 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Volume 5, Issue 1 3 January 2009 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Devon Higgs

I have nominated Devon Higgs, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devon Higgs. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. rootology (C)(T) 16:34, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Moharris2dtv.JPG)

You've uploaded File:Moharris2dtv.JPG, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of characters from EastEnders

Why do you persist in removing Reverend Stevens - Michael Keating from the table of recurring characters? Stephenb (Talk) 13:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That last time was a mistake - I was trying to get rid of all of the recurring characters who are not actually classed as recurring. The four left on there (Jim, Sal, Janet and William) are classed by the BBC press office as recurring, while Brenda is another character who is definitely recurring. Other characters (such as Ritchie, Amir, Poppy, and come to think of it, Rev. Stevens) are merely guest characters who sometimes reappear. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 14:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What differentiates "guest characters who sometimes reappear" with "recurring characters" (and tell me where you found that definition!)? Still, I've put him back in the table - he's definitely a character, and he definitely recurs :) Stephenb (Talk) 14:51, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Gaynor (EastEnders)

I have nominated Gaynor (EastEnders) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Stephenb (Talk) 11:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Marie (EastEnders)

I have nominated Marie (EastEnders) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Stephenb (Talk) 11:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Waseem (EastEnders)

I have nominated Waseem (EastEnders) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Stephenb (Talk) 12:01, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of characters from EastEnders, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. That was NOT "clean-up" but replacing valid links with redirects (which are discouraged). That edit was therefore vandalism. Do not do that again! Stephenb (Talk) 10:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't give me that "welcome to Wikipedia" vandalism crap, it looks neater as it is. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 11:15, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Welcome to Wikipedia" is just Twinkle's standard text. "Looks neater" has nothing to do with anything - to the user, whether the link redirects or not is invisible, as you well know. Avoiding redirects in links is also not advisable, and I'm sure you know that, too. I don't know why you're so obsessed with non-speaking, non-notable extras Trampikey - they have no place in an encyclopeadia except possibly as mentions in *relevant* areas, and certainly adding character boxes for them is inappropriate (especially on pages that list other things). And I'd advise you to be civil, please: you were not behaving well, and you know it. Stephenb (Talk) 11:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 2 10 January 2009 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 20:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 3 17 January 2009 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 01:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of buildings in EastEnders

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of buildings in EastEnders, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unsourced list of fictional buildings with no indication of their notability outside of the EastEnders universe. Coverage of this topic in independent, reliable sources seems to be trivial at best. Wikipedia is not a directory.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 18:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of buildings in EastEnders

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of buildings in EastEnders, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of residences in EastEnders. Thank you. B.Wind (talk) 22:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 4 24 January 2009 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered at 05:26, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 5 31 January 2009 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 22:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marissa Moore

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Marissa Moore, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced; real-world notability not established per WP:MOSFICT or WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rodhullandemu 22:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 6 8 February 2009 About the Signpost
Features and admins
Features and admins
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:EEnewtitles.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:EEnewtitles.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009

The Signpost
Volume 5, Issue 7
Weekly Delivery
2009-02-16

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:58, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Fictional builders

Category:Fictional builders, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 14:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Girls@Play

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Girls@Play, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No reliable sources to establish notability. All sources are to another wiki.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bdb484 (talk) 18:41, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dot cotton branning.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Dot cotton branning.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zara Posener

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Zara Posener, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non notable child actor, career ended when she was 2 years old, has received no media attention. Character is notable, but the "actor" not in the case of a baby.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 12:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Forde

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article James Forde, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This minor has not received significant media attention (89 distinct Google hits, no Google News hits).

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 14:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alex Francis

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alex Francis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non notable child actor. He has received no significant media attention (no Google news hits, less than 100 distinct Google hits).

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 15:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:13, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Chloe jackson 2000.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Chloe jackson 2000.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article you have edited is being considered for deletion - The Secret Mitchell

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Secret Mitchell for more infomation. Dalejenkins | 17:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Psycho sam mitchell.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Psycho sam mitchell.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 17:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where are you?

You're missed, and AP has returned from the widerness too, it's just like old times. Hurry back :) GunGagdinMoan 11:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you're missed! We need you back! Seen you edit this month but one edit's no good! Come back full time like me!!! AnemoneProjectors (what?) 15:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Brana Bajic

I have nominated Brana Bajic, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brana Bajic. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. decltype (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:EastEndersAreHere1985.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:EastEndersAreHere1985.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 19:26, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 23:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:28, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:37, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 14:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mary harkinson.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Mary harkinson.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Oliver Cousins

The article Oliver Cousins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minor character, Appeared only for some months in a long-running soap opera. Articles has no referenced and/or real world information.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magioladitis (talk) 23:18, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:41, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:06, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Jim branning 1st app.JPG)

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jim branning 1st app.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 23:01, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Big ron.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Big ron.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:17, 30 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 13:17, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 07:02, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soniabirth.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Soniabirth.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ÷seresin 04:28, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

I have nominated EastEnders in popular culture, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EastEnders in popular culture (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. magnius (talk) 20:17, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

Happy Birthday!

Hey, Trampikey. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!-- GrooveDog (oh hai.) 13:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

Orphaned non-free image File:Annie smithee1.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Annie smithee1.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Patevans2dtv.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Patevans2dtv.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ee sweethearts titles.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ee sweethearts titles.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:48, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Civvy titles.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Civvy titles.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGatalk 16:56, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eepatnmo.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eepatnmo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGatalk 17:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eedotsstory.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eedotsstory.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:56, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AQOEE titles.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AQOEE titles.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:58, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

Orphaned non-free image File:New ee web.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New ee web.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:15, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oldee.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oldee.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Trampikey! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 16 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 28 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. David Spinx - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Janet Amsden - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Pamela Cundell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Huggy Leaver - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Gerard Monaco - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Natasha Beaumont - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Stuart Laing - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Ben Cartwright (actor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Michael Evangelou - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  10. Hugh Miller (writer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

WP:CHERUB

Hi Trampikey,

I notice that you've been doing some great work regarding CHERUB and Henderson's Boys. Please consider joining the CHERUB and Henderson's Boys task force, an effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of CHERUB and Henderson's Boys. If you would like to participate please pop over to the project page where you can join the project and see an open list of tasks that you can help with. Thank you for your time.

Regards, Rock drum (talk·contribs·guestbook) 19:10, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

Citing

I thought you would have learnt to use {{cite web}} by now. Handy hint: go to your preferences, go to the gadgets tab and tick the box for refTools. Then use the cite button that appears above the edit box. And I also thought you would have known by now that dates should not be wikilinked and should be in the format 9 March 2010 (for UK articles) not 2010-03-09. anemoneprojectors talk 11:00, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

Thank you for uploading File:G@Play.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:G@Play.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

Bianca Jackson

Bianca Jackson has been checked against the GA criteria and the reviewer placed the article on hold. I've never done any work on it, but you and your fellow project members have, I nominated it because I thought it was good. Noticed you had previously heavily contributed to the article more, so wondered if you would make some of the changes, just a few there by the reviewer, then it's a GA, congrats.RAIN the ONE (Talk) 15:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

Fair use rationale for File:Charlieslater2dtv.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Charlieslater2dtv.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:26, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

Hello

Hi, don't do that again please. --Closedmouth (talk) 11:42, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please discuss changes before making them, especially where there is a note asking you not to make changes? Thanks. AnemoneProjectors 12:11, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010

Orphaned non-free image File:Lindalahughes g g g.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lindalahughes g g g.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

Orphaned non-free image File:Moore, marissa.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Moore, marissa.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Reg cox civvy.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reg cox civvy.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:53, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picture 196.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Picture 196.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 21:00, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

Orphaned non-free image File:Revtomstuart.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Revtomstuart.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:46, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

Proposed deletion of Dave Hill (actor)

The article Dave Hill (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ENT

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dweeby123 (talk) 07:24, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

Orphaned non-free image File:Jack edwards ee.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jack edwards ee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This also applies to:

Hammersoft (talk) 14:51, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gerrymc.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gerrymc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This also applies to:

These images were removed due to failing WP:NFLISTS in the article in which they were used. Please do not restore them. If you have questions, ask. Thank you, Hammersoft (talk) 19:17, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Hi, I wanna say I'm really sorry for the things I said before as I was wrong to say them. I hope you can forgive me. P.S. please archive this page or remove the spam lol AnemoneProjectors 21:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. AnemoneProjectors 15:29, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't seen this before I wrote on Gungadin's talk page, but not sure what specific things you're referring to? -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 15:35, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The whole argument over the names we should use on the list of EastEnders characters when I kept saying you should leave Wikipedia. I know it was a while ago now but I still feel really bad about the things I said. We used to be good friends and stuff. Your contributions are valued, in fact there was a time I was begging you to come back here! I understand if you don't want to accept my apologises but I do really mean it, sincerely. AnemoneProjectors 16:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

Fair use rationale for File:Dotbranning2dtv.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dotbranning2dtv.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

Fair use rationale for File:Et civvy.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Et civvy.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

Orphaned non-free image File:Colletteflaherty.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Colletteflaherty.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emaonflahjr.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emaonflahjr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Maggieflaherty.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Maggieflaherty.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gerrymc.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gerrymc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

Speedy deletion nomination of Johnnie Clayton

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Johnnie Clayton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GSorbyDesroid - (Contribs!) 20:14, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

Orphaned non-free image File:Branning, Sue.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Branning, Sue.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGatalk 05:43, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

Orphaned non-free image File:Mary v sign.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mary v sign.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:45, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

Fair use rationale for File:Katmoon2dtv.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Katmoon2dtv.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 23:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Katmoon2dtv.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Katmoon2dtv.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

The Signpost: 24 January 2011


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Dot Branning and Charlie on EastEnders.png

Thank you for uploading File:Dot Branning and Charlie on EastEnders.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 13:27, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

Possibly unfree File:Osman.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Osman.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –AnemoneProjectors– 19:37, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

Proposed deletion of Hugh Miller (writer)

The article Hugh Miller (writer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:BASIC -- Can't find reliable, secondary sources providing significant coverage of this author. Gbooks lists the books, Amazon and other retailers sell it, and so on, but no news coverage, secondary book coverage, etc. Additional sources welcomed, of course.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe deckertalk to me 02:47, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

Fair use rationale for File:Lindalahughes g g g.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lindalahughes g g g.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

Nomination of Tracy Kirby for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tracy Kirby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Kirby until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 18:59, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

Orphaned non-free image File:Arthur 95.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur 95.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:43, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

Orphaned non-free image File:Lofty Holloway jilted at the altar.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lofty Holloway jilted at the altar.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

EE Newsleter June 2011

Hi just asking if you want this newsletter. If not tell me, if yes tell me! MayhemMario 15:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EE June 2011 Newsletter

The WikiProject EastEnders Newsletter
Volume 1 - June 2011
Project news
  • Welcome to the new EE newsletter! This is a new thing that I am trying out, so make sure once it's out, give me feedback! If you want to recieve the newsletter, just tell me on my userpage.
  • We are looking for new editors for the newsletter for future issues. If you are interested in helping shape the newsletter to focus on new areas or submit individual stories, we can use your help! The newsletter can be edited by all members of the project, and we are always seeking new volunteers. Instructions will be provided on how to develop the newsletter each month. Any interest and/or questions can be submitted to MayhemMario.
  • One EE article is available for review at WP:GAN. This is Yusef Khan. As members of this project are more familiar with WP:EE guidelines for EE articles, input at these reviews can be helpful for determining if they meet all good criteria. Other articles can also be found at WP:PR looking for helpful comments.
  • Based on views, the top five most popular character articles from our project this month were: Mandy Salter, Syed Masood, Tanya Branning, Ronnie Mitchell, and Janine Butcher. For a list of our project's top 500 most popular articles, see here. Consider helping to improve one of these articles that is seen by thousands to millions of people each month.
  • Remember to always add the {{WikiProject EastEnders|class=}} template to a EE article's talk page so the project can get a better idea of what work still needs to be done. If you believe that an article should be assessed at a certain class assess the article yourself (it's not too difficult to determine the basic classes such as stubs, categories, or lists).
  • Spotlight Update: One EE article has reached GA status in June 2011.
Member news
  • The recipient of the WikiProject EE Award: was GunGagdinMoan for adding sources to past EastEnders characters.
  • Remember that any editor can give the WikiProject EE Award to another WP:EE member. If you do present this award, please make mention of it here or tell one of the newsletter editors who will then include it in the next issue.
  • Please add your name to the member list if you have not already.
EastEnders Cast Changes

June's Departing Cast :

June's Returning Cast:

June's Future Cast:

From the editors

If you've just joined, add your name to the Wikipedia:WikiProject EastEnders. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered to your userpage. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 7 – July 2011). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Newest Articles
Contributors to this issue

We couldn't do it without you!

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please tell MayhemMario.

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

Orphaned non-free image File:Dot Branning (Tallulah Pitt-Brown).jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dot Branning (Tallulah Pitt-Brown).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:38, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


Proposed deletion of Wayne Thompson

(removed automated Twinkle notification) - you may (or may not!) want to know that a redirect that you made was hijacked by someone else, and it is that new page that I've nominated for deletion as it is unreferenced. The-Pope (talk) 11:04, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 October 2011

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

Proposed deletion of Brana Bajic

The article Brana Bajic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Bajic has only been in a few things, not very notable probably, I propose deletion as there is no personal details (i.e. date of birth etc). also according to her IMDb profile her last credited appearance on television was in 2009 so she has appeared in nothing since if anyone disagrees feel free to comment otherwise allow the deletion to carry on

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Equalizer2011 (talk) 15:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rosie swann 2.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rosie swann 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:21, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2011

The Signpost: 7 November2011

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

Proposed deletion of EastEnders – Book One: Home Fires Burning

The article EastEnders – Book One: Home Fires Burning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article meets neither WP:N or WP:NB - no significant independent coverage. No reviews or coverage of any kind found on newspaper archive sites, internet presence limited to retailers, cataloguing sites and fansites.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Frickative 23:30, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of EastEnders – Book Eleven: Taking Chances

The article EastEnders – Book Eleven: Taking Chances has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article meets neither WP:N or WP:NB - no significant independent coverage. No reviews or coverage of any kind found on newspaper archive sites, internet presence limited to retailers, cataloguing sites and fansites.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Frickative 23:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Who's who EE.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Who's who EE.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

Orphaned non-free image File:EEB11takingchances.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EEB11takingchances.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eastenders1homefiresburningpaperback.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eastenders1homefiresburningpaperback.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

New Suri Cruise AfD

Hello. You previously voted in the 2006 AfD for Suri Cruise. At the time, Suri was less than 10 days old, and the ultimate verdict was to turn the article into a redirect to her mother's page.

Since then, Suri has become much more notable in her own right as a toddler fashion icon, with over 13 million hits on google image search. After getting an administrator to lift the protection on the redirect, I recently restored the article as a stub, but an editor who believes that "6 year olds are not inherently notable" has again requested deletion.

If it's not too much trouble, I'd appreciate your making your opinion known at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suri Cruise (2nd nomination) Warren Dew (talk) 07:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2012

The Signpost: 05 March 2012

Category:The Story of Tracy Beaker

Category:The Story of Tracy Beaker, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 23:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

Deletion review for File:Reg cox civvy.JPG

I have asked for a deletion review of File:Reg cox civvy.JPG. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --George Ho (talk) 03:13, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now this file has been restore. Then it becomes nominated for deletion. Will add this to WP:files for deletion#File:Reg cox civvy.JPG soon. --George Ho (talk) 23:41, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Reg cox civvy.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reg cox civvy.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 11:51, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

Proposed deletion of Lorraine Arnold

The article Lorraine Arnold has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A single episode of Eastenders and a stage role does not show the multiple significant roles required to meet WP:ENT notability criteria. The Modern Toss role also appears to have been minor as it is mentioned mainly in wikimirrors.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

File:Eeowendenise.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eeowendenise.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 22:41, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

Nomination of Jean Fennell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean Fennell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Fennell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

Orphaned non-free media (File:Alistairmcgownasdot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Alistairmcgownasdot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:44, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

Orphaned non-free image File:Peterbeale josephshade.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peterbeale josephshade.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. GeorgePing! 13:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

The Signpost: 25 September 2013

The Signpost: 25 September 2013

The Signpost: 02 October 2013

The Signpost: 09 October 2013

File:Moon ft.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Moon ft.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:17, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

The Signpost: 06 November 2013

The Signpost: 13 November 2013

The Signpost: 20 November 2013

The Signpost: 04 December 2013

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

The Signpost: 18 December 2013

The Signpost: 25 December 2013

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

The Signpost: 22 January 2014

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

Category:Fictional cleaners

Category:Fictional cleaners, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 16:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

The Signpost: 02 April 2014

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

The Signpost: 23 April 2014

The Signpost: 30 April 2014

The Signpost: 07 May 2014

Orphaned non-free image File:Janet mitchell.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Janet mitchell.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:34, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

The Signpost: 21 May 2014

The Signpost: 28 May 2014

Orphaned non-free image File:Phil Mitchell.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Phil Mitchell.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:48, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 June 2014

The Signpost: 11 June 2014

The Signpost: 18 June 2014

The Signpost: 25 June 2014

The Signpost: 02 July 2014

File source problem with File:EastendersLouBealeFuneral.png

Thank you for uploading File:EastendersLouBealeFuneral.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:39, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EastendersLouBealeFuneral.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EastendersLouBealeFuneral.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:48, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 July 2014

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

The Signpost: 23 July 2014

Happy First Edit Day

Happy First Edit Day, Trampikey, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Vatsan34 (talk) 18:44, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rochelle Gadd for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rochelle Gadd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rochelle Gadd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 17:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Janet mitchell.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Janet mitchell.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:48, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amy Noble

The article Amy Noble has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Actor who has only had minor television roles and was one of 15 young actors nominated for a less-than-major theatre award. She is a current actor in the 21st century so any coverage should be much easier to find if it exists. As such, she fails to meet either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sionk (talk) 17:04, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sara Cogan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sara Cogan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Free Bullets (talk) 23:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shaun Dooley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaun Dooley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Dooley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 23:39, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mark Springer

The article Mark Springer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable actor.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 23:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dot Branning (Tallulah Pitt-Brown).jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dot Branning (Tallulah Pitt-Brown).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dot Branning (Tallulah Pitt-Brown).jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dot Branning (Tallulah Pitt-Brown).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Project blue.JPG

The file File:Project blue.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

file with unclear usability on project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:36, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Max Branning.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Max Branning.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Denise Fox.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Denise Fox.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Phil Mitchell.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Phil Mitchell.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yolande Trueman.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yolande Trueman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Max Branning.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Max Branning.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Martin Crowe (Emmerdale) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin Crowe (Emmerdale) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Crowe (Emmerdale) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Michig (talk) 14:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jade Sharif

The article Jade Sharif has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. –Davey2010Talk 22:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mickey miller2.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mickey miller2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 21:09, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Prtscrnbb1.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Prtscrnbb1.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jane collins.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jane collins.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lorraine stanley as mo porter.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lorraine stanley as mo porter.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alan Cooke

Notice

The article Alan Cooke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor, IMDB is only source

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 15:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philmitchell2dtv.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Philmitchell2dtv.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Liambutcher2.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Liambutcher2.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jayne Tunnicliffe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jayne Tunnicliffe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayne Tunnicliffe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Launchballer 21:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tanveer Ghani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanveer Ghani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanveer Ghani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi (talk) 18:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EastEnders Title.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EastEnders Title.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The Houndsworth (talk) 06:27, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Madeline Duggan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madeline Duggan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeline Duggan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–Davey2010Talk 17:08, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kate Colgrave Pope for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kate Colgrave Pope is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Colgrave Pope until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 01:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Danielle Lydon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danielle Lydon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Lydon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 21:58, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Janine Butcher Young.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Janine Butcher Young.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LilyAllen&Friends.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LilyAllen&Friends.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Butcher, Liam 2.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Butcher, Liam 2.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dean, Tiffany.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dean, Tiffany.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gyuri Sarossy

Notice

The article Gyuri Sarossy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor who fails WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:23, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of F*** Off, I'm a Hairy Woman

Notice

The article F*** Off, I'm a Hairy Woman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, documentary not of particular note

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of F*** Off, I'm Ginger

Notice

The article F*** Off, I'm Ginger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable documentary

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of F*** Off, I'm a Hairy Woman

Notice

The article F*** Off, I'm a Hairy Woman has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:33, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gyuri Sarossy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gyuri Sarossy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gyuri Sarossy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:45, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:I'm a Hairy Woman.png

Notice

The file File:I'm a Hairy Woman.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Used in one article that has been deleted. Unlikely to be used in future articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:45, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:I'm a Hairy Woman.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I'm a Hairy Woman.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anna Lauren

Notice

The article Anna Lauren has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional councillors has been nominated for renaming

Category:Fictional councillors has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:24, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yolande Trueman.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yolande Trueman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Little Mo Mitchell.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Little Mo Mitchell.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ian Virgo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ian Virgo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Virgo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 15:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Denise Fox.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Denise Fox.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Blue Peter presenters

Template:Blue Peter presenters has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 13:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dot Branning.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dot Branning.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chrissie Watts.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chrissie Watts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Sir William Ramsay School.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Sir William Ramsay School.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 03:30, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matthew Silver (performance artist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Silver (performance artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Silver (performance artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Drmies (talk) 22:48, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chelsea fox.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chelsea fox.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joseph Kpobie

Notice

The article Joseph Kpobie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 18:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 

Index: pl ar de en es fr it arz nl ja pt ceb sv uk vi war zh ru af ast az bg zh-min-nan bn be ca cs cy da et el eo eu fa gl ko hi hr id he ka la lv lt hu mk ms min no nn ce uz kk ro simple sk sl sr sh fi ta tt th tg azb tr ur zh-yue hy my ace als am an hyw ban bjn map-bms ba be-tarask bcl bpy bar bs br cv nv eml hif fo fy ga gd gu hak ha hsb io ig ilo ia ie os is jv kn ht ku ckb ky mrj lb lij li lmo mai mg ml zh-classical mr xmf mzn cdo mn nap new ne frr oc mhr or as pa pnb ps pms nds crh qu sa sah sco sq scn si sd szl su sw tl shn te bug vec vo wa wuu yi yo diq bat-smg zu lad kbd ang smn ab roa-rup frp arc gn av ay bh bi bo bxr cbk-zam co za dag ary se pdc dv dsb myv ext fur gv gag inh ki glk gan guw xal haw rw kbp pam csb kw km kv koi kg gom ks gcr lo lbe ltg lez nia ln jbo lg mt mi tw mwl mdf mnw nqo fj nah na nds-nl nrm nov om pi pag pap pfl pcd krc kaa ksh rm rue sm sat sc trv stq nso sn cu so srn kab roa-tara tet tpi to chr tum tk tyv udm ug vep fiu-vro vls wo xh zea ty ak bm ch ny ee ff got iu ik kl mad cr pih ami pwn pnt dz rmy rn sg st tn ss ti din chy ts kcg ve
Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia

Portal : Agama
Agama
Portal : Bahasa
Bahasa
Portal : Biografi
Biografi
Portal : Budaya
Budaya
Portal : Ekonomi
Ekonomi
Portal : Elektronika
Elektronika
Portal : Film
Film
Portal : Filsafat
Filsafat
Portal : Geografi
Geografi
Portal : Indonesia
Indonesia
Portal : Ilmu
Ilmu
Portal : Lingkungan
Lingkungan
Portal : Masyarakat
Masyarakat
Portal : Matematika
Matematika
Portal : Militer
Militer
Portal : Mitologi
Mitologi
Portal : Musik
Musik
Portal : Olahraga
Olahraga
Portal : Pendidikan
Pendidikan
Portal : Politik
Politik
Portal : Sastra
Sastra
Portal : Sejarah
Sejarah
Portal : Seni
Seni
Portal : Teknologi
Teknologi