Hello @Reconrabbit: - thank you for the whitespace and dashes cleanup on Bakewell, Pears and Company. I'm always glad to have some cleanup work on articles. I did notice that at least two of the archived sources now do not work. Is it possible that some web addresses need dashes instead of endashes? If so, I will need to re-archive some references. TwoScars (talk) 18:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This award is given in recognition to Reconrabbit for conducting 141 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You can upload pictures that you hold the copyright to (like a picture of yourself) on Wikimedia Commons. Though I would be cautious. Since it looks like you are writing about yourself, please read this page: Wikipedia:AutobiographyReconrabbit14:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question from Fk Kreativity (22:58, 13 January 2025)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tres Marias cottontail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Type locality.
I saw you moved my page to drafts due to the sources. I have since changed the sources and moved it back to an article in Neea River (singer). However, now the main page (Neea River) has been asked for deletion by another user. And now, I cannot put in Neea River as the title, because the other one still exists.
I did not know you can add alt text as a default. That may be helpful for the future, but usually the articles I edit do not re-use images. Alt-text can be defined easily in the article anyway with
|alt=
It is a good accessibility option but only strictly required for FA-class articles regardless. I wish I knew about data/commons integration to help here. Reconrabbit15:03, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, my apologies for not responding to the first question, since the template was incorrect on my end. The way it is written is unusual when compared to other articles. Put simply, it is more of a personal reflection or an exercise in promoting the field and study of meeting science more than it is a neutral overview of the field, its history and principles. The statements like The universality of the principles and practices of meeting science facilitates its adoption beyond the corporate world. given without context seem blatantly promotional, especially since there is no reference to establish this universality. it is like this should be patently obvious to the reader that meeting science is important - which should not be the goal of an article. Reconrabbit13:39, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! You declined the submission for a global privacy control article citing that it is a topic in the do not track article. Of course, that's true, but originally there was a global privacy control article a few years ago that was merged with the do not track page due to the lack of adoption of the former. The former is widely adopted now, with even Colorado legislature enshrining it in law so I think it meets the notability requirement now. Thus, I was going to make it its own article again to improve upon it and redirect the section in do not track to the new article. I think your denial did not correctly capture that, is that not the ideal way to perform this action? Cakubilo (talk) 21:39, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
