|
User talk:JetLoverRETIRED
This user is tired of being on Wikipedia, and has retired from Wikipedia.
JetLover, my love who makes want to be a jetHey, Is This Thing On? *tap tap tap* Testing, testing, 1-2-3... Well, a long time ago, I was vandaliser who constantly raided this page and stuff like that. Although me and JetLover seemed like enemies on the surface, deep down I always had deep respect for him, a feeling I can only hope was mutual. So, now that JetLover is retired, I decided to dedicate this song to him. JetLover, if you can hear me, I just wanted you to know I love you. And now, without further ado, here's my song, JetLover. I hope you will enjoy it: JetLover, JetLover, when will those clouds all disappear? JetLover, JetLover, where will it lead us from here? With no loving in our souls and no money in our coats You can't say we're satisfied But JetLover, JetLover, you can't say we never tried JetLover, you're beautiful, but ain't it time we said good-bye? JetLover, I still love you, remember all those nights we cried? All the dreams we held so close seemed to all go up in smoke Let me whisper in your ear: JetLover, JetLover, where will it lead us from here?
I hate that sadness in your eyes But JetLover, JetLover, ain't it time we said good-bye? With no loving in our souls and no money in our coats You can't say we're satisfied But JetLover, I still love you, baby Ev'rywhere I look I see your eyes There ain't a wikipedian that comes close to you Come on Baby, dry your eyes But JetLover, JetLover, ain't it good to be alive? JetLover, JetLover, they can't say we never tried —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.125.83.238 (talk) 15:24, 9 July 2010 (UTC) Please come back to wikipediaI miss you...PL290 is not a foe good as you are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.68.151.59 (talk) 11:00, 3 July 2010 (UTC) Conspiring against the vandals, eh?Digusting. Using utmost care, I vandalized your user page twice. TWICE! When I arrived at the unvandalized article, the vandalism counter was set to 115. Following my two malicious edits, [and the subsequent reverts] the vandalism counter was reset to 115. I find this conspiracy to withold the accurate amount of vandalous edits against you from the public utterly horrific. I demand recognition for my desperate attempts to get attention! THIS IS WAR! Sincerely, 216.154.16.182 (talk) 01:22, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba (talk) 22:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC) SorryOK, hows about we stay the crap away from each other? Blue Laser (talk) 00:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC) Your subpage "WikiRoom"Jetlover, your subpage is showing up as a candidate for speedy deletion here. Do you want the page deleted? If not, I would recommend removing it from that category. If so, let me know, I'll take care of it for you. Keeper | 76 18:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC) Barnstar
Vandals at the rampartsThanks for your assistance. I wanted to note the vandalism but couldn't think of anything more erudite than "Knock it off." Your templates look like a great idea and I will use them. It appeared to be a kid's horsing around but still a more formal caution would be appropriate. FWIW Bzuk (talk) 04:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC). Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:27, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Hi, I overwrote your IAR speedy request at Pavelic-Vatikan with a redirect, hope this is OK. This is the third time that article had been created tonight and I thought a redirect might be better than a speedy since it doesn't technically meet the criteria. CIreland (talk) 04:17, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
My RfAHey there, I'm writing to inform you that I have withdrawn my request for adminship, which was currently standing at 11 supports, 22 opposes and 6 neutrals. This count could have been so much better if I had understood policy, although I believe that 17 questions is a lot to ask of a user's first RfA. I will take on all comments given at the RfA and will endeavour to meet the high expectations of the RfA voters. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDENplay it cool. 21:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC) RfAPlease let me know when this is running. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 05:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC) FYIYou opposed an RFA candidate here per User:Edward Morgan Blake, but you may want to look again. That user is confirmed as an involved sockpuppet. Lawrence § t/e 20:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
My RfaMy effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful, But I wanted to thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion.--MONGO 19:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Re a question you posted at an RfAAt Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pb30 question 4, you stated that the candidate had created a certain article. Another user has stated that someone else was the creator of the article. Given the sensitivity of RfA's, please make it a priority to check the facts of this matter and please strike out some of your words if you think you may be in error. Thanks. --Coppertwig (talk) 23:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
RfAApparently, User:Dreamafter nominated you for RfA last month without telling you and without posting it on the RfA page. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 23:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
What's wrong?What's wrong with putting my opinion on an image's talk page? It's not an article so it does not push POV.--Angel David (talk) 00:35, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Hey, I see you are already an adopter; that's fine if this guy goes with it, you probably have more experience dealing with younger editors than I. What would be worse, of course, is that he ignores the friendly gesture. Up to him, I guess. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 01:54, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Hey Jetlover, I accept the request of you adopting me. No hurries to write back on my talk page. Cheers!--Pookeo9 (talk) 19:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Hi again!Remember me, Barkjon? You adopted me. I have one question for you. How do you graduate the Adopt-a-user program? Reply on my talk page.-- Barkjon 00:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
???Are you going to follow me around and undo all of my edits? Wavesswung99 (talk) 01:00, 31 January 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC) Wavesswung99Thanks for your help yesterday. We were all newbies once; it will be interesting to see what he does as he develops an understanding of how we work here. --John (talk) 16:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanksI am not one for sending round pretty pictures, but after my recent RfA, which passed 68/1/7, I am now relaxed and this is to thank you for your comments, which I will take on board. I look forward to wielding the mop with alacrity. Or two lacrities. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 21:42, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Thread about Pookeo9, your adoptee, at WP:ANIHi JetLover. It would be good to hear from you about Pookeo9 at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Pookeo9. Thanks, Iamunknown 23:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC) IAM NEW SO PLEASE BE PATIENT
Talk pageThanks for reverting the comments that User:BRIEFCASE FULL OF GUTS left on my talk page. Useight (talk) 06:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Im leaving wikioh well--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 08:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Notability of Devilry Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Devilry, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Devilry seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC) AngieI'm not really sure. As she's not so much causing harm as she is being opinionated, most normal methods of dealing with long-term abuse won't work. Likewise, normal dispute resolution hasn't helped. ArbCom is the only ting I can think of that will get a definitive result. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 04:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
About the article that i recreatedhi there, thanks for your message and now let me tell you why i've recreated an article about Kord (band) and why i don't understant someone has deleted. First i think this band named Kord it's notable because they are a good band and i find out more details about them on google. I read the Wikipedia policy for artists and because they had at least one charted hit in a national chart, they were for many times subject of half hour a broadcast on a national radio and tv channel, and one of the members was a part for a very well known band of artist named Nicola Nicoleta Alexandru, because of all of this i think they should be present here on Wikipedia, i mean they are notable. I understand that YouTube is not considered a reliable source, but in this case how should i prove that they are notable, that they were a subject of a broadcast on a national tv? I think there are already many motives for Kord (band) being present on Wikipedia. Let me show you some reliable sources that i found about Kord on internet and tell me how should i use this for let others know that Kord is a band which is notable: 1. 2 months ago they were invited in a very well know tv show named TEOVIZIUNEA 2. In december they were the subject of a half hour broadcast on a radio 3. On Myspace i saw so many comments about them from many people which admire their work. 4. One of the members of Kord, named Stefan Corbu was a part of very well known band of artist named Nicola Nicoleta Alexandru . And those are only few reliable sources which i remind right now, and i'm sure that anyone who'll search on internet about them will find out more reliable sources. So, please tell me if i'm not right when i tell that Kord (band) it's notable. Lukassandi (talk) 01:51, 8 February 2008 (UTC) Improving articlesMy question was directed at improving the article, since I was under the impression that the character's mother was dead, but the article states that his parents were divorced. It's not important, since they just said that on tonight's show, but you should follow Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. Lavender Gooms (talk) 04:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC) Quick question...Is there any specific assignments you would want be to do or anything for me to work on? I'm always up for a challenge or assignment.-- Barkjon 19:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC) Well, sorta more assignments for the "adpotion" program or things to improve being good here.-- Barkjon 22:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC) Thanks!I think you are right. Thanks a lot for reminding me.--Mark Chung (talk) 00:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC) reOk sure. No problem. But please also tell the same to this user: User:Pollinghigh. KhostiPakhtoon (talk) 04:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Giant Cabbagessince my page was completely deleted I'm still not done, I'm going to make it again, and again just for the record Wikipedia is not a reliable resource, it is not a real encyclopedia, almost anyone can edit a page and if it sounds convincing enough it would pass by the inspections of people like you. so i could make a page that sounds true and Wikipedia wont know the difference, at least not for a while. i have seen mistakes before, but don't get me wrong alot of the information is factual but there is enough that is not that would make me want to back up anything i find on Wikipedia with any other websites. plus almost anyone can make websites for that matter, making probably less than 10% of the stuff you find as true creditable websites did you really just ask me to find you something not notable on wikipedia? you do know all notable means is well known, just hit the random article button on the home page, you can find a one sentence wikipeia page dedicated to a random famous person's sister. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neilbennett (talk • contribs) 05:17, 14 February 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC) I have protected this page due to edit warring between you, Maniainc, OverlordQ and GlassCobra. You should consider carefully the implications of using your rollback button in a content dispute - it says "this edit was so worthless I am not even going to explain why I am reverting it". Misuse of the rollback privilege may result in its withdrawal. Stifle (talk) 09:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC) My secret pageJust letting you know i have a secret page now! Oh yeah i also have a guestbook too, so be sure to sign it.-- Barkjon 22:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC) RollbackGuess what? I'm a rollbacker now! The person I asked for the rollback-ness, (I guess you call it that), approved!-- Barkjon 18:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC) WP:AFC Backlog Drive
You are receiving this letter because you are listed as a participant in the Articles for creation WikiProject at WP:WPAFC. To avoid receiving further notices, please remove your name from the list. Thanks! Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC) Thank you...
GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 23:58, 29 February 2008 (UTC) KaylaGreetings, On Kayla you wrote that Kayla means "full of joy" in Hebrew. As a native Hebrew speaker, I'm unfamiliar with this meaning and this name. What is the Hebrew transcript and what was your source? Thanks, Lior (talk) 03:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
RfAInterested in an administrator nomination? GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 01:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Re UFOWere you in the Stephenville, Texas area ? Also go to the MUFON website to report your sighting, and also go to the National UFO Reporting Center website as well. 65.173.104.52 (talk) 04:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC) RfA - DiscospinsterThank you so much for your support in my RfA, which was successful with a final count of 70/1/1! ... discospinster talk 23:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)\ HelloI Just only put as a warnings because there are such wikipedian that vandalize the article either you will help the article to be semi-protected.Will you? {Angelians (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)}
TemplatesOops, I just noticed that you'd replaced the deleted templates earlier on the P.Silat page. I was in the edit section at the same time and wasn't paying attention. Sorry about that. Beemer69 01:53, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC) AdoptionHi again. I have something to tell you. (Drum roll please). I think I am good enough to graduate from the adoption program! I loved doing it and being your adoptee, but I fell that I've got "the lay of the land" here in Wikipedia. Thanks for everything. Oh ya, I have a question for you: can you still give me the occasional tip? I think I'm going to see if I can adopt someone.-- Barkjon 19:20, 28 March 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:13, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Help!!!You saw my NavBar, right? Well, I was trying to change the pictures (because I copied it from someone else's page) on it, but it said: Image not found/Image invalid. Do you know what to do?? Please reply on my talk page.-- Barkjon 00:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Yes, I'm sure I got the name right! Well, the link to the navbar is here: Template:Barkjon/navbar. The pictures were:
And others!-- Barkjon 00:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Pic here:
-- Barkjon 00:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
-- Barkjon 00:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Um the drumset pic didn't work.-- Barkjon 00:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Well, gotta go. Can you keep trying to fix the header? Thanks.-- Barkjon 00:31, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Thanks for you help on the navbar. I've got it all worked out.-- Barkjon 00:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC) adoptioncould you please adopt me, i love learning more about airlines and airports, i do know a lot anyway! Tajtheman (talk) 00:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC) I adopted him already. Sorry.-- Barkjon 00:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for April 7th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:19, 10 April 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for April 14th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:25, 17 April 2008 (UTC) Help!I need some help with my userbox and awards page!-- Barkjon 22:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC) Nevermind, got the Awards done!-- Barkjon 22:32, 22 April 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:55, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Hey! (Administration)Hey, JetLover. Personally, I think you should run an RfA. I really think you should become an admin. You are so helpful and nice, and have over 10,000 edits! I'd so vote for you if you did. Reply on my talk page.-- Barkjon 22:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC) Ok. Thanks!-- Barkjon 22:04, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC) Unified orphan/de-orphan processYou might be interested in this discussion.--Aervanath's signature is boring 22:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:53, 31 May 2008 (UTC) Vandal support
no no never mind, it was deleted 69.113.203.57 (talk) 16:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC) Help!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mini_gorrillas Its been about 5 to 10 mins since tagged, help me out, support deletion. 69.113.203.57 (talk) 16:20, 1 June 2008 (UTC) CensorshipWhat's the point of contributing if the Article Creator can keep wiping out all Discussion he doesn't like? Like the Dogfights TV Series article still looks more like the Series Homepage or a biased Promotional Add for the Series even future DVD and Computer Game Sales. What happened to "neutral objectivity"? AthabascaCree (talk) 07:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC) New deal for page patrollersHi JetLover, In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created. Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work. Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC) RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers! This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis) Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016. Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings. Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Introduction warn
User group for Military HistoriansGreetings, "Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC) April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing DriveHey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
