User talk:Mmcannis

Latest Events-(2011 to DEC-2013, (('12)summer/winter/spring'13 of GRAND CANYON-Geology, etc.))

{Latest Notes/Additions)-I will enter a "BLURB"-here, to be updated in days/weeks ahead: NOT--SEND more FOOD (to me or the World (or the new moon rover))-(I have to choose/FIND my food)

The BLURB's intentions will be to state my opinion, (my take on "it"/things), to all who want to live in "Real-Ville" (as opposed to Rio Linda). (on-ward fellow Homo sapiens sapiens (if 'you' (or the parts of "you" are listening). [these are juxtaposed against the 99 percent plus of [the Homo.sapiens), the H. sapiens religiosum-s (the "true-believers" (religions/philisophies/beliefs/predilections/(including wikipe.)/(politico's/syncoFants, RockStars/Starettes, included))]
I left the "religion-game" when I found that the bottom of the list of religions (or TOP) contained 'agnostic', 'atheist', (and for wikipedia: "ir-religion", and "non-religion")-Note: at the 1350's BC Amarna letters, nothing existed AFTER 1350-1334 BC (we know what transpired; THEY lived in (their) REAL-VILLE)

(end of Note)..Mmcannis (talk) 13:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Letters done: EA 9, 19, 252, (273), 282, 365 Letters to do: EA 26, 28, 30, 35, 39, 147, 245, ----286,287,289,290, EA 325, etc.

Addition of December, 2013--Mmcannis (talk) 13:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


My Latest-/ and greatest-(~2005--> present: Jan-2011)

My Categories

Categories


My Articles

Articles

My Ancient Egypt/ ancient times, etc.

Birds


(Old-original)-latest/ and greatest-(Summer-Fall/2009?)

Category:Birds of the Madrean sky islands Category:Birds of Sierra Madre Occidental


Philately

  • (for-Jan 15,2011)-Category:Wikipedians interested in philately--(I need to enter this category, in time). (my personal favorite stamp I have is on a page of two stamps in the (Canton (country subdivision)-Cantons of Switzerland),.. cantons of Switzerland-(1843, not reprint of 1848,(no burellage)), a Numeral 6 (Black) with Red burellage, (either Horiz or Vert- mine is Horiz)))
    • (Corrected description)-Jan 16,2011-From 1989, Scott Standard Postage Stamp Catalog, Vol 4. Stamps of Switzerland begin in 1850 ( "Federal Administration" ). The ( "Cantonal Administration" ) begins 1843(Zurich, Geneva). Three cantons represented: Cantons of Switzerland—1—Canton of Zurich, 2—Canton of Geneva, and 3—'Canton of Basel'.
      Denomination: 100 Rappen(or Centimes) = 1 Franc. For Zurich, 3 types of stamps, (A1, A2, A3); A1, A2 are in the first series. A1,A2 (1843) is vertical RED burelage; A1,A2 (1846) is horizontal RED burellage (with 5 varieties of burellage).
      (Total variety No. is now: 2 + 10)
      The NOTE: for A1,A2 is: Reprints of the Zurich stamps show signs of wear and lack the red lines. (That adds +2, and are either from 1843 or '46, and unknown which year). Total No of stamps now 12 + 2 (unlined)(=no burelage).
      Description(for what its worth). The stamps are BLACK, the numerals are 75 per/cent the height of the stamp, (on a matrix background).
      A (somewhat) narrow "decorated" border is on the four sides, with the following differences explaining the 4R, and 6R denomination: ZURICH is inscribed in the top border (about Half-); the bottom border is completely (mostly)-85% made of: (for A1, 4R): LOCAL TAXE (for local Zurich), and higher value: (for A2, 6R), CANTONAL TAXE, (out of the city)(my stamp is the 6R,cancelled (lines)(a cancellation)-about 40% of stamp, in SEast quadrant-(lower right))
(Added 2 days later:)
This 6r is apparently the: Zurich 4 and 6, 6r.
One of my favorite photos.

Hi

It is traditional to put a "Welcome to Wikipedia" message here. I won't do that because you have already been here at least three weeks! But welcome anyway.

If you are feeling a little confused at the moment, I have very little sympathy for you: you delayed so long in creating an account and took absolutely no part in the Votes for Deletion process. Now you have an account you can see that it is no big deal is it?

The good news is that nothing of your work has been lost. You will find links to it at the start of this list.

Go ahead, find the articles, do a few edits just to assure yourself that they all right, then stop. You said if you accept the Return of some Pages. The blunt answer is: we do not accept the return of any of your pages. The kindly answer is: Great work, Michael, but please do it elsewhere.

You must now turn your mind to finding a new home for your work. As I said in the talk page, you will probably be best creating your own site. If you go to Wikibooks or Wikisource you will run into the same sort of problems as here - they are colaborative projects so other people will edit your stuff or at least express opinions about it!

Please keep in touch. You can always leave messages for me at User talk:RHaworth and since Tony Sidaway did the job of moving your stuff, he should be willing to talk to you via User talk:Tony Sidaway.

RHaworth 19:40:44, 2005-08-28 (UTC)


Hello, RHaworth. Well, I have been busy at work, so this is my first chance to get back to what i was doing with Wikipedia. Since i Have hard copies of most of what I was working on, I must explain some things.

  • ----First I think the El Amarna letters will go down in history as with other clay tablet, or lignuistic "Sources", as with other major linguistic, // slash antrhropological sources. With the ADVENT of the Internet, these letters are "Destined" to become available to anyone, For so long they have been kept hidden, and I mean that as Point of Fact, .....just like the Dead Sea scrolls, were kept hidden.
  • --- My efforts were partially finalized before I started, but I was able, Or Had To polish some, or come to conclusions.
  • ----I have more conclusions now, say about EA 245, and the story of "The Plight of Yasdata". He may be now "Osiris Yasdata", the body of Dead Souls,.... I have looked at these really clear cuneif. characters, and am still Not Sure, of some things. Shepard is the other word that may apply here. "Shepard,Journeying, Yasdata". I KNOW, that few have really figured it out completely. What is interesting. ... the same "cuneiform" is used two lines later, ... so i think shepard is what applies.
  • ---what is so "kool", is that there are interesting religious implications in these letters. the Amaran Letters, are Pre-Biblical, and they are not "translated" ! ! ! as the bible is. so, as i predict, they will eventually be studied by many, many more people. My talents, are more Earth Sciences, and Paleontology, Puzzles, but also in pictures, like the anthropological Hand-created items. Those are the puzzles i am refferring to. (The picture in a book, LIKE of Mr king Gudea ?)
  • ----I think the future of wikipedia, is endless, ....in summary, ... so I look forward to doing more
  • ---Thanks for being patient. The focus of the last weeks, was the stuff/the body of stuff I did, as well as the presentation available on the Display screen. I was focussed on the accuracy of my work, and 2nd its look in front of me.
  • ----the transliteration Topic is where it is at. When a Human has the transliteration in front of him/her, they than can figure what it means. The Paragraphic Layouts i did, helped me immensely. It was truely Crossword puzzle stuff, trying to fill in words, and sometimes thoughts, in sentences, or parts of sentences. .... The best example of that is in EA 28, taling about the "problem" of the messengers going and returning to eqypt. the scribe uses the word for "hurdle", to address [the "mountain" concerning the problem about the messengers ]... i.e, the mountain, the hurdle. there are such exquistite English words that drop into place, once the story in front of one is Understood.
  • So, I reread, and just proof, read, I look forward to again talking with, you, and Tony,. Thanks again, Mmcannis, in YumaAZ (the desert ! )



Michael, thanks for getting back in touch with us. Our main concern now is that if you have content in the articles currently on Wikipedia, you *must* take the opportunity to download them within the next seven days. We really shall delete them, but we're granting a stay of execution out of consideration for the appreciable amount of work that they must represent. The articles are where RHaworth said they would be, so if there is any content you need please download it immediately. I'll let it hang around for a week, and after that time it'll be gone from Wikipedia. --Tony SidawayTalk 03:51, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't edit those articles. The clock is ticking. They will be completely removed by 8th September. --Tony SidawayTalk 21:59, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]


RHaworth , this is Mmcannis, here ...Please look at a year 2000 calendar. It was NOT a leap year. 1600 was not, and 2400 will not be a LEAP YEAR. I first read this stupid formaula para ( 2 ) months ago and could hardly get thru the first sentence. I made corrections back then on " 1899" . I read how others had also found the formula so confusing. Any way it is correct at the moment until somebody goes and revises it again. It is not worded trerrilbly well. I was just trying to make it factual. Please check a calendar, etc. Monday noon, Labor day....Mmcannis,YumaAZ

I was working on the Rosetta Stone, and the Grandfather's the Decree of Canopus, which implemented Leap year, 238 B.C.E. The book I was given at the Reference desk by a Librarian, had 1 and a half pages on Leap year. It was implemented by Caesar in 55 B.C.E. in 1592 ( ? ) the reorganezed calendar was done. 10 days came off the calendar. then 1600 was skipped, Only the second 400 year skip occurred in 2000; the next 400 year skip is on Feb 28, 2400, certainly a long way aways....Mmcannis

Rosetta Stone etc.

Thanks for your comment on the Rosetta Stone. In future, please don't remove other comments from people's talk pages when adding your own. Thanks. It really is a nice picture... there are quite a lot of talented people in the project that contribute. I agree, it would be nice to have more pictures of stuff in the British Museum. The best way to get some is to take some yourself. If you don't get out there too often (quite reasonable since you appear to live in Arizona, not the UK) then you could try asking someone to get what you're looking for. You could always try leaving a note on the image's talk page, contacting the uploader, or maybe having a look around Wikipedia:UK Wikipedians' notice board to see whether there are any willing people around.

P.S. Regarding Leap year, see 2000, 1900, and all of the other years. A year is a leap year if it is divisible by 4, unless it is divisible by 100 but not 400. So, 2000 was a leap year, and 1900, 1800, 1700 aren't. Cheers, JYolkowski // talk 20:56, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just read up on the Facts of leap year..... with a smug shrug, i have to admit I was sleeping all day on Leap Year Day 2000, and/or I was translating. Oh well, ( I never did understand how the one day skip every 400 years equalled the ten days taken off. I guess I screwed up the formula !). Mmcannis,YumaAZ.... It was obviously 3 days per 400 years !

Good. We have got that 'sorted'! The article Gregorian calendar says it was 1582 only for the Popish heartland of Europe. Some countries did not change until the 20th century. There is a wonderful painting/engraving by William Hogarth (which, strangely, I cannot find on the web) in which someone is waving a placard saying give us back our eleven days. -- RHaworth 17:24:44, 2005-09-06 (UTC)
I did not look hard enough! It was here in the Commons. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 03:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After: Amarna letters Rosetta Stone THE Epic, My creations

RHaworth, and others, Thanks for your Patience. My practice of Amarna letters was Really important. Just today, I Now see how these, User, Talk pages work. I just looked at the developer of the LMLK seal page, Mr "Funhistory" 's Talk page, and with the help of many people, I now know how to make and add to " Category: " pages.

So, I am assessing directions to go in. Today I completed (For Now) the "Impression seal" group. I finally opened a Masterful type Book" from Germany(Konemann Publ.) see ref at Scaraboid seal, (subgroup of Impression seal ), 2 editors, and 35 Authors. Quite the pics, etc.

Note on Kushite phar. Piankh 1074-1070 BC

I asked at the Talk:Lunar eclipse, page, Lunar eclipse if someone could check on the Stela of Piankhi for the lunar eclipse(asked about season of year) mentioned in his Stela Autobiography, of about 40 pages, (Long), It is in the 1907 work by James Henry Breasted who in the 5-Volume( Ancient Records of Egypt ) work redid all the Egyptian translations (How long did that take him?). Any now, thanks fellow citizens (grk, demotoles), guys and gals. (Work, and other business.) Mmcannis,YumaAZ

Mummy

See: User_talk:Mmcannis/Archives/Archive 1 partials


3D images

See: User_talk:Mmcannis/Archives/Archive 1 partials


sandbox

I distinctly recall you saying that you do not want a user page. I encourage you to create one:

  • it makes you look less like a newbie
  • it is where you can list pages to which you have contributed
  • it discourages people from mis-placing talk messages there

but I won't insist. However I do insist that you should not use your talk page for notes to yourself, etc. Talk pages are for dialogue with other users. You are encouraged to keep private pages for your own jottings - you will now find yours at User:Mmcannis/sandbox - please use it. -- RHaworth 12:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I just got home from work, so I'll write a complete note later, after I look at the sandbox ( I see now why the name 'Sandbox' must exist). Thanks again. Mmcannis,YumaAZ--Mmcannis 02:21, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for your help on Laguna Diversion Dam. I appreciate you catching that typo. I had wondered if anyone had noticed the new article yet. It is a dam with a very interesting history. Kukini 19:57, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Winged sun=winged--Ra, note

Ancient Egyptian use

All of the subordinated gods of Egypt were considered part of the Sun god Horus, (= the Pharaoh).
List of gods represented in the Winged sun center disk:

Hi/Arizona flora

Hi Michael, Thanks for your comments on my talk page. They were interesting in terms of the plants you've seen recently as well as the info about stuff that can be done with "related changes", "Contrib", etc. I'm learning as I go along. I don't have a lot of time to work on Wikipedia, but my respect for the project has greatly increased as I've looked at it, and I'm hoping to add some middle Tennessee botanical stuff in the near future.

I'm going to southern AZ this July to visit two sisters-in-law and families. They tell me that the drought has pretty much creamed all of the vegetation there. So I don't know what I'll see.

Steve Baskauf 20:04, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Arizona Wilderness Areas

See: User_talk:Mmcannis/Archives/Archive 1 partials


Categories

I noticed your cats for trogon. Since not all members of the family occur in Arizona or Mexico, tagging the family rather than individual species is inappropriate, and I'm going to delete them. The logic of tagging families means that groups like Old World warbler could be tagged for US states on the strength of one species, despite the vast majority being Old World. jimfbleak 09:18, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michael - I've added a response to your query at Talk:Saguaro - MPF 16:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx. Before I found the NRCS database, I was proceeding more slowly. I had been working on a page for plants in the Sonoran Desert, after I made the Lower Colorado River Valley, category. (originally because of a bird page).... So, I then pulled up my Volume 3, Minor Hardwoods of North America. Only after doing other flora's, in other states, did I finally come up to the Buckthorn's etc. And see the renaming of some of the Genus levels..... Anyhow..I finally looked at the maps (as in the Jepson maps), for the Saguaro: AZ, CA for the USDA data and saw that it was Not updated. The saguaro's go all up the river, both east and west side. In Imperial Co, San Bernardino Co., and Riverside Co. And of course they extend up the "Joshua Tree Parkway" towards Western Mohave County, Arizona, and the Mojave Desert. I'll go look at the Saguaro talk. Thanx again.(PS, as a young teenager(new to Ariz.), I will never forget seeing them at Bagdad, in the foothills, down in the Open Pit Mine, Miles from Nowhere, literally! [I newly lived in Prescott; they are not around Prescott!]) ,,,,,M-McA,inHotYumaAZ--Mmcannis 17:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sully Island

Hi - can I please confirm why you've added a Nova Scotia category to Sully Island, a page about a small island in South Wales? Vashti 12:38, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I probably totally misread the article. I'll remove it, and thanks. Michael, inArizona,--Mmcannis 03:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, we've all done it. Thanks for your quick response. :) Vashti 05:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

naturalhistory cats

Well, I don,t mind going through Category:Natural history of the United States by state to make sure categorization is pertinent (see WP:CG: Articles should not usually be in both a category and its subcategory, for why I've been making many adjustments). While there are sometimes arguments for puttng an article into a cat and its child, I do not believe they apply here. Right now, I'm working on Subdivision footers standardization, but I can go through Natural history of the United States by state onceI'm finished. Circeus 13:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that like the avifauna cats, the flora is divide by reions and states. Well, I hope somebody is going to add the states under the regions as for avifauna, because it's not oing to be me. Circeus 20:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

fauna

you might be interested in the deletion proposal for all the 'fauna by state' categories. So far, I am one of few to oppose it. Hmains 03:51, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion can be found here. —Viriditas | Talk 04:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

if you do not agree with the planned deletions, you may go to discussion page (above) and vote to 'keep all' Thanks Hmains 16:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mmcannis - please don't add links like "[[Western United States|western]] [[North America]], from central [[British Columbia]] ..." - by doing so you are stating that Canada is part of the United States, which of course, it isn't. Also please go easy on categories; if a species occurs in more than 4 or 5 states/provinces, then use a regional category that covers the whole area. - MPF 10:36, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That Oak Ridges Moraine certainly looks an interesting place - MPF 11:06, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Natural history of Trinidad and Tobago and Category:Land Birds of Trinidad and Tobago

See: User_talk:Mmcannis/Archives/Archive 1 partials


talk page etiquette

Regarding Talk:Graffito (archaeology): If you're wondering who made a comment, please use the edit history; it will tell you who said what and when they said it. If you wish to reply to a specific part of a comment, please quote it and add your response; posting inline destroys the flow of discussion and is the equivalent of interrupting someone while he's talking. See Wikipedia:Talk page for more. —Charles P._(Mirv) 15:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trees of the Caribbean Basin

Can you explain what the benefit of this edit is? If you want to include common names, why just a few, and why bold some and not others? Could you explain what your plan is? Thanks. Guettarda 05:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I realize this is all somebody elses work, However, you must know that I have just been creating some of the Fauna, Birds, Trees, Flora etc. I had started in Western US, (where I live). I went thru Canada, and parts of N. Mexico. The Madrean sky islands of the Sierra Madre Occidental, etc.
Anyhooowww, I just went thru the C. Amer stuff and the South American. I have no plan, just creating as I go (For example: Category Talk:Trees of Chile). And once I ended up at Tierra del Fuego, and the Falkland Islands, I found how the sub categories like: Category:Trees of the Guianas need to be put together—(see now 2011/2012, Category:Trees of northern South America).
And I just started again on the Lesser Antilles, for Trees; I had done some of the Birds. And I started putting Trees into the (New) category: Category:Trees of the Amazon; Since I don't live there, and can only read about it. ..... I do need advice. The cycad Zumila, or whatever its name is I had added to Category:Trees of Cuba when I was just starting. I just entered the Durango Pine starting down the W.Mexico side, after doing many of the categories for the states. And today I was redoing Category:Sonora, looking at links in Sonora, and updating stuff I had added to categories back in January thru July. Soooo.... I just had started, and certainly expected somebody to say something, And I could use some advice. If something ends up dumb and wrong please make an obvious change. I expect to NOT have any final answers, but some of the things I did, were at times, I think "inspiring" (like the name I found for the midwest U.S.) Trees, Fauna, and Flora, and Avifauna of: Category:Trees of Plains-Midwest U.S.—(changed to: Category:Trees of the Plains-Midwest (United States)-(as of 2011/2012, still named as such)), i later made Category:Trees of Appalachia U.S. and left off up at the Great Lakes (after working on: Category:Natural history of Ontario, which is southerly into the U.S. and has gobs of stuff from all over the South, just extending into Ontario.
Any how change anything you think appropriate, or give it a day or two. Obviously the page shouldn't be Junked-up with irrelevant info. (And I just figured out all the Yucatan stuff too: Category:Natural history of the Yucatán},and redid how it looks in the Supercategories.(and I can't reread all this to edit it.) Michael, out in the Sonoran Desert; .....--Mmcannis 05:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I am in Oklahoma (and very homesick). Guettarda 06:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner (and I'm just here for a moment now) but the Trees of the Caribbean Basin is very incomplete - I found it with just a handful of examples and have added a lot to it, but not systematically. I'll probably harvest what I can from your "Trees of..." cats when I get a chance. The list of palms of the Caribbean should be pretty much complete, at least based on the species recognised by the compiler of the Kew list (now to add some info about each species...). The Trees of the Caribbean will probably take a decade to finish ;) Guettarda 02:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flora/Fauna by continent categories

Hi,

You recently reverted my edits to the continent articles, stating this: "As with the "Island Nations" of "Oceania", (and "Hawaii"), and for Flora (the "Flora of Eurasia"), so this goes here, as does "Central America", w/ its Nations".

Could you please explain to me what you mean, as it doesn't make sense to include islands, and regions of North America as seperate continents. We don't call New Zealand or Tasmania there own continent. --liquidGhoul 03:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't ignore me, and continue with what I am inquiring about. I want to clean up these sections, and there is still some work which needs to be done on them. These changes may fix the problems you are trying to "fix". In the mean time, I would prefer you not make any major changes without discussion. --liquidGhoul 03:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
But why include them as continents. It is arguable as to whether the Caribbean is its own continent, but Central America is definitely not. --liquidGhoul 04:15, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yuma, Arizona radio stations

AM

FM

  • _88.1 - KCFY --The Source– Christian - Yuma
  • _88.9 - KAWC - National Public Radio, etc - AWC (college) - Yuma
  • _93.1 - KLJZ ---- Z93– Modern Rock - Yuma
  • _95.1 - KTTI ---- Country - Yuma(Ktti-Kountry)
  • 100.9 - KYJT -- The Jet– Modern Rock - Yuma
  • 104.5 - KCEC - La Campesina– Modern Rock/{Hispanic/Mex/USA) - Yuma

List of palms of the Caribbean

Hi. I was wondering if you might have a look at List of palms of the Caribbean and see what you think of it. I am especially interested in what you think of the format - do you like the distributions the way they are formatted, do you think the comments at the end of the genus sections are useful (and do you think they would be better at the top of the section, or as they are at the end)? Thanks for your input. Guettarda 20:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the redirects - I was working towards WP:FL standards - list items aren't supposed to be redlinks, so I made them redirects. I agree with the issue of redlinks vs redirects - so, obviously, I realise that creating the redirects leaves me with the obligation of creating all those articles. Guettarda 03:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historical people of U.S. natural history

Could you add some criteria for inclusion in Category:Historical people of U.S. natural history? It's not clear to me how some of the categorized folks qualify. -Will Beback · † · 01:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Message page

Sorry for wrong page! Cheers, Pete Tillman 19:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New talk-Dec-Jan1

Hi -- & thanks for the compliments. I lived in Tucson for almost 30 years, so know S. AZ well. Will take a look at your new page.
Cheers, Pete Tillman 19:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wrong page

I am mystified by your comments: I do know how to search now, so I really don't have the excuse of not finding my name easily. a) providing you are logged in, it don't matter what browser you are using, there will always be a link to your user page on every Wikipedia page you view and it will always be in the same place; b) does it really make things any better if it is a red link? c) if you want it always to be a missing page, why do you need to find it?

But no matter. Yes it is something you can fix yourself:

  • copy and paste the present content to your talk page (standard Wikipedia courtesy)
  • replace this page with {{db|I prefer my user name to be a red link (even though it makes me look like a newbie)}}
  • wait and see what happens.

-- RHaworth 11:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)(moving informationa).... -Mmcannis 08:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good try. Now change { into { ! -- RHaworth 20:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ratings

hi,

just wanted to clarify what the ratings in certain talk pages are good for: this way it's much easier for maintainers of projects like WikiProject Spiders to assess which pages need work, and which are good already. it's not meant to be some kind of contest ;) cheers :) --Sarefo 22:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category

Hi! I noticed some of the categorization you've been doing. I think that prior existing category "Category:American naturalists" is a more concise category that, if not quite the same, is more in line with other categorizations (categorizing naturalists by nationality rather than geographical area of work), and probably co-extensive with the one you've created. I suggest using that instead; we should clear out the new category so it can be deleted. I've added the category "natural history of the United States" to "American naturalists", so it should serve the purpose of the new category.--ragesoss 19:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern, but "naturalist" is a pretty broad category (that is, Roosevelt - and certainly Carson - can legitimately be considered naturalists, even if Roosevelt wasn't a scientist, along with people like Ansel Adams, etc.), and along with "American environmentalists" and "American ecologists", it makes this category redundant. "Historical people of U.S. natural history" is also extremely awkward, and I don't think we really need a separate category for the handful of naturalists who weren't at least hyphenated-Americans and still were important for U.S. natural history. It's also not a very natural designation; by it's very nature the category invokes historical significance (people who have been significant to the study/appreciation/goverence of the U.S. natural environment), and it many cases it will hard to draw the line of who should be included. I feel it's better to keep it simple and include the appropriate existing categories in "Natural history of the United States".--ragesoss 20:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cat:Avifauna of Texas

Curious, what all goes in this category? I was considering adding the Greater Roadrunner to it but wasn't sure, since Category:Avifauna of Texas falls within Category:Avifauna of Southwestern United States, if its worth putting in that category? I'm not sure how the entire Fauna/Flora of ______ system works. drumguy8800 C T 22:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

and/or

In reverting an edit to the page Morph (zoology), you indicated that "It seems pretty clear why '...and/or...' was used here-....Putting and/or back in."

Perhaps you can explain to me what seems pretty clear about it? What seems pretty clear to me is that A OR B is True if A is True, B is True, OR A AND B are True. Please provide an example of a situation where A AND/OR B is True when A OR B is NOT True or, if you prefer, the converse.

Perhaps you find it more convenient to use the language of the article. Assume that species A is behaviourally distinct but not morphologically distinct from species B; this means that species A is behaviourally OR morphologically distinct from species B. Similarly, in the case where species A is not behaviourally distinct but is morphologically distinct from species B, we can say that species A is behaviourally OR morphologically distinct from species B. Finally, should it be that species A is behaviourally AND morphologically distinct from species B, we can see that species A is behaviourally OR morphologically distinct from species B. Can you not see that the OR condition includes the AND condition?

Please show me a possible construct where A AND/OR B conveys information that is not already included in A OR B.

For this reason, I maintain that the use of "and/or" is an abuse of the language and should be avoided. Of course, I am willing to be convinced otherwise. It's just that I can't fathom a case where "and/or" means something distinct from "or". If you can help me out in understanding why it seems so pretty clear to you, I'd be in your debt.

In the interim, I'm sure you'll understand why I shall revert that edit. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fluri (talk • contribs) 05:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Oops! Yeah, sorry, I forgot to sign that comment... Thanks, bot. :-) Dave 05:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aretalogy

Nice to see you still around. I saw aretalogy and thought of you. -- RHaworth 00:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Well, thanks much. And good luck in your work, which you obviously enjoy. Hmains 01:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Environment and natural history

You might want to look at the attempted discussion at Talk:Natural history which is about whether Natural History categories should be subcats of Environment categories or vise versa or something else. This started about U.S. states, but by extension is about all countries. Hmains 16:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black-throated Mango

I noticed your cats for this. Is Blue-throated an error, or have I overlooked something? Jimfbleak 14:39, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain Plover categories

Hi. You put Mountain Plover in three "endemic" categories—Endemic birds of the U.S. Rocky Mountains, Endemic birds of Plains-Midwest U.S., Endemic birds of the Southwestern United States—that are mutually exclusive. Also it's seldom found in the Rocky Mountains, and it's not even endemic to the U. S., as it's also found in Canada and Mexico. I'm removing those three categories, but what's going on? —JerryFriedman 02:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cross posted on WP-categories project

I notice you are busy adding birds of country x cats to bird articles and formatting so that they are listed on the category page by their type name; thus Blue-spotted Parrot comes under P and Yellow-rumped Fan-parrot comes under F. Why? is this some Wikipedia wide standard? Surely this doesn't aid in finding articles if you have to hunt unalphabetically for the article you want. Sabine's Sunbird talk 02:39, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Endemic

Please stop adding "endemic" categories that don't apply. "Endemic" means the species is found nowhere else but in that region. —JerryFriedman 17:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Red-capped Cardinal

Your amendment to this article read as if in South America it only occurred south of the Amazon, which cannot be what you intended since it is common in Venezuela and Colombia. I assume that you meant in Brazil, please correct if that is not what you meant. Jimfbleak 05:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added to the page Red-throated Caracara do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Oneiros 01:36, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that; I've reverted it. Are you related to User:71.227.26.32?--Oneiros 20:01, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Endemic birds of Alaska

Hi Mmcannis: I'm just letting you know that I've nominated this category for deletion, as only a single species (McKay's Bunting) qualifies as an Alaskan endemic. If you'd like to comment at the CfD, you can do so here. MeegsC | Talk 14:38, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Endemic birds of Canadian regions

Hi. I've just done the same for four categories such as "Endemic birds of Western Canada". Canada has no endemic birds at all. If you want to comment, please do so here. —JerryFriedman 05:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


AfD nomination of List of archaeological world treasures (major and minor)

List of archaeological world treasures (major and minor), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of archaeological world treasures (major and minor) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of archaeological world treasures (major and minor) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of archaeological world treasures (major and minor) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 00:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User page

It would be good if you could put a little about yourself (not too much) on your user page. It is not a home page, but it belongs to the wiki. Your user name always shows up as a red link, and can give they wrong impression that you are a new editor. Snowman (talk) 18:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am very appreciative of your hint/advice/suggestion. I have had to revert by name back to red a couple of times,.....and I use it so I can find my name more quickly. ...So I found that more important than any- -body knowing who I am. On the talk page,.... I kind of Have a List of some of the Nice things I have done. .. --Again, I thank you for the advice..(whenever I get a message, I always wonder: "Now what?"..) so I will at some time compose some UserINFO... I recently moved near a small ARBORETUM, and i.(sic) also recently made my first 3 plant pages. I have stayed away from it, because of the depth, or study, .. one has to do. But I have some ideas for developing a nice couple Arboretum pages... thanks again. Michael, SonoranDesert guyYUMA,AZ, ..Mmcannis (talk) 18:38, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that you can use the "nickname" (see "my preferences") to name some or part of the words of your name a different colour. The nickname should not take up too much space. Snowman (talk) 18:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Greetings

Wishing you the very best for the season - Guettarda 05:45, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Double-listing plants in flora categories

Please explain the rationale for putting common-name redirect pages into categories. If you want it to appear under the common name, you can always do a redirect on the article page. As it is, every page you do that to appears twice in the category.--Curtis Clark (talk) 04:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grave goods

I see you have a history of working on the article Grave goods. I am looking at it from the project Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles where it is one of the longest {{unreferenced}} tagged articles that does not meet at least the barest minimum of verifiability. It has been tagged and completely without references since June 2006. It would be extremely helpful if you had some references you could add to the article to help support its verifiability and notability. Thanks for any help you can give. BirgitteSB 19:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Defaultsort

Hi Michael: I know you do a lot of work categorizing biology articles, and I wondered if you'd come across the DEFAULTSORT template yet. It can save a lot of time (and typing!) when adding the same species to a numebr of categories. Instead of having to type the same thing over and over again, you can simply list the sort name once and it will be applied to all the categories which follow the template. See Least Grebe for an example. Here, I've put {{defaultsort|Grebe, Least}} at the start of the list of categories, and that order has been applied to every category that follows. I thought the template might come in handy for your ongoing efforts! MeegsC | Talk 12:57, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

barnstar

The Barnstar of Diligence
For your tireless efforts to improve the quality of bird articles, I award you this barnstar of Diligence. Keep up the good work! Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 02:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EA (el Amarna)

I've nominated this for deletion, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2008_May_26#EA_.28el_Amarna.29 Doug Weller (talk) 10:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eshnunna

I'm pretty sure that "within the first two centuries of the third millennium BC" would be from 3000 BC to 2800 BC (give or take one year based on your view of millennium).

Since Eshnunna reached it's height during the first babylonian empire, that would be like 2000 BC to 1700-ish (depending on when you set the 30th year of Hamurabis reign).

Ploversegg (talk) 23:39, 2 August 2008 (UTC)ploversegg[reply]

AfD nomination of Cagebird trade

I have nominated Cagebird trade, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cagebird trade. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Snowman (talk) 09:33, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well done on Trackway (disambiguation)

^ --mboverload@ 02:40, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Cariama

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Cariama, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Cariama has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Cariama, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muggins Mountains, et al

Thanks for your good work on fixing up the photo caption at this article -- and, while I'm at it, for your many contributions to the Lower Colorado River Valley articles. Best regards, Pete Tillman (talk) 01:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC), Rimrock AZ[reply]

Ankhnesneferibre

Strangely, you don't seem to have ever touched the Egyptian hieroglyphs article. So you probably did not see this image which appeared there briefly. Read down the second column from the left! I have memorialised the incident in this blog post.

As a total irrelevancy, I note a curious commonality between you and the hoaxer: you have both edited from sites which have grabbed more than a reasonable share of the limited pool of IP addresses! You edited from Yuma and the hoaxer edited from Ford Motors. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 03:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of sofer scribes

Hi, could you please explain to me the difference between a sofer and a sofer scribe? The Hebrew word sofer means scribe! Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 21:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I went ahead and cleaned out "Category:Sofer scribes" (maybe it even disappeared?) and added a new sub-category to "Category:Scribes", called "Category:Jewish scribes (soferim)". I also did a redirect from List of sofer scribes to List of sofers. You could check to see that I did it right. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:36, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 December 16#Lower Colorado River Valley flora categories Hesperian 06:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Greetings

Wishing you the very best for the season. Guettarda (talk) 07:30, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mexicali

The reason for inclusion of Mexicali (municipality) on the Yuma County article is that the municipality borders Yuma County. I'm not arguing that the city of Mexicali borders Yuma County, or even that it's nearby: but the municipality plainly is, as you can see from this map. If you're confused about the status of Mexican municipalities, as I was until a couple of days ago, read Municipalities of Mexico — you'll see that they're analogous to US counties. Nyttend (talk) 04:02, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bridgwater Bay

The wierd fishing sledge thing used in Bridgwater Bay is known as a mud HORSE so I have reverted your edit. I can see why you thought that might be a typo & I had to check it twice when I wrote it.— Rod talk 08:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Enuma Elish category

Can you please clarify what your intentions are with this? What is the point of Zodiac (Enuma Elish) being a redirect to Zodiac, seeing that the Enuma Elish isn't even mentioned there, nor is the Zodiac mentioned in the Enuma Elish article? It would be more helpful for you to expand the articles to include whatever it is you seem to think connects the two topics. Please also note the existence of Babylonian calendar, which may be a better redirect target. But as far as I can see the Babylonian calendar as reported in the article is a full millennium younger than the Enuma Elish epic. The burden would be on you to provide evidence of the form of the Zodiac at the time of the epic's composition. This may be connected with the Sumerian "Umma calendar", but we don't seem to have any references regarding that. --dab (𒁳) 18:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have figured it out now. As I suspected, the Enuma Elish predates the zodiac. King has chosen "stars of the Zodiac" in his translation for simplicity's sake, rendering lumashi, the name of a group of seven stars. See Babylonian zodiac. --dab (𒁳) 13:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Madrean sky islands graphic

You're right: User:Tom Radulovich asked for permission and posted the email to my Talk page (see User talk:Hike395/Archive 6#Madrean Sky Islands Image). I simply forgot about it after three years. I'm sorry. I've asked the admin at Commons to undelete the image (see Commons:User talk:MichaelMaggs), hopefully that will work. Thanks for pointing this out. —hike395 (talk) 05:01, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of tree species common to Cuba and Florida

I have nominated List of tree species common to Cuba and Florida, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tree species common to Cuba and Florida. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Vicenarian (T · C) 06:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KMT

Hey, I came across this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Ham.2C_son_of_Noah

Sounds like some is tryna change the meaning of KMT Keep an eye on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ham_(son_of_Noah) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_(hieroglyphic_%27km%27) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.10.104.191 (talk) 21:09, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And, horror of horrors, they are replacing references to Budge to references to Gardiner and using Gardiner to update articles. Dougweller (talk) 16:38, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dream Stele

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dream Stele, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/tuthmosis4.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some general wonderings

At Talk:Mul.Apin. BTW, should we move Mul.Apin to MUL.APIN according to your opinion? ... said: Rursus (mbork³) 18:37, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

You can't unilaterally remove a deletion tag from a category once the discussion has started. Please contribute your thoughts at the respective CFDs if you think those categories should be maintained. Cheers, Postdlf (talk) 21:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you've been adding Category:North American restricted-range endemic bird species to articles and categories that are already in its subcategories. Please keep articles and categories in the most specific subcategories only, as it just makes a mess otherwise. I've been trying to clean up the fauna categories, starting with the U.S. ones, and there's a lot of consolidation and cleanup that has to be done to make it a comprehensive, workable system. I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. Postdlf (talk) 21:39, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canadian restricted-range endemic bird species

Why not just name it Category:Endemic birds of Canada? Naturally any bird only found within Canada has a range restricted therein. Or am I missing something that the extra verbiage clarifies? Postdlf (talk) 21:42, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I figured this one out. Postdlf (talk) 16:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But on further investigation... So "restricted-range" means less than 50,000 sq km according to Endemism in birds. You created this category for one species so far, the Newfoundland Crossbill. But the distribution map linked to from the article shows it has a broad range from coast to coast; its range across all of British Columbia alone would be 944,735 sq km (the total area of that province). So this means the category is now empty. You also included Lesser Prairie Chicken in the North America-level restricted-range category, even though the first external link cites its range as over 100,000 sq km. This makes me wonder what your basis is for adding the restricted-range categories to any bird species, if these are so plainly wrong. Postdlf (talk) 20:26, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Native birds of Canadian Prairies Canada

I have nominated Category:Native birds of Canadian Prairies Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Native birds of Canadian Prairies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:46, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Native birds of the Canadian Prairies

The category has gone through a name change and can be found at Category:Native birds of the Canadian Prairies; it is the twin to the other category for the Great Plains of the U.S. and Canada, Category:Native birds of the Plains-Midwest (United States). (author of ....from the SonoranDesert, USA-Arizona)Mmcannis (talk) 02:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Hurricanes and tropical depressions of the Gulf of California

I have nominated Category:Hurricanes and tropical depressions of the Gulf of California (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tonto Basin

Proposed deletion of Little Picacho Wilderness flora

The article Little Picacho Wilderness flora has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Egypt, and "Egyptian hieroglyphs"

You made great work on pages about Rahotep and his wife. Do you some expert for ancient history, Egypt,or just you like that stuff?--Mychele (talk) 15:40, 10 June 2010 (UTC) As I can see, you likes lists.--Mychele (talk) 17:18, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ediacara biota

Thanks for the copyedits. However, I'm removing your

"Since all of Earth's present taxa were formed in the Cambrian Explosion, with no survivors from the Ediacara incorporated into it, an assumption about DNA-, or genetic-evolution should explain this. McMenamin's claim for lack of an embryonic stage doesn't address reproduction, gametes, or animals vs. plants, but the lack of embryonic stages, and DNA replication in genetic-evolution may have been solved in the Cambrian, though why it multiplied into the multipicity of forms, is probably more explained by genetic evolution, since no taxa were ever added later. Ecological niches filled rapidly with macroorganisms, but even the 'ecological niche' of the DNA, had been filled-(addition of "embryonic growth").[citation needed] Thus, with an evolution in DNA replication, 'embryonic forms' may have been incorporported into the biological life cycles, of all, or most of Earth's taxa.[citation needed]"

as it's uncited (WP:V) "all of Earth's present taxa were formed in the Cambrian Explosion, with no survivors from the Ediacara" is wrong - Kimberella was a bilaterian, and possibly an early mollusc or sister of the ancestral mollusc - see cites at Kimberella. --Philcha (talk) 06:20, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of flora (LCRV-picturesEZ)

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of flora (LCRV-picturesEZ), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of flora (LCRV-picturesEZ) (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rkitko (talk) 01:46, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Location maps

I noticed your comment at User talk:Hmains regarding maps and locator dots. The issue you've found is one of those things I've never really wanted to dive into. Have you considered fixing the maps? I think that can be done by regular editors. If you look at {{Location map USA Arizona}}, you'll see the coordinates specified for it. If those coordinates are wrong, what do you figure might happen? Edit it to see what's actually going on. I suspect you can fix it, or other maps, if you can figure out what the proper numbers should be. - Denimadept (talk) 22:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chama, New Mexico

Why are you adding an admittedly inaccurate map that adds nothing to the article, since we already have a map of where the village is? --Golbez (talk) 14:53, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Um. Right. So why are you making a point by readding a map you yourself say is inaccurate? --Golbez (talk) 15:29, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a problem with the maps (and the problem does appear valid), bring it up somewhere. Don't make dozens of edits just to make a point. You've been here long enough, you should know that. --Golbez (talk) 16:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Granite Wash Mountains

I thought I had got GeoBox's built-in locator map working. What is the problem with the pushpin dots? --Stepheng3 (talk) 02:25, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Nubayrah Stele" or the "Damanhour stele"

I have continued to do further research in this area as it relates to the Rosetta Stone.

In your article on the Nubayrah Stele you referenced an Egyptian Museum number for it. So I did a search in the literature for anything from the Egyptian Museum with that number.

I found an article in JSTOR called "The Great Temenos of Naukratis" (from the Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt, Vol. 31, (1994), pp. 99-113), and on page 103 is the following paragraph:

Petrie and Griffith "heard in the winter of 1884 that a large inscribed stone had been found in the north-east part of the Great Temenos, and taken away" to Bulaq. This was the limestone 'Damanhour stela', Cairo JE 22264/CG 22188, fromerly Bulaq 5576, dated to Year 23 of Ptolemy V Epiphanes (182 B.C.), but inscribed with what seems to be an imperfect copy of the hieroglyphic text of the Rosetta decree of Year 9 of Ptolemy V (196 B.C.).

So my original guess on the RS talk page that it went under a different name fits. Note that the old "Bulaq" number is from the beginning of the 20th century, and that a new number (and name) ought to be referenced instead.

So there may be a good argument for renaming the article to the "Damanhour stele". I can certainly find more reliable references when using this name to search than on "Nubayrah Stele". Indeed, your source (from Budge again) on the Museum reference number actually says:

A large portion of the missing lines of the hieroglyphic text can be restored from a stele discovered in 1898 at Damanhur in the Delta (Hermopolis Parva), and now in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo (No. 5576)

...so "Damanhur" comes up again, perhaps suggesting that it was beginning to be better known under that name (there is no reference at all to "Nubayrah Stele" in that book you referenced, just this one. I checked).

All of this underlines my concerns about basing your work off a single source (you reference other publications, but only ever cite the works by Budge, which suggests you haven't actually read the other sources).

Forgive me, I am being critical of your approach, but I hope you understand that I am only doing so to seek clarity on the subject. Cheers! Captmondo (talk) 10:31, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: svg Map use in the "Geobox" template-(ARIZONA)

I use Google Earth to get the approximate latitude and longitude of the edges of the map. The ratio is height in pixels divided by width in pixels (I think - might be the other way around). Almost all of the .png state locator maps have already been calibrated. Be aware that different computers and monitors will shift the red dot by a few pixels in different directions. I usually only tweak if the dot is pretty far off. I will be glad to help on a specific problem, though I am busy and it may take me a few days. Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:38, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coyote Mountains Wilderness

Hi, now that you've made Coyote Mountains Wilderness into a disambiguation page, could you help clean up the links that now point to the disambig per WP:FIXDABLINKS? Thanks, --JaGatalk 11:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much! I'd say your template edit took care of the majority of links; we can clean up the rest. Cheers! --JaGatalk 14:02, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amarna/Execration texts

The following discussion may interest you: Execration_text_places --Sreifa (talk) 04:54, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain Zone as a reference

Thanks for creating the Fra Cristobal Range article. Please be advised that mountainzone.com is not a reliable reference. While they often have correct information, usually directly from the United States Geological Survey, they often have very suspect information, for example see their entry for "Endicott Mountains" in Alaska. Montainzone.com does not have adequate editorial review. Peakbagger.com is better, it does do editorial review. Overall, it is much better to cite to United States Geological Survey sources directly. Take a look, for example, at GNIS. --Bejnar (talk) 22:36, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"archaeological corpus"

re Category:Archaeological corpora, Category:Archaeological corpora documents

Please stop inventing terms. The term "archaeological corpus" exists, but it doesn't mean what you think you mean. If you do not have a solid background or education in a subject, you would do well to verify things before plunging into editing. If this sounds curt, please remember that I have asked you before to stop creating random categories in Ancient Near East topics. --dab (𒁳) 13:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When(YEARS LATER) I have to add oil lamp (an 'archeological corpus') to Category:Archaeological artefact types, ...somebody needs to go to school, and I know who they are...(Not all 'archeological artefacts' are a corpus, but some ARE...) the Oil lamps are a type of 'corpus'...i.e. ..."a body of 'works' .."....so ...who else should explain this to you?... (If I can't?)...(from the SonoranDesert, ArizonaUSA)..Mmcannis (talk) 13:50, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(AND,...I see somebody finally put MUL.APIN back where it came from.. If you want to work on something original, go work on the Sumerograms, etc., etc.,)... Mmcannis (talk) 13:55, 13 October 2010 (UTC)–(try EDIN (sumerogram))Mmcannis (talk) 14:10, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't claim to Know anything, or be "Right" about anything,... I am here, and I try.. But one truth is...sometimes you know that things are not right, and that something else should be there.. (It's related to a concept in logic) of "NOT-this"... assuming that the "This" when found, is closer to what we are looking for.. the ridiculous "Wiki-Merging"..(almost ridiculous) will never end. ..Eventually....differentiation and integration will yield equal amounts of articles, requesting differentiating into appropriate articles.... (end)..Mmcannis (talk) 14:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of New York Mountains north divide

See: User_talk:Mmcannis/Archives/Archive 10.1


Edits in conflict with User:Hike796

See: User_talk:Mmcannis/Archives/Archive 10.1


Great Basin Divide, in Nevada

See: User_talk:Mmcannis/Archives/Archive 10.1


Sockpuppetry case

See: User_talk:Mmcannis/Archives/Archive 10.1

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/US40AL-01 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Good Ol’factory (talk) 05:12, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Valleys of Nevada

See: User_talk:Mmcannis/Archives/Archive 10.1


Black Rock Desert region-northwest Nevada & California border listed at Redirects for discussion

See: User_talk:Mmcannis/Archives/Archive 10.1


Lake Mead-Lower Colorado River Watershed-(northwest-section) on the Nevada-Utah border listed at Redirects for discussion

See: User_talk:Mmcannis/Archives/Archive 10.1


Category:Introduced species sites

See: User_talk:Mmcannis/Archives/Archive 10.1


Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Colorado coordinates svg in border states - 50 state svg error

Category:Colorado coordinates svg in border states - 50 state svg error, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:54, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Desert flora

Your idea for recreating Category:Flora of the Mojave Desert seems a good one. I must have bumped into the 'deleted cat. notice' when creating/naming Category:Flora of the California desert regions, as otherwise that is too vague. Currently some of the Mojave endemic plants are in Category:Natural history of the Mojave Desert. I'm slow to recreate old one until find out why it was deleted. The Jepson Manual is my main Calif. flora research resource.---cheers---Look2See1 t a l k → 18:09, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Las Vegas Valley (landform)

Isn't this a basin and not a valley? Vegaswikian (talk) 19:56, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of How to Read Egyptian Hieroglyphs

The article How to Read Egyptian Hieroglyphs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Nuujinn (talk) 18:42, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Seven-dots glyph for deletion (withdrawn)

The article Seven-dots glyph is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven-dots glyph until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 15:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what's going on, when I did this my search for "seven dots" failed. I just had an inspiration and realised I probably used the word 'glyph' in my search, after all, it's in the title. And lo and behold, that was the problem. Anyway, I've withdrawn the nomination. Dougweller (talk) 19:16, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rimush, post Manishtushu Obelisk

Thank you for editing-editinig(sic) Rimush, and Happy new year! Did we meet-met(sic) here? Are you the guy with a great knowledge of hieroglyphs?--Mychele (talk) 18:55, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have concluded that you are very good with translation and transliteration of hieroglyphs. Can you please translate me this name - Kekheretnebti?--Mychele (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.119.27 (talk) 08:52, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fit like min (what like man)

Hi there, just thought I'd post a quick thank you for all your efforts tidying up after me lately. Much appreciated. Been an honour editing with you sir! Let me know if you ever need any help with anything. Latest of mine that probably needs loads of corrections is Gudea cylinders. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 21:20, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to P. Bedson, (now an "honorary Sumerian, etc")

I will try to be succinct, (not necessarily short):

  1. --I love editting. I only fix a typo, or an edit if I want an article on my watch list. 98 percent are still on my watch list.
  2. --at work once a compatriot had a hard copy, about 7 paragraphs of a hugely technical computer/ sound-(acoustic)/ software-trailer-mounted system for "scoring" a sound-produced event. (think weapons). The first paragraph was one sentence about 10 technical ideas strung together, about 5 sentences worth. I made 2 minor edits for the following 6 paragraphs, but I looked at my buddy, and said-(for para 1)... I get this with these edits to the mid paragraph point.... but from there i am lost. He said, yeah, i know.... I never looked at the final copy, but the Trailer appeared some years later.
  3. --Edits to me, are like the BIG S, in Greek the Sigma-(i.e. Smmation: minor ones added to Major ones): I start at the first sentence, or words, and just continue...(or at midpoint, then go back to Start Point) and continue to the end. For the Song of the hoe, I didn't press SAVE, until between iteration 10 to 20, maybe about the 15th point, I added the last comma, or whatever.
  4. --A quick look at the Gudea cylinders appears to confirm that: Graham Hancock... (his books, follow-on ideas) about the 'star alignments, with buildings is proof from the cylinders that the Great Pyramids,.. are (obviously, (by Deductive Observation, (reasoning), etc)), the three stars of Orion's Belt. (I will never read his books, though I turned pages in them. As with wikipedia, I seldom read EVERY article I edit.) (time)... (I assume Hancock wasn't the FIRST-person)
  5. --I consider ALL of WIKIPEDIA, personal RESEARCH. all of the REF's are irrelevant (to me). Planet Earth-H. Sapies-humanitarium, is still coming out of the Dark Ages (of Religion, and fool-hardy interpretaions of our smarts)
  6. --Paul, please explain the title on my talk page: (if you care to): == Fit like min (what like man) ==. I'm smart, (but not clairvoyant-smart)(I have only one guess what it means)
  7. --I used to order the book at the Bookstore (B. & Noble), and have a shelf (1/4th filled with books on Egypt-(at the store), ...that I had at home). (the favorite was the (book), with the (now famous, color) Dashur-necklace encircling the 5 Hieroglyph-based small, miniature "pendants" where 1 of 5 was upside down. To view, the book had to be rotated 180 deg.).. (it's the Hotep "tablet", with hieroglyphs sitting on it instead).. (these are all beautifil, colorful, stone-inlaid pendants)
  8. Charles R. Pellegrino's book from some years ago, Return to Sodom and Gomorah-(I read most of it once-(or twice): uses the term riverworlds referring to the Nile Egypt, and the Tigris-Euphrates-World... It explains why the cultures began at the same starting points.. (water), it also explains why they are so dramatically different in their typology, cosmology, etc. (Not Pellegrino's explanation: but using the term, easily defines the history from about 5500 BC to the Greek-Roman World time)

These are just 'notes to self', and as I started editting some of your articles, I knew you'd be examining my edits.... For what it is worth, on Wikipedia Commons I created, first: Category:Hieroglyphs on meda, then Category:Cuneiform on media. The Gudea cylinders photos have been there at least 2-3 years-(Category:Hieroglyphs on clay cylinders-(or whatever the cat name is).... And I had to go to commons to make the Cat: Category:Hieroglyphs of Egypt (check the Category:Meteor hieroglyph, and look at the stele in the Louvre).. that categorizing of Photos was needed before I worked on the Category:Egyptian hieroglyphs-Gardiner listed. Till later... (floating along in my own 'Edin')
And...thanks for giving me "grist for the mill", and how many more topics are on the clay tablets (it is pretty much endless, part of my quote: "you can't teach, what you don't know")... [from the HOT-108-to-114-Deg-3 weeks-more) SonoranDesert-ArizonaUSA-... Mmcannis (talk) 06:57, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Mmcannis, Fit like min is a traditional Scottish way of saying "hello". I just saw the "Mc" in your name there and assumed some common ancestry somewhere ;-) Will have to go read a bit more about riverworlds so thanks for that. I have no problem with any of your edits. They all look great to me and am just very pleased to have some assistance helping our race out of your concept of the Dark Ages, which is something else we share a world view about. Hope the sun doesn't get too hot for you there. From the far more mild and changeable Plymouth, U.K. skies. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 13:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Native birds of Southwestern Canada

Category:Native birds of Southwestern Canada, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:38, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Economic texts = Text corpus?

I have noticed that you have made several valuable and constructive edits to the Kassite king articles I have been developing, for which I thank you. I also note that you have added a link to the phrase "economic texts" to the page marked "text corpus" which I do not understand. When using the term "economic texts" I have tried to cite some examples, e.g. shopping receipts, records of tax collections, etc., to try to better elucidate what the term really means in terms of the analysis of cuneiform tablets. The link seems to be even more vague.BigEars42 (talk) 19:41, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You.
I first have to say: – I'm the creator of the Category:Clay tablets, and the cat I just created for it: Category:Ancient Near and Middle East clay objects-(Plus the WikiCommons categories). I previously worked on the Amarna letters and the three cats I created for it. It was an intense 8-week effort, at the end of which I googled all visible Amarna EA letters. One photo I had to do a "reproduction" of. It was the reverse side of a letter -(the continuation of the letter's topic), and the only real word I found was Ha Na T N, for the now article Hannathon-((8 characters in the line, last 4 for HaNaThoN)). (It was on the Bible, archaeology list)--(I also created the category: Category:Kudurru boundary stones in one intense weekend.)(Googled)(Note: as a Novice, I had worked on 10-to 20- to 40 different EA letters, about 15-30 with Answers (translations), over about 3 years, intermixed with the Epic of Gilgamesh translations where I ended up with 3 photos of 3 sections of the 12 tablets. Middle, then tablet I, then tablet XI.)
The text corpus stuff was just a reference to the text corpus of an archive, document hoard, "library", cache, in this case the clay tablets. One of the articles you just referred to....mentioned, I think a 7-year extent-(time period) for the clay letter corpus-(A timestamped event: 7 years, is one definition for a corpus)..... So, I'll send you a note on your talk page that I've commmented. (And...... I believe the ONLY real truth written, is in Egyptian hieroglyphs, Cuneiform, tablets, and steles, or stone inscriptions, or other 'royal objects', or 'non-Royal', 'populist objects'. I know other archaeological languages can be trusted (the oldest Greek), but as you know, so much gets re-Written, or re-Interpreted. (From the SononanDesert, ArizonaUSA)--....Mmcannis (talk) 03:15, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I liked the improvements you made to the Enlil-nirari article, especially the link, but noticed you deleted the ṭ (t with a dot under it) from Aššur-uballiṭ, making him sound like an Italian instead of an Assyrian! I was wondering if the "ṭ" was rendering correctly on your screen. Unlike that article, one that I am entirely guilty of is the Ilī-padâ one (you should see a hat over the last "a"). Please feel free to fix my atrocious grammar. I desperately need an editor.BigEars42 (talk) 22:42, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for copy edits

Thanks for the copy edits at Portia schultzi. --Philcha (talk) 19:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Mmcannis! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Libyan Palette

I could move the photo, but I don't think it is a free image. There are several copies on the internet (eg [1]) - I believe it is scanned from a book. I suspect the page relating to the image on amharic wiki says that, but as it just looks like a bunch of squiggles to me too, I don't know for certain. A non-free image would not be acceptable on the English Wikipedia, assuming the object still exists in a museum somewhere, and it would be possible to get a free-licence photo of it. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:10, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Chino Valley (Arizona), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pinyon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was on a mission of filling articles into the new category (I created) Category:Prescott National Forest-(responding to efforts by User_talk:Jllm06 in his categorizing of Arizona articles).
I assume only one species of Pinyon dominates the Chino Valley (Arizona), but one species is at least found in northwest Arizona and Nevada and states around Nevada. (The Chino Valley species is the Colorado/New Mexico/Arizona/etc. species)—Another (1/or 2) species may be in Arizona, in the southeast, possibly the Mexico-region-species. So the link to 'Pinyon' was to get somebody/searching to the various species, or a discussion thereof.
An article for Pine trees of Arizona would have a subsection for the Pine trees of Arizona#Pinyons and their state regions.Mmcannis (talk) 19:59, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Canyon Mountains

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Canyon Mountains, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.summitpost.org/trout-creek-mountains/511954.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Cricket Mountains, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Rock, Utah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

San Pitch Mountains, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:30, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Surprise Valley (Modoc County, California), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eagleville, California and Lake City, California (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Grass Valley (Pershing County), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grass Valley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Rush Valley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cedar Valley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Sevier Desert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Rock, Utah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Las Vegas Valley (landform) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Las Vegas Valley (landform) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Las Vegas Valley (landform) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dianna (talk) 01:11, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Mogollon Plateau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Long Lake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nazi-Maruttash inscription photo

I noticed that the cuneiform seemed to be back to front. Are you sure its upside down and not just a mirror image? Should we check with User:Jastrow who took the picture before messing around with it?BigEars42 (talk) 16:24, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nazi-Maruttash inscription, at the Louvre, France.
(Some possible, probable cuneiform signs)
Line 2, last sign: Aš (cuneiform),
Line 4: First sign looks like I (cuneiform)-(alphabetic i), (but probably is NOT-?), 2nd sign looks like Ma (cuneiform),
Line 5: the last sign appears to be the sign for god, Dingir, (and is Star-shaped-!)-(Historically, many varieties(?)),
(Line 3, first sign may also be ma (cuneiform))

Today, late August, 2013;
back in 2012: I discovered "anybody" can rotate the image, so the image has been rotated since late 2012(?). (Peace & Accountability (Unknown in Amerika today, by sycophants, (of both party-persuasions) Chaos is reigning.... "SEND MORE FOOD"-(i.e. (don't address the ISSUE(issues))))--from HOT, SONORAN-Desert, SWest Arizona, USA Mmcannis (talk) 15:08, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bird terminology

Category:Bird terminology, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brad7777 (talk) 14:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abimilku for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abimilku is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abimilku until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mdann52 (talk) 15:30, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

R.azz.miligi

Please look at User talk:R.azz.miligi#Nefertiti and possibly glance at User:R.azz.miligi/sandbox and its history. Then, if you think it is worth doing so, leave the guy a few words of advice. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:28, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But one

Actually it's British English for the predecessor of the predecessor. I don't know the American term. Perhaps you do?BigEars42 (talk) 23:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In fact I'm an expat in New York City. BigEars42 (talk) 00:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Late Oct-2012, Hittite use + Egyptology, and Homo sapiens religiosum (User talk Hmains)

(For 2 Wiki users) - Pharaoh Name - [ Neb Kheper Ra ]. I'll send this response to you and User_talk:R.azz.miligi.-(never sent) I just looked at the sandbox history you suggested.

The only item of interest to me, was the Hittite reference to the individual pharaoh named Nibhururia (letter sent to him), with the Hittite spelling for the pharaoh of Nibhururia. or Nib hur-r -ria.

Many pharaohs used as one of their 5-names: Neb-Kheper-Ra. I can't speak for the various spellings of the name by the Hittites, (in probably more than one reference), but here, Neb Kheper Ra, is the Egyptian hieroglyphs.

V30L1N5(King created(of the) sun(god))

What is more important-----an individual, a person has to study or know the source material. A translation will not do. After one studies, or learns Egyptian hieroglyphs, a student of (E. hieroglyphs) is forced to learn the 1350-1335 BC Amarna letters, written in the pre-Arabic, Akkadian language, and "Canaanite", (the Akkadian being the lingua franca, the correspondent, official language, for scribes).

Neb-Kheper-Ra means Lord-Transforming-Ra, King-Transforming-Sun. (In cuneiform lord is a different word than King. In the Amarna letters the Pharaoh is referred to as King-Lord-mine, then Gods-mine, Sun-god-mine, etc.) So... Lord/King-Transformed-Sun is something along the lines of: King-Manifested-(of)-Ra, King, Manifested of The SunGod. The later Greeks, the Ptolemies of Egypt used the word "manifest" as the word "epiphany", the thing that "appears", and in hieroglyphs using the walking feet

O1
D21
D54

----, now used (partially incorrectly) in Wikipedia as epiphany (feeling). It is more an Epiphany (ideation), an Idea appearing, arising in the Mind.

I personally do NOT participate in the Big G, God, or small "god", but it was used in Egyptian hieroglyphs, and cuneiform, and is part of HUMAN history. I also don't partake of the religion game of Agnosticism, or Atheism. I am more a member of Homo sapiens sapiens, not the more common, Homo sapiens religiosum. And the Common Man, or Common Woman, in all cultures, eventually in thier personal lives, or at times in their lives, leave H. sapiens religiosum, to become H. sapiens sapiens, part of a lot of people, crowds of common people, the "citizens"-(also represented in hieroglyphs, in more than one word; the 2nd script on the Rosetta Stone is the "citizen script" of Demotic Egyptian), the common man. (Thanks Ron; this helps me understand my last 6 months understanding of the H. sapiens religiosum; I now see the part related to the "Common Man")-Cheers to all....(signed to User_talk:Hmains, late October)

Adding a message posting, Late October, for the Homo sapiens religiosum discussion, which answered a question, (I had been having for 6 months)...--Mmcannis (talk) 05:28, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Kudurru of Meli-Šipak"

I was going to suggest "Land grant to Marduk-apla-iddina kudurru", but unfortunately my draft is only around half done. This is because Meli-Šipak never names Marduk-apla-iddina as his son, only his servant, leaving the tempting possibility that either Marduk-apla-iddina was not his successor, or that his successor was not his son.

You had caught me unawares as I had nothing prepared for this kudurru, my efforts being currently devoted to the "Land grant to Munnabittu kudurru" (i.e. the Marduk-apla-iddina I one with 47 god names) and the "Prebend to Puzru kudurru" (Nazi-Maruttash).

You might look to compare the Kudurru of Gula and Nazimaruttaš kudurru stone as these also seem to describe the same object, ironically a kudurru-copy of the era of Marduk-apla-iddina I, a period which seems to have favored Gula as a divine image. The god of healing exhorted perhaps because of the bronze age collapse which was unfolding. Here there are two other kudurrus featuring Gula, for example this one, which has nothing else to provide its name as the inscription is degraded. Perhaps the "Kudurru of Gula" name could be recycled? BigEars42 (talk) 22:54, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bidahochi Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Juan River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wescogame Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eolian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You For Your Copy-Editing

Hi, Thank you for taking the time and trouble to copy-edit the Bass Formation, Cardenas Lava, and Hakatai Shale articles. Your efforts are well appreciated.Paul H. (talk) 03:17, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Amarna letters authors

Category:Amarna letters authors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 05:58, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dox Formation Outcrop Map

As you commented on, I agree that a map of the Dox Formation / Unkar Group in the Grand Canyon is needed. I am thinking about one. Unfortunately, either making one or finding one that does not violate copyright will take time. Currently, I am both looking through USGS publications and thinking about what it would take to draft one. Paul H. (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clover Valley Nevada

This valley is "not" H-shaped. The portion you interpreted to be the "eastern half" is a completely separate valley, Independence Valley. It even is signed on Interstate 80: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kenlund/2378610819/

I have therefore removed all references to the "eastern half" and its supposed "H-shape". Famartin (talk) 13:23, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to TI (cuneiform) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • :(other city-governors: "17. who, are with me 18. are not 'performing' (doing) 19. as I. They are not

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:32, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to TI (cuneiform) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • :(other city-governors: "17. who, are with me 18. are not 'performing' (doing) 19. as I. They are not
  • curving bottom of [[clay tablet]]; most of tablet in focus; high resolution, expandible photo])

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Amarna letter EA 19 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:16, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TI (cuneiform), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Megiddo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ru (cuneiform) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Hittite and Amurru
Ir (cuneiform) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Megiddo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Amarna letter EA 9 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • and salutory Paragraph I, highlights, ''peace'' (šalāmu-''shu-[[ul (cuneiform)|ul]]-mu''} for King Burnaburiash, and wishes ''peace, and well-being'' to the Pharaoh, and on the many
  • [http://ib205.tripod.com/budge.html 3 el-Amarna letters: EA 26-([[Tushratta]]), EA 147-(Abimilku)-{'''Obverse'''), and a EA 34 (from King of [[Alashiya]]) ]; [http://www.egiptomania.com/historia/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aš (cuneiform) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[File:Amarna letter mp3h8879.jpg|--->
  • ] to Pharaoh, with usage of cuneiform ''aš'' in the spelling of ''šapāru'', "to send in writing)" (two locations in letter, line 18 obverse, line 52 reverse). <br>(high resolution, expandible

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:22, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ne (cuneiform), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Old Babylonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of flora of the Lower Colorado River Valley

Nomination of List of flora of the Lower Colorado River Valley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of flora of the Lower Colorado River Valley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of flora of the Lower Colorado River Valley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thank you. -Tortie tude (talk) 07:21, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lady of the Lions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dinger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Amarna letter EA 19 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Old Babylonian
U (cuneiform) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Old Babylonian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amarna letter EA 365, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Megiddo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Amarna letter EA 161 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • -[[ni (cuneiform)|Ni]]-[[i (cuneiform)|I]])'''. My lord, I was residing in''' '''''[[Tunip]],'''''-([[URU (city (Sumerogram)|URU]]-[[tu (cuneiform)|Tu]]-[[ni (cuneiform)|Ni]]-[[ib (cuneiform)|iP]]) ''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:04, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to U (cuneiform) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [clay tablet]] letter follows on (this)-reverse side (one line needed as 'final line' on an edge). (2nd use of conjunction '''u''', ''and...'', at start of line 8 (1st character at left.) <br>(high
  • * Cuneiform-'''[[di (cuneiform|di]]'''--Sign No. '''3'''---[[Image:C+B-Babylonia-CuneiformImage15.PNG|100x24px|]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:42, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
This is to thank you for your work on the Amarna letters, which I found enriching, interesting and very agreeable to read! Keep up your good work! Iry-Hor (talk) 19:02, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ù (cuneiform) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • , [[Image:C+B-Persia-Cuneiform10.PNG|100x24px|]], mostly used for a conjunction, and ''numeral 10''), is also substitued for the "alphabetic u".
  • [[Endaruta]]), has an atypical variant, but the entire letter has somewhat unique cuneiform signs. (gáb(káp)-(4 uses), tá, variant of [[um (cuneiform)|um]] (=''ṭup'', also in the letter, for "[[clay

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ka (cuneiform) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Na (cuneiform), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Old Babylonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monitor Range, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horst (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Native birds of the Pacific region U.S.

Category:Native birds of the Pacific region U.S., which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BDD (talk) 19:52, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Temple Butte Limestone may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ** 1-[[Tapeats Sandstone]] (~544-~530_

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Folded cloth (s hieroglyph) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • S<br>(vert)<br>'''[[S-vertical (hieroglyph)|S (folded)]]'''<br>'''[[S-vertical (hieroglyph)|cloth)]]'''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:36, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Flora of the Great Basin desert region

Category:Flora of the Great Basin desert region, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Rkitko (talk) 01:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Birds of Suriname

Category:Birds of Suriname, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 19:39, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Newborn calf (hieroglyph) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Note: On the Palermo Stone all the hieroglyphs face in the other direction (Gardiner signs are only facing left, on the stone they face right (reading right-to-left). The

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 10 (hieroglyph) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ''A List of Hieroglyphic Characters: '''''Strokes and Doubtful Objects''''', p. cxlvii.</ref> (now in Gardiner's list as V19 and Aa19 <hiero>V19..Aa19</hiero>. (Budge shows a 3rd variety.)</div>
  • in a few of the King Year-Registers that record: "date" (month & days), or especially Row VI (of the VI rows on the ''Palermo Piece'' (of the 7&mdash;piece stone), where accounting of fowl,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:27, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bread bun (hieroglyph), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Mmcannis! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:21, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Birds of Gibraltar

Category:Birds of Gibraltar, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 20:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Natural history of the Caribbean by island

Category:Natural history of the Caribbean by islands has also been proposed for upmerging, see discussion here. – Fayenatic London 19:10, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ARAD (servant Sumerogram), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hittite. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
For your dedication in creating a series of cuneiform sign articles. Great work! - Cwobeel (talk) 03:02, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A (cuneiform), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Old Assyrian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2640s BC

A tag has been placed on Category:2640s BC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Fayenatic London 15:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep creating content on important topics, you are making a great contribution Flat Out talk to me 02:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amarna letter EA 86, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pitati. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Bouse and Centennial Wash landforms

The article List of Bouse and Centennial Wash landforms has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unclear why this group of landforms should have its own list article, or what the contents of the article actually mean.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Owl (hieroglyph), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Psamtik. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of valleys of the Lower Colorado River Valley
added a link pointing to Bajada
Rice Valley
added a link pointing to Bajada

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
Dear Mmcannis, thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Fortification Hill. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 23:05, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Thanks for the Barnstar

Dear User:Mmcannis, you're very welcome! I hope that you're enjoying the warm weather there! With regards, AnupamTalk 23:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grand Wash Cliffs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Big Sandy River and Painted Desert. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of flora of the LCRV (birdwatching) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of flora of the LCRV (birdwatching) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of flora of the LCRV (birdwatching) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DexDor (talk) 17:56, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gardiner's sign list for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gardiner's sign list is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gardiner's sign list until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  10:12, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Geobox locator Texas svg

Template:Geobox locator Texas svg has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grapheme entries

Please, please stop creating article pages about individual graphemes. This is entirely within the scope of Wiktionary, where your contributions will be very welcome and perfectly adequate. With your current approach you are creating a giant backlog of content to be moved to Wikitionary. In rare cases, where individual graphemes may indeed satisfy WP:NOTE, please pay attention and check if your article already exists. E.g. your An (cuneiform) is a cfork of Dingir, which is the existing page on the exact same grapheme. General information on the grapheme itself belongs on the corresponding Wiktionary page, in this case wikt:𒀭. --dab (𒁳) 10:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mmcannis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Regions of Northern Mexico has been nominated for discussion

Category:Regions of Northern Mexico, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpbT 13:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Forgotten article - List of Pará rivers by confluence ?

Hi Mmcannis.

I refer you to the article List of Pará rivers by confluence you created in 2007. This seems to have been forgotten since then, and has remained orphaned since then, and also with no inline references. Do you want to keep it? If so, please advise, and it needs a bit of work and linking in somewhere. If not, please advise an I will initiate a deletion process.

Eno Lirpa (talk) 13:40, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Birds of Cordillera Neovolcanica Mexico has been nominated for discussion

Category:Birds of Cordillera Neovolcanica Mexico, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 10:52, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mmcannis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Palermo Stone hieroglyphs

A tag has been placed on Category:Palermo Stone hieroglyphs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT go beyond 18:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

birds of the Madrean Sky Islands

I've been working my way through the (massive) WP:Birds cleanup listing, trying to resolve some of the longterm issues, and today came across the list of birds of the Madrean Sky Islands, which Postdlf tells me was created from a deleted category you had created. (The category was deleted in 2009, and the article was created to preserve its contents). Did you get the information about which species were found in the Madrean Sky Islands from somewhere, or are they your personal observations? If the former, can you please provide a reference? Otherwise, the article is likely to be deleted. MeegsC (talk) 17:02, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've spent a fair bit of time in Arizona myself! Unfortunately, while you may be right about the species you've included in the list of birds of the Madrean Sky Island article, without references it's original research, which isn't appropriate for the encyclopedia. Do you think you can find sources for the species on the list? MeegsC (talk) 21:29, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I only did it as a learning experience. I made categories for Central and South America. Somebody recently (a few years ago) completed my categorizing of regions for South American birds, by doing the Andean, and dividing it into Central, Northern, and Southern. I presently am more interested in the Amarna letters, as I have already entered about 25, ((( of 380 ))), and find their implications (in Human history)----- beyond profound. As humans are still doing what they (we) have always been doing... (and we are taking it to other planetoids). The world is learning --- but most people have no time to learn the truth about anything).. I have been delayed by health, and a change of priorities. There are interesting philosophies:--- Robert Frost "Education by presence", and Apache indian philosophy "I am what I do".... I have had little time to be on the computer. ( I am proud of the things I got started---- Wikipedia,,,, is quite a human project !!! )Mmcannis (talk) 21:40, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Birds of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands has been nominated for discussion

Category:Birds of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 07:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Amarna letter EA 364 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Babylonian
Amarna letter EA 367 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Babylonian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Babylonian Map of the World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Line drawing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Amarna letters by size, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Megiddo and Tyre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amarna letter EA 59, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Messenger and Sumur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is the point of all the commented out stuff

in this article? Amarna letter EA 147 It's confusing to say the least. It doesn't help there is a comment that is not properly closed. --Palosirkka (talk) 12:33, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amarna letter EA 147, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exclamation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mmcannis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Hieroglyphs of Ancient Egypt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Hieroglyphs of Ancient Egypt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hieroglyphs of Ancient Egypt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 21:49, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of mountain ranges of Pinal County, Arizona

Notice

The article List of mountain ranges of Pinal County, Arizona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, mostly red links, and creating articles on mountain ranges by county does not make much sense.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 07:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bear Creek or Black Creek?

In this initial edit you wrote "Bear Creek" where it looks like "Black Creek" would be correct. I'm going to change it, but please do let me know if Bear Creek was actually right for some reason. Dicklyon (talk) 02:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fauna of Navassa Island has been nominated for discussion

Category:Fauna of Navassa Island, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indicator species has been nominated for discussion

Category:Indicator species, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 18:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of LCRV communities (birdwatching)

Notice

The article List of LCRV communities (birdwatching) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced, not WP:HOWTO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 15:34, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of lakes of the LCRV (birdwatching)

Notice

The article List of lakes of the LCRV (birdwatching) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced, WP:NOTHOWTO, see precedence

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 17:11, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Trees of Tierra del Fuego

A tag has been placed on Category:Trees of Tierra del Fuego requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Flora of Tierra del Fuego

A tag has been placed on Category:Flora of Tierra del Fuego requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 01:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:South American tinamous has been nominated for renaming

Category:South American tinamous has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 18:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Native birds of Southern Mexico has been nominated for renaming

Category:Native birds of Southern Mexico has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:25, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Trees of Curaçao

A tag has been placed on Category:Trees of Curaçao requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Monuran trackway for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monuran trackway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monuran trackway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kent G. Budge (talk) 22:11, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Trees of Hispaniola

A tag has been placed on Category:Trees of Hispaniola requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:29, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ancient Egyptian concepts has been nominated for deletion

Category:Ancient Egyptian concepts has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Understanding Hieroglyphs: A Complete Introductory Guide for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Understanding Hieroglyphs: A Complete Introductory Guide is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Understanding Hieroglyphs: A Complete Introductory Guide until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 00:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Amarna letter EA 364 has been nominated for deletion

Category:Amarna letter EA 364 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:40, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vassal city-state & miscellaneous Amarna letters has been nominated for renaming

Category:Vassal city-state & miscellaneous Amarna letters has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cuneiform signs, Amarna letters has been nominated for renaming

Category:Cuneiform signs, Amarna letters has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Trees of Northern Mexico

A tag has been placed on Category:Trees of Northern Mexico indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:09, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Marine fauna researchers of the Gulf of California has been nominated for renaming

Category:Marine fauna researchers of the Gulf of California has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Muggins Mountain Wilderness flora

Notice

The article List of Muggins Mountain Wilderness flora has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

General references are not specifically about this wilderness, notability not established for this topic when we don't typically have plant lists specific to a wilderness area.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 03:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of eastern shore communities on the Gulf of California

Notice

The article List of eastern shore communities on the Gulf of California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced list, significance or need not established

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Big Mama stela for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big Mama stela, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Mama stela until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Natural history of Baja California has been nominated for renaming

Category:Natural history of Baja California has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 

Index: pl ar de en es fr it arz nl ja pt ceb sv uk vi war zh ru af ast az bg zh-min-nan bn be ca cs cy da et el eo eu fa gl ko hi hr id he ka la lv lt hu mk ms min no nn ce uz kk ro simple sk sl sr sh fi ta tt th tg azb tr ur zh-yue hy my ace als am an hyw ban bjn map-bms ba be-tarask bcl bpy bar bs br cv nv eml hif fo fy ga gd gu hak ha hsb io ig ilo ia ie os is jv kn ht ku ckb ky mrj lb lij li lmo mai mg ml zh-classical mr xmf mzn cdo mn nap new ne frr oc mhr or as pa pnb ps pms nds crh qu sa sah sco sq scn si sd szl su sw tl shn te bug vec vo wa wuu yi yo diq bat-smg zu lad kbd ang smn ab roa-rup frp arc gn av ay bh bi bo bxr cbk-zam co za dag ary se pdc dv dsb myv ext fur gv gag inh ki glk gan guw xal haw rw kbp pam csb kw km kv koi kg gom ks gcr lo lbe ltg lez nia ln jbo lg mt mi tw mwl mdf mnw nqo fj nah na nds-nl nrm nov om pi pag pap pfl pcd krc kaa ksh rm rue sm sat sc trv stq nso sn cu so srn kab roa-tara tet tpi to chr tum tk tyv udm ug vep fiu-vro vls wo xh zea ty ak bm ch ny ee ff got iu ik kl mad cr pih ami pwn pnt dz rmy rn sg st tn ss ti din chy ts kcg ve
Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia

Portal : Agama
Agama
Portal : Bahasa
Bahasa
Portal : Biografi
Biografi
Portal : Budaya
Budaya
Portal : Ekonomi
Ekonomi
Portal : Elektronika
Elektronika
Portal : Film
Film
Portal : Filsafat
Filsafat
Portal : Geografi
Geografi
Portal : Indonesia
Indonesia
Portal : Ilmu
Ilmu
Portal : Lingkungan
Lingkungan
Portal : Masyarakat
Masyarakat
Portal : Matematika
Matematika
Portal : Militer
Militer
Portal : Mitologi
Mitologi
Portal : Musik
Musik
Portal : Olahraga
Olahraga
Portal : Pendidikan
Pendidikan
Portal : Politik
Politik
Portal : Sastra
Sastra
Portal : Sejarah
Sejarah
Portal : Seni
Seni
Portal : Teknologi
Teknologi