User talk:Shortride

Archives

2006 - 2009 2010 - 2013 2014 - 2017 2018 - 2019

Santa Lucia Preserve

Hi Shortride, I saw you added Santa Lucia Preserve as an unincorporated area of Monterey County. I'd looked into this prior but couldn't determine if it were actually the case. Do you have a source? Thanks!

Rosenbergwrite (talk) 23:48, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of Pennzoil

I know it's been more than a decade, but there's some talk about an aspect of the Pennzoil article. Your edit changed the original company's origin to Los Angeles, but without citation. There's nothing online that can confirm this as their origin, nor can contradict it, either. Do you happen to recall where you definitively determined Los Angeles?      — BoringJim (talk) 07:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walden, New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middletown, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:38, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TFH Publications, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neptune, New Jersey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Discount Beverage Outlet" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Discount Beverage Outlet. Since you had some involvement with the Discount Beverage Outlet redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 05:16, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Growing a Greener World" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Growing a Greener World. Since you had some involvement with the Growing a Greener World redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nob Hill Foods

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nob Hill Foods requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 23:55, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crane School District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crane Elementary School District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dispatch Printing Company

Template:Dispatch Printing Company has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (t • c) 06:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mapleton Communications

Template:Mapleton Communications has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (t • c) 09:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dix Communications

Template:Dix Communications has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (t • c) 09:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wolfhouse Radio

Template:Wolfhouse Radio has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (t • c) 09:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lost Coast Communications

Template:Lost Coast Communications has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (t • c) 09:20, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Eureka Broadcasting

Template:Eureka Broadcasting has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (t • c) 09:21, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wrapports

Template:Wrapports has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (t • c) 09:04, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Calistoga Tribune

Hello, Shortride,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Calistoga Tribune, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 07:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"North Carolina Historical Review" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect North Carolina Historical Review. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 3#North Carolina Historical Review until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Le Livre de Poche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hachette.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SouthComm

Template:SouthComm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 17:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Save-a-Lot store count

Back on 1 July 2011, you added the store count of "1,280" to Save-A-Lot. I know this was back nearly a decade ago, but I'm wondering if you still recall where you got that information from. I ask because, in the process of making a footprint map, I've only found 984 locations, according to their store locator. (I'm more inclined to believe they're missing stores from their locator, than to think they've lost 296 stores in that time - but I'd like to make sure.) Thank you.        —  BoringJim (talk) 20:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I got the information from the SuperValu website, since Save-A-Lot was owned by them at the time. --Shortride (talk) 14:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:RTL Group

Template:RTL Group has been nominated for merging with Template:Bertelsmann. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. –Piranha249 (Discuss with me) 17:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luxury Resorts

The article Luxury Resorts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly-sourced short stub on non-notable company

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:50, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Best Boy (film)

added a link pointing to Commonweal

Colin Westerbeck

added a link pointing to Commonweal

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"New York NOW" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect New York NOW. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 7#New York NOW until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:22, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American Fraternal Alliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GCU.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"10Best.com" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 10Best.com. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 27#10Best.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reinhold Publishing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reinhold Publishing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:30, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

redirect for Feet in 2 Worlds?

I am curious about your redirect for Feet in 2 Worlds (from September 2020). How is this connected with the Milano School of Policy, Management, and Environment? I think Feet in 2 Worlds is a podcast, but the website about the Milano school makes no mention of it. Am I missing something? --DaffodilOcean (talk) 14:57, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feet in 2 Worlds was a media organization based at the Milano School but it appears to have just spun off as an independent nonprofit.--Shortride (talk) 03:20, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should that be mentioned in the page for the Milano School of Policy, Management, and Environment, or in The New School page? I am not familiar with Feet in 2 Worlds or the school, so I am not sure what makes the most sense. --DaffodilOcean (talk) 11:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alive from Off Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GBH.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question about redirect

It looks like you created the redirect for Ankerwycke to the American Bar Association. Someone has asked a question about it at Talk:American Bar Association so I'm bringing it to your attention. Thanks! Marquardtika (talk) 13:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santa Fe Springs, California, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Metrolink and Norwalk Transit.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited San Diego, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jitney.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"CatholicMom.com" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect CatholicMom.com. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 7#CatholicMom.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 10:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:American General

Hello, Shortride. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:American General, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Spenard Builders Supply" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spenard Builders Supply and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Spenard Builders Supply until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:57, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for adding junctions to California county routes in zone G. weeklyd3 (block | talk | contributions) 15:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Melanie Kroupa Books

The article Melanie Kroupa Books has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails MOS:DABMENTION: this imprint is not mentioned at any of these targets. I wouldn't even know where to redirect. Imprint doesn't appear to be notable - proposing deletion instead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Merloyd Lawrence Books

The article Merloyd Lawrence Books has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails MOS:DABMENTION: this imprint is not mentioned at any of these targets. I wouldn't even know where to redirect. Imprint doesn't appear to be notable - proposing deletion instead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pilgrim Press

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Pilgrim Press, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Militum professio scriniarii (talk) 18:13, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"United Bank of Arizona" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect United Bank of Arizona and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 10#United Bank of Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 22:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MNI – Market News for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MNI – Market News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MNI – Market News until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

(posted on behalf of nominator, User:Hollytrinity.) Storchy (talk) 11:53, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Huntington Beach Independent

The article Huntington Beach Independent has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article about a former local newspaper. Searching found some coverage of the sale of it's owner, Orange Coast Publishing Co., in 1988 and non-independent coverage by Los Angeles Times in 2003. No significant independent coverage of the newspaper itself was found. Fails general notability criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gab4gab (talk) 14:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Greyhound tracks in the United States

Template:Greyhound tracks in the United States has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nate • (chatter) 02:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Shortride!

Happy New Year!

Shortride,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 18:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 18:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Advanced Bionics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Advanced Bionics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Bionics. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Catholic Health East

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Catholic Health East requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/43121-80 and https://www.cbinsights.com/company/catholic-health-east. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mike1901 (talk) 15:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"The Catholic Answer" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Catholic Answer has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 1 § The Catholic Answer until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 18:39, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Studies on Women and Gender Abstracts" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Studies on Women and Gender Abstracts has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § Studies on Women and Gender Abstracts until a consensus is reached. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 06:25, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 8

Two quick points to elaborate on my last edit summary:

• First, we need a source. The Google Street View imagery for the three exits from February, March, May 2023, respectively, does not show any destinations at those exits, just the road names. We don't have a way to verify that the signs have been changed until Google drives through ggain and captures new images. I-8 is a featured article, so verification is a priority.
• Second, we don't include destinations not present on the main guide sign at an exit in that fashion.
  • If the "big green sign" (BGS) with the exit number at the exit has those destinations, we'd include them in the destinations column.
  • Instead, if there is supplemental signage listing them, signage separate from the BGSs at the exit, says a "Viejas Reservation Exit 33", then that could be listed in the notes for the exit, "Also access to Viejas Reservation" or the like.

Imzadi 1979 → 20:57, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Oracle Press" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Oracle Press has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 15 § Oracle Press until a consensus is reached. Paul_012 (talk) 13:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Agra-net.com" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Agra-net.com has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 24 § Agra-net.com until a consensus is reached. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:07, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shortride. Thank you for your work on RSG Group. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Graphix

Hello, Shortride

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Pichpich and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Graphix, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 25 § Graphix.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pichpich}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pichpich (talk) 18:06, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Covenant theological seminary

CTS is looking for an editor… we could use your skills. Gocovenant.com dr will Ryan 72.135.50.161 (talk) 13:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Beckett Theater" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Beckett Theater has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 24 § Beckett Theater until a consensus is reached. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Entertainment Rights into Where's Wally?. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 18:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Anthology Editions

Hello Shortride, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Anthology Editions, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthology Editions.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chris Troutman (talk) 16:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KIDS Magazine!

Hi! I noticed you added quite a bit of content to the KIDS Magazine (1970s Magazine) entry on Wikipedia a few years ago. I bought this as a kid and loved it, and I own issues 1 - 21 and 23. Do you happen to know what the final issue was? I'm trying to collect the rest but don't know when it ended! Thanks for any info you may have! Keithgreenfan (talk) 15:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Make Me A World" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Make Me A World has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § Make Me A World until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Hubert’s Lemonade" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hubert’s Lemonade has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 19 § Hubert’s Lemonade until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conquest of Light moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Conquest of Light. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 19:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Conquest of Light has been accepted

Conquest of Light, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Xegma(talk) 08:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references, as you did to Vermont Public! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources, including details such as title, author, date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Littlehampton Book Services" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Littlehampton Book Services has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 14 § Littlehampton Book Services until a consensus is reached. Isla🏳️‍⚧ 00:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Science Update" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Science Update has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 30 § Science Update until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 05:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Shortride. Thank you for your work on Camp Crittenden. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT. An easy to use redirect user script is User:Eejit43/scripts/redirect-helper.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:11, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Family Radio

Template:Family Radio has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tdl1060 (talk) 18:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"ChinaFile" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect ChinaFile has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 26 § ChinaFile until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:08, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Shortride. Thank you for your work on Entegra Coach. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Warm salutations! Thank you for creating the article! May you and your family have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tolkien's publisher

Hi, please don't update the historic name of Allen & Unwin. That is what it was at the time, and it makes no sense to introduce a glaring anachronism. I've reverted all I've seen, but please stop, it's just an error. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 02:26, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tolkien's publisher changed named and was acquired in the 1980s and 1990s, so the publisher of some volumes of The History of Middle-earth would not be Allen & Unwin Shortride (talk) 23:32, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We must use the name that he saw, or for posthumous volumes, that appeared in the first editions We can't go about creating anachronisms. The existing redirects will find the current owners so there's no advantage in any sort of updating.

To be clear, we can't cite a publisher that did not exist at the time of publication. Use the publisher named in the first edition.

Note also that it is not safe to reason from takeovers, Publishers often continue to use old names as imprints. If there is any doubt, then refer to the cover of each book individually for what was actually printed there. Predicting from dates is OR. Chiswick Chap (talk) 03:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I've checked several volumes individually, and sure enough they have different imprints, so I updated those. The Allen & Unwin imprint survived for a little while after the Hyman merger so it was indeed not safe to make an inference from takeover date: all that shows is that from that moment, multiple imprint names were possible. It is essential to check each volume individually. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:29, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]