I am aware that the right translation of llengua pròpia was already discussed. What I meant was that perhaps changing it to official language is not entirely appropriate, for Spanish is also official in spite of not having the status of llengua pròpia. It is for this reason that I would remove official language as a translation for the term.
On the other hand, own language is broken English. If you are OK with it, I think that both own language and official language should be removed from the footnote you added - for the reasons just mentioned, I do not think either of them is a good way to translate llengua pròpia.
Best wishes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])
Hi again! I believe there is a confusion here. Please read carefully my comments in the edit history.
First, in the lead (The Valencian Community's 1982 Statute of Autonomy and the Spanish Constitution recognise Valencian as the official language (along with Spanish) in the Valencian Community.), we're not talking about "llengua pròpia" but rather about "llengua oficial".
Secondly, as far as my note is concerned, in the "Official status" section (which does speak about "llengua pròpia" this time), I agree that "own language" is broken English (I added it because it was used on the talk page). I'll remove it, sure. Also, I see no "official language" in the note. The adjectives used there are proper, own, native and regional. Best regards. Taurus Littrow (talk) 14:05, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Theodore Stephanides you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of John B123 -- John B123 (talk) 18:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Taurus Littrow, I've completed the review and marked the page as passing the GA review. A bot should add the good article icon to the article shortly. Well done on your hard work improving the article. Regards --John B123 (talk) 21:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article Theodore Stephanides you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Theodore Stephanides for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of John B123 -- John B123 (talk) 22:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
