hadron families
there are three families of hadrons
1. monons or monoquarks (Big Bang singularity, Black Hole monon - singularities in fact do not exist due to the holographic principle, instead both the Big Bang singularity, and the Black Hole monon are "degenerate particles" (not degenerate matter) or "adiabatic scalar fields" or monons/monoquarks) 2. mesons 3. baryons 4. polyons or multiquarks [tetraquarks, pentaquarks etc.]
vague probabilistic property cloud due to puny timescale + ultra-high energies (or not high energies but then the phenomenon becomes statistically harder to be observed
Bent Octavic Intervals or simply semi-collapsed wavefunctions - thus each quark has a more vague probabilistic cloud
We all know that hadrons are categorized into two families: baryons, made of three quarks, and mesons, made of one quark and one antiquark. Protons and neutrons are examples of baryons; pions are an example of a meson.
But what about tetraquarks and pentaquarks?
Hadron rules remain simple, even now that we know that multi-quarks occur at extreme conditions.
Color charge neutrality is a fundamental hadronic characteristic.
Octave in music means: representing doublings or halvings in pitch.
Stable are only the octavic hadrons (or "octave hadrons").
In quantum chromodynamics {QCD) an "octave" has nothing to do with number eight, it simply means multiple or submultiple of the number two (2) of an initial frequency.
Each "color" in "quantum chromodynamics" {QCD), has a unique (probabilistic or statistically nominal) "frequency" (color tone).
In music, a single "tone" or "frequency" cannot produce any "harmony". Only "harmonious ratios" also called "intervals" or "harmoniously combined tones/frequencies" can create a "standard chord" (QCD only at extreme conditions becomes "atonale", QCD prefers pre-Classical (ultra harmonious) "harmonies").
"Harmonious chord (or formation/group/grouping)" means that each "color" or "tone/frequency" of the "chord" after some "periods/loopings" will "match" all other "tones", eachone of them, at a different number of repetitions-"periods".
In music even a single "tone" has a distinct "frequency", dissimilarly though in "QCD" a "single tone" has NOT a distinct "frequency" (it has a "potential tonal range" instead, that is affected by the expansion rate of the void at that specific region) because the "disassociated QCD tones" are "relativistic" so the "single QCD tone"("disassociated QCD tones" or "chromodynamic noise" or "grid noise") cannot have a value unless we crash onto them, then some of the pre-existing "disassociated QCD tones" become combined to form "particles" (all fundamental particles are constituted by "grid noise"-"disassociated QCD tones" that due to an "energetic QCD field disturbance" embroiled harmoniously - because their wavefunctions (their range of uncertainty = that phrase is the definition of the "wavefunction) had collapsed in a harmonious way).
The "octave" (multiple or submultiple of the number two (2) of an initial frequency - nothing to do with number 8 in QCD) is the "ultimate harmony" in nature (in multi-nature if we want to be exact - because even universes not connected with our own still maintain that fundamental principle).
To create an "octave chord" (or "octavic chord" or "a chord that starts at an "arbitrary tone/frequency" and ends at an octave (or octavic) multiple of that initial tone")
the "sum of all intervals" should be octavic (multiple or submultiple of 2).
If we mentally "remove the color(s)" of each (of all) "QCD colored" interactions, we can still study their "intervals" at their junctions.
Now that "pure QCD intervals" still have a neutral overall color, even if we removed the color of each interaction.
In fact we know that in QCD. Color is a "relativistic value" thus we should call it "color intervals".
The only true/actual color is the neutral overall color. The neutral color is not simply an "interval-relativistic color" but has a specific neutral value (black-gray-white are the three neutral colors in optics).
For example protons and neutrons feign that are constituted only by 3 quarks. In fact baryons experimentally are more complex than previously thought. They have some (mass not included) nominal attributes of 3 quarks, due the wavefunctional interference of a hider range of potentials, restricted by the overall wavefunction of the particle.
Why do we have tetraquarks, pentaquarks and other multi-quarks (will be detected in the future for sure due to QUC)?
At very high energies/highly energetic interactions, also during puny timescales, quarks are still "semi-virtual".
Due to QCD, "semi-virtual" quarks don't have the time to acquire/secure their nominal characteristics, thus all their properties dwell on a wider cloud of probability,
so more quarks can be introduced inside a fundamental particle for that puny timescale, because they (quarks) can virtually shift/bend their yet semi-collapsed properties for a while, in an order that maintains the sum of the overall particle color neutral.
In the future, with more energetic particle accelerators we will create for even punier timescales larger multi-quarks, because we will expand the probabilistic clould of properties of each individual quark, thus the sum of all "color intervals" will still remain neutral.
There is NOTHING in nature BUT "QCD noise", that becomes "QCD particle tones" if "energetic QCD field disturbance" occur.
There is NOTHING in nature BUT "QCD noise" embroiled harmoniously (or not if it's still a part of the "QCD grid") - because the wavefunction of each "QCD probabilistic oscillation"/"virtual noise grain" if collapsed in a harmonious way forms EVERYTHING that there is. Their range of uncertainty (that phrase is the definition of the "wavefunction")
is also known as "the theory of everything" (ToE), but her (in Greek the word "theory" is a feminin) name is misleading, because "supersymmetry" is not functional as a closed system of fraudulent mirages, but only as a "FRActal Nebulus Symmetry" - "probabilistically consistent as SUSY at the prospect of infinity". SUSY is a momentary actualization of FRANSY, thus the "the theory of everything" (ToE) abodes at a "higher level of fractally evolving macro-symmetry".
FRANSY is born
SYSU in the current form is not correct because she forces a non probabilistic closed symmetry of a monoverse [single universe].
HELL [Helically Evolving Laterigrade Laws] or "Helix-symmetry" might not be a sexy name.
Use instead the term
FRANSY or FRActal Nebulus Symmetry
or FRANk's SYmmetry
[do not ever mention the last one, it is between us that the new lass is TOTALLY yours - do not mention the FRANk's SYmmetry definition - FRANSY or FRActal Nebulus Symmetry
will do for the others. FRANSY is wider - a promiscuous woman, a non closed symmetry. An OPEN/EVOLVING FRACTAL SYMMETRY.
FRANSY is infinite ["probabilistically consistent as SUSY at the prospect of infinity]
You will not ever abandon LUSY.
SUSY is a momentary actualization of FRANSY.
FRANSY is the gestalt.
SUSY goes to HELL
The Devil
Supersymmetry or Susy is not only a great idea, but a fundamental truth of multi-nature. The current "Susy" is a mechanism to bend the mono-universal laws (of our Universe). The current "sypersymmetry model" is a sham, a false mirage of our monoversal laws (monoverse: a single Universe - not the whole Multi-verse). There is nothing wrong with "Susy" but with brains that don't understand her! "Susy" is a "Helix", an evolving symmetry, not closed to itself (herself if you are in love). The correct name of "Susy" is "Helix-symmetry", and it's not a closed-simple symmetry, but a probabilistic-infinite symmetry. "Susy" is way more prodigious than anyone had ever thought! We even got her name wrong, it's called "Helix-symmetry" or "evolving helix symmetry". By distorting, making smaller, making a closed loop non probabilistic theory, or misnaming "Susy" one can never understand her full mechanisms. I said "Susy", because people don't care about her, but only lust her functionality, not her essence. She is also an it. If one tries to rape the miltiversal laws, he/she will only diverge from their awareness.
Welcome to HELL! Helically Evolving Laterigrade Laws.
Best Regards,
Satan
[sorry - I was mischievous for calling my self "Satan", but HELL has not a joke. HELL is a wider SUSY, or SUSY more accurately defined.
HELL (Helically Evolving Laterigrade Laws) as a name, describes more thoroughly the mechanisms of the actual SUSY, for SUSY makes no sense monoversally and self-looped!]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, RadicalOne. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
|
