Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Quite possible. Seems various parts of the internet attribute this photo to different horses. Unclear if we'll ever definitively know which is which, though on balance I'd guess this was Brookyln Supreme. Seems sensible to avoid using images unless the horse in question can be definitively identified. Thanks for bringing this up, please make any edits you see fit. --LukeSurltc15:34, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
WP:Notability: the concept of the "Blood Quota," as described in the article, fails to meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines.The sources cited in the article are primarily focused on Abimael Guzmán and the Shining Path, rather than on the "Blood Quota" concept itself. The term does not have the independent significance required for a standalone article.
WP:Verifiability: the "Blood Quota" article contains several claims that are not adequately supported by citations from reliable sources.
WP:NPOV - the tone is overwhelmingly negative and lacks balance, failing to provide a comprehensive view of the topic. For example, it describes the concept as one that "communist militants willfully promoted hatred and violence to attract adherents," which is a loaded statement that does not reflect a neutral perspective. Additionally, the article does not offer any counterpoints or broader historical context that could provide a more balanced view.
WP:OR: Some parts of the article appear to be original analysis or synthesis of the Shining Path’s ideology and actions. For instance, the interpretation of the "Blood Quota" as a core tenet of Gonzalo Thought and its implications for the Shining Path’s strategy is not directly supported by the cited sources.
Therefore, it is appropriate that the article has been deleted from the Spanish Wikipedia, and it should not be reintroduced in EN.wiki in its current form. The writing is disorganized, with sections that are poorly structured and redundant. For example, the discussion of the Lucanamarca massacre is repeated in different sections without clear organization - this makes the article difficult to follow and understand. Additionally, the writing style is not sufficiently encyclopedic, with a tone that is more suited to a narrative or polemic piece rather than an objective, informative encyclopedia entry.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
.jpg){kind=link}