en User talk:Doctree

This user may have left Wikipedia. Doctree has not edited Wikipedia since September 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

RfA candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report
RfB candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report

No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online}

Archives

Your submission at Articles for creation: Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This page has been declined or rejected as an abandoned draft by an inactive editor. If it is not edited further within six months after it has been declined or rejected, it will be deleted as a disused draft. Since the originator of this draft is inactive, any comments may be addressed to the last reviewer.

No text. Only an infobox.

This draft does not make a credible claim of significance. This draft would be subject to speedy deletion in article space. If this draft is resubmitted in its current form or a similar form, it should be nominated for deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:30, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doctree! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:30, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate to the talk pages consultation

Hello

Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.

We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.

We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.

Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate to the talk pages consultation - link update

The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.

The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019.

Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I was hoping for someone to take a look at my Draft Artical that i am editing

Draft Artical that i am editing please if you could check it out thank you

Hello brother in Christ or Sister i just want to stand correct i have come across this draft Artical i have been editing it but i am not the best of editors yet i was hoping you could take a look at it and see what else i need to do. For i have known about this Jurisdiction for when i was in Africa because i do medical missions there can you please help. I would be ideated to you for this. --Rickmartin123 (talk) 23:09, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Doctree/sandbox/Jonathan E. Grindlay

Hi. I came across User:Doctree/sandbox/Jonathan E. Grindlay while looking at at stale userspace drafts. FYI, I've cleaned it up and submitted it for review, as it appears to cover a notable topic wikipeida has no article about. - GretLomborg (talk) 20:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

Hello, Doctree. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 00:58, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

I just read an article about your efforts regarding the CyberSafe stuff. I'm very proud that people like you are keeping the wiki safe. I wanted to say thanks. You are awesome. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 17:34, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

living bird

Thank you for quality articles related to birding and astronomy, such as Living Bird (2012), List of citizen science projects and Muriel Mussells Seyfert, for expansions such as Herbert Friedmann, for hating intolerance and welcoming hundreds of new users, - Tree, birdwatcher and citizen scientist, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2399 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:57, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aileen Fisher.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aileen Fisher.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I MISS YOU!

Hey Doctree! I just wanted to reach out to you and let you know that I was thinking about you... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same here, I hope you're OK! - FlightTime (open channel) 20:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Richard Stetson Morse.png

Thanks for uploading File:Richard Stetson Morse.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tim Landy (talk) 16:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover of May-June 2013 issue of SchoolArts magazine.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cover of May-June 2013 issue of SchoolArts magazine.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]