If I leave a message on your talk page, I prefer to continue the discussion where it began, but reply wherever you see fit; here or there, I'll make sure I see it.
Hi. :-) Nice to hear from you again. I usually check in at least once a week to make sure no-one's made a hash of a select few articles in my absence; I don't have a lot on my watchlist, but I'd noticed you were semi-active again, and was glad to see it. Plus, you tend to indirectly shame me into a brief bout of editing; the last substantial contribution I made was a rewrite and expansion of Tenebrae (film) after you took it to FAR. Heck, I might even do a couple of FAC reviews while I'm here ... SteveT • C22:52, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's disappointing to hear; I recall some productive interactions with the DocKino sock on film-related articles and FAs, where I picked up some invaluable copy-editing tips from him. I'll have a look at those FARs this weekend, see if there are any I'm able to help with. SteveT • C22:41, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Steve. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi Sandy. Thanks for the heads-up. I reverted the changes; they were some of the same points that caused this article to become the battleground it was several years ago. Ring-fencing all the points of contention into the Analysis section was one of the best decisions we made I think. The rest of the article reads as a straightforward—bland even—nuts-and-bolts description of making a movie. I'm glad too that we used the Stoneman book for much of the synopsis section. Stoneman is not neutral of course, but I think it helps that his biases are in broad support of the film (and therefore Chávez), so it's not as if we can be accused of selective sourcing. I should have realised that current events might bring a little attention to this article again; I'll make sure to keep a close eye on it (I imagine you have your work cut out for you on the more prominent Venezuela project articles). All the best SteveT • C07:59, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, those current events enticed me back :) I think the excellent job you did on that article is obvious by how long it has stood, relatively untouched. I thought the edits needed reversion for the very reasons you give, but I hesitate to do so when I don't have the sources. I don't engage too much here anymore, but I am hard at work on Juan Guaido for now, just cleaning it up a bit, partly because I have been stuck in bed for days with a dreadful cold! I hope you are well, and it is great to hear from you. Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 08:36, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Curious ... there is non-reliable speculation all over the internet that the latest President was one of the Puente Llaguno shooters; do any of your sources address that? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:03, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, that's a new one on me. Nothing I've seen gives any reliable indication of their identities. Glad to see you back around, even if it's only temporary. :-) SteveT • C23:14, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi, Steve, I'm Kingsif, and I've been editing here for a few years on Venezuelan film in particular. I've been improving a particular article (Un célebre especialista sacando muelas en el gran Hotel Europa) and wanting to write it up to FA standards! There's obviously different approaches and views - we editors are only human - but Sandy said that I should send you a message and see if you're around to give it a look (and I couldn't work out how to set up email, so here I am). If you're around any time, Sandy sends you well-recommended, your input would be appreciated :) Kingsif (talk) 16:53, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kingsif. It's good to make your acquaintance. Nice to see people saying nice things about me too. :-) I'll read through the article then the FAC comments over the next couple of days and let you know if I think there's anything I can help with. SteveT • C16:25, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
On 5 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Indelicates, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that to promote their 2011 concept albumDavid Koresh Superstar, based on the 1993 Waco siege, UK indie rock band the Indelicates created the video game Super David Koresh Attack? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Indelicates. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Indelicates), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
.jpg)
