User talk:Luckydhaliwal

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Luckydhaliwal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Danger ^High voltage! 00:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Times Now, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zoom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dunlop India Ltd.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dunlop India Ltd. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Lithorien (talk) 14:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Hi. Please don't add copyrighted material to the Balwant Singh Rajoana article. If you do so again, you will be blocked. Thanks. --regentspark (comment) 17:43, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Balwant Singh Rajoana

Your addition to Balwant Singh Rajoana has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. utcursch | talk 18:45, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hrs for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at Balwant Singh Rajoana. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. regentspark (comment) 19:12, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luckydhaliwal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have not pasted anything which is a copyright. Please show the copyright content that I have pasted. I had undone the edits (deletions only) of regentspark because I felt he was vandalizing the page

Decline reason:

Regentspark clearly mentioned in his edits multiple times that he was removing the copyvio: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. I did the same thing: [8]. You undid the edits, so you must have come across the edit summaries: I see no reason why you "felt he was vandalizing the page". Plus, you reinserted the copyrighted content after being requested not to do so, on your talk page. utcursch talk 19:41, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luckydhaliwal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have not pasted anything which is a copyright. Please show the copyright content that I have pasted. I had undone the edits (deletions only) of regentspark because I felt he was vandalizing the page

Decline reason:

The material is copied from http://www.ensaaf.org/news/press/pr2011-10-18.php. Two editors warned you of copyright violations. Numerous edit summaries did the same. Since this is your first block, I suggest you read Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks before making another unblock request. --regentspark (comment) 20:09, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luckydhaliwal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have not pasted anything which is a copyright. Please show the copyright content that I have pasted. I had undone the edits (deletions only) of regentspark because I felt he was vandalizing the page. 2. Utcursch is saying that regentspark mentioned that he is removing copyrights text but how could I believe that. A person vandalizing a page can vandalize the page and write that he is removing copyright text.

Decline reason:

Copyright violation is described in previous unblock request review. --jpgordon^::==( o ) 22:31, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. When you recently edited Balwant Singh Rajoana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beant Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, I'm Isarra (HG). This might not have been intentional, but I noticed that you recently removed some content from Lecithin without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, -— Isarra (HG) ༆ 07:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of scandals in India

Sorry, I know you did a lot of formatting on List of scandals in India, but I had to revert you. The source you gave doesn't mention any of those three scandals, nor the specific people you mentioned; you also removed wikilinks and removed valid sources without reason. If you have questions, let me know on my talk page. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Madhu Koda

I have no idea why you tried to rewrite that page and change his name, but if you look at the sources, his name is clearly Madhu Koda. Are there perhaps two different people with similar names? If so, you would need to create a new article about the person called Madhu Kora. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:19, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And I have put it back. Do not move that article again. We need to first figure out why there are multiple different names used. Why do the sources use the name Koda? You can't just declare that every single newspaper source is wrong. It's time for you to start a discussion on the article's talk page. Then we can figure out what is going on. That is how Wikipedia works--through collaboration and discussion. Qwyrxian (talk) 11:47, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very concerned

Luckydhaliwal, I notice that basic all of the changes you are making are being reverted. Most of your changes remove valid information, or change from valid to invalid, or remove sources without explanation, or are simply confusing or grammatically incorrect. Furthermore, looking at the rest of this page, I see that you've had problems in other areas--not understanding copyright, making formatting changes that aren't necessary, and, as I just reverted you on Koda, changing the spelling of things for no clear reason. I'm wondering--is English not your native language? You may find it easier to contribute to the Wikipedia version in your native language. I'm seriously considering blocking you indefinitely per WP:COMPETENCE, because it does not seem that your contributions to en.wiki are helpful, and are instead causing other editors more work to revert your errors. Please let me know what you think. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:30, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Help

Hi, yeah, tell me what help you need. Thanks! -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 03:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Its great that you have learned and corrected things on your own. Ping me for any help. Thanks! -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 13:15, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of highest-grossing Bollywood films, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kabir Khan and Arbaaz Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:49, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please remember that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on List of newspapers in India by readership. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:12, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of highest-grossing Bollywood films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agneepath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Opsonin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Complement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm LogX. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of highest-grossing Bollywood films, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- L o g X 18:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re

Ofcourse it needs to be! -- L o g X 19:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why you changed the table format then? -- L o g X 19:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your comments with using these "~~~~". Else i couldn't figure out who i'm talking with. No problem on that. The readers who does know the fact that the film is out from the theatre will do that. Or else, we can do that too in future if we come to know. Thanks -- L o g X 19:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok either put on all or first two. I am putting blue color on only first two... if you like you can put on all.. but pls do not reveret my edit as earlier only half were blue and some were not... if you want put on all Luckydhaliwal (talk) 19:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please be familiarise yourself with the H:TABLE and then do some edits on the table. Or the format of the table will entirely change. -- L o g X 19:48, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It look perfect now! Great job! Happy editing! And learn some basic stuffs on the wikipedia! - Fomarting styles -- L o g X 19:57, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Once you come to know that the film is out. Please remove the colors. -- L o g X 20:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chennai Express, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Jionpedia ✉ 12:15, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are providing unreliable sources and wrong information. AND DON'T YOU DARE CALL ME A VANDAL.----Jionpedia ✉ 12:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stay calm

You are a new user and therefore might not be accustomed to all Wikipedia policies and guidelines and therefore might violate some. In such violations you need to stay calm, assume good faith and try to end the dispute instead of going all guns blazing at an editor. If you think he had a misjudgement then discuss with him politely. Sohambanerjee1998 12:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I can help you too if you want too. Ping me, if you will need my help! O' and most important...--Mishae (talk) 23:46, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Luckydhaliwal, Mishae has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 06:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks

Plkease do not remove valid redlinks, as you have been doing at Ajay Singh Yadav. It is entirely possible that someone will create an article for a member of a state legislative assembly. See WP:Redlink. - Sitush (talk) 08:19, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Luckydhaliwal. You have new messages at Sitush's talk page.
Message added 08:25, 28 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sitush (talk) 08:25, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Link

Hi,you have removed dead link from some articles but that's not a good idea.See here Wikipedia:Link rot#Keeping dead links for further clarification.---zeeyanwiki ^discutez 05:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicts

How can you decide? when the references on other movies are from Koimoi. Sumesh Dugar (talk) 08:07, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How can you decide reliability? Sumesh Dugar (talk) 08:07, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The links you have posted on my talk, prove nothing! How do you know one is reliable and the other one is not? Sumesh Dugar (talk) 08:07, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of newspapers in India by readership, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandesh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion from Black Dog Scotch Whisky

Hello, I'm BarrelProof. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Black Dog Scotch Whisky without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —BarrelProof (talk) 20:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After checking the sources cited in that sentence, it seems that neither one of them mentions 100 Pipers, so you're right. It seems to have been inserted in this edit, which was part of a series of edits that were disputed by another editor, but that part seems to have remained there. Thanks for fixing it. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ajit Doval without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at MSG-2 The Messenger. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Diffs: [9] In these edits you inappropriately removed a page protection template and you inexplicably removed the Box office section (a normal section for a film article) and moved the sourced box content to the bottom of the section. This doesn't make any sense, since the box office section should be focused on the box office. Are you trying to hide the information? Please don't do that. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:31, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When I was editing, I did not see your edits. I saw them after I saved my edit. I really felt sorry after I saw that I overwrote your edits. I had no intention to remove your template. I was just reverting some vandalsim.Luckydhaliwal (talk) 17:57, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the explanation. I've struck the warning. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:59, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Box office

Regarding your query here (I was in the middle of responding when you deleted it), the box office section is a common, desired section. Note first the Manual of Style for film. Note also Avengers: Age of Ultron#Reception, Hercules (2014 film)#Release and if we prefer to use a featured article as our metric, Alien vs. Predator (film)#Reception. The under-performance of the film, either monetarily or by poor attendance, seems intuitive to include in a box office section. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:26, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply bro. I deleted my message because I thought that let the box office section be there. Luckydhaliwal (talk) 18:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLPCRIME

Hi there, re: your edits here at Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, we always treat biographies of living persons very carefully, as having a casual attitude about living people can present very serious libel concerns. While it is true that the subject has been accused of crimes, you have to remember that Wikipedia is the biggest encyclopedia on the planet, and we have to be very careful about the content we present. Per WP:BLPCRIME, we should avoid detailing accusations until the subject is convicted. I have removed the content. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cefuroxime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GSK. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Foramen lacerum

added a link pointing to Sympathetic

Inferior salivatory nucleus

added a link pointing to Medulla

Otic ganglion

added a link pointing to Medial pterygoid

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject!

Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:

• Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
• You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
• We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
• We write for a general audience. Every reader should be able to understand anatomical articles, so when possible please write in a simple form—most readers do not understand anatomical jargon. See this essay for more details.

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! CFCF 💌 📧 18:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh discussion is already open

Regarding the Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh WP:BLPCRIME matter, there is an open discussion with several participants at Talk:Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh#Criminal accusations - WP:BLPCRIME. I strongly encourage you to participate. If you do not, and your disruptive editing continues after the protection is lifted, you will be looking at your editing privileges being interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your tone is wrong bro. You are threatening me with block without any reason. I have never done disruptive editing. Luckydhaliwal (talk) 22:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No threats at all. He is warning you based upon your recent edits. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom. Please see all my recent edits. Luckydhaliwal (talk) 22:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The issue, and the discussion at this time, is not about you. It is about the content you are attempting to introduce to a Wikipedia article, whether it is appropriate for inclusion in the article at this time, and the sources for that content. It will only become about you if you persistently restore the content even after a consensus has been established that it should not be added. General Ization ^Talk 23:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cerebellopontine angle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flocculus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Airbus A380, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - BilCat (talk) 21:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frontal vein

Hi Luckydhaliwal - Reverted the page back to Frontal vein - the TA name given in the infobox is the accepted alternative, and the preferred name on the anatomy pages is for the English equivalent. The pages are meant for the general reader. --Iztwoz (talk) 18:13, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gray's anatomy is the standard text for anatomy and in 40th edition the name supratrochlear is used. Luckydhaliwal (talk) 18:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would refer you to the Welcome box - clearly states we write for the general reader. --Iztwoz (talk) 18:23, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Iztwoz, that's fine but name has nothing to do with that. Most readers are medical students and they should get the correct information to avoid confusion. Luckydhaliwal (talk) 18:27, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree that most readers are medical students - this group has access to medical text books. Initiate discussion on Project Anatomy if you want to.--Iztwoz (talk) 18:41, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iztwoz Even if most readers are general readers, the name does not need to be changed, it has to be the same. The content has to be simple. Luckydhaliwal (talk) 18:44, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Luckydhaliwal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Luckydhaliwal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]