User talk:Shadowssettle

Shadowssettle, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Shadowssettle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Department of Computing, Imperial College London has been accepted

Department of Computing, Imperial College London, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Discussing with you, good proposal!

Mikecurry1 (talk) 18:45, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of Template:Imperial_College_London

Administratively the Centres and Institutes are different. There are six global challenge institutes at Imperial College London [1] which are set up to address challenges across the Faculties. The Centres are established within individual faculties. This makes your reversion of the template is administratively incorrect. If you have a moment, there are other issues in the template though - such as the Department of Physics and not Blackett. BenBritton (talk) 08:17, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BenBritton – A navbox doesn't need to split up things exactly into specific groups - it's not an article giving you accurate and precise information, rather a Wikipedia guide for the information about the college. For example, in earlier versions it merged the groups of department and centres, which were split when the college had enough departments to justify having their own grouping. The difference between centres and other kinds of institutes I would argue most readers would not find helpful when looking for an article. If they grew long enough that you had to trawl through both, I doubt a reader would be helped by not finding an article in one of the lists, not being sure which list to check. Also, the use of the Blackett Laboratory is what the article is named, and often what the physics department is known as[2] (although technically yes, it's the laboratory and building name) Shadowssettle(talk) 18:32, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.imperial.ac.uk/research-and-innovation/about-imperial-research/global-institutes/
  2. ^ "Academic writes 270 Wikipedia pages in a year to get female scientists noticed". The Guardian.

University of Durham vs Durham University

Hello, You suggested I start a talk about this topic. The legal name for the University is 'University of Durham'[1]. Whilst I agree that the title of the page should be 'Durham University', the side information box of the page should be titled after the official name. Durham University is simply a trading name. It is not the historically correct or legally correct name. I keep making the changes because they are well informed and you are changing it back without a valid reason against the use of the official name. I feel like my reason for changing is valid and if we can reach a compromise on this that would good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.0.27 (talk) 00:22, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please bring this up on Talk:Durham University. This is not just my views, but WP:UNI general policy, so it would be more appropriate to discuss this with the general community of editors of that page. I am also not reverting it because I disagree, but rather because going wildly against a built consensus is not constructive editing, which is why it keeps getting reverted. Shadowssettle(talk) 18:28, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.dur.ac.uk/about/trading_name/

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Shadowssettle! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 10:30, Wednesday, April 17, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

University of Copenhagen Center for Planetary Research

According to WP:Deletion Policy, once a proposed deletion tag is removed by any editor for any reason, it may not be restored. I have removed the WP:PROD request on University of Copenhagen Center for Planetary Research. The way to proceed if you still wish to delete the article is to through WP:AFD; if you do this , be aware of WP:BEFORE. But consider a possible merge into Danish Space Research Institute or Niels Bohr Institute, See WP:Deletion Policy for alternatives to deletion. DGG ( talk ) 16:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial College Faculty of Medicine moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, does not have enough citations to independent, significant coverage to remain published. While it includes many citations, none of the independent sources appear to include significant coverage of the subject (that is to say, one or more paragraphs devoting significant attention to the Faculty of Medicine). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. signed, Rosguill talk 22:23, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/STIR/SHAKEN

Hi, welcome to DYK! Please see note on your review. Yoninah (talk) 21:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Imperial College Central Library

On 3 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Imperial College Central Library, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the recreational reading collection at Imperial College London's Central Library was started from books accumulated in student halls? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Imperial College Central Library. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Imperial College Central Library), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Imperial College Faculty of Medicine has been accepted

Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 03:18, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Durham University stubs

Hi, I noticed that you re-created Category:Durham_University_stubs. This was previously merged, see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_June_30#Category:Durham_University_stubs. A stub category is generally only created or kept when there are 60 or more members. I have therefore reverted your change to the template.

No offence intended. Thanks for participating here; I hope you continue to enjoy it! – Fayenatic London 21:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Feldkirch, Vorarlberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buchs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SVG coat of arms

I've got no issues. It looks pretty darn good, actually. Excellent work! Catsmeat (talk) 09:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's based on a previous image created over a decade ago (see previous filename history, all versions). It was a little strange, but I can't take all the credit. Shadowssettle(talk) 09:33, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flattery

While I appreciate the compliments, I wonder if on sober consideration my userpage is something we should be exposing newbies to. After all, think of the children! EEng 21:15, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If people coming to Wikipedia don't just see the officious bureaucracy, I feel that's a Good Thing. Shadowssettle(talk) 22:59, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I guess my user page does act as a modest counterweight in that department. I also hope it helps diffuse conflict. EEng 23:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • FYI, pings only work if made in the same edit as the ~~~~. If, after you've made a post, you later add on a ping as you did here [1], the ping doesn't work. EEng 17:24, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

/* Notable alumni */ Durham University

Independent viable source for ArthurTV being Durham alumni provided here: https://ibb.co/d5dTqJs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.208.202.60 (talk) 00:57, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sections removed

What sections have you removed and why, from UBC Computer Science. I am brand new to this, so not sure how to find those sections, or know what I am to do to rectify them.

Also, not clear on what copy is being considered "promotional" ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cthomp1 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Imperial College London crest.svg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Imperial College London crest.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mate, I designed, uploaded, and put in place the replacement; I am very aware and don't need a "warning" Shadowssettle(talk) 18:05, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Salvio 11:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I really appreciate your friendliness and constructive approach to discussion. Sorry if I can come off as harsher-than-intended with my recent comments on higher education; I hope to see you around more! RedHotPear (talk) 21:48, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment, I appreciate it; you've been pretty constructive yourself. I find on Wikipedia it's easy to offend some people, which I don't think anyone is trying to, so I try to keep well away from the lines.
(In case anyone else is reading this before putting a less-than-polite comment on my talk page, feel free to, just don't insult other people) Shadowssettle Need a word? 19:21, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Academic Boosterism

Dear Shadowssettle, I recently tried to implement the WP:HED project-wide RfC close consensus to the article about the Central European University (CEU). And see where it got me....

Can you help? Otherwise, boosterism will prevail.

Kind regards, Cambridge51 (talk) 22:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cambridge51: Unfortunately, that RfC is under reconsideration after the close was later overturned at WP:AN. Feel free to contribute to the reopened RfC at WT:HED. However, you're right in that the placement and content as such is problematic outside of the RfC, so some clean-up is a good idea. Shadowssettle Need a word? 09:33, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the notification, and for taking care of this! (The neutrality concerns on the CEU Talk Page reach back to 2009; see also here, Jan 2020. Seems to be an illustrative example.) All the best, Cambridge51 (talk) 10:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I gather that the RFC has been confirmed and closed again. If you had a bot, would you like to run it on University of Buckingham? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Shadowssettle: You might want to have a look at Talk:Central_European_University#Neutrality_(again)... The debate (with basically a single individuum) gets pretty heated there, with no consensus in sight :( Cambridge51 (talk) 10:45, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Armorial of British universities

Hello! Your submission of Armorial of British universities at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CMD (talk) 15:55, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the reviewer responded to you a week ago. Are you returning to this nomination? Yoninah (talk) 19:48, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for leaving me a message here, much appreciated. I'm a little swamped right now, and I don't see anyone else taking it on (@Robminchin and Robin S. Taylor: do you want to?), it'll be too long before I think I'd have time to clean it up so it might as well slip. Thanks again Shadowssettle Need a word? 20:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Robin S. Taylor, it has been 2 weeks since my note. Are you coming back to this nomination or shall we close it as unsuccessful? Yoninah (talk) 00:09, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diplomacy
Thank you for the ceasefire @CEU (neutrality issues)! Cambridge51 (talk) 12:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial College School of Medicine

I hope this email finds you well. We would like to point out a few updates for the page on ICSM:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_College_School_of_Medicine

Is there an email address we could use to send you some recent updates?

Many thanks and best wishes

Professor Amir H. Sam Head of Imperial College School of Medicine — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:358A:1301:2C1D:6FBC:110E:1930 (talk) 13:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial College School of Medicine

Would the author of the ICSM page be able to kindly give us an email address to send them some resources to update the page. Please use the meail below: Professor Amir Sam (a.sam@imperial.ac.uk) Head of Imperial College School of Medicine

Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:358A:1301:C5CE:8505:338B:CEDA (talk) 12:19, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Why was it WP: Soapbox that I included Fall Guys a game that was promote in 2020 in 2020s, It wasn't bad or my opion it was just as good as Among Us so why did u revert the changes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LittleMAHER1 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LittleMAHER1: Please leave a signature in the future when you use a talk page using four tildes: ~~~~. It seemed like you were trying to advertise the game, as you provided no citations for your claim. However, there is a dearth of citations on that article anyway, so I have left it up to the other editors and yourself to sort out. Shadowssettle Need a word? 19:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Shadowssettle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Concerned about what reads as a very POV article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

University Heraldry

Last year you helped with the Armorial of British universities. This year I'm doing one for Canada. The majority of blazons are already done and the process should be easier this time. Could you help with the rest? Robin S. Taylor (talk) 13:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arms of the University of Warwick

Hey Shadowssettle,

Can I please ask that you do not reinstate your version of Warwick's arms again? I apologise if that sounds rude. (I really don't mean to be. Heraldry and the university are just dear to my heart.)

The version you have made is unfortunately not very heraldic or internally consistent. Specifically: mantling should not be used without a helm; and, the charges of the shield, eg. the elephant, the bear, and the double helix, are all of inconsistent artistic styles.

I've seen your other heraldic work, and they look quite decent. So it just breaks my heart that Warwick's one was not as good.

The version a friend of mine recently uploaded now is painted by the College of Arms' own painter. In absence of a perfect vector graphic, can this one stay until a new one is created?

(I apologise again for any offence caused). — Preceding unsigned comment added by HKA15 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LCR color

Hi, please don't remove these colours. The TfL Rail colour is still necessary for record purposes - just like we still have the colour of First Capital Connect, even though it is now Thameslink. Hope that helps. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 09:56, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]