User talk:Reconsider the static

This user may have left Wikipedia. Reconsider the static has not edited Wikipedia using this account for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking the assistance of this user, you may need to approach someone else.

To leave a message, click here.

• /Archive 1 (2009)
• /Archive 2 (2010)

Cool, calm and collected. Not like this guy.

Plain White T's

what do we have to do to get rid of the clean up thing at the top. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plainwhitefan (talk • contribs) 02:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nonnie Berard Page

From what I've read, the only problem was that her notable wasn't great enough yet, but as of now her notable as fairly increased. She has even signed a deal with Universal Music Publishing Group. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JunMaster (talk • contribs) 06:09, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JunMaster (talk • contribs) 06:20, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :)

Saw you on the GW page and thought I'd introduce myself :) Hello. Torontokid2006 (talk) 21:17, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I was planning on doing a POV check on the article but now it's under full protection. Ah well, I normally shy away from these contentious articles anyways, most of the time it's not worth the trouble. -Reconsider! 02:04, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

haha it definitely is a lot of trouble. Hopefully it's all worth it in the end though! People need to know what's happening. Torontokid2006 (talk) 05:58, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I know. What do you think about the current state of the article? -Reconsider! 11:14, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's quite good! I just think the millions of dollars in funding in climate denial is critical information that makes the entire picture of public/political action more clear. I find it interesting that certain editors hate the idea of mentioning this :/ Torontokid2006 (talk) 18:31, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm not sure if that particular section is encyclopedic though. It could be perceived as POV pushing, given the tone of the section. -Reconsider! 01:51, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Manuel Espinosa

Could you help fix up the page, what do I do about the boxes at the top?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Espmone (talk • contribs) 04:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the cheeseburger!

~ QwerpQwertus ·_Talk_·_Contribs_· The Wiki Puzzle Piece Award 17:18, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Ibrahim

On John Ibrahim you added the refimprove thing but the article already has lots of references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Resinzc (talk • contribs) 02:17, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Acton-Boxborough Regional High School

What was this edit all about? 173.48.43.197 (talk) 14:12, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming that you're Bird1sky? Well I reverted because the figures in the 'Academics' section were altered even though it was already referenced. Verifiability is important. -Reconsider! 01:47, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Bird1sky. And I understand that verifiability is important. But isn't having up-to-date figures important too? I think the more proper thing would have been to google MCAS results and change the reference yourself, leaving Bird1sky a note about what you did. Reverting to outdated information doesn't help anyone. 173.48.43.197 (talk) 01:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say that verifiability takes precedence. Note that the figures were changed but the reference which supported the 2005 data was not. But you're right, I should've notified the editor. -Reconsider!

User:Sami70/International Organization for Peace, Care and Relief

Hi Reconsider , Thanks for the compliment , and as for requiring some re-structuring and a clean-up for The International Organization for Peace, Care and Relief 's page ;

I realy need help figuring out what needs to be done to the article that can improve and fix it, if any fixing is needed so that I can move it to the articals space.

Cheers ... --Sami70 (talk) 14:19, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should place a greater emphasis on the history and activities rather than focusing on the administrative components of the organisation. By 'administrative' I mean the objectives, hierarchy and partners. -Reconsider! 01:57, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A nice cup of...

Caffieinebooost (talk) has given you a cup of coffee, for taking the time to weather a dispute. Thanks for staying calm and civil! Coffee somehow promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a coffee, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

Spread the lovely, warm, bitter goodness of coffee by adding {{subst:WikiCoffee}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

The International Organization for Peace, Care and Relief

Hi Reconsider , I have moved The International Organization for Peace, Care and Relief 's to the articals spacepage after doing my best to improve it by working on the feedbacks i've recieved . I would like from you to kindly review it and see if it still needs anything so that the template on the top can be removed .

Thanks for your help ...Cheers --Sami70 (talk) 10:13, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I've made some more changes. I think the main issue here is the formatting i.e. integrating the information so that it is written as a continuous prose rather than using bullet points. -Reconsider! 11:08, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

Thanks for everything you do, you do seem to help out alot here! Arfn24 (talk) 02:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PBSKIDS

Hello Reconsider the static, thank you for your contributions on articles related to PBS Kids. I'd like to invite you to become a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject PBSKids, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of PBS Kids articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks!

American Motors edit

Re this [[1]]. My computer crashed when I hit the preview button. After reboot, the section I was editing came up and I finished my edit. Obviously, the edit deletd the rest of the article, except for the section that I was editing. I tried to revert my edit and you had gotten there first. Good fast work on your part. Never had that set of circumstances happen before. BTW, that is one big article - 91 kb--TGC55 (talk) 10:25, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I don't get many posts on my talk page so I'm glad that you posted, it makes me feel like a real editor, rather than somebody editing into a vacuum.--TGC55 (talk) 10:56, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Catmose College

Hi, I saw that you added those boxes at the top of the article. Why did you add it? It is a good article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmp99 (talk • contribs) 05:14, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:VERIFY, WP:WEASEL for more details on the problematic areas. -Reconsider! 00:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

thanks for the links, especially the intro to Wikipedia link. cool. I already found the areas where the article I'm working on, can be improved. really appreciate it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by NUiniV (talk • contribs) 03:11, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

photo uploading?

Hello,

Thanks for the welcome, still finding my way around. I'm hoping to add photos to entries I work on - these are promotional photos of my creation, authorized for free use anywhere and everywhere - but apparently I won't be able to do that until some time in the future? In the meantime, is it possible to email the photos to you for uploading?

Gspeedlace (talk) 09:20, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

multiple citations of same source

Hello again,

Would you please point me in the right direction for the correct way to make multiple citations from the same source ("a b c" style).

Thank you!

Gspeedlace (talk) 10:37, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Mercury (South Africa)

Hi...we at Independent Newspapers SA are new to updating Wikipedia pages. This page was edited by us to reflect updated and expanded information about the title. Are you able to provide some insight as to why the changes were reverted?

Much appreciated.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.215.25.159 (talk) 19:12, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of article Queeria

Hi,

Queeria is an important LGBT-movement in Serbia, so I don't unterstand why the article had to be deleted. There also wasn't a voting how I'm accustomed them by the German and Serbian Wikipedia.--Carski (talk) 13:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, with speedy deletion an admin can delete the article without a discussion. The article in question falls under the A7 criteria of WP:SD which covers articles about: "real person, individual animal(s), an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant". -Reconsider! 08:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Swizz Beatz Divine Styler Karagöl, Mardin Mor Gabriel Monastery Michael Tierney (Professor of Greek) Suryoyo Sat Slim Thug Greatest Messages Mazıdağı Doc's da Name 2000 Lake Ianthe MagicISO The Adventures of Grandmaster Flash on the Wheels of Steel Mor Hananyo Monastery Shut Up Stella Ad-Rock Rustamnagar Sahaspur Assyrians in Germany Adventures on the Wheels of Steel

Cleanup Doctor Ivo Robotnik Shadow the Hedgehog Tony Rich Merge Nintendo DSi Syriac flag Rich Boyz Add Sources Sonic the Hedgehog (character) Amy Rose Kid Creole (rapper) Wikify Jens Hoffmann (Filmmaker) Sinisa Ivanji Marco Amenta Expand East Coast hip hop Ghizer District Free (Erika song)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:35, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Allison Blake Article

I was trying to update the information on this page and somehow removed a text box. I think I saw you trying to fix it but I might have accidently undone your fix. Sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.136.3.186 (talk) 00:59, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, don't worry. Next time you should use the preview button to review the changes before saving. -Reconsider! 01:16, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Need help with user page

Hi Reconsider, I’ve recently created a new user page article "User:Mackay 86/House of Supplinburger‎" and need some help from an expert on the subject before I can move it to wikipedia proper and was wondering whether you or someone else you know might be able to help me finish it thanks. Mackay 86 (talk) 08:01, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not familiar with the topic in question. If you need an expert you should make a request on WP:HISTORY or WP:ROYALTY. -Reconsider! 09:48, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing own Talk Page

Is editing your own user talk page totally in line with Wikipedia standards? It seems silly and vain, in my opinion. Citation needed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robobogle (talk • contribs) 04:05, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I need help

I have someone making unwanted edits and wholesale reversions to the page Cement Corporation of India which are out of line with policy. I do not know what to do and how to tell the person to discuss before making uncessary edits. Thanks for your help in advance. Shmilyshy 09:17, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Reconsider the static. You have new messages at Boing! said Zebedee's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Arnoud De Meyer and Peter Nolan etc

I am a newbie. Thanks for your comments. I'm not sure why you think these subjects fail the professor test for academic notability. One criterion for notability is that 'the person holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research.' Well, both Peter Nolan and Arnoud De Meyer (and the other Chaired Professors I've listed on the Judge Business School page) hold full professorial chairs at Cambridge University. Unlike in the US, in the UK there is no distinction in terms of academic prestige between a named chair and a university chair. In the UK the distinction merely refers to the method of financing the appointment. A chair is a chair is a chair. Some Nobel Laureates at Cambridge hold University chairs whilst others hold named University chairs - the latter do not enjoy any special aura. There is also no special category called Distinguished Professor at Oxbridge or in the UK in general. In any case, Peter Nolan does have a named Cambridge University chair. And, Arnoud De Meyer holds a full University chair. Moreover, De Meyer is the Head of Cambridge University's Judge Business School. He Held a named chair at INSEAD before coming to Cambridge. Hope I've convinced you. Bradcam66 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bradcam66 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I admit I may have been a little quick to add the PROD template. On a closer analysis, the subject seems to pass WP:ACADEMIC #3, #5. -Reconsider! 06:10, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tourism in Kerala

It links is informative, pls dont remove it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kenesn (talk • contribs) 04:39, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreviewed article

Thank you for your response, i've made an article on lord krishna college of engineering and it says that someone has to review it. So where should i ask to get it reviewed? Papasj (talk) 12:32, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: OSN Cinema

Hello Reconsider the static. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on OSN Cinema to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:03, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm I think that the a7 would have sufficed. -Reconsider! 08:54, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree OSN Cinema is non-notable, but it's a service and I'm not sure that qualifies under A7, which applies narrowly to companies, people, etc. That's why I converted it to a PROD. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 17:00, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie Miller

I am confused as to why my addition to her page was removed. She did just say on her show publicly that she was coming out as a gay woman. The reason she felt that she couldn't honestly discuss these issues while keeping that hidden. There was nothing slanderous nor was it incorrect.

Yensid55 (talk) 14:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide a reliable source to verify the statement. See WP:BLP "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion". -Reconsider! 14:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So..post a link to her show? She just said it on the air and they are discussing it now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yensid55 (talk • contribs) 14:43, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The welcome message sent ...

I receive a welcome message. Thanks. Beamertate (talk) 14:45, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Skybrake?

Hello, I created article about brand Skybrake (this is Latvian brand and because I am Latvian I wanted to add information about this brand in Wikipedia). I write an article and used article about Apple as sample, but my article was deleted for being commercial/advertising. Where could I find information about non-commercial/non-advertising and can I or can't I rely on samples how is written articles about well known companies/brands?

111goga111 (talk) 07:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)111goga111111goga111 (talk) 07:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Reconsider the static! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 20 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Pascale Bruderer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:23, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your afd nomination of fartbarf

Please transclude the afd page onto the latest afd date per WP:AFDHOWTO to notify others of the deletion discussion next time. I have relisted it to generate more responses. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 21:56, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eatmewhileimhot

Please remove the thing at the top. The band is definately notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eatanomolie (talk • contribs) 04:32, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think having a member who's well-known on his own makes this pass WP:BAND, doesn't it? Everard Proudfoot (talk) 05:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well actually it says that there must be "2 or more independently notable musicians". As far as I can see, there's only one. -Reconsider! 13:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, you're right. Thanks. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 20:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

furthering validity

hello Reconsider, I saw your note on my request for help with my first potential page (user page right now) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Darkmuse/Dark_muse You made some valid points regarding trying to make my project more valid, and I thank you for that since I had no idea what to look for. I did check out allmusic and freedb search sites for my project Dark Muse and they did uncover at least one of my official albums on each site (one had 4 of my cds posted, official and samplers). I guess it all depends on how important others find this information for validity? I thought by showing acts I had opened for in the past (acts that are tops within their own genre's) that might help too. I will continue to find more avenues of connection and attempt more validity hopefully from further discoveries and recollections and links. I was able to add a few extra links and information toward that goal just now. Thanks again for your time and links you gave for further investigation on my end. Any other comments or help would be appreciated. Take care. Darkmuse (talk) 10:08, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a few changes in terms of the structure, referencing etc. The main issue here is the lack of reliable third party sources. Perhaps you could reference the magazines in which the artist is mentioned. There doesn't seem to be a lot of reliable sources on the net. -Reconsider! 13:32, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, trying to find more third party sources for reference has been a little hit and miss for me. But I've just added a bunch just now for reference, for the compilations I am on, as well as adding another magazine. There is also another zine I may have been in, but want to search my studio for it first to make sure I have the proper info on it since it is a bigger magazine name, I only want to add it, if I feel my project mention in it was noteworthy. Luckily since you've helped me out a lot with structure and helping to edit what I had, it makes more sense, and added elements I did not know how to do. Thanks so much, please check out my additions when you get the chance. Hopefully I haven't mucked it up too much. Take care, Darkmuse (talk) 16:48, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

also, do I need to add the External Links to the External Links section at the bottom of the page, If those same external links are also shown in the Reference section? thanks. Darkmuse (talk) 16:53, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of the referencing, you should look for reviews and features which give a more in-depth look into the band, as opposed to commercial sites which simply list the album. With that said, I think that you've done a good job with the infobox and the referencing style. The article is looking a lot better now. As for the external links, it's generally for a place to list official links etc, but it's not really that important. -Reconsider! 13:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hip hop music

Well first of all, the current revision ('Turntablist techniques, such as scratching was pioneered by Grand Wizard Theodore') makes no grammatical sense.

And I thought it was better to say that Theodore invented scratching than pioneered it, because pioneering it means he was simply one of the first, whereas invented establishes that he was THE first. However people do not seem 100% sure about this (some credit Grandmaster Flash with inventing scratching), so that's why I wrote seemingly invented. Matthew Fennell (talk) 09:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Reconsider the static. You have new messages at Matthew Fennell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Conflict of Interest

I have read the conflict of interest guidelines and want to know specifically what is the conflict. I did not write this biography, nor did I initiate it. Upon reading the post, there were many errors regarding my birthplace and my academic accomplishments. I corrected these errors. Therefore, I would appreciate knowing specifically what is considered "conflict of interest" when I did not initiate the biography. Thank you.Yvonne S. Thornton (talk) 02:03, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Yvonne S. Thornton[reply]

Changes by others

I truly understand your comment about writing my concerns in the Discussion area. However, I am not computer savvy and this wikipedia behemoth is very confusing. I didn't how to do that and just corrected the errors directly on the post. If I knew who wrote it, I would address the concerns to them. How do I go to the Discussions area? Thank youYvonne S. Thornton (talk) 02:11, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Yvonne Thornton[reply]

Please Adopt me:)

Hi my name is Fabiola and i am in a school proyect. it would be awesome if you adopt me.FabGalvez (talk) 03:20, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Made changes, page looks reviewed, how does one remove the "unreviewed" article Tag?

Please see Krishnan Menon. you left me a welcome message, but if there is feedback on my first contribution, I would be glad to listen and correct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alec273 (talk • contribs) 05:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Business English students in Mexico

That's great! I have a list of my students on my userpage. Feel free to adopt one or two. They have a short assignment due next Tuesday, which is on my userpage as well. Thanks!Thelmadatter (talk) 13:52, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cheeseburger!

Thanks for the cheeseburger! Right when I was hungry, too. Susfele (talk) 01:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help with moving a page.

Hi there, thanks for helping me tidy up my article on birdengine - I have now moved the page and would really appreciate it if you could check that I have changed the New unreviewed article template okay? I think I've done it correctly but am not 100% sure. Thanks again :-) (Legoon (talk) 11:00, 20 September 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Oh, I think you used the wrong template. You should use {{Userspace draft|source=ArticleWizard|date=September 2010}}. Anyhow, everything else seems to be in order-Reconsider! 13:25, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you're a star! (Legoon (talk) 13:56, 20 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Titus Bramble article

It's acceptable to place information about the Titus Bramble rape case online as long as it's made clear that they are rape allegations and not statements of undisputed fact, so there was no point in reverting my edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.35.108.96 (talk) 12:43, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taking into account WP:BLP concerns, it's probably better to wait till the situation is made clearer. -Reconsider! 12:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adopt-a-user reminder

Hello, I have completed a general cleanup of the adopter information page for the adopt-a-user project, located here. During my cleanup, I have removed several inactive and retired users. In order to provide interested adoptees with an easy location to find adopters, it is essential that the page be up-to-date with the latest information possible. Thus:

• If you are no longer interested in being an adopter, please remove yourself from the list.
• If you are still interested, please check the list to see if any information needs to be updated or added - especially your availability. Thank you.

• You are receiving this message because you are listed as an adopter here.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Netalarm (talk) at 03:46, 23 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

BLP Reward Board Challenge

I have answered your call, sir! 20 articles, 2 references each. Here's my list of edits for your appraisal. That was fun! NielsenGW (talk) 16:45, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have reached the 50 article milestone, as per your challenge--Edit List. Now on to the next target... NielsenGW (talk) 17:14, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hip Hop.

43 edits, from what I counted. Mostly sentence restructuring, wikification/grammar, and two references thrown in. I've got a Tirless Contributor, but I've never had the Hip Hop award; I think I'd like to try that, please. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 03:45, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, very much! As for the article's further improvement, I'll see what I can do, but it may take a while, as there's a lot of other things I've got to do. But I really enjoyed helping that article, and would love to help it come along even further! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 10:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• As per your request at WP:RB, I have made 41 edits to Hip hop – general punctuation corrections, spelling mistakes, and making "hip hop" consistent throughout the article, to be in line with the article's title. Thanks. – S Masters (talk) 07:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

API article

Please refer to Australian Pharmaceutical Industries article talk page for further explanation.Smallworldsocial (talk) 09:51, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to review it. Smallworldsocial (talk) 01:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The API article has undergone a number of edits since the COI banner was put up on May 2010. In its current state, the article seems to be neutral and reliably sourced. Do you have any other suggestions to ensure this article's tone or style meets Wiki's guidlines? Smallworldsocial (talk) 01:37, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My guess is that the COI tag will probably remain for an indefinite period. With that said, I applaud your honesty in regards to the disclosure of your vested interests and intentions. If you want to improve the article, you can take a look at WP:ASSESS. -Reconsider | speak 13:09, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. Considering that the COI policy is in place to discourage editors to violate policies such as neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, why is it suitable to put it on this article? All the COI guidelines have been met and it is neutral with verifiable sources. I would just like to know your point of view to ensure the correct Wiki policy is displayed. Smallworldsocial (talk) 01:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would like a second set of eyes on draft

Hello, I have been working on my first article and received some helpful information when I requested feedback, as well as some assistance in editing the page. Could someone please take a look at the page below and let me know if you think it is ready to go live?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Janeway1701/Starbase_Indy

Thank you, Janeway1701 Janeway1701 (talk) 16:24, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks pretty good, it's definitely ready to go live. It would be great if you could add some photos. -Reconsider | speak 06:38, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to look at it; you seem to be a very busy person here! I will check policy about using photos properly and giving proper attribution to avoid copyright issues.

I don't know yet how to give you a cup of coffee like another person did on here, but please accept a typed @(_) cup of coffee in appreciation.

Thank you, Janeway1701 Janeway1701 (talk) 18:20, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Reconsider the Static: You wrote, "I hope you like the place and decide to stay." I will not only stay at Wiki, I have found my calling. I will be a volunteer Wiki editor. I will delete the extraneous apostrophe in "it's", replace "I" with "me" in the phrase that begins, "between you and...", reformat footnotes. In a few years, I will drool in public. Since I will never leave my computer, that won't bother me. Furthermore, I love Wiki's editing style. I love italicizing with four apostrophes and bolding by adding two more. I even love signing my name, my date, and my precise time with four tildes. I have been waiting for Wiki all my life. I should call a rehab now, and save myself the pain. But then I would miss out on the joy. Tuttitalia (talk) 19:29, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To Reconsider the Static: I don't know who Tuttitalia is, nor why this person is jumping in with a topic unrelated to the article being discussed. Please do not take anything this person says as being in any way connected with me. Thank you, Janeway1701 Janeway1701 (talk) 01:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the coffee. Don't worry about that, sarcasm is best delivered in small doses... -Reconsider | speak 05:27, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My Article

I received from tips from a user to add links to my article but am not sure how to thank him. Can you take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Wolchek and see if it is completed correctly? Now that I understand the format, it should come a lot easier! Kmea (talk) 04:52, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not bad. I think you should expand on the biography by adding details of the early life and education. Right now, the article seems to place a lot of emphasis on the Chrysler news story.-Reconsider | speak 12:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I put more biographical info in as suggested. Take a look if you can. Thank you so much for your input. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Wolchek -Kmea (talk) 04:50, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work, it's looking a lot better. I've added an infobox, if you know any specific details please fill in the blanks-Reconsider | speak 13:02, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I will try to find out answers for the info box. I appreciate the encouragement. I am hoping to make this a bit of a hobby. Kmea (talk) 04:03, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

how can I protect a page from unwanted edits? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marawi123 (talk • contribs) 23:17, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For vandalism/content dispute, you can make a request at WP:RPP -Reconsider | speak 23:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An update from adopt a user

Hi there Reconsider the static! You may be wondering, what have I done to sound the alarm this time? Nothing. I'm messaging you in regards to the adopt-a-user program, which currently has a backlog of users wishing to be adopted. This doesn't make much sense, as we have a considerable list of users offer adoption, so there shouldn't be any backlog. I've begun to eliminate this backlog myself through a matching program, but I need your help to make it work. Of course, adoptees and adopters don't have to go through there, but I believe it helps eliminate the backlog because someone is actively matching pairs.

On the list of adopters, I have modified the middle column to say "Interests." It's easier working with other users that have similar interests, so if it's not too much to ask, could you add your interests in the middle column? For example, if I was interested in hurricanes, computers, business, and ... reptiles? I would place those in the middle column. Counter-vandalism and the like can also be included (maintenance should be used as the general term). The more interests, the better, since adoptees can learn more about you and choose the one they feel most comfortable working with. The information about when you're most active and other stuff can go into the "Notes" section to the right.

Finally, I've gone around and asked adoptees (and will in the future) to fill in a short survey so adopters can take the initiative and contact users they feel comfortable working with. We all know that most adoptees just place the adopt me template on their user page and leave it - so it's up to us to approach them and offer adoption. So, please take a look at the survey, adopt those that fit your interests, and maybe watchlist it so you can see the interests of adoptees and adopt one that fits your interests in the future.

Once again, thank you for participating in the adopt-a-user program! If you wish to respond to this post, please message me on my talk page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Netalarm (talk) at 05:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Mexico's bicentennial

My students and I are working on the Celebration of Mexican political anniversaries in 2010 if you´d like to through your two cents' in. Its definitely a work in progress.Thelmadatter (talk) 16:48, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possible conflict of interest

Hi there, I noticed you are helping Teojs and there maybe a possible conflict of interest in the articles he is editing. Google search on teo jen sen turns out that Mr John Teo Jen Sen is an IT manager working at DP Architects, see link [2]. Given the initials teojs and Mr John Teo's name, it is possible they are the same person.

While the articles he created are neutral so far, I thought it will be good if you can let him know about COI issues or maybe you have already done so. Thanks! --Xaiver0510 (talk) 05:44, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update on Mexico City students

My students are now working a number of different articles in groups. These are Street marketing, PyMEs in Mexico, The Eyes of My Princess, Diagnostic Enterprise Method, El Tepeyac National Park, Alpura (company), Bernardo Quintana Arrioja and User:Oscarbrum/Epitafio De Un Asesino

Any and all help is appreciated.Thelmadatter (talk) 22:16, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Halloween!

Wilhelmina Will has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween! If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

Cheers! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 04:40, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLP Drive

Hi... Regarding your Unreferenced BLP Drive, I have taken up the challenge - quite an interesting experience, and an area I think I'll keep contributing to. Anyway, I have referenced 20 uBLPs, mostly unreferenced, adding a total of 92 references. Here is the list:

1. Ernesto Benedettini – unref'd since 06/2009 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 2 added refs and content
2. Stipe Erceg – BLPprod & unref'd since 10/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 2 added refs and content
3. Bajram Kosumi – unref'd since 03/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 3 added refs and content
4. Loleta Didrickson – unref'd since 10/2010 – before I made any changes and diff showing 2 added refs
5. Silvestre Siale Bileka – unref'd since 10/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 2 added refs and content
6. Vaneta Becker – unref'd since 03/2009 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 2 added refs and content
7. Pablo Ruiz (Argentine singer) – BLPprod & unref'd since 10/2010 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 9 added refs and content
8. Forbes Masson – unref'd since 03/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 4 added refs and content
9. Michael Egan (author) – unref'd since 02/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 2 added refs and content
10. Matthew Scannapieco – unref'd since 06/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 5 added refs and content
11. Oxana Yablonskaya – unref'd since 06/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 6 added refs and content
12. Robert Olmstead – unref'd since 03/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 6 added refs and content
13. Robert Suettinger – unref'd since 03/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 5 added refs and content
14. Nyam-Osoryn Tuyaa – unref'd since 06/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 4 added refs and content
15. Gregg Gonsalves – unref'd since 07/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 4 added refs and content
16. Baghdadi Mahmudi – unref'd since 08/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 4 added refs and content
17. Melvin Steinberg – unref'd since 03/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 11 added refs and content
18. Meli Saubulinayau – unref'd since 09/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 6 added refs and content
19. Rick Clayburgh – unref'd since 07/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 7 added refs and content
20. Melania Carolina Hotu Hey – unref'd since 03/2008 – before I made any changes and cumulative diff showing 6 added refs and content

Have a look and see what you think. Feedback welcome. Cheers. EdChem (talk) 10:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLP drive

Hi there, I took up the challenge and use the opportunity to touch up Singapore related unreferenced BLP. Started off with random BLP but something closer to home is easier to find materials :).

My edits are recorded in this user subpage, do see and consider whether do I qualify for a BLP barnstar or not~! Thanks Xaiver0510 (talk) 02:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation Appeal

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help! Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1844 submissions waiting to be reviewed. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Are you autoconfirmed? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

WikiProject Cleanup

Hello, Reconsider the static. You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Backlog

Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help! Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1844 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Are you autoconfirmed? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. PS: we have a great AFC helper script at User:Timotheus Canens/afchelper4.js which helps in reviewing in just few edits easily! We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial. On behalf of the Articles for Creation project, TheSpecialUser ^TSU

Adopt-a-user

Hi Reconsider the static. I'm leaving you this message because you have previously been involved as an adopter with Wikipedia's Adopt-a-user program. A clean-up of this program is currently underway, and as part of the process I am trying to find out who is and isn't still interested in remaining an adopter.

If you would prefer not to be part of the adoption program anymore, you need do nothing; when the overhaul of the project is completed your name will be removed from the list of active adopters. However, if you have current adoptees, an active adoption school or an interest in adopting in the near future, then please let us know by signing here.

If you want to remain in the project and can currently take on more adoptees, there is a serious backlog at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user; it would be enormously helpful if you could take on one or two of the users there. Please do keep an eye on the project for upcoming changes, we could use your opinions and your help! Yunshui 雲‍水 09:17, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1844 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. PS: we have a great AFC helper script at WP:AFCH! News Good article nominee 04 Aug 2012 – Parental brain (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Carina1205 (t · c); see discussion AFCH script improvements 1.16 to 1.17 Batman still works!

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser ^TSU

• Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 09:03, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

EdwardsBot (talk) 00:14, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation needs YOUR help!

Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1844 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script! Thanks in advance, Nathan2055^talk - contribs

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation at 22:21, 29 November 2012 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.

WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter

Delivered 00:51, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject AFC needs your help... again

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.

Delivered at 12:54, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1800 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. --Mdann52talk to me!

This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]