User talk:NYCWikiKid

Your submission at Articles for creation

List of Armories in NYC and surrounding NY State counties, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lugia2453 (talk) 22:36, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

Welcome to Wikipedia. You might find the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject of interest. Happy editing. :) --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - General Health ‖ 17:25, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Ebyabe. Thanks for the welcome. The WikiProject looks very good. Definitely am interested in collaborating in any way I can.  :) NYCWikiKid (talk) 19:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)NYCWikiKidNYCWikiKid (talk) 19:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome - but I dont think we need to see List of Armories everywhere

Hi, welcome to wikipedia. I see you're adding list of armories to many (all?) of the list of registered historic places. Armories are fine, but we dont need it on every page, especially under See Also, a section which should be minimal for most articles. Just my opinion. dm (talk) 18:32, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for cleaning that up a bit. I looked at List of Armories in NYC and surrounding NY State counties It stikes me that putting into a table format could be useful. Please let me know if I can help. dm (talk) 19:10, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi. Thanks for the welcome and the assist Dmadeo. I completely understood what you meant in that the armories represent a specific type of structure, while the landmarks view all types that are registered. A little new to organizing here on Wiki. Hopefully I can get the hand of it. And I appreciate whatever help you can provide. You have my assistance as well. NYCWikiKid (talk) 19:30, 27 July 2013 (UTC) NYCWikiKid NYCWikiKid (talk) 19:30, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I took the liberty of reformatting this page a bit for you. This is a bit rude to do, but I hoped you'd forgive me if I showed you how most people use the Colon to indent their replies. You can also use an asterix like I did with this line. The links above give a lot of good information for a new user. Most of us want to help new users get their bearings so dont get too worried, just ask. You might need to see this in "edit source" mode to get what I'm talking about. Personally, I find editing in "edit source" mode much easier than the visual editor, your mileage may vary. dm (talk) 06:30, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks D. I am reading through as much info as possible and doing test runs to practice. I am glad that there is collaborative effort and much support on the site. Thumbs up. NYCWikiKid (talk) 16:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)NYCWikiKidNYCWikiKid (talk) 16:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• You should probably copy the article to your userspace while you decide on whether you want it to end up in the bullet style or in table form - having both in the public article is confusing to the reader. When you've finished tinkering, just copy the article from your userspace to article space, or ask an admin to move it for you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:20, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Beyond My Ken. Thanks for providing very useful help. I appreciate it. I'm actually intending on having the two parts be separate in that the first is more of an index while the second is an illustration. Hopefully some pictures can be put up of all the facilities. Let me know what you think. NYCWikiKid (talk) 05:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)NYCWikiKidNYCWikiKid (talk) 05:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And while you're at it ...

For one thing, the article title should follow policy. To wit, "NYC" should be spelled out so it's List of armories in New York City.

For another, I think you'd be better off doing two lists: one for the city and another for all the other counties in the state, regardless of whether they're near the city or not. We just don't do geographic subdivisions like that without a very good reason (and I don't see one here). Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• To begin...Hi. Glad for your interest. To shed light, Daniel Case, when the original article was submitted, it was spelled out with New York City, written as: List of Armories and Arsenals in New York City and surrounding New York State Counties; as it is shown within the article. I believe it was acronymed and streamlined to make it easier to fit. Second, the list was made to address the armories within mainly what is considered the NY State part of the Metropolitan Area or "Downstate New York" region. Before you jump the gun, I am studying the possibility of placing a counterpart list which addresses all other armories in the state or the formal "Upstate New York". Two regions makes for two lists. They will eventually be placed under one umbrella list of New York State armories. Hope that alleviates your steadfast concerns. Cheers. NYCWikiKid (talk) 20:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)NYCWikiKidNYCWikiKid (talk) 20:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome NYCWikiKid

Welcome!

Hello, NYCWikiKid, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account with Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Sorry about that, I thought you already had been welcomed officially! dm (talk) 06:32, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NYCWikiKid, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi NYCWikiKid! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Two quick notes

Hi:

• In section titles, only the first word and any proper nouns should be capitalized, so it's "See also" not "See Also", "External links" not "External Links", "Life and career" not "Life and Career"

• Do not use an ampersand (&) in text to mean "and" (unless it specifically appears in a proper name), always use "and".

Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:42, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BMK, Thanks for the heads up. As you may have experienced along the way, Wiki has an enormous amount of information to learn. I am trying my best to pick up things along the way and do as much reading as possible. Really appreciate the pointers. NYCWikiKid (talk) 23:21, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing great, keep it up. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:05, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks BMK!

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael J. Garvin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Melrose and Beaux-Arts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DPL. Thanks for letting me know. Doing a lot of writing and editing at the same time lends itself to missing editing details like those. I just fixed it. If you or anyone else sees something in addition, just make me aware. All the help is appreciated. NYCWikiKid (talk) 18:03, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI That was a bot talking to you, not a person. dm (talk) 22:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dmadeo! That is too funny. Who knew bots could speak. :) NYCWikiKid (talk) 23:46, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Armories in NYC and surrounding NY State counties may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *8th Regiment - Private house on Seventh Avenue (between West 34th Street and West 35th Street(1879 - 1880)
• / West 66th Street / Lincoln Square Armory || || 1901-1903 || Manhattan; 56 West 66th Street (between Columbus Avenue and Central Park West (Eighth Avenue) - present day Lincoln Square

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:29, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of New York metropolitan area sports teams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Falcon Field

New York Velodrome (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Marble Hill

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of soccer stadiums in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hempstead

New York Cosmos Stadium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nassau County

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Michael A. Carroll Stadium.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Michael A. Carroll Stadium.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:49, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

Thanks for the compliment,, but I hadn't gotten to doing that yet. I hope you weren't being sarcastic ... that doesn't seem like you anyway. Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:New York Cosos at James M. Shuart Stadium - August 3, 2013 - First game.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:New York Cosos at James M. Shuart Stadium - August 3, 2013 - First game.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:35, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Soccer Bowl 2012 logo.png

A tag has been placed on File:Soccer Bowl 2012 logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Blurred Lines 15:54, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Soccer Bowl '75 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Spartan Stadium

Soccer Bowl '83 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Toronto Blizzard

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Soccer Bowls

Awesome that you got so many of these pages up! Good work, I'll gladly help to expand them wherever I can. A word of note though, Alan Ball was NOT the man of the match of Soccer Bowl '79. He was the 1979 playoffs MVP, which is not the same. If you view the SB '79 video, you'll see that an offensive and defensive MoM was selected. If memory serves, Trevor Wymark was offensive MoM, with 2 goals. I'll watch the video again to see who the defensive MoM was. I'm pretty sure this may be the case with several other SBs of that time frame too. To differentiate playoff MVPs from Finals MoMs (and when they did this), you'd need to view the videos or find newspaper stories from each year to confirm. Anyway great job, Cheers! Creativewill (talk) 17:02, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Awesome. I'll probably start by dropping in all the basic box scores in that I did for the NASL Season pages. Then maybe a few uniform kits like Soccer'78 has. The rest will depend completely on how much detail I can find about any given match or series (i.e. starting IX, subs used, available subs, yellow cards, etc.), not to mention free time. I'm sure fans of any particular team will help fill in the blanks. Talk soon.Creativewill (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the 1972 finals page additions. Any idea how to get a white cuff and collar on a kit with stripes? :-) that's what St Louis jersey looked like. I've looked at hundreds of kits all over wikipedia. All the ones w/white collars have solid colored shirts. hmph. -Creativewill (talk) 17:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks, but the Colorado kit won't help. Both SB teams have the correct collar shape for that game. StL just happens to have had a white boarder on theirs and on the cuff as well. Minor detail, but it bugs me nevertheless -Creativewill (talk) 19:16, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries on "club" fix. Man o'man, it's hard to find color images of some of the kits in the finals... and then create them! i'm quiting for today after i finish '77. Creativewill (talk) 17:49, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the kudos, writing recaps of some of these matches is my real dread. I found the USA 1967 Finals video on youtube. Btw, an absolutely WILD match! Well worth watching. I linked it to the kits as a reference, so that no one would/could question my sources. Cheers -Creativewill (talk) 03:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (1988 Fort Lauderdale Strikers season) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1988 Fort Lauderdale Strikers season, NYCWikiKid!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

/

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (1968 Washington Darts season) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1968 Washington Darts season, NYCWikiKid!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

/

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (1969 Washington Darts season) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1969 Washington Darts season, NYCWikiKid!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

/

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (1994 Fort Lauderdale Strikers season) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1994 Fort Lauderdale Strikers season, NYCWikiKid!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

.

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (1993 Fort Lauderdale Strikers season) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1993 Fort Lauderdale Strikers season, NYCWikiKid!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

/

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Template:New York City FC

Hey NYCWK. Just to establish this right away - I'm totally neutral on the whole "should the NYCFC navbox have colours yet or not?" argument but I just thought I should point out that if you are going to add the colours, you might want to add the right ones. The colours of nycfc.com are sky and navy blue not because they are the proposed colours of NYCFC, but because that entire website is a total copy of parent club Manchester City's website, which is here. Man City's colours are not sky blue and navy blue, although navy blue has been a trim colour a few times, but instead they are sky blue and white, as you can see from their current season's kit launch photo, and from pretty much every kit they've worn since the 1890s. If you want to put a bet on NYCFC's colours, you'd be losing your money if you betted against sky blue and white. Navy blue will most likely barely feature.

Just a friendly heads-up from a (Manchester) City fan who is eagerly following NYCFC's progress - and who created the New York City FC article of course... Falastur2 ^Talk 19:44, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sports in New York City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SOHO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Oklahoma City NASL 2015

Template:Oklahoma City NASL 2015 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 09:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jacksonville NASL 2015

Template:Jacksonville NASL 2015 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 10:02, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fort Lauderdale Strikers

I think you overlooked the disambiguation page American Soccer League while rewriting Template:Fort Lauderdale Strikers. In effect, you placed two different leagues into one section. Could you fix that? The Banner talk 22:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Al Lang Stadium SSS.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Al Lang Stadium SSS.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 17:34, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Edelman Financial Field at One Loudoun.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Edelman Financial Field at One Loudoun.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 17:36, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Toyota Field 3 phases.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Toyota Field 3 phases.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:03, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Edelman Financial Field.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Edelman Financial Field.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 14:27, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New York Cosmos Stadium Rendering 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New York Cosmos Stadium Rendering 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 14:43, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NYAC Travers Island Athletic Field

The article NYAC Travers Island Athletic Field has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced stub about a minor facility - no indication of notability - "before" search turns up no significant coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ^BE _C K ^Y _S A ^Y LE _S  22:17, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sports venues in York County, Virginia

A tag has been placed on Category:Sports venues in York County, Virginia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 17:14, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sports venues in James City County, Virginia

A tag has been placed on Category:Sports venues in James City County, Virginia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 19:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sports venues in Virginia by county

A tag has been placed on Category:Sports venues in Virginia by county requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 11:10, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of EJ Murray Memorial Skating Center

The article EJ Murray Memorial Skating Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP;NOTPROMO and WP:NORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 01:24, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"One Loudon" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect One Loudon. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#One Loudon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Vahurzpu (talk) 16:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrews Field (Norwalk, Connecticut)

The article Andrews Field (Norwalk, Connecticut) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wp:GNG without independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. User:Namiba 17:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrews Field (Norwalk, Connecticut) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrews Field (Norwalk, Connecticut) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrews Field (Norwalk, Connecticut) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

User:Namiba 14:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NASL Final 1969 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NASL Final 1969 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NASL Final 1969 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

dashiellx (talk) 16:50, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Soccer Bowl (NASL Championship)

Template:Soccer Bowl (NASL Championship) has been nominated for merging with Template:North American Soccer League (1968–84). You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. S.A. Julio (talk) 16:15, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yonkers Police Athletic League

The article Yonkers Police Athletic League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks citations, does not appear to be notable from a Google search

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Apocheir (talk) 01:02, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Falcon Field (Meriden, Connecticut)

The article Falcon Field (Meriden, Connecticut) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for notability for over a decade, brief search for sources reveals nothing useful.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ljleppan (talk) 19:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of sports venues with the name Toyota for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of sports venues with the name Toyota is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sports venues with the name Toyota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 14:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:National Professional Soccer League 1967 logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:National Professional Soccer League 1967 logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:North American Soccer League 1968-1974 logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:North American Soccer League 1968-1974 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]