User talk:Junglecat
Good work, friend...
RE:Awsome Revert - 2 times
Need your adviceHey there Junglecat, if you have time could you visit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shopping malls in Houston, Texas? I'm not asking for your vote, just a sanity check! Am I wrong here? Thanks again for your help! Postoak 22:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC) SmileSJP has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
My (KWSN's) RFAThank you for commenting my recent (and successful!) RfA. It passed at at 55/17/6. I'll try to make some changes based on your comments. Kwsn (Ni!) 01:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC) Thanks for your supportThanks for your support with respect to my request for adminship, which successfully closed today with a count of 47 support, 1 oppose. If you ever see me doing anything that makes you less than pleased that you supported my request, I hope to hear about it from you. See you around Wikipedia! Accounting4Taste 05:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC) GlassCobra's RfA
Thanks for the revertThanks for the revert on the Food science article. I greatly apprecaite it. Chris 19:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
my rfaIf you voted in my RFA...
...thank you for your participation. I withdrew with 83 supports, 42 opposes, and 8 neutrals. Your kind words and constructive criticism are very much appreciated. I look forward to using the knowledge I have accrued through the process to better the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers and Wikidudeman for their co-nominations.
Thanks for your voteImageryThere was a better version a few edits back which I moved it back to. Is that ok? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberdalek (talk • contribs)
Looks like ED vandalismBut he's blocked now...[1]--MONGO 00:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
My RfaI wish to thank you for being supportive of my effort to regain my adminship. Though it was not successful, your support was still very much appreciated. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you. Thank you!--MONGO 06:10, 27 January 2008 (UTC) OhanaUnited's RFA
User Page VandalismYour user page was recently vandalized, and reverted by me. See your history for further review. Advise an Admin of your situation. --InvisibleDiplomat666 (talk) 06:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC) Heather MillsIt was worth it, and it wasn't an experiment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepmix (talk • contribs) 23:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC) How did you know I was adding trash to Wikipedia so fast? Are you there? Or is there a detector that takes away your edit every time you post a swear word? Just respond! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.186.195.15 (talk) 03:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
User Page VandalismGot one on yours. :-) --ScaldingHotSoup (talk) 19:12, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Suzanne EngoI'm just letting you know that another user has all but blanked this article and is now attempting to have it deleted. John celona (talk) 02:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC) RfA thanksThanks for commenting in my recent request for adminship which was successful with 89 supports, 0 opposes, and 2 neutrals. Unfortunately all I can offer is this lame text thanks rather than some fancy-smancy thank-you spam template thingy. I know you have concerns about me as an administrator, and I certainly invite you to keep an eye on my work and bring any problems you see to my attention. Thanks again for taking the time to comment!--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 01:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC) that wasn't me...i swear it. either someone hacked onto my account, or my little brother did it. I'm sorry. I checked the history and saw what happened. If it offended you, I'm sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Masterwiki (talk • contribs) 18:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Fizzle (nuclear test)--Elkman (Elkspeak) 15:52, 10 May 2008 (UTC) RfA thank-spamJunglecat, just a note of appreciation for your recent support of my request for adminship, which ended successfully with 112 supports, 2 opposes, and 1 neutral. If there's something I've realized during my RFA process this last week, it's that adminship is primarily about trust. I will strive to honour that trust in my future interactions with the community. Many thanks! Gatoclass (talk) 06:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Motiva Enterprises LLC logo.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Motiva Enterprises LLC logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 23:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
--MONGO 01:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)==My RfA==
Thanks for adding some images to the above linked article. Its always great when those with firsthand experiences can add their work to article space. Best wishes.--MONGO 01:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:Time Cover Glenn McCarthy.jpg listed for deletionAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Time Cover Glenn McCarthy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 15:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Images for deletionThanks for the tip, I added some of your stuff. You better give a fair use rationale like I did here, otherwise they start complaining again. Good luck, and we better keep on eye on this guy. - Mafia Expert (talk) 23:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Happy New YearHope 2009 is a great year for you!--MONGO 15:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
MFD noticeUser:Junglecat/marriage has been nominated for deletion at MfD. //roux 18:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC) Rolling meth lab articleHi. I de-orphaned your Rolling meth lab article. Are you going to create a DYK entry for it? -- OlEnglish (Talk) 05:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Rolling meth lab--Dravecky (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
You might want to look herehttp://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/18/cuban-spies-shortwave-radios-defy-detection/?page=2 Someone is "borrowing" your picture without attribution... Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 20:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Paul CW Chu.jpgA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paul CW Chu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Jackl 07:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC) Nice picI like the pic you have on your userpage...nice...hard to imagine it has already been 8 years now. Hope you're doing well these days!--MONGO 04:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:TexasHistComm.jpgThanks for uploading or contributing to File:TexasHistComm.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —GFOLEY FOUR— 03:14, 1 May 2011 (UTC) I don't understand thisI was reading about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vsevolod_of_Kiev and at the tops it said I had a new message (I don't even have a username for wiki) And then this showed. Latest revision as of 19:00, 23 March 2008 [edit] March 2008 Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Your test is here. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 19:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC) I'm not sure how this is a 'new' message. I guess it got lost in cyberspace. I did not live in this house in 2008, so not sure whats up with all this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.225.87.110 (talk) 09:47, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Photo locationHi there. You uploaded File:Norfolk Southern Engine.jpg to Commons back in 2007. Do you recall where it was taken? Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Duff Goldman of Charm City Cakes.jpgThanks for uploading File:Duff Goldman of Charm City Cakes.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC) Johnsons BayouI would like to talk to "Jungle Cat" about Johnsons Bayou. Lived there as a child, I'm now 81 years old. Please e-mail me at mrd1932@cableone.net. (72.24.251.142 (talk) 18:56, 20 January 2014 (UTC)) MfD nomination of User:Junglecat/marriageUser:Junglecat/marriage, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Junglecat/marriage (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Junglecat/marriage during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 17:08, 21 December 2014 (UTC) Hi, Hi, ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Junglecat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Junglecat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Junglecat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Nomination of Malicious compliance for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malicious compliance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malicious compliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 04:18, 29 March 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter messageMfD nomination of User:Junglecat/marriageUser:Junglecat/marriage, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/onemanonewoman 4th nomination and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Junglecat/marriage during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 13:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC) ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageOrphaned non-free image File:Motiva Enterprises LLC logo.jpgThanks for uploading File:Motiva Enterprises LLC logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC) Let's Go BrandonGreat work! Why do you even need to go through AfC? I'd advise you to be BOLD and post this to the mainspace straight away (maybe after the RfD is done so as not to disrupt the process though). But there's definitely encyclopedic merit here. Let's go!!! Kingoflettuce (talk) 01:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Polemic marriage userboxAs you well know, that userbox was deleted in an MfD last year (Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:UBX/onemanonewoman_4th_nomination) where the closer stated "Consensus is quite clear ... that these templates ... violate the guideline on userbox content restrictions (WP:UBCR) because they are "inflammatory or divisive" and "propaganda [or] advocacy", as prohibited by that guideline." Therefore, recreating it by stealth on your userpage is seriously not a good idea for multiple reasons, and I have removed it. Furthermore, re-creating it again (by whatever means) will certainly result in a sanction. Thank you, Black Kite (talk) 09:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC) Don't bother fighting it. You'll only end up being blocked/banned. GoodDay (talk) 00:25, 4 November 2021 (UTC) Important NoticeThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Doug Weller talk 13:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC) ArbCom 2021 Elections voter messageArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Custom signature fix neededHi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid. The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags. The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing. Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
Solution 3: Do nothing:
If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC) |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia