User talk:Kiwi128

Welcome to Wikipedia from JDDJS

Hi, Kiwi128. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put {{helpme}} (and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. Again, welcome! JDDJS (talk) 03:52, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Translation messages

Hello Kiwi, I saw that you've tagged some articles with the {{notenglish}} request for translation and I thought I'd leave you two hints on that. First, after adding the template to an article, please have a look at the note on the bottom of the tag message. You can copy the code provided there and paste it in the relevant section at Pages needing translation so the translation project is informed about a new candidate. And there's also a standardised template for notifying the authors of non-English articles. {{subst:uw-notenglish | Place article name here...}} displays a nice message that people might help with translating their article, because foreign language articles will be proposed for deletion if they are not translated within 14 days. Happy editing, De728631 (talk) 20:50, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Barnstar moved to my user page.

I've also removed those edits from the edit history, as they meet the criteria for such an action. Really, who has nothing better to do on Valentine's Day than vandalize someone's user space anyway? :) Acdixon ^(talk • contribs • count) 14:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

On 22 February 2011, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2011 Canterbury earthquake, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

Mjroots (talk) 06:44, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Five senses

I noticed you attempted to remove the 5 senses from the Omniscience contribution I have made.. Sorry, but in order for something to know and be aware of even it's own existence, it will require the 5 basic senses in order to observe itself as an object of inquiry. It's entirely relevant to whether or not it could even know anything at all. Please leave it or supply a reason why you think a conscious mind would not require senses to observe itself and it's environment. It has everything to do with Omniscience. Thanks :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SniprKlr (talk • contribs) 16:02, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NZ barnstar

Barnstar moved to my user page.

Wow! Glad my edits were useful. Kiwi128 (talk) 03:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

Just wanted to let you know, it's not your decision whether User:JoeCool950 is delteted, it's mine, since that is my own userpage. (JoeCool950 (talk) 09:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Generally, when someone blanks a page that they are the main author of, it means that they want the page deleted. Sorry for any misunderstanding, and happy editing. Kiwi128 (talk) 09:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The userpage can be blanked, now if there are any articles that are blanked, that's considered deletion, and if blanked on purpose, is vandalism. Userpages though, it's up to the user whether to have deleted. I wanted to see what it looked like deleted, since what I had the userpage changed to had to be deleted, but I changed my mind. Don't know if it would be vandalism to have them delete the userpage to see what it would look like, and then put it back up.. Just want to see. I should be able to put it back up, because I've got everything I need to put back up in one of my sandboxes. (JoeCool950 (talk) 09:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Blanking for deletion only applies to main space pages, not user pages. The primary user page cannot be deleted with an active user account, as far as I know, but it's sub pages can be. Sorry, yes, I'm stalking you, but not for much longer. – SMasters (talk) 09:38, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to stalk me as long as you wish. :) Thanks for the heads up on the user page blanking rules, and apologies to JoeCool950. Kiwi128 (talk) 09:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Planet Veritas

Hi there, I noticed that you changed my details re: Planet Veritas. The problem with this is that this page has been vandalised so badly. Is there any way I could call you to explain?

Hi. If there are issues with the article, it would be excellent if you could explain them on the article's talk page. Many thanks. Kiwi128 (talk) 09:13, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is a very complex matter and so the page reflects the truth I need to explain what has happened. Currently the page isn't correct and the people who have edited it eg. piccolapixxie is not doing it with good intentions. She used to be a Director of Veritas Language Solutions and in fact owed money to the company. I would like a true reflection but due to the sensitive nature I would like an opportunity to call you and explain. Thank you.

If you have matters of a sensitive nature that you would like to discuss regarding bias issues on the article, I suggest reading this. Best wishes. Kiwi128 (talk) 09:24, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid, I contacted Help and it wasn't resolved. I just need someone (hopefully you) to have a good understanding of the situation so it is reflected properly. I have felt that vandals have been supported and people with malicious intent - not me. Please could you help to sort this out once and for all. Thanks

You are welcome to send me an email using the contact details found here. I can't guarantee any particular action, but am happy to hear you out. Kiwi128 (talk) 09:46, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you confirm that you have received my email please. thanks

Hello, have done. Will respond tomorrow (New Zealand time). Thanks. Kiwi128 (talk) 09:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Kiwi128! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Ewairways

None of the airlines for which this user has created articles actually exist. They all have foundation dates in the 2030s. I think this user is a straight-up vandal rather than an errant user name. I've logged it at WP:AIV. Regards, Bazj (talk) 10:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A7 vs A11

You were right the first time... A11 is for things like neologisms (used by one class in one school), 'new' drinking games (Cherry Cola and Vodka Pong), or new games/sports (that bear very close resemblance to baseball, but use a cricket bat and a tennis ball). They are things that probably are real - but currently have zero notability, with little chance of any improvement in this (if they do go viral, then might be the time for an article). We AGF on these. They almost always involve schools or students. Things about named people that are made up are hoaxes, if clear enough (a 14 year old billionaire entrepreneur with ten ghits - all social media), or A7 if just plain good ol' non-notable if what they're being celebrated for wouldn't confer notability anyway whether real or not. Some of these distinctions at CSD would make a Polish rabbi, or a Jesuit, quail and depart rapidly... Peridon (talk) 12:21, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Harvey Englander

Your tag for deletion of Harvey Englander is unwarranted. He has an extensive career in local politics, which is discussed in part here: http://www.englanderpr.com/team/234-harvey-englander19.html

Thanks for your message. I've responded on the appropriate talk page. Regards. Kiwi128 (talk) 23:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bernie Sanders Revision

Hi, I was wondering why you considered my edits on Bernie Sanders good faith? It was neutral as it was thoroughly sourced. Describing out his view points have not changed is not biased in anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkninja505 (talk • contribs) 05:09, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Darkninja505. "His views have been consistent throughout his political career" is a direct assertion of what is an opinion. I expect there are people who would disagree with that statement. Something to the affect of "Many commentators have noted that his views have remained consistent throughout his political career." would be less biased. Kiwi128 (talk) 05:15, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reworded your addition to the article as explained above. Kiwi128 (talk) 05:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Nvm you did you for me lol Darkninja505 (talk) 05:22, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton coloring article

Hi, This is Bonny. Thank you for your inputs. I started a new page on hamilton coloring because I found it non existing in the wikipedia. also it is one of the important coloring in the area of graph coloring. I didnt just create the page i am willing to work upon it and more inputs will be put soon. I would definitely welcome your valuable inputs. Thank you. Hope to get a reply soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonny TM (talk • contribs) 07:10, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bonny. I'm about to reply on your page. Kiwi128 (talk) 07:12, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, well if you ask me whether hamilton coloring is a type of graph coloring then yes it is a type of graph coloring. And yeah there are many results associated with it. But there is no need to be sorry about it. im passionate about maths and particularly graph theory. so created the page and will definitely work on it. A big thanks for your inputs. Im new to editing so i need such inputs. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonny TM (talk • contribs) 07:19, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bonny. I'm about to reply on your page. Kiwi128 (talk) 07:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, absolutely hamilton coloring is not a synonym for graph coloring. it is not another name for graph coloring. It is a specific type of graph coloring just like T-coloring, Star coloring and many other coloring. It is not mentioned in the wiki page "graph coloring". I dont know why but it must be mentioned there too. It is a specific type of graph coloring which is defined using some new parameters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonny TM (talk • contribs) 07:28, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bonny. I'm about to reply on your page. Kiwi128 (talk) 07:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Best wishes

Ivan Trayling article

Source is speaking with / interviewing the subject (Ivan Trayling) himself. Please advise how to reference this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tralis2 (talk • contribs) 07:32, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tralis2. Wikipedia has a policy of no original research. This means that we must be able to cite reliable, published sources. If you have interview material, it would be awesome if you could publish it on another site. After being reviewed by a Wikipedian other than yourself, we might be able to use it to support content in the Ivan Trayling article (although this is not guaranteed). Thanks much for your efforts, and don't hesitate to ping me if you require further assistance. Kiwi128 (talk) 07:39, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mel Finkelstein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohammed Ali. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thanks, but ...

How on earth do you - does anyone - manage to spot a new translation in less than a minute? Regards Charles01 (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Charles01. Firstly, thanks for your contribution. I'm a new page patroller, meaning I sometimes go to Special:NewPagesFeed and watch for a while. :) Regards. Kiwi128 (talk) 10:52, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Interesting. Thank you. Regards Charles01 (talk) 15:02, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

why have your deleted my edit of Jose Baxter?

Why have you deleted my edit of Jose Baxter? The-truth12345678 (talk) 08:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It looks like Cluebot, our handy anti-vandalism bot, removed your edit, not me. Your edits looked like vandalism to it, and it looks like vandalism to me as well. Regards. Kiwi128 (talk) 10:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page

Under WP:UP I am entitled to clear my talk page. Please do not revert it. Thank you. 121.220.23.33 (talk) 10:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry about that. I've reviewed WP:UP and believe you are correct. Best regards. Kiwi128 (talk) 11:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the apology. Appreciated. 121.220.23.33 (talk) 11:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prince of Penzance

Thanks for creating the article. I didn't see that one coming! Rugby World Cup and Melbourne Cup in the space of three days. Not a bad week for NZ. Tigerboy1966  08:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All good, thought I would start a sports-related article for a change. :) Yes, New Zealand is certainly representing well in sports at present. Kiwi128 (talk) 08:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Colective nightclub fire

hi - this might not be the place to put this, but it looked like you did quite a bit with the images on the page dealing with the tragedy in Romania. so i wondered if you could check the caption for the panoramic picture at the bottom of the "Protests" section? it gives a date of 5 November, but throughout the text, it is always 4 November. it may be that protests went for yet another night, but i just thought someone should check. i can't read the Romanian articles (okay, or any articles not in English), and the online translators are pretty awful, so i can't check this out. if this is not something you could, or would, do, i apologize. but with your work on the other pictures there, this somehow seemed better than bringing it up on the article's Talk page.Colbey84 (talk) 11:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Colbey84. I actually don't speak Romanian, and made those translations by using an online translator to get the gist of the caption, and then wrote it in my own words. Not perfect, but probably better than no translation at all. As regards the protests, I have found a single reference that seems to suggest that there were protests on the night of 5 November (see (Bloomberg)). Whether the panoramic photo was taken that night, it is hard to say; I guess we'll have to take the uploader's word for it. It looks like they wiped the metadata in the photo before upload (if there was any metadata in the first place), making investigation of the actual time close to impossible. Thanks for pointing out the issue. Best regards. Kiwi128 (talk) 21:30, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

lol - i did that for some of that article, too—slogged thru the awful translations and rewrote some bits, hoping i'd gotten the gist correct. having the "original" helped. i was kinda thinking it was written by someone who didn't know English well enough to write it "super great," which was part of why i decided to go ahead with a re-write. (much of it seemed like "colloquial"...um..."errors" in English.) i'd just seen, on the History page, that you'd done a lot of edits around the pictures. i'm a bit 'new' to editing on WP, so still trying to figure things out. and trying not to piss anyone off (because that seems to be an....'issue' here). thanks for taking the time and digging into that picture more!Colbey84 (talk) 06:37, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Russian Sukhoi Su-24 shootdown

Hi. I saw your edit summary in removing the overquote tag I added. This is not correct. Wikipedia does not predominantly consist of a series of quotes from sources. Instead we summarise the best sources we can find. I also found your removal of an article improvement tag without contributing to an ongoing discussion in talk pretty unhelpful. Please do not do this again. Thanks. --John (talk) 14:53, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John. I am aware of the guidelines around quotes, and happened to disagree with your interpretation. However, I do apologise for not contributing to the ongoing discussion. Regards. Kiwi128 (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

mySupermarket page

Hi,

I'm head of marketing for mySupermarket. The mySupermarket wiki page is out of date and I am trying to make factual changes to our page. For example, our logo has changed and there is information in the top right box which I wanted to add e.g. number of employees and our CEO. When I tried to make changes you reverted back to the previous version. How can I make these changes but ensuring they are in line with wikipedia guidelines?

Thanks, Rafi Mendelsohn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rafi Mendelsohn (talk • contribs) 10:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rafi. It is not generally a good idea for people to edit articles that they have a direct interest in, as this compromises Wikipedia's integrity. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Also, I note that you added an image caption which was far from neutral. If there are reliable references which indicate your new CEO and size, feel free to let me know and I'll look at making those edits. Best regards Kiwi128 (talk) 10:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

Hi, can you translate the section "Translation" of my userpage to Māori? You can leave the translation on my talkpage. -XQV- (talk) 10:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora. Wow, you found me quickly. :) I'm actually still learning to speak Te Reo Maori, so not ready to perform translations yet. But hopefully in a few months I'll be ready. Best regards Kiwi128 (talk) 07:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Edward, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Edwards. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"European migrant crisis" under discussion at WP:ITNC

The removal of "European migrant crisis" from Main Page is re-proposed at WP:ITNC. Because you were involved in the previous discussion several months back, I invite you to improve consensus. --George Ho (talk) 08:55, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:My Life as a Traitor (2007 cover).jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:My Life as a Traitor (2007 cover).jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kiwi128. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taurenidus

I'm not taurenidus, i just uses taurenidus user id, which is empty, for writing article about taurenidus, how to stop getting this page from deletion. After one hour this page get indexed in top ten for keyword taurenidus. And all this i collect from his google plus profile and whatsapp talk in one month. Please help me Taurenidus 11:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taurenidus (talk • contribs)

A page you started (Op. 18) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Op. 18, Kiwi128!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this useful disambiguation page!

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 00:27, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Op. 19) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Op. 19, Kiwi128!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this useful disambiguation page!

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 00:27, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Op. 27

Hello Kiwi128,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Op. 27 for deletion. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an unnecessary disambiguation page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Reb1981 (talk) 01:44, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora Reb1981. I have contested deletion here. Best regards. Kiwi128 (talk) 08:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

drupal edit

I deleted that sentence on drupal because it repeats what is stated in the first sentence of the article and IMHO is poorly written. Why mention a section of the website called "The Drupal Overview" - what's special about that? And then it doesn't attempt to explain what a framework is vs 'just' a CMS I suppose might be appropriate, so what's the point of the sentence? JuanTamad (talk) 00:46, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit because it (I suspect accidentally) trampled on some other edits made to the article. However, I then removed the sentence manually as per your edit. I agree with you that the sentence was not useful. Kind regards. Kiwi128 (talk) 03:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kiwi128. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's "List of Led Zeppelin songs written or inspired by others"

If you don't like my particular insertion of Wikipedia's "List of Led Zeppelin songs written or inspired by others," no problem -- but please then get it in yourself. It is utterly absurd not to refer to it when mentioning Zep's well-documented plagiarism. Christian B Martin (talk) 11:10, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora Christian B Martin. I'm not sure why you are addressing this to me. I haven't reverted your addition, to the best of my knowledge. Kind regards Kiwi128 (talk) 19:20, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I (obviously) posted my comment on the wrong Talk Page. As correction, I then deleted my post. Oddly, you reverted it back. Not really sure why you did that, but sorry for the confusion... Christian B Martin (talk) 06:30, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora Christian B Martin. I restored your post on my talk page, because I was unclear why you had removed it. Thank you for the clarification. Kind regards. Kiwi128 (talk) 19:48, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LibreSSL version tracking

Hello, I see you've been maintaining the LibreSSL version data here. Thank you for doing that! Since that template tracks the "stable" release, which has once again diverged from the development release with the release of 2.8.0, I've added a second pseudo-article to separately track the development release over here, which you might want to put on your watch list. The LibreSSL article now shows both the stable and development ("preview") release numbers. Cheers. --Stybn (talk) 18:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating that and for letting me know, Stybn. Regards Kiwi128 (talk) 21:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2018 Taumarunui earthquake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 Taumarunui earthquake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Taumarunui earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stephen 22:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kiwi128. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the article about the bacteria Mycoplasma bovis

Just a question but I was wondering if you knew whether or not Mycoplasma bovis is heterotrophic or not. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Errpie (talk • contribs) 17:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please double-check your coordinates

When entering coordinates into Wikipedia, please always double-check them against the internet mapping services. Abductive (reasoning) 04:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hydrogen peroxide

What you fixed was not simply vandalism, but someone who can't even write a coherent version of an ooooold joke:) See [1]:) Thanks for fixing it! DMacks (talk) 08:00, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: User talk:84.248.174.153

Hello Kiwi128. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:84.248.174.153, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: WP:G1 specifically excludes the kind of rambling going on here in "userspace". User talk pages are only deleted in a narrow range of circumstances and this isn't one of them. My advice would be to simply ignore this. If the IP editor gets disruptive anywhere else, this is a past record for future action. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 10:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whatisthis

Widria finely Arrekasnothing20 (talk) 02:05, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rag pudding

Um - it is constructive. I'm repairing vandalism from an ip address who is / was changing location information. Help me out by reverting true vandalism, not good faith (and as it happens, accurate and verifiable) corrections. 193.84.224.251 (talk) 10:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Good to meet another Kiwi! Thanks for reporting User:Iscreatives to AIV. I blocked the account as a promotional username but as they weren't spamming or actively vandalising moving forward just report promotional usernames to WP:UAA. We'll catch them there as well. Thanks again! Glen 10:06, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GS

Please read this notice carefully.

You are receiving this notice because you recently edited one or more pages relating to blockchain or cryptocurrencies topics. You have not done anything wrong. We just want to alert you that "general" sanctions are authorized for certain types of edits to those pages.

A community decision has authorized the use of general sanctions for pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after the editor has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Jtbobwaysf (talk) 21:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request writing about Isabelle de Charrière (Q123386)

Hello Kiwi128 Would you like to write about Isabelle de Charrière (Q123386) for the MI wikipedia? That would be appreciated if it is done. Boss-well63 (talk) 14:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for applications for position of Wikipedian-at-Large, Aotearoa New Zealand

Kia ora! The Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand User Group invites you to read about the call for applications for a Wikipedian-at-Large for Aotearoa New Zealand in 2024. Group members are happy to explain the process and discuss ideas with interested editors.

Sent by Zippybonzo on behalf of MurielMary using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 06:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Golden Bay Air are holding some seats for us until 21 November

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]