User talk:TheUnbeholden

Since you are new

Because you might be new, you might be unaware that remaining polite is pretty much the only way that you are going to ever get anything done. Comments like "I suggest you let me handle the wiki" are counter-productive, and an earlier version of myself might very well have taken you apart for such dickish remarks. The current version will simply point out a few policies that WP uses as guides, such as WP:OWN (which discuss how you don't own or control how any wiki is written), and WP:RS (regarding reliably sourcing the information you are adding, and restraining the temptation to include your personal observations). More than anything, it is important to remain polite; more edit-wars are fought over a basic lack of civility than anything else, except perhaps for neutrality. If you have questions, please ask. I will help, but you will find my well of good faith understandably empty if you act unpleasantly. - Arcayne (^cast a spell) 13:52, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would also point out that you might want to read up on a policy called WP:3RR, which you are in danger of violating. Since you are new. I don't want you to encounter the experience of being blocked so quickly out of the starting gate. Ease off posting your version for a while and discuss the matter. - Arcayne (^cast a spell) 14:34, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Imdb

I've reverted the replacement of the IGN citation with the one from Imdb. As I noted on the artcle discussion page, we don't consider Imdb a reliable source of citable information. If you can find one that is reliable, you can use it in addition to the IGN one, but removing it isn't going to help the article - Arcayne (^cast a spell) 18:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is reliable, all information there is fact checked by IMDB editors. I'm not removing the IGN one, there are 2 in the article. The Unbeholden (talk) 06:51, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Poster JPG.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Poster JPG.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:12, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Upier. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. This is not a warning - you got the last two from other editors because basically you failed to fill in the edit summary - so they did not know what you were doing in deleting material  Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:26, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bands

Do not add bands that do not have articles on wikipedia. This is vandalism.Curb Chain (talk) 19:57, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dungeonbowl.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Dungeonbowl.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:45, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TheUnbeholden. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting and using talk pages

Re your edit here: Please do not revert to re-insert contentious edits. When proposing substantial changes to a lead section, an editor may object to your proposals. The proper response when this happens is not to unilaterally revert, but to try to obtain consensus on the article talk page. You especially should not revert other editors without an explanation in the edit summary (or on the talk page) - it is considered very discourteous. Neutrality^talk 15:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No the default position is to keep whatever edit is based on the evidence presented, ie you cannot unedit it UNLESS its based on the evidence or reliable source. The unedit implies a conclusion that the KKK is still relevant, it is against the core principle of No original research and lacks a neutral perspective by denouncing the fact that according to the rest of the sources he is a conservative politician. Therefore the edit must remain as I made it, without evidence to support the original lead section your claim of it 'lacking consensus' has no merit to the dispute in question. The Unbeholden (talk)

You are wrong on every point. There is no "default position" to keep your edits; rather, you must establish consensus. Moreover, your edit is at odds with the portrayal of the article by reliable sources (which state clearly that Duke is a far-right perennial candidate known primarily for his extreme (neo-Nazi) views and Klan association, and do not depict him as a garden-variety conservative politician at all). Neutrality^talk 21:51, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are seriously trying to pass off Duke as a 'far-right perennial candidate for extreme neo-nazi views' because he frequently addresses the Jewish Question? I don't see any evidence so far that he has Klan assocation in the past 40 years. I'll have to assume that this is merely a extreme left leaning bias on your part, while using consensus as a shield to prevent the introduction of a unbiased correction based on the multitude of sources showing he is conservative, like his campaigning in Louisiana. Been noticing similar bias in covering war crimes under Russian Revolution article. The Unbeholden (talk)

Discretionary sanctions notification

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Ian.thomson (talk) 23:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm The1337gamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Quake Champions, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 08:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aristocracy

added links pointing to Enterprise, Responsibility, Royalty and Conquest

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to White genocide conspiracy theory. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. As editors we should not add our interpretation of what a source might imply for a subject it doesn't directly discuss. Doug Weller talk 14:51, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Southernization, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The source cited does not specify "southern nationalism". SummerPhD^v2.0 16:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Southernization, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 12:48, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Its already heavily sourced on wikipedia The Unbeholden (talk) 14:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TheUnbeholden. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nine Noble Virtues 2-JAN-2018

Hello TheUnbeholden, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Nine Noble Virtues have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Spintendo ᔦᔭ 08:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TheUnbeholden. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pussy whipped (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Pussy whipped (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:39, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dom from Paris (talk) 10:14, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shamata (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shamata (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamata (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:23, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone your cut-and-paste page move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Royal and noble styles a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:33, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing, WP:OR and WP:Tone

TheUnbeholden, you need to source your material. You should not be adding your unsourced, personal commentary to articles. No WP:OR. No WP:Editorializing. You should also keep WP:Tone in mind. If you do not follow the sites rules, you will be reverted at articles. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:37, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Man (utopian concept), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscussed page-moves

Could you pease stop your undiscussed page-moves? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:53, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Yoga (philosophy) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Asmita

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Your addition to Organic unity has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:52, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscussed page move #2

As said before: please discuss, before you move a page. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:15, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-existent categories

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Arishadvargas, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. You may find it helpful to use the gadget HotCat, which tests whether a category exists before a change saved.Thank you.

You also added the same non-existent Category:Hinduism and mind to a bunch of other articles, from which it has also been removed. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:25, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unjustified parenthetical disambiguators

Your edit summary "changed title name to reflect description" does not justify adding parenthetical disambiguators where they are not needed. Please stop, and help unwind those. Dicklyon (talk) 20:00, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And if you feel that disambiguation is needed, you need to also adjust the disambig page, as at Scared to Death (disambiguation). For such multiple moves changing primary topic, and RM discussion is probably in order. Dicklyon (talk) 20:03, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a recent innovation of yours, not obviously consistent with you being a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation; how am I to understand what's up here? Dicklyon (talk) 20:18, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dicklyon was clear that you should not do this. Do stop it. I just reverted you here. We do not disambiguate when there is no need to and when a topic is the WP:Primary topic. If the term has other meanings and there are pages for them, those pages are disambiguated, but the primary topic remains. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 13:00, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just undid two more of these, at Epicureanism and Nobilis. Please pause to discuss, and/or just cut it out before we have to ask for admin intervention. Dicklyon (talk) 03:57, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sword and sorcery anthologies

A tag has been placed on Category:Sword and sorcery anthologies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 01:11, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sword and sorcery short stories

A tag has been placed on Category:Sword and sorcery short stories requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 01:11, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wholesomeness

The article Wholesomeness has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't think Wholesomeness refers to either of these. At best this page is a short & bizarre essay.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tagishsimon (talk) 09:08, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wholesomeness

The article Wholesomeness has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wholesomeness does not refer to these things Changing a crap essay page into a DAB does not solve the problem.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tagishsimon (talk) 17:16, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The-Lady-and-the-monster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The-Lady-and-the-monster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:46, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stub tags

Hi, I've just noticed you're moving stub tags to the tops of articles. Never saw this done before, and it does seem strange, also highly obtrusive. I believe Wikipedia's philosophy to be to present content as far as possible, with maintenance tags as unobtrusive to the ordinary reader as can be accomplished... of course, they remain just as searchable by Wiki-gnomes and content editors when they're at the end. Hope this is fine with you. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I came here to raise the same issue. TheUnbeholden, please stop adding stub templates to the top of articles. They're placed at the very end: see WP:TAGSTUB. Also, it's best to use only the most specific stub tag: for example, there's no need to add a "Hinduism" tag if the article is tagged as a "Hindu philosophy" stub. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 10:35, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Oh, and one more thing: if the article is more than about a paragraph long, and it's on a relatively obscure topic for which there isn't that much to write about, then it's normally not considered a stub. You might want to have a look at Wikipedia:Stub#How_big_is_too_big?. – Uanfala (talk) 10:40, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, clearly. I will move stub tags to the bottom on any articles I come across (I shan't go looking), but if this continues, discussion on another forum will plainly be needed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:50, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Courtly love, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Devotion and Gallantry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mythic fiction has been nominated for discussion

Category:Mythic fiction, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:47, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Megalomaniacal, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. gnu57 02:48, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Megalomaniacal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Megalomaniacal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megalomaniacal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. gnu57 10:01, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Eurocentrism, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 14:36, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Irish films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Reid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Karuṇā (self-compassion) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Karuṇā (self-compassion). Since you had some involvement with the Karuṇā (self-compassion) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:32, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Severity of manner (attitude) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Severity of manner (attitude). Since you had some involvement with the Severity of manner (attitude) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:22, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abundance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cornucopia (god) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cornucopia (god). Since you had some involvement with the Cornucopia (god) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Down to Earth (disambiguation)

I noticed that you tagged the page Down to Earth (disambiguation) for speedy deletion with the reason "unnecessary redirect". However, "unnecessary redirect" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can take the page to Wikipedia:Redirects for Discussion for discussion on the merits if you still seek deletion. Thanks! Iffy★Chat -- 10:04, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged it for moving an article to the redirect page. Its number 9 on Wikipedia:Redirect/Deletion reasons. The Unbeholden (talk) 12:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please stop moving disambiguation pages from Foo to Foo (disambiguation) without establishing a consensus (e.g. at WP:RM) for what to do with the page at Foo. Primary topics are controversial at best, and unilateral page moves like yours can be considered disruptive. Thank you. Iffy★Chat -- 10:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tattoos by country

A tag has been placed on Category:Tattoos by country requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 20:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dark urban fantasy

A tag has been placed on Category:Dark urban fantasy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 20:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please review

You might want to review Wikipedia:Categorization. Thanks! Editor2020 (talk) 19:56, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Herne the Hunter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mabon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:47, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Your addition to Herne the Hunter has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to "Reactionary"

I'm not sure what you were thinking but the source you used in this edit is very clearly not reliable. It references this very Wikipedia article in the second sentence, its page title is written in Comic Sans and it is obviously a person or persons' idiosyncratic definition and interpretation of the term's meaning. The most cursory glance at the article shows that your claim, viz. "Reactionaries have the following beliefs in civil liberties and civil rights; [sic; was this supposed to be a colon (:)?] Bill of Rights, Anti-Patriot Act, Equal Protection Clause under the law and Natural Rights." is absurd. Please take the bare minimum effort to read the article before introducing such sweeping and contradictory statements into its lead. Thank you. 144.134.23.43 (talk) 13:38, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image uploads

File:Rihanna's, Pour it Out, Rihanna twerking.jpg snapshots of videos are not public domain unless the video itself is public domain. Neither the claimed permission source of File:Scuola Finita - Photocall at the 5th International Rome film festival.jpg nor File:Puranas tall.jpg supports your copyright claim. You've already been repeatedly warned about infringing copyright. Keep doing it (particularly if you name false claims about sources) and you will be blocked.©Geni (talk) 20:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free music video screenshot would require there be a fair use keeping with US law and wikipedia policy and there wasn't (we can get free images of twerking).©Geni (talk) 19:09, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Face tattoos by country

A tag has been placed on Category:Face tattoos by country requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 00:58, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Half Light (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to British

Hellbreeder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to British

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comedy thriller

I think it should not be moved to comedy thriller film because the genre isn't restricted to just films. Like romantic comedy (formerly romantic comedy film), it is used for various forms of media, even novels. --Kailash29792 (talk) 13:36, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PRODding redirects

When you want to move a page to a new title covered by a redirect, do not use the {{subst:prod}} tag, as redirects are not eligible for proposed deletion and it would create unnecessary clutter at WP:PRODSUM. Instead, use {{db-move|Other page|reason=Your reason here}} and move the page when the redirect is deleted. If the redirect has no history except for creation, you may also overwrite it by moving the page directly. In any case, you should discuss potentially controversial moves first, following the guide at WP:RM. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:47, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Snakes on a Plane, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:47, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1980s Crime drama film stubs

A tag has been placed on Category:1980s Crime drama film stubs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

R3 - implausible typo; stub categories are populated by template, so this is unlikely to be used

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DannyS712 (talk) 20:19, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canadian zombie web series has been nominated for discussion

Category:Canadian zombie web series, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 13:56, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Starsky & Hutch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mystery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Film genres, categories, and verification

I can't tell whether you have any interest in an actual discussion of your recent neo-noir edits given that you deleted my comments, but if you do, I've opened said discussion, without naming you,here. You're welcome to participate if you would like. DonIago (talk) 17:15, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding the genres from the neo-noir list of titles. The Unbeholden (talk) 17:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware; but beyond my concerns with your edits it's a more general problem in any case. We have many, many film articles where it's unclear how the list of genres in the lead was determined. Is this a problem? Probably 90% or more of the time nobody even cares, but 10% of the time would still be a huge number of articles, and I don't go a day without seeing the genres listed in the leads of film articles being edited. I think we need a better system for this. That said, thank you for your efforts to better document your genre-related changes; I really appreciate it! DonIago (talk) 17:21, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We do not use one source for genres. See WP:FILMLEAD: Genre classifications should comply with WP:WEIGHT and represent what is specified by a majority of mainstream reliable sources. Not one source. A ref is unnecessary and usually not used in the lead, because it's a summary of many sources. - Gothicfilm (talk) 22:56, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, I may have partly led to this by noting that the films couldn't be categorized as neo-noir without sourced information in the articles describing them thusly. However, I believe we've found a good compromise option where we mention that the films have been considered neo-noir but don't elevate that to a lead genre classification. DonIago (talk) 03:38, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Web series categories on TV series articles

Hi Please provide a explanation for adding Web series categories on TV series pages as here and here you did not provide any reason for these changes and hence they were removed. --Sid95Q (talk) 17:01, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New categories

Hi, I see you've added non-existent categories to several articles today, including Category:American spy drama television series, Category:French action drama films, Category:Spanish romantic thriller films, Category:American supernatural romance films, and others. I just wanted to make sure that you were actually planning to create these new categories in the near future. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 20:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:31, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheUnbeholden (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Rotten Tomatoes and Allmovie are the links The Unbeholden (talk) 06:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. stwalkerster (talk) 07:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Unbeholden (talk) 06:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your email, as far as I can tell, you're mass-reverting edits with a boilerplate edit summary that references external links that may or may not verify your edits. In particular, I asked you to provide a link to the specific source that you were using for one of your edits. Instead, you deleted the question. It is your burden to provide a source when it is requested. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, I've provided the links I'm using. Rotten Tomatoes and Allmovie to verify.The Unbeholden (talk) 07:41, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's a wikilink. It's worthless in verifying content. I'm asking you to provide a URL that explicitly says the film is "supernatural horror". NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:47, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

example: https://www.allmovie.com/movie/the-horror-show-v23154 The Unbeholden (talk) 07:48, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

example: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/speed_demon/ The Unbeholden (talk) 07:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not for The Haunted Lighthouse. Are you trolling? I'll make your block indefinite. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That one was mislabeled. The Unbeholden (talk) 07:56, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some of those are ghost films like Haunted Lighthouse. i.e supernatural The Unbeholden (talk) 08:00, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That statement is WP:OR. I would note that neither the allmovie or RT link you provided say anything about the cat you added to the articles. NinjaRobotPirate on the off chance you have not seen it this thread Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film#Genres and verification notes the problematic category additions by this editor. MarnetteD|Talk 16:19, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: I posted the following request on 21 August 2019 regarding the categories being added: "Please do not add categories to film articles when there is no relation to the category, as you did by adding an American category to the Norwegian film, Thelma. You should look at a film article more carefully. Just because an American company acquires the North American rights to distribute a foreign film does not make that film "American". Thank you. It was deleted. Pyxis Solitary yak 14:21, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Spy-fi

A tag has been placed on Category:Spy-fi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fad diets in Britain

A tag has been placed on Category:Fad diets in Britain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 01:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Entertainment companies of the Southern United States

A tag has been placed on Category:Entertainment companies of the Southern United States requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 01:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cornucopia (god)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cornucopia (god) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:57, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Techno-thriller television series

A tag has been placed on Category:Techno-thriller television series requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 00:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Heimr" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Heimr. Since you had some involvement with the Heimr redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 06:24, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mockumentary web series has been nominated for discussion

Category:Mockumentary web series, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 23:06, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Irish Gaelic-language films

A tag has been placed on Category:Irish Gaelic-language films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for merging

Category:Fairytale fantasy, Category:Fantastique, Category:Hard fantasy and Category:Historical fantasy have been nominated for speedy merging to Category:Fantasy genres. Please see WP:CFDS. – Fayenatic London 09:35, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:American fantasy comedy films

A tag has been placed on Category:American fantasy comedy films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:13, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Clerical television shows

Category:Clerical television shows has been nominated for renaming, as part of a group of related categories. Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_January_24#Category:Jewish_television_series. – Fayenatic London 14:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Star deities

A tag has been placed on Category:Star deities requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^Read! Talk! 03:54, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sex horror films has been nominated for deletion

Category:Sex horror films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 08:40, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scream spinoffs has been nominated for deletion

Category:Scream spinoffs has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 12:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Evil Bong (franchise) has been nominated for renaming

Category:Evil Bong (franchise) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 09:47, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Camp Blood has been nominated for renaming

Category:Camp Blood has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 19:02, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Grimdark has been nominated for deletion

Category:Grimdark has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 21:45, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Prom Night (franchise) has been nominated for renaming

Category:Prom Night (franchise) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 15:49, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited High culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinema.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Delayed gratification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:American action adventure web series

A tag has been placed on Category:American action adventure web series indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 14:39, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fantasy drama web series

A tag has been placed on Category:Fantasy drama web series indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 14:42, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Legal drama web series

A tag has been placed on Category:Legal drama web series indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^Read! Talk! 14:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Revisionist Western has been nominated for renaming

Category:Revisionist Western has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:44, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Noir by nationality has been nominated for renaming

Category:Noir by nationality has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Isabelle ^🔔 16:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Roman imperialism

Template:Roman imperialism has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 17:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Freak artists has been nominated for renaming

Category:Freak artists has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 08:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Noir by genre has been nominated for deletion

Category:Noir by genre has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:29, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Danish Noir writers has been nominated for merging

Category:Danish Noir writers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Survival thriller has been nominated for deletion

Category:Survival thriller has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Survival thriller films has been nominated for merging

Category:Survival thriller films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:56, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Latino sitcoms has been nominated for renaming

Category:Latino sitcoms has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 03:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films about fratricide and sororicide has been nominated for renaming

Category:Films about fratricide and sororicide has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Abundance goddesses has been nominated for merging

Category:Abundance goddesses has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PepperBeast (talk) 02:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Recent edits

Hi. Your recent edits puzzle me. An editor of your experience should know that creating an article like this one is unlikely to last long, reading as it does like a personal reflection with only two cites. Your other edits read like self help guides and frequently address the reader with "your", "our", "we", which is not an encyclopedic tone. They also generally lack cites and again read like your own thoughts on things.

I appreciate that the topic of these articles are tricky, often being "soft" attributes that are difficult to define and open to opinion and interpretation. But that makes the need for attributing content to good sources and authorities all the more important. Otherwise your additions can read like you are contributing your own thoughts. Thanks. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 13:41, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Enigmatic personality for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enigmatic personality is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enigmatic personality until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pichpich (talk) 19:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]