User talk:MariusEllingsen47

Proposed deletion of Adrian Grønnevik Smith

Hello, MariusEllingsen47. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Adrian Grønnevik Smith, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tigraan^Click here to contact me 14:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Petrus A. Christensen

Hello, MariusEllingsen47,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Petrus A. Christensen should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petrus A. Christensen .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Tigraan^Click here to contact me 15:02, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MariusEllingsen47, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MariusEllingsen47! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Adrian Grønnevik Smith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrian Grønnevik Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Grønnevik Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tigraan^Click here to contact me 08:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Third Eye

I notice that you added wikilinks to a page for the Norwegian TV series "The Third Eye" to Ida Elise Broch and Third eye (disambiguation) but the page that you are trying to link to doesn't exist. If you are intending to create an English page based on the Norwegian page Det tredje øyet, please add the links after the page has been created. Thanks, Rob - Robman94 (talk) 15:07, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you've added the The Third Eye (Norwegian TV series) page now, so I have added wikilinks to it from the two pages that I mentioned earlier. Robman94 (talk) 19:06, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Endre Lund Eriksen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Endre Lund Eriksen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endre Lund Eriksen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 02:03, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nipper Read, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brits. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pax (film)

Hi Marius, would you be interested in creating an English language page for the Norwegian movie "Pax"? Robman94 (talk) 19:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robman94, I am interested in creating an English language page for the Norwegian movie "Pax". MariusEllingsen47 (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great, let me know if I can help. Robman94 (talk) 16:55, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for starting Pax (2011 film), but in its current state the page is likely to be deleted because it has no references. Could you please copy and translate as much info as you can, including the references, from the Norwegian page over to the English page. Robman94 (talk) 20:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hi Marius, you've probably noticed that most of the pages that you have created have been instantly put up for deletion, the main reason for this is that your pages generally don't include references. References from reliable sources are required to (a) establish notability and (b) verify the claims made in the articles. References shouldn't just be a random list of links added at the end of an article, they should be inline citations so the reader is clear which statement the reference is supporting. Take a look at the changes that I made to your Endre Lund Eriksen page to see how references should be added. Also, when someone opens an AfD on one of your pages, it's a good idea for you to post something in the AfD page stating why you believe the page should not be deleted. The main complaint will be notability, so your message should state why you believe the subject is notable. Rob - Robman94 (talk) 17:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pax (2011 film)

According to other wikis as well as the IMDB, Pax (2011 film) was actually released in 2010. Wgolf (talk) 21:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But according to Filmweb and the Norwegian Wikipedia, the film was actually released in 2011, Wgolf. But I'm not sure how we should say it. Was either released in 2010 or 2011? MariusEllingsen47 (talk) 06:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wgolf: I agree that this movie was released in 2011, it was the book that was released in 2010. As it's a Norwegian movie, if we're going to trust other wikis, I would trust the Norwegian one the most, which says 2011, plus here's a reliable source in English: tnp.no Robman94 (talk) 15:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Thomas & Friends episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 17:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thomas & Friends (series 10), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please see WP:KIDSTVDATES. SummerPhD^v2.0 12:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change the episode numbering in Top Gear (series 23) or other articles covering the series of Top Gear (2002 TV Series); they were updated recently to cover specials and compilation episodes. GUtt01 (talk) 23:35, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 04:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did not open the thread but it can be found HERE --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 04:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above I didn't open the ANI thread I just told you it was there. TBH I have no idea why the editor opened the thread when it was a content issue, without first discussing it with you as would be proper. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 18:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please do not change the numbering on any series of Top Gear (2002 TV Series); the numbering was updated to incorporate all specials and compilation episodes. Refrain from reverting this again. GUtt01 (talk) 01:04, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Erling Pedersen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rauma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^bons mots 16:11, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MariusEllingsen47. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]