User talk:Wikip rhyre


Rhyre

Recent Wikipedia revisions/contributions

(back to user page)

Non-wikipedia Projects and tasks

  • Futures studies
    • Futures education program
  • OLPC (www.laptop.org)
    • Give one Get one Donor
  • Sugar Labs (www.sugarlabs.org)
    • Activities for the Sugar environment
      • Model activity (System dynamics) (inactive)

Wanting to make contact with these users:

Clouts 87 (Hilda Taba)

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 06:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Topics of interest

US Morse code stations


US Flagged ocean liners

These are not military ships, they all served as Ocean Liners from the 1950s until they were no longer viable as cruise ships. Three of the ships were allowed to run aground or were otherwise sunk or scuttled, only the SS United States remains.

It's a shame to see our industrial base contract to the point where we aren't building big ships like this anymore, for civilian and merchant marine purposes. It would be useful to have boats that can carry cruise passengers or be used to respond to emergencies like the BP Oil Spill in the Gulf.

The fast five saga

Regarding "Fast Five"

There are certain times when it is not appropriate to have disambiguation pages, such as Fast Five, which should be the location of the new article. It is also not appropriate to have quotes in titles. ("Fast five (2010)"). If you have any questions, please ask. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 16:20, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The title problem (quotes) has been addressed rhyre (talk)

problem resolved

former deletion nomination of Fast Five (consulting)

(Nomination by talk) 19:24, 19 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Speedy deletion not appropriate for this article, as noted in the talk page.rhyre (talk) 18:48, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fast Five (2011)

The article Fast Five (2011) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per the notability guidelines in WP:MOVIE, this planned movie should not have its own article yet (the production is too recently started to be certain of a final product). If kept, article needs to be pared down only to those aspects notable to the movie itself.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:31, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confused...

Ok, do you want a disambiguation page at Fast Five, or do you want the page for the movie there and a hatnote at the top directing users to the Fast Five (disambiguation) page? There are currently three pages where there should be two. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 17:36, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want the movie content at Fast Five - it's inappropriate there. Since Fast Five may eventually not be about the movie (the title is currently "Fast and Furious 5"), I'd prefer Fast Five be a wayfinding page. The film name / whether it deserves a page issue is being currently debated on Fast Five (2011). I don't even care if that links to a section of the existing "Fast and Furious" page.

The Fast and the Furious 5 (2011) is what IMDB says it is, it seems appropriate to have Fast Five be the disamiguation page, with links to either:

My concept for all this is that a two-word phrase is too generic to be attached to a specific article, especially when there are multiple notable examples of the term being used in popular culture or business publications. In that formulation, "Fast Five" would never be an article about a 2011 Movie or a Music group. Even the "Fab Four" page doesn't jump you directly into the Beatles. If Fast Five becomes the central page, then Fast Five (disambiguation) could go away, except that as a practical matter, the movie's IP-anonymous fanboys will vandalize it again just to put their movie references in, as has happened before. That's why I chose the structure I did, with Fast Five being a Redirect to the Fast Five (disambiguation) page.

I hope this clarifies things. rhyre (talk) 18:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will take the steps to move the disambiguation page to the main title of Fast Five. I think that I may procedurally decline the PROD (for uncontroversial deletions which this is not; anyone including you can remove it) so that there can be a full community discussion at WP:AfD (which is the default deletion disussion where the article will be debated on its deletion for 7 days) unless you wish to put the info back at the series page. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 19:04, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. If the resulting Fast Five page could be semi-protected (only editable by autoconfirmed users), that would help, too. This is a lot of work for a movie I doubt I will see. Thanks to User talk:Fiftytwo thirty for helping out. rhyre (talk) 19:13, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Working pages

I have several pages being developed in userspace:

This page accidentally ended up in main space. I've moved it to User:Wikip rhyre/List of observatories with IAU codes when available, so it's in your user space now. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 06:38, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Fast Five (film)

I have nominated Fast Five (film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fast Five (film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 14:00, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, no need to worry. I have just moved the deletion discussion to the final location; click on the link above to view and participate. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 14:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done. I'm not 100% sure on what "procedural deletion" is, but I responded to the note with comments in the AfD page. rhyre (talk) 15:22, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Procedual nomination" means that I am not "for" or "against" the deletion of the page; I am merely moving the discussion to a higher level of debate than a PROD. I made a minor formatting change to your comment. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 15:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to This Is Not a Test (1962 film), you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. serioushat 10:15, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The link to actor/producer Mike Greene did not properly account for the spelling of his name at the time the movie was made. Are you asserting that completing the cast list did not add content? rhyre (talk) 21:36, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Messages

People I've exchanged notes with

RadicalOne

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:22, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pollution

Wikipedia:WikiProject Pollution has been created. --Ne0 (talk) 04:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Christoper Dorner

Information icon Hello, I'm Toshio Yamaguchi. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Christoper Dorner without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- Toshio Yamaguchi 07:50, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Changed a bogus redirect that was pointing Dorner to the page for "LL Cool J" - I noted that the blanking of the redirect was because it was essentially vandalism - "(blank redirect - vandalism)" is in the edit history. Misspellings of words shouldn't be in an encyclopedia at all.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mt Healthy City Schools, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Healthy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oscar Treadwell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WNOP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boston Community Information System

Dear Wikip rhyre,

Thank you for mentioning the Boston COMINS at talk: low-power broadcasting. I was surprised that Wikipedia didn't already have an article about it. So I posted a quick rough draft.

I suspect you know much more than I do about it. Perhaps you could add a few words -- and more importantly, a few more references -- to the Boston Community Information System article? Again, thank you for making Wikipedia better. --DavidCary (talk) 04:43, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wikip rhyre/Systems architecture review board

Hi there, I noticed User:Wikip rhyre/Systems architecture review board and was wondering if you would consider moving to draftspace for the AFC submission process? It's one of the very few remaining articles at Category:Userspace drafts created via the Article Wizard from October 2009 but it does need some re-writing before I think it's worth publishing. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Wikip rhyre/Systems architecture review board

User:Wikip rhyre/Systems architecture review board, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wikip rhyre/Systems architecture review board and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Wikip rhyre/Systems architecture review board during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Wikip rhyre/Systems architecture review board

User:Wikip rhyre/Systems architecture review board, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wikip rhyre/Systems architecture review board (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Wikip rhyre/Systems architecture review board during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! Great Buckeye Wiknic 2016

Hello there! You are invited to attend the Great Buckeye Wiknic in Columbus, Ohio on Sunday, July 10th from 1:00 to 5:00 PM! Join us for a day in the park for food and socializing with others from the Wikimedia movement. We'll be meeting up at Fred Beekman Park, a park on Ohio State University's campus.

If you're interested, please take a look at our events page for more information, including parking info, food options, and available activities. If you plan on attending, please add your name to the attendees list. We look forward to seeing you!

If you have any questions, feel free to leave one on my talk page. Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: If you would like to stop receiving notifications regarding Wikimedia events around Ohio, you may remove your username from this list.)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wikip rhyre. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Crew scheduling

The article Crew scheduling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly referenced, written as how-to. WP:TNT needed

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Train2104 (t • c) 22:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

-- I'm not the only contributor to the page, and it bears little resemblance to what I originally wrote. There are about 10 academic references to this topic, as it is still an active area of research. rhyre (talk) 06:32, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wikip rhyre. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wikip rhyre. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Wikip rhyre/Technical architecture

Hello, Wikip rhyre. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Technical architecture".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 21:59, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle - January 2022

The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions

Featured Article assessment

Good Article assessment

Deletion

Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
Aviation pages by quality
Quality
Total
FA 142
FL 15
A 56
GA 505
B 4,573
C 11,878
Start 15,082
Stub 18,754
List 2,539
Category 11,638
Disambig 653
File 2,713
Portal 629
Project 89
Redirect 1,518
Template 2,489
NA 66
Assessed 73,339
Unassessed 1
Total 73,340
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 252,286 Ω = 4.91
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page

Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 

Index: pl ar de en es fr it arz nl ja pt ceb sv uk vi war zh ru af ast az bg zh-min-nan bn be ca cs cy da et el eo eu fa gl ko hi hr id he ka la lv lt hu mk ms min no nn ce uz kk ro simple sk sl sr sh fi ta tt th tg azb tr ur zh-yue hy my ace als am an hyw ban bjn map-bms ba be-tarask bcl bpy bar bs br cv nv eml hif fo fy ga gd gu hak ha hsb io ig ilo ia ie os is jv kn ht ku ckb ky mrj lb lij li lmo mai mg ml zh-classical mr xmf mzn cdo mn nap new ne frr oc mhr or as pa pnb ps pms nds crh qu sa sah sco sq scn si sd szl su sw tl shn te bug vec vo wa wuu yi yo diq bat-smg zu lad kbd ang smn ab roa-rup frp arc gn av ay bh bi bo bxr cbk-zam co za dag ary se pdc dv dsb myv ext fur gv gag inh ki glk gan guw xal haw rw kbp pam csb kw km kv koi kg gom ks gcr lo lbe ltg lez nia ln jbo lg mt mi tw mwl mdf mnw nqo fj nah na nds-nl nrm nov om pi pag pap pfl pcd krc kaa ksh rm rue sm sat sc trv stq nso sn cu so srn kab roa-tara tet tpi to chr tum tk tyv udm ug vep fiu-vro vls wo xh zea ty ak bm ch ny ee ff got iu ik kl mad cr pih ami pwn pnt dz rmy rn sg st tn ss ti din chy ts kcg ve
Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia

Portal : Agama
Agama
Portal : Bahasa
Bahasa
Portal : Biografi
Biografi
Portal : Budaya
Budaya
Portal : Ekonomi
Ekonomi
Portal : Elektronika
Elektronika
Portal : Film
Film
Portal : Filsafat
Filsafat
Portal : Geografi
Geografi
Portal : Indonesia
Indonesia
Portal : Ilmu
Ilmu
Portal : Lingkungan
Lingkungan
Portal : Masyarakat
Masyarakat
Portal : Matematika
Matematika
Portal : Militer
Militer
Portal : Mitologi
Mitologi
Portal : Musik
Musik
Portal : Olahraga
Olahraga
Portal : Pendidikan
Pendidikan
Portal : Politik
Politik
Portal : Sastra
Sastra
Portal : Sejarah
Sejarah
Portal : Seni
Seni
Portal : Teknologi
Teknologi