User talk:Sgerbic
TUSC token b57886a212c826c663608bfecd17b794I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgerbic (talk • contribs) 15:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
deprod noticeWhat a silly question, human.Regarding this, of course your birthday qualifies for that list. What a silly
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add PostmodernismMy name is Steve Pittman. I am a regular reader of Skeptical Inquirer and have considered joining the GSoW but never have. Two editors on Wikipedia (Patrick_Welsh and Tsavage) have been revising the Postmodernism page extensively. In particular, they have been moving all criticism of Postmodernism to the Criticism_of_postmodernism page. A consequence is that a naïve visitor to the Postmodernism page is going to conclude that there is some there there 🙂, but I agree with the statement on the Criticism_of_postmodernism page: "It is frequently alleged that postmodern scholars promote obscurantism, are hostile to objective truth, and encourage relativism (in culture, morality, knowledge) to an extent that is epistemically and ethically crippling." and "Thus, while common targets of postmodern criticism include universalist ideas of objective reality, morality, truth, human nature, reason, science, language, and social progress, critics of postmodernism often defend such concepts." Stronger versions of those criticisms formerly appeared on the Postmodernism page but have been moved to the Criticism_of_postmodernism page and weakened considerably. I am a Wikipedia editor but do not have extensive experience. I would like to help address the problem by editing both pages, but I am sure that some disagreements will end up in arbitration, so I would like to proceed carefully and prepare for that. I am not looking to join GSoW now, but would like to find other interested parties with whom I could collaborate. I note that Hogo-2020 was actively editing the Criticism_of_postmodernism page back in October but hasn't been active for a while. Based upon his comments on Talk:Postmodernism, it is not clear if he would be a helpful collaborator. Do you know anything about that user? And are there members of GSoW who might be interested in collaborating with me? Thanks! OneSkyWalker (talk) 19:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia